throbber

`

`Intellectual Property
`
`Procurement
`
`Buchanan offers a full—service IP Section, the cornerstone of which is
`
`the intellectual property procurement group. Whether you need a patent,
`
`trademark or copyright, Buchanan will ably assist you at every turn.
`
`Patents
`
`Buchanan boasts over 50 practitioners registered to practice before the United States Patent and
`Trademark Office. In 2014, we prosecuted over 2,100 applications and helped our clients obtain
`1,682 U.S. patents. Calling upon our network of foreign counterparts, we helped our clients
`prosecute over 550 foreign applications and obtain 342 patents in 2014.
`
`Application Dralting
`
`An invention’s value often turns on the quality of the patent embodying it. Because our team
`members are versed in life sciences, we can readily understand an inventor’s contribution to the
`art, and we work directly with inventors to capture and claim the full invention. We follow case
`law developments in the Life Sciences area and draft applications that satisfy current standards
`yet leave options open should shifts occur.
`
`Prosecution
`
`Buchanan’s lP Section prides itself on cross—training. Our patent prosecutors have litigation
`experience and realize that every word in a file history is carefully analyzed. As a result, our
`patent prosecutors draft accurate and efficient responses. Should an Examiner fail to appreciate
`a given invention based upon written responses, Buchanan frequently takes advantage of its
`location and conducts in-person interviews with Examiners. Buchanan’s flagship IP office is in
`Alexandria, Virginia, just blocks away from the Patent Office.
`
`Opinions
`
`Key business decisions rest upon analyses not only of your IP, but also that of your competitors.
`Whether the issue is validity/invalidity, infringement/non-infringement or both, we can help you
`determine whether to stay the course or modify your tentative plan so as to minimize risk.
`
`Diligence Investigations
`
`Whether you seek to acquire a patent portfolio or seek to transfer your patent portfolio, diligence
`investigations involve a detail-oriented process. From verifying that the “owner” truly owns the
`property to determining whether the risks in the transaction outweigh the potential rewards,
`Buchanan's Life Sciences Team can assist with every step.
`
`Licensing
`
`A key reason to have patents is to monetize them. We have experience with issues encountered
`in life sciences licensing transactions, including those associated with inter-institutional
`agreements, federal funding, cooperative research and development agreements, the Bayh-Dole
`Act, F/RAND and export control.
`
`

`

`Portfolio Management
`
`Obtaining a patent is just one hurdle along the life cycle of an invention. Buchanan’s Life
`Sciences Team will help you chart out how best to fully protect an invention, be it with one or
`many patents. Buchanan offers institutional knowledge of the invention from its inception, and
`we use that knowledge to assist you in deciding what assets to retain and enforce.
`
`Patent Term Adjustment
`
`Every day of patent term matters, especially in the life sciences world. Due to our familiarity
`with PTA-triggering events, our patent prosecutors work with you to maximize valuable term. In
`addition, Buchanan's team can verify PTA calculations performed by the PTO and can challenge
`erroneous calculations.
`
`Patent Term Extension
`
`Applying for PTE is a seemingly straight—forward task but one that brings with it important
`consequences. From helping to analyze which patent in the portfolio should be extended to
`shepherding the application through the regulatory channels, Buchanan can advise you at every
`turn.
`
`Biosimilars/Biologics
`
`The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) became law almost five years ago,
`and the import of the Act is now emerging. Our team can help you navigate the biosimilars world
`—from pre—litigation considerations to discovery mechanisms to actual litigation.
`
`Trademarks and Copyrights
`
`Buchanan’s Trademark and Copyright Group includes attorneys and paralegals who handle all
`aspects of trademark and copyright matters, including investigation and clearance, registration
`and maintenance, opposition and cancellation proceedings at the Trademark and Trial and Appeal
`Board (TTAB), federal and state court litigation involving the protection and enforcement of
`trademarks and copyrights, and administrative litigation at the International Trade Commission
`(ITC). The firm has experience in remedies against trademark and service mark counterfeiting on
`the Internet. We also handle preparing and filing copyright applications and have experience in all
`aspects of copyright litigation, including notice and takedown demands and safe harbor defenses
`underthe Digital Millennium CopyrightAct.
`
`Product Naming
`
`Our trademark lawyers represent life sciences companies in selecting and obtaining approval of
`product names for prescription and over—the—counter drugs. We research, review and vet possible
`trademarks with our clients and guide them through each phase of the naming process.
`
`Counterfeit Products
`
`Because the value of a product can be undermined by harmful or ineffective counterfeits, our
`Trademark Group develops strategies to uncover and combat counterfeit goods in the markets.
`Buchanan’s trademark lawyers are prepared to work aggressively to obtain injunctions and
`seizure orders and to take other steps to minimize the harm to our clients a the public.
`
`

`

`Intellectual Property
`
`Enforcement
`
`Patents, trademarks and copyrights permit the holder to exclude others
`
`from encroaching upon the protected area. Buchanan’s Life Sciences Team
`
`helps patent, trademark and copyright holders decide whether their rights
`
`are being threatened and, if so, when and how to take action. Our team
`
`also helps alleged infringers determine whether the infringement allegations
`
`are well—founded and whether the underlying intellectual property is valid.
`
`We are sensitive to the invasive nature of litigation, as well as the costs
`
`associated with enforcement. Drawing upon the technical knowledge of
`
`our deep bench, we tailor each litigation team to your particular needs.
`
`Traditional Litigation
`Buchanans IP Litigation Group offers the resources and experience of a general practice firm
`but with the locus of an IP boutique. We handle patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret,
`unfair trade/competition, ITC and arbitration matters from the initial tribunal through the highest
`appellate court.
`
`Patent
`
`Patent litigation is complex, and the amount in controversy in the life sciences space is often
`very high. Our litigators roll up their sleeves and truly learn the technology, which enables them
`to develop efficient litigation strategies. We have handled many life sciences cases involving
`chemicals, pharmaceuticals, genetica||y—modified organisms and medical devices.
`
`Trademark
`
`Buchanan’s trademark litigators handle a wide range of trademark disputes, including all types
`of trademark infringement and dilution claims, counterfeiting, gray-market goods, domain name
`claims and licensing disputes. We also assist our life sciences clients in disputes before non-
`judicial forums, including ex parts and inter partes registration and cancellation disputes before
`the TTAB and anti—counterfeiting enforcement through the United States Customs & Border
`Protection Service.
`
`Copyright
`
`Our copyright litigators understand and work through key issues in copyright disputes, including
`originality, fair use, work-for-hire agreements and ownership, public domain, the Digital
`Millennium CopyrightAct, Orphan Works and database protection.
`
`Trade Secret
`
`Trade secrets can be among a life science company’s most valuable assets. In today’s
`competitive global marketplace, it is all too easy for a trade secret to be revealed, especially in
`light of the mobility within the life sciences sector. Our litigation team handles a broad spectrum
`of scientific, factual, legal and procedural issues in all state and federal courts, and we are
`prepared to proceed under all state and federal statutes and regulations, the Uniform Trade
`Secrets Act, the Federal Economic Espionage Act and state business tort laws.
`
`

`

`Unfair Trade and Unfair Competition
`
`Buchanan’s litigators are familiar with the substantial body of federal and state law directed to
`unfair trade practices and unfair competition, including laws that prohibit false advertising. False
`advertising can be especially harmful in the life sciences area. We develop creative strategies
`using the Lanham Act and other tools to protect our clients against unfair competition in various
`forms, including false product comparisons and scientific claims made without proper testing and
`verification.
`
`International Trade Commission
`
`The ITC provides a specialized, fast-paced venue for solving intellectual property disputes,
`including for life science companies. Whether you are a complainant or respondent, our litigators
`can assist with every step of the process from development of theories for domestic industry
`assertions to the full scope of invalidity attacks and defenses.
`
`Arbitration
`
`Because the courts are not the only, best or most cost-effective forum for many disputes, our
`IP litigators are experienced in domestic and international arbitration of patent, trademark and
`copyright disputes. Our team members use this experience to counsel clients on the advantages
`of arbitration in certain IP disputes.
`
`Hatch—Waxman (Paragraph IV) Litigation
`Ever since its adoption, members of Buchanan's Life Sciences Team have counseled companies
`with Paragraph IV litigation under the Hatch—Waxman Act. We staff our Paragraph IV teams
`in a manner that makes sense for the particular dispute. We endeavor to minimize invasive,
`expensive discovery that does not bear on the merits of the validity and infringement challenges.
`We work with our FDA and Antitrust groups to stay abreast of developments in these overlapping
`areas. Because members of our team are located in key Paragraph IV |ocations—DeIaware
`(Wilmington), New Jersey (Trenton and Newark), New York (New York City), and Virginia
`(Alexandria, home of the "Rocket Docket")—the expense of local counsel is obviated.
`
`Concurrent Proceedings
`
`Gone are the days of single patent, single proceeding litigation. Life sciences companies
`increasingly face concurrent proceedings on several assets, which can drain precious resources.
`Due to our teams familiarity with each type of concurrent proceeding, we can work with you
`to determine whether a multi-proceeding path is wise and can advise you on what to expect at
`each phase. For example, |PRs (detailed below) are now a complement to traditional Paragraph
`IV litigation. We counsel pharmaceutical companies about the pros and cons of using IPRs and
`on how best to navigate such proceedings. If you are faced with concurrent proceedings, we will
`quickly assemble a team to vigorously protect your assets.
`
`(continued)
`
`

`

`Intellectual Property Enforcement
`(continued from previous page)
`
`interferences
`
`Buchanan offers an interference team that has handled hundreds of interferences before what is
`
`now the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the Board). While interferences are being phased-out due
`to the transition to first-inventor-to-file, many cases in the life sciences field remain vulnerable to
`interference practice. Our interference practitioners can work with you to position your portfolio
`so as to provoke an interference and then assist you with every step of the process. Should you
`unexpectedly find yourself in an interference, we can work with you to develop validity attacks on
`your opponent. Buchanan’s experience with all phases of interference practice and our familiarity
`with the Board removes what would otherwise be unknowns associated with an “arcane”
`
`practice.
`
`Inter Partes Reviews (|PRs)
`
`The America lnvents Act (AIA) brought about several new types of post-grant proceedings,
`including |PFls. |PRs are modeled closely after the motions phase of an interference, and
`Buchanan has effectively transitioned its interference experience to IPR practice. To date, we
`have assisted with over 35 |PFls, on behalf of both patent owners and petitioners. For petitioners,
`we help identify art, retain experts, formulate bases to efficiently attack the targeted claims,
`and draft persuasive petitions. For patent owners, we develop a coherent strategy to protect the
`patent, retain experts, decide whether to file a preliminary response and whether to amend, and
`draft persuasive responses. Our versatility in these proceedings allows us to craft and execute
`an appropriate strategy, anticipate our opponent’s next move, and create an appropriate record
`should the matter proceed to appeal.
`
`Post Grant Reviews (PGRs)
`Subject matter eligibility, written description and enablement issues are key concerns to our life
`sciences clients. While not appropriate for |PFls, which are limited to anticipation and obviousness
`attacks, these issues can be pursued using a PGR. Our team can help you determine if a PGR is
`the right way to challenge your competitor and can help defend you should your property face
`one of these new attacks. In time, a PGR will also become a possible alternative to traditional
`Paragraph IV litigation.
`
`Reissue and Reexamination
`
`Our patent reissues team has the in—depth knowledge our clients have come to expect,
`particularly when they are considering filing patent infringement litigation to enforce their
`intellectual property rights. Reissue proceedings are similar to standard patent prosecutions, but
`critical differences between the two can lead to a poor outcome if they are not handled correctly.
`Our experience in both broadening and narrowing reissue applications and in reissue protests
`provides our clients with full access to this sometimes critically valuable option. Many defendants
`and some plaintiffs in patent litigation are interested in reexamination requests, an option with
`both benefits and serious risks. We are ready to advise our clients about the complex strategic
`decisions presented by reexamination requests.
`
`For more r'nformafr'on, please visit us at B/PC.com
`
`

`

`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket