throbber
PTO Form 2194 (Rev 9/2005)
`
`OMB No. 0651-0054 (Exp. 10/31/2017)
`
`Petition To Revive Abandoned Application - Failure To Respond Timely To Office Action
`
`The table below presents the data as entered.
`
`Input Field
`
`SERIAL NUMBER
`
`LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED
`
`86353436
`
`LAW OFFICE 102
`
`DATE OF NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT
`
`06/25/2015
`
`Entered
`
`PETITION
`
`PETITION STATEMENT
`
`RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION
`
`MARK SECTION
`
`MARK FILE NAME
`
`LITERAL ELEMENT
`
`STANDARD CHARACTERS
`
`USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE
`
`EVIDENCE SECTION
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S)
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)ORIGINAL PDF FILE
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(4 pages)
`
`Applicant has firsthand knowledge that the failure to respond to the Office Action by
`the specified deadline was unintentional. The signatory did not receive the Office
`action prior to the expiration of the six-month response period, and requests the
`USPTO to revive the abandoned application and reissue the Office Action.
`
`http://tmng-al.uspto.gov/resting2/api/img/86353436/large
`
`OTTER CREEK MILLWORK
`
`NO
`
`NO
`
`evi_21616456213-20150825161342286599_._OTTER_CREEK_MILLWORK.pdf
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\863\534\86353436\xml7\POA0002.JPG
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\863\534\86353436\xml7\POA0003.JPG
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\863\534\86353436\xml7\POA0004.JPG
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\863\534\86353436\xml7\POA0005.JPG
`
`GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (class deleted)
`
`GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (class added) Original Class (019)
`
`INTERNATIONAL CLASS
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`035
`
`Retail building supply store services featuring : Non-metal mantels for fireplaces, Non-metal windows, Non-metal window jambs, Door jambs
`not of metal, Non-metal doors, Non-metal, building products, namely, trim, Non-metal window screens, Boards of wood, Construction
`material, namely, nonmetal exterior boards, Wood boards
`
`FILING BASIS
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE
`
`Section 1(a)
`
`At least as early as 10/09/2013
`
`At least as early as 10/09/2013
`
`"The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s)
`was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the
`application"[for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR "
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

`

`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)STATEMENT TYPE
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)SPECIMEN
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)FILE NAME(S)
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION
`
`PAYMENT SECTION
`
`TOTAL AMOUNT
`
`TOTAL FEES DUE
`
`SIGNATURE SECTION
`
`PETITION SIGNATURE
`
`SIGNATORY'S NAME
`
`SIGNATORY'S POSITION
`
`SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER
`
`DATE SIGNED
`
`DECLARATION SIGNATURE
`
`SIGNATORY'S NAME
`
`SIGNATORY'S POSITION
`
`SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER
`
`DATE SIGNED
`
`RESPONSE SIGNATURE
`
`SIGNATORY'S NAME
`
`SIGNATORY'S POSITION
`
`SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER
`
`DATE SIGNED
`
`AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
`
`FILING INFORMATION SECTION
`
`SUBMIT DATE
`
`TEAS STAMP
`
`The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s)
`was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to
`Allege Use or expiration of the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use" [for
`an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. OR "The attached specimen is
`a true copy of the specimen that was originally submitted with the application,
`amendment to allege use, or statement of use" [for an illegible specimen].
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT 16\863\534\86353436\xml7\ POA0006.JPG
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT 16\863\534\86353436\xml7\ POA0007.JPG
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT 16\863\534\86353436\xml7\ POA0008.JPG
`
`Specimen consists of screen shots of applicant's webpage displaying goods available
`in retail store as well as image of retail store displaying the applied for mark in
`commerce.
`
`100
`
`100
`
`/khardley/
`
`KEISHA HARDLEY
`
`ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY DUNLAP BENNETT & LUDWIG (MD BAR)
`
`703.777.7319
`
`08/25/2015
`
`/khardley/
`
`KEISHA HARDLEY
`
`Associate Attorney, Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig (MD Bar)
`
`703.777.7319
`
`08/25/2015
`
`/khardley/
`
`KEISHA HARDLEY
`
`Associate Attorney, Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig PLLC (MD Bar)
`
`703.777.7319
`
`08/25/2015
`
`YES
`
`Tue Aug 25 16:30:00 EDT 2015
`
`USPTO/POA-XXX.XXX.XX.XXX-
`20150825163000706728-8635
`3436-5404c5243a66971a6545
`e5cfd54257dcc6a589889df7d
`9431cb7e28c434d7be67f2-CC
`-6346-2015082516134228659
`9
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

`

`PTO Form 2194 (Rev 9/2005)
`
`OMB No. 0651-0054 (Exp. 10/31/2017)
`
`Petition To Revive Abandoned Application - Failure To Respond Timely To Office Action
`To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
`
`Application serial no. 86353436(cid:160)OTTER CREEK MILLWORK (Stylized and/or with Design, see http://tmng-
`al.uspto.gov/resting2/api/img/86353436/large) has been amended as follows:
`PETITION
`Petition Statement
`
`Applicant has firsthand knowledge that the failure to respond to the Office Action by the specified deadline was unintentional. The signatory did
`not receive the Office action prior to the expiration of the six-month response period, and requests the USPTO to revive the abandoned
`application and reissue the Office Action.
`
`RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION
`
`EVIDENCE
`
`Original PDF file:
`evi_21616456213-20150825161342286599_._OTTER_CREEK_MILLWORK.pdf
`Converted PDF file(s) ( 4 pages)
`Evidence-1
`Evidence-2
`Evidence-3
`Evidence-4
`
`CLASSIFICATION AND LISTING OF GOODS/SERVICES
`Applicant hereby deletes the following class of goods/services from the application.
`Class 019 for Building materials, namely, windows, doors, trim, mantels, screens, locks, door hardware, jambs and boards
`
`Applicant hereby adds the following class of goods/services to the application:
`New: Class 035 (Original Class: 019 ) for Retail building supply store services featuring : Non-metal mantels for fireplaces, Non-metal windows,
`Non-metal window jambs, Door jambs not of metal, Non-metal doors, Non-metal, building products, namely, trim, Non-metal window screens,
`Boards of wood, Construction material, namely, nonmetal exterior boards, Wood boards
`Filing Basis: Section 1(a), Use in Commerce: The mark was first used at least as early as 10/09/2013 and first used in commerce at least as
`early as 10/09/2013 , and is now in use in such commerce.
`Applicant hereby submits a specimen for Class 035 . The specimen(s) submitted consists of Specimen consists of screen shots of applicant's
`webpage displaying goods available in retail store as well as image of retail store displaying the applied for mark in commerce. .
`"The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the
`filing date of the application"[for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR "The substitute (or new, or originally
`submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to Allege Use or
`expiration of the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use" [for an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. OR "The attached
`specimen is a true copy of the specimen that was originally submitted with the application, amendment to allege use, or statement of use"
`[for an illegible specimen]. Specimen File1
`Specimen File2
`Specimen File3
`
`FEE(S)
`Fee(s) in the amount of $100 is being submitted.
`
`SIGNATURE(S)
`
`Signature: /khardley/(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)Date: 08/25/2015
`Signatory's Name: KEISHA HARDLEY
`Signatory's Position: ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY DUNLAP BENNETT & LUDWIG (MD BAR)
`Signatory's Phone Number: 703.777.7319
`
`

`

`Declaration Signature
`
`DECLARATION: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or
`any registration resulting therefrom, declares that, if the applicant submitted the application or allegation of use (AOU) unsigned, all
`statements in the application or AOU and this submission based on the signatory's own knowledge are true, and all statements in the
`application or AOU and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.
`
`STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(a) APPLICATION/AOU: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C.
`§1051(a) or AOU under 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), the signatory additionally believes that: the applicant is the owner of the mark sought to be
`registered; the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with
`the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; the original specimen(s), if applicable, shows the mark in use
`in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in
`the application or AOU; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark application, or certification mark
`application, the applicant is exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and was exercising legitimate control over the
`use of the mark in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU; for a certification mark application, the applicant is not engaged in
`the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification
`program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no
`other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce,
`either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective
`membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.
`
`STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(b)/SECTION 44 APPLICATION AND FOR SECTION 66(a)
`COLLECTIVE/CERTIFICATION MARK APPLICATION: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(b),
`1126(d), and/or 1126(e), or filed a collective/certification mark application under 15 U.S.C. §1141f(a), the signatory additionally believes that:
`for a trademark or service mark application, the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services
`specified in the application; the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in
`commerce as of the application filing date; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark, or certification
`mark application, the applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and
`had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the application filing date;
`the signatory is properly authorized to execute the declaration on behalf of the applicant; for a certification mark application, the applicant will
`not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the
`certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge
`and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in
`commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the
`goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.
`
`Signature: /khardley/(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)Date: 08/25/2015
`Signatory's Name: KEISHA HARDLEY
`Signatory's Position: Associate Attorney, Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig (MD Bar)
`Signatory's Phone Number: 703.777.7319
`
`Response Signature
`Signature: /khardley/(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)Date: 08/25/2015
`Signatory's Name: KEISHA HARDLEY
`Signatory's Position: Associate Attorney, Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig PLLC (MD Bar)
`
`Signatory's Phone Number: 703.777.7319
`
`The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which
`includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the owner/holder's attorney or
`an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not
`currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the applicant in this matter: (1) the owner/holder has filed or is
`concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior
`representative to withdraw; (3) the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the owner/holder's
`appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.
`
`

`

`RAM Sale Number: 86353436
`RAM Accounting Date: 08/26/2015
`
`Serial Number: 86353436
`Internet Transmission Date: Tue Aug 25 16:30:00 EDT 2015
`TEAS Stamp: USPTO/POA-XXX.XXX.XX.XXX-201508251630007
`06728-86353436-5404c5243a66971a6545e5cfd
`54257dcc6a589889df7d9431cb7e28c434d7be67
`f2-CC-6346-20150825161342286599
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Applicant:
`Serial N0.:
`
`Otter Creek Millwork LLC
`86353436
`
`Filed:
`Trademark Atty:
`Trademark:
`
`July 31, 2014
`Giselle Agosto Hincapie
`OTTER CREEK MILLWORK (design)
`
`RESPONSE TO JANUARY 07, 2015 OFFICE ACTION
`
`This Response is filed in reply to the Office Action e-mailed on November l9, 2014. The Applicant
`
`respectfully submits the following response. Applicant submits that the above-identified trademark
`
`application for OTTER CREEK MILLWORK (design) is in condition for allowance to publication.
`
`AMENDMENT TO IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES:
`
`Applicant amends the description of goods and sen-'ices to the following: Class035: Retail building
`
`supply store seiyices featuring : Non-metal mantels for fireplaces, Non-metal windows, Non-metal
`
`window jambs, Door jambs not of metal, Non-metal doors, Non-metal, building products, namely,
`
`trim, Non-metal window screens, Boards of wood, Construction material, namely, nonmetal exterior
`
`boards, Wood boards
`
`POTENTIAL SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL — PRIOR PENDING APPLICATION/LIKELIHOOD
`
`OF C ONFUSION
`
`Applicant submits a preliminary response to the potential section 2(d) refusal; however, Applicant
`
`reserves all rights to provide a detailed and descriptive response if Examining Attorney Giselle
`
`Agosto-Hincapie raises a Section 2(d) refusal in a subsequent Office Action.
`
`

`

`APPLICANT’S MARK
`
`CITED PENDING MARK
`
`T’
`W U
`E R C R E E K
`
`OTTERCREEKBYPANAMAJACK
`
`5efia1N0- 86353436
`
`Registration. No. 4753000
`
`Class 035: retail store services featuring, non-
`metal mantels for fireP1a°eSs ¥1°n'meta1 Windowss
`non-metal W1nd0W Jambs, non
`metal window screens, wood boards
`
`Class 020: Furniture Outdoor furniture mirrors
`pillows, beds, benches, chairs, cushions, screens
`and Wall decorations
`
`Factors used to determine likelihood of confusion in trademark registration case include: similarity or
`
`dissimilarity of marks in their entireties as to appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial
`
`impression; similarity or dissimilarity and nature of the goods described in application or registration
`
`or in connection with which a prior mark is in use; conditions under which and buyers to whom sales
`
`are made; number and nature of similar marks in use on similar goods; any other established fact
`
`probative of effect of use. Lanham Trade—Mark Act, § 2(d), 15 U.S.C.A. § 1052(d). Not all of the
`
`factors used to determine likelihood of confusion in a trademark registration case may be relevant or
`
`of equal Weight
`
`in a given case, and any one of the factors may control a particular case. Id.
`
`Likelihood of confusion under the Lanham Act,
`
`15 U.S.C. § l052(d), is a legal determination based upon factual underpinnings. On-Line Careline,
`
`Inc. v. Am. Online, Inc, 229 F.3d 1080, 1084 (Fed.Cir.2000).
`
`AN EXAMINATION OF THE MARKS AS TO APPEARANCE,
`CONNOTATION DETERMINE THEY ARE NOT SIMILAR
`
`SOUND AND
`
`Under In re E. I. du Pom‘ de Nemours & C0., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A.
`
`1973), the first factor requires examination of "the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks in their
`
`

`

`entireties as to appearance, sound, connotation [,] and commercial impression." When considering the
`
`similarity of the marks, "[a]ll relevant facts pertaining to the appearance and connotation must be
`
`considered." Recot, Inc.
`
`12. MC. Becron, 214 F.3d 1322, 1329, 54 USPQ2d 1894, 1897 (Fed. Cir.
`
`2000)
`
`Appearance & Sound
`
`In the instant case, the Applicant has applied for OTTER CREEK MILLVJORK (design), Whereas
`
`cited mark is OTTER CREEK (design) BY PANAMA JACK. Applicant’s mark has a distinct logo
`
`that includes the image of an otter, further distinguishing Applicant’s mark for the cited registration.
`
`WHEN VIEWED IN ITS ENTIRETY APPLICANT’S MARK HAS A DISTINCT
`COMNIERCIAL IMPRESSION
`
`Courts have held that the addition of different terms to common elements appreciably reduces the
`
`likelihood of C011filSl0Il between two marks, even in cases where the goods are highly similar. See
`
`USTmst v. US. States Trust Co, 210 F. Supp 2d9 27-28 (D. Mass. 2002), (holding that UNITED
`
`STATES TRUST COMPANY not confusingly similar to UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF
`
`BOSTON, both for financial services).
`
`In the present case, the marks give off different commercial impressions. The cited registration is
`
`specifically for furniture, whereas Applicant’s mark is strictly for building materials. Applicant’s mark
`
`does not include terms reflecting a commercial impression that would connect the mark to fiirniture
`
`but strictly building materials by usage of the term “millwork.” The similar phrase “OTTER
`
`CREEK,” cannot be dispositive since the marks give off different commercial impressions.
`
`

`

`APPLICANT DOES NOT OFFER THE SAME GOODS
`
`The applicant’s goods are in a different class and there is no overlap between the services and goods
`
`offered by applicant and those offered by the prior pending application. Applicant offers retail store
`
`services featuring building materials while the cited application provides furniture.
`
`LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION IS NOT SUBSTANTIAL
`
`When determining whether an Applicant’s mark creates a likelihood of confusion with marks covered
`
`by cited registrations, "[a] showing of mere possibility of confilsion is not enough; a substantial
`
`likelihood that the public will be confused must be shown." Omaha Natl. Bank, 633 F. Supp. at 234,
`
`229 U.S.P.Q. at 52.
`
`For at least the reasons cited above, Applicant respectfully asserts that the
`
`potential for confusion is not substantial. As such, the 2(d) refusal should be resolved in favor of the
`
`Applicant.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Applicant has f11lly responded to the Office Action. Furthermore, for at least the above reasons,
`
`Applicant asserts that Applicant’s mark, OTTER CREEK MILL WORK (design),
`
`is sufficiently
`
`distinct from the cited pending application, so as not to result in consumer confusion. Applicant
`
`respectfully submits in good faith that all potential 2(d) refusals, rejections, and/or objections have
`
`been overcome and that the applied for mark is in condition for publication.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/Keisha M. Hardley /
`Keisha M. Hardley (MD Bar)
`Associate Attorney of Record for the Applicant
`
`

`

` um E_REEK
`
`
`
`Home
`.'-Xbout Us
`Design GaEe;I.'}'
`C onta ct Us
`
`Homeoxx-'11e:1's
`.=\1'cl1itects
`Builder,“ Remodele1'
`
`\«’l«'ind.o\\'s
`Doors
`HHl'd\\El'B
`
` Cionslxliation '
`
`_
`ID 5. GreenwayA\-“enue_. Boyce, VA 22620
`?hone: (5.10) 837-9351
`
`
`
`Double Hung
`Casement
`Awning
`Glider
`Bay‘ 8: Bow
`Special Shape
`Rou I-.d' T<::p
`Tilt Turn
`Hopper
`Wood
`Wood Clad
`Fiberglass
`Aluminum Clad
`I nstallatic-n
`
`Welcome to Otter Creek Millwork of Boyce, VA.
`The 1W'usl‘ed Choice For Qurlfify Windows, Doors & M1'Hwork 1'n The Sfaealandoah Valley
`
`Interior Doors
`Patio Doors
`Entry Doclrs
`Lift 8: Slide
`g Patio
`ng French
`;
`Swinging French
`Arch Top French
`' Ei—FnId
`Closet Doors
`. Pocket Doors
`Installation
`
`'
`
`_ sing
`Flooring
`Brick Mould
`Custom Trirn
`Profiles
`Wei:-d Paneling
`
`

`

`F4 be rgl a 5 5
`.a'Aiurninum Clad
`In st-all anon
`
`Arch Top French
`' Bi—Fo|d
`Closet Doors
`Pocket Doors
`Installation
`
`‘
`
`Otter Creek Millwudt is a Eocal, farni|y—o=wned Marvin and Integrity Windows and Doors certified dealer and installer located in lire heart of the Shenandoah
`Valley. Wid1 over 35 years of experience specializing in windows. doors, hardware and millwork we provide second—to—none service before. during and after the
`project. We offer complete window and door solutions to homeowners, builders, remodelers and commercial applicators. Whether you are looking for
`traditional wood or clad windows, a hard to find replication of a historic window or door. or custom millwork. you can count us to help you find the perfect
`product that meets your needs and your budget! C_lI!I_2fl1\E!.'l.IS Isoday for a free, no obligation consultation.
`
`
`
`Showroom Hours:
`-.__
`
`Monday - Friday‘ 17:30 am - 5:00 pm
`9,
`
`
`Satnnlaj-s b§;.app0§I1l]:I1ent
`‘“'-'5
`-
`Closed Sundays
`
` MAIIVIITNQ
` w...-... ..¢ n....
`
`Windows pd Dunn
`
`Buill ground you:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.~\ineric.m li"iI14'km- Ceiltet. |.i..C
`
`

`

`

`

`RAM SALE NUMBER: 86353436
`
`RAM ACCOUNTING DATE: 20150826
`
`INTERNET TRANSMISSION DATE:
`
`SERIAL NUMBER:
`
`2015/O8/25
`
`86/353436
`
`Description
`
`Fee
`Code
`
`Transaction
`
`Total Fees
`Paid
`
`POA
`
`7005
`
`2015/08/25
`
`I00
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket