To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`Henrietta Letailleur (hennylet@gmail.com)
`
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88483920 - SCARF FACE LIT CITY BY SCARF FACE - N/A
`
`September 12, 2019 02:04:10 PM
`
`ecom127@uspto.gov
`
`Attachment - 1
`Attachment - 2
`Attachment - 3
`Attachment - 4
`Attachment - 5
`Attachment - 6
`Attachment - 7
`Attachment - 8
`Attachment - 9
`Attachment - 10
`Attachment - 11
`Attachment - 12
`Attachment - 13
`Attachment - 14
`Attachment - 15
`Attachment - 16
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
`
`U.S. Application
`Serial No.
`88483920
`
`     
`
`Mark:   SCARF
`FACE LIT CITY
`BY SCARF FACE
`
`Correspondence
`Address: 
`HENRIETTA
`LETAILLEUR
`SCARF FACE
`114 S GRAMERCY
`PLACE, APT 209,
`114 S GRAMERCY
`PLACE
`LOS ANGELES,
`CA 90004
`Applicant:  
`Henrietta Letailleur
`
`    
`
`   
`
`hennylet@gmail.com
`
`NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
`
`Reference/Docket
`No. N/A
`
`Correspondence
`
`Email Address:  
`
` 
` 
` 
`  
` 
`

`

`The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be
`abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).   A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the
`
`end of this Office action.   
`
`Issue date:  September 12, 2019
`
`The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to
`the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
`
`SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
`Section 2(d) Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion
`Specimen Refusal
`Disclaimer Requirement for International Class 25
`
`SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
`
`Registration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the marks in U.S. Registration Nos. 3130385 and
`3130384.  Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.  See the attached registrations.
`
`Here, applicant’s mark is SCARF FACE LIT CITY BY SCARF FACE for “Scented candles” in International Class 4, and “Silk scarves” in
`International Class 25.
`
`The registrant’s marks are SCARFACE for “Hats, caps, shirts, t-shirts, tank tops, sweatshirts, jackets, underwear, polo shirts, shorts, sleepwear,
`jeans, shoes” in International Class 25, and “Postcards, posters, calendars” in International Class 16.
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that is so similar to a registered mark that it is likely consumers would be
`confused, mistaken, or deceived as to the commercial source of the goods and/or services of the parties.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  Likelihood of
`confusion is determined on a case-by-case basis by applying the factors set forth in In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361,
`177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973) (called the “ du Pont factors”).   In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d 1315, 1322, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1747
`Inc., 450
`(Fed. Cir. 2017).  Only those factors that are “relevant and of record” need be considered.   M2 Software, Inc. v. M2 Commc’ns,
`F.3d 1378, 1382, 78 USPQ2d 1944, 1947 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (citing Shen Mfg. Co. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd., 393 F.3d 1238, 1241, 73 USPQ2d
`
`1350, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2004)); see In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC , 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1744 (TTAB 2018).  
`
`Although not all du Pont factors may be relevant, there are generally two key considerations in any likelihood of confusion analysis:  (1) the
`similarities between the compared marks and (2) the relatedness of the compared goods and/or services.  See In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d at
`1322, 123 USPQ2d at 1747 (quoting Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 1164-65, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002));
`Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co., 544 F.2d 1098, 1103, 192 USPQ 24, 29 (C.C.P.A. 1976) (“The fundamental inquiry mandated
`by [Section] 2(d) goes to the cumulative effect of differences in the essential characteristics of the goods [or services] and differences in the
`marks.”); TMEP §1207.01.
`
`1.     Similarity of the Marks
`
`Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.  Stone Lion Capital
`Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve
`Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v). 
`“Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.”   In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d
`1742, 1746 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB 2014)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
`
`Incorporating the entirety of one mark within another does not obviate the similarity between the compared marks, as in the present case, nor
`does it overcome a likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d).  See Wella Corp. v. Cal. Concept Corp., 558 F.2d 1019, 1022, 194 USPQ 419,
`422 (C.C.P.A. 1977) (finding CALIFORNIA CONCEPT and surfer design and CONCEPT confusingly similar); Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Jos.
`E. Seagram & Sons, Inc., 526 F.2d 556, 557, 188 USPQ 105, 106 (C.C.P.A. 1975) (finding BENGAL LANCER and design and BENGAL
`confusingly similar); In re Integrated Embedded, 120 USPQ2d 1504, 1513 (TTAB 2016) (finding BARR GROUP and BARR confusingly
`similar); In re Mr. Recipe, LLC, 118 USPQ2d 1084, 1090 (TTAB 2016) (finding JAWS DEVOUR YOUR HUNGER and JAWS confusingly
`
`similar); TMEP §1207.01(b)(iii).  
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`In the present case, the registered mark, SCARFACE, is incorporated in its entirety within the applied-for mark, SCARF FACE LIT CITY BY
`SCARF FACE. In fact, it appears twice in the applied-for mark. The only difference is the word “SCARFACE” appears as a compound word
`with no space separating the words in the registered mark, and it appears as multiple words with a space separating the words in the applied-for
`mark.  As such, the term is identical in sound and virtually identical in appearance in the marks, and the marks are thus confusingly similar for
`the purposes of determining likelihood of confusion.  See, e.g., Seaguard Corp. v. Seaward Int’l, Inc., 223 USPQ 48, 51 (TTAB 1984) (“[T]he
`marks ‘SEAGUARD’
`and ‘SEA GUARD’ are, in contemplation of law, identical [internal citation omitted].”); In re Best W. Family Steak
`House, Inc., 222 USPQ 827, 827 (TTAB 1984) (“There can be little doubt that the marks [BEEFMASTER and BEEF MASTER] are practically
`identical”); Stock Pot, Inc., v. Stockpot Rest., Inc., 220 USPQ 52, 52 (TTAB 1983), aff’d 737 F.2d 1576, 222 USPQ 665 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
`(“There is no question that the marks of the parties [STOCKPOT and STOCK POT] are confusingly similar.  The word marks are phonetically
`
`identical and visually almost identical.”).   
`
`Furthermore, the fact that a mark is intended to be a parody of another trademark is not, by itself, sufficient to overcome a likelihood of confusion
`refusal, because "[t]here are confusing parodies and non-confusing parodies." J. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair
`Competition, §31.153 (4th ed. 2010); see also Nike, Inc. v. Maher, 100 USPQ2d 1018, 1023 (TTAB 2011) ("[P]arody is not a defense if the
`marks would otherwise be considered confusingly similar."). "A true parody actually decreases the likelihood of confusion because the effect of
`the parody is to create a distinction in the viewer’s mind between the actual product and the joke." Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Novak, 648 F.
`Supp. 905, 910, 231 USPQ 963, 965 (D. Neb. 1986), aff’d, 836 F.2d 397, 5 USPQ2d 1314 (8th Cir. 1987). Thus, "[w]hile a parody must call to
`mind the actual product to be successful, the same success also necessarily distinguishes the parody from the actual product." Id.
`
`Thus, because the marks are otherwise confusingly similar, the fact the applied-for mark is intended to be a parody of the registered mark does
`not obviate the confusing similarity between the marks.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the marks are confusingly similar.
`
`2.     Relatedness of the Goods
`
`The goods are compared to determine whether they are similar, commercially related, or travel in the same trade channels.  See Coach Servs., Inc.
`v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369-71, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722-23 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc. , 308
`F.3d 1156, 1165, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2002); TMEP §§1207.01, 1207.01(a)(vi).
`
`the same entity commonly
`The attached Internet evidence, consisting of Madewell, Banana Republic, and J Crew, establishes that
`manufactures/produces/provides silk scarves and clothing, and markets the goods under the same mark. Similarly, the attached evidence from
`Draper James, Southern Tide, and Lily Pulitzer, establishes that the same entity commonly manufactures/produces/provides both calendars and
`scented candles, and markets the goods under the same mark.  Thus, applicant’s and registrant’s goods are considered related for likelihood of
`confusion purposes.  See, e.g., In re Davey Prods. Pty Ltd., 92 USPQ2d 1198, 1202-04 (TTAB 2009); In re Toshiba Med. Sys. Corp., 91 USPQ2d
`1266, 1268-69, 1271-72 (TTAB 2009).
`
`Based on the analysis above, the applicant’s and registrant’s goods are related.
`
`3.     Conclusion
`
`Because applicant’s and registrant’s marks are similar and the goods are related, there is a likelihood of confusion and applicant’s applied-for
`mark must be refused under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act.
`
`Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by submitting evidence and arguments in
`support of registration.
`
`SPECIMEN REFUSAL
`
`Registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce in connection with any of the goods
`specified in International Class(es) 4 and 25 in the application.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R.
`§§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); In re Keep A Breast Found., 123 USPQ2d 1869, 1876-79 (TTAB 2017); In re Graystone Consulting Assocs., Inc., 115
`USPQ2d 2035, 2037-38 (TTAB 2015); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(d), (g)(i).  Specifically, the specimen provided shows a picture of a
`candle, but the candle does not contain the applied-for mark.
`
`Furthermore, the other specimen provided is merely a picture or rendering of the applied-for mark, and thus fails to show the applied-for mark in
`use in commerce with the goods for each international class.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R.
`§§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); In re Chica, 84 USPQ2d 1845, 1848 (TTAB 2007); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(g)(i).
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each
`international class of goods and/or services identified in the application or amendment to allege use.  15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R.
`
`§§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).  
`
`Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or
`packaging, and displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale.  See TMEP §§904.03 et seq.  Webpages may also be specimens for
`goods when they include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the goods.  TMEP
`
`§904.03(i).  
`
`Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following for each applicable international class:
`
`(1)      
`
`Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing
`date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for
`the goods and/or services identified in the application or amendment to allege use.  A “verified substitute specimen” is a
`specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R.
`§2.20:  “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early
`as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of the amendment to allege use.”   The substitute specimen cannot be
`accepted without this statement.
`
`(2)      
`
`Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required.  This option will later necessitate
`additional fee(s) and filing requirements such as providing a specimen.
`
`For an overview of both response options referenced above and instructions on how to satisfy either option online using the Trademark Electronic
`Application System (TEAS) form, please go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/law/specimen.jsp.
`
`If applicant responds to the refusal(s), applicant must also respond to the requirement(s) set forth below.
`
`DISCLAIMER REQUIREMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL CLASS 25
`
`Applicant must provide a disclaimer of the unregistrable part(s) of the applied-for mark even though the mark as a whole appears to be
`registrable.  See 15 U.S.C. §1056(a); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).  A disclaimer of an unregistrable part of a mark will not affect the mark’s
`appearance.  See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d 978, 979-80, 144 USPQ 433, 433 (C.C.P.A. 1965).
`
`In this case, applicant must disclaim the word “SCARF” because it is not inherently distinctive.  These unregistrable term(s) at best are merely
`descriptive of an ingredient and/or characteristic of applicant’s goods.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med.
`
`Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).  
`
`This wording appears in applicant’s identification of goods as “Silk scarves.”   Thus, the wording merely describes applicant’s goods, namely,
`that applicant is offering scarves.
`
`Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:  
`No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “SCARF” apart from the mark as shown in International Class 25.   
`
`For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the
`
`Disclaimer webpage.  
`
`Response guidelines.  For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action.  For
`a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above.  For
`a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements.  Please see “ Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video
`“Response to Office Action ” for more information and tips on responding.
`
`Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining
`attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with
`additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does
`not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record. 
`
`See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.  
`
`TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online
`using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office
`actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3)
`agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b);
`TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125
`per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS
`Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring
`
`this additional fee.    
`How to respond.   Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action    
`
`/Megan Mischler/
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`Law Office 127
`(571) 272-9997
`megan.mischler@uspto.gov
`
`RESPONSE GUIDANCE
`Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.   A response or notice of appeal must be received by
`the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.   TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen
`
`circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.   
`
`Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon.  If applicant does not have an
`attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic
`applicant.  If applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.
`
`If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.
`
`  
` 
` 
`

`

`Print: Sep 12, 2019
`
`76816530
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`serial Number
`T6616530
`
`Status
`REGISTERED AND RENEWED
`
`Word Mark
`SCAREACE
`
`Standard Character Mark
`Yes
`
`Registration Number
`3130334
`
`Date Registered
`zooexosxls
`
`Type of Mark
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[4
`STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
`
`
`
`Owner
`UNIVERSAL CITY STUDICS LLC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY DELAWARE IDD
`UNIWRSAL CITY PLAZA UNIVERSAL CITY CALIFORNIA 91608
`
`GoodsfServioes
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`
`IC 016.
`
`US
`
`002 005 022 023 0255I 037' 038 050.
`
`G & S: POSTCARDS, POSTERS, CALENDARS. First USE: ZOOZHOIKUO. First
`Use In Commerce: 2002f01f00.
`
`Filing Date
`ZOOAHIUHIB
`
`Examining Attorney
`EYANMC, PATRICIA
`
`Attorneyr of Record
`Kevin S. Blum
`
`

`

`SCARFACE
`
`

`

`Print: Sep 12, 2019
`
`76816531
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`serial Number
`T6616531
`
`Status
`REGISTERED AND RENEWED
`
`Word Mark
`SCAREACE
`
`Standard Character Mark
`Yes
`
`Registration Number
`3130335
`
`Date Registered
`2006x03x15
`
`Type of Mark
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[4
`STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
`
`
`
`Owner
`UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY DELAWARE 100
`UNIWRSAL CITY PLAZA UNIVERSAL CITY CALIFORNIA 91608
`
`GoodsfServioes
`G a S: HATS, CAPS,
`022 039.
`US
`10 025.
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, SWEATSHIRTS,
`JACKETS, UNDERWEAR, POLO
`SHIRTS, SHORTS, SLEEPWEAR,
`JEANS, SHOES. First Use: 2002/01/00.
`First Use In Commerce: ZOOZHOIHOO.
`
`Filing Date
`2004f10f13
`
`Examining Attorney
`EVANKO, PATRICIA
`
`.i-‘nlttorneg‘pr of Record
`Monique Chang Joe
`
`

`

`SCARFACE
`
`

`

`Search
`Q
`
`1544;} PM 91122019
`
`M
`
`Aaount
`R
`
`Favontes
`Q’
`
`Bag
`m °
`
`NEW DENIM
`CLOTHING
`SHOES
`ACCESSORIES
`LIFE
`LABEL5 WE LOVE
`SALE
`COMMUNITY
`
`
`Tees 8: Basics
`Tops
`Sweatshirt 8c Long Sleeve
`Turtlenecks
`Graphic Tees
`Bodysuits
`Tanks & Camis
`
`
`I47 ResuLts
`FILTER IIY v
`Sort By-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mbsflwwwmadewellconflwomenslclulhlngflees
`
`

`

` _ WM"
`Search
`AI:(aunt
`FCWDI\(25
`Hag
`Q
`M
`R
`‘7
`‘3‘ °
`
`COMMUNITY
`SALE
`LABELS WE lOVE
`LIFE
`ACCESSORIES
`SHOES
`CLOTHING
`NEW DENIM
`
`
`0
`
`. 10!2 RATED
`
`SiLk Bandana
`
`$24.50
`select colors $9.99 — $l4‘99
`Extra 40% off sale styles w‘th code SEEYA
`
`erte a review
`
`* **** Read revlews
`
`COLOR Dried OLIve Multl
`
`SIZE
`
`hIIps lfwwwmdewelILmTVsileandanaiGZQfi hImWSIECOdE:Paid,Sea[chiSearchiNnnBIandGnogIelPM6"GAMadewelLUSNBDSA"AII»X£eneIaI&NnPwpUp:TmeKgclifiCjOKCQMeflBRD3ARIsAEnIOeie<3><46IkCV1 RbJnOthVrIIQsMbyGw7brwaaIyJTLUfJZay
`3ZWaAITquEALW7WCB3sgCISIFaW.dS
`
`

`

` FIND A MORE CREDIT CARD GIFF CARD
`BANANA REPUBLIC
`gm
`Q
`PETITES
`SHOES
`ACCESSORIES
`FACTORY
`
`NEW ARRIVALS
`
`WOMEN
`
`MEN
`
`ABOUT US
`
`SALE
`
`1:53.28 PM 91122019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0 O
`
`THE
`TEE
`
`SHOP
`
`Flow through the
`seasons in wildly
`soft SUPIMA®
`cotton and more‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SLEEVELESS
`SHORT SLEEVE
`LONG SLEEVE
` .
`._
`|.
`mcLu-uv:
`EXTRA
`
`Women /TheTee Shop
`SPECIAL OFFERS
`UP TO 40% OFF ALL
`ntmm x DANTQ
`
`407 Items
`
`CATEGORY
`
`v
`
`SIZE
`
`v
`
`COLOR
`
`v
`
`PRICE
`
`v
`
`flips Imananalemblic gap colwmowselrmegmyd0?C|d:1055063&Inn"#45001 ”momiwomeniapparelimejeeismdinb1 5682852
`
`
`
`109/OFF
`CODE: BRCARD
`v.
`
`

`

`1.52:43 PM 9121201!)
`
`NEW ARRIVALS
`
`WOMEN
`
`BANANA REPUBLIC
`PETITES
`SHOES
`ACCESSORIES
`
`MEN
`
`ABOUT US
`
`FACTORY
`
`SALE
`
`q
`
`FINDASTORE
`
`CREDITCARD
`
`GIFFCARD
`
`Search results for: "silk scarf"
`
`22|tems
`
`CATEGORY
`
`V
`
`COLOR
`
`"
`
`PRICE
`
`V
`
`‘\
`
`$32 {$75
`
`\ ,3“|\
`
`Square Logo Scarf
`$25.00
`Now $20.00
`
`Stripe Square Scarf
`$25.00
`
`Large Square Scarf
`$48.DD
`
`Animal Print Square Scan“
`$38.00
`
`mms Imananaiepthllc mp cmnmmwsdsmlch dummTeszmZflsu-m
`
`CODE: BRCARD
`
`

`

`J C RE \R/
`
`New Women
`
`Men
`
`Brands We Love
`Kids
`USE CODE SHOPNOW Details
`
`(
`
`Sale
`
`Factory
`
`FREE STANDARD SHIPPING WITH LERE )
`
`Q Search LC rew
`See All Offers (2)
`
`Sign In
`
`1:52 12 PM 911212019
`
`
`
`
`
`52 Blockprints'“I for J.Crew sarongicanc
`Shop all SZELOCKFRINTS
`* i f *1 '5 REVIEWS
`
`Size Charts
`
`$52.00
`Color: Red
`
`Sile: One Sile
`
`
`
`v |
`Quantity:
`i1
`
`ADD TO BAG
`
`ADD TO WISHLIS!’
`
`Size I; Fit
`- 75" Lx43" w.
`Overall Fit based on user reviews
`
`K F
`z y
`
`runs
`smalf
`
`[me [0
`size
`
`runs
`large
`
`hiips IMMjCIHWLOWpMomensJaiegmyraILaccessmiesisrammwrapsiahlockprinisfoH'clewisamngsrarleQMB'ImioLnarnFmd
`
`

`

`1:51 23 PM 9“ 22019
`
`J C RE \x/
`
`New Women
`
`Men
`
`Kids
`
`(
`
`Factory
`Sale
`Brands We Love
`30% OFF FULL-PRICE STVLES.‘ GNlINE ONLY. USE CODE SHGPNOW DeIaII;
`
`Q Search J.Crew
`SeeMIOHers (2)
`
`)
`
`Sign In
`
`fl
`
`HIDE FILTERS
`
`CATEGORY
`
`WOMEN'S T-SHIRTS 8. TANK TOPS
`SORT BY v
`
`1 v on
`
`ViewAll
`
`LONG SLEEVE
`
`Lung Sleeve (59)
`Short Sleeve (73)
`Graphk Tees (:9)
`Tanks I; Camls (IE)
`Maternity (a)
`
`FABRIC
`
`OCCASION
`
`FIND IN STORE
`
`
`FIT
`
`SHE
`
`COLOR
`PRICE
`
`(3 555' “It“
`SIIm pen‘ed longisIeeve Trshirt
`53550
`an% on FULL PRICE wnH com SHOPNGW
`avaIIabIe In I3 (alors
`
`Slim perfectlong-sIeeve T-shirl
`$39.50
`aux oFr FUlL PRICE WITH CODE sHoPNow
`avaIIabIe In 4 colors
`
`1!) 555' 5m“
`Vintage (otton s(oopne(k longisleeve TrsIIIri
`$36.50
`avaIIabIe m 10 (oIoIs
`
`TRENDING
`mlps'IMwchIewcotrIIcMomenstegmyflshirIsJanklops
`
`

`

`11930 PM 9r12r2019
`Today's prams help Hurricane Dorian relief“
`
`NEW
`
`DRESSESV
`
`DRAPERfiJAMEs
`CLOTHINGV
`ACCESSORIESV
`HOME
`
`SALE
`
`
`
`q we C
`
`
`
`Magnolia Weekly Planner
`$28
`*****1wrlteaRevlew
`
`
`.l
`
`
`
`
`
`gl—
`
`4
`'
`
` -
`
`a
`Hoverto
`290m
`
`Color: Navymagnolla
`
`
`Size: OS
`
`Qty:
`
`1
`
`Details & Fit
`
`SIZE Gulde
`
`0
`
`—
`
`_ Wamng [or draperjames.zendesk.(om..
`
`' 9 B" X 7‘5" x ‘6"
`I 192 pages
`I Undated year, month and week mews
`I
`Includes monogram stickers fur persondhzabon
`Import
`mmsjldiapeljames colwploduclsflmgmllaiweekwiilannemafla"1:205761 9056241 7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hover to
`Zoom
`
`1185!) PM $122019
`Today's profits help Hurricane Dorian rellef"
`
`NEW
`
`DRESSES v
`
`CLOTHING v
`
`ACCESSORIES v
`
`HOME
`
`SALE
`
`DRAPERSfiJAMEs
`
`<17,
`LOVE) 4,6” "
`
`q dug D
`
`Wildwood Flower Candle
`
`$32
`
`*tttt 7Rev|ews
`
`Color: Spring scent
`
`Size: 08
`
`Size Guide
`
`Qty:
`
`1
`
`Add ta Bag
`
`Details 8- Fit
`
`I 86 01
`I 60765 hours of burn time
`I Natural soy wax blend; cottnn wick
`I Made In South Ca rolma In collaboration with Votive
`
`Cf)
`
`—
`
`
`
`_ war—r
`
`mildapeljalmnmwptmmmimm-flowetwflemW2036085371 71 05
`
`

`

`1:17:05 PM $132019
`
`Southern Tide Blue Fragrance Candle
`
`
` .9...—_-——-.—-
`
`$36.00
`
`SKU:
`65653
`
`Weight:
`2.00 LBS
`
`Shipping:
`$2.99 {Fixed shipping cost)
`
`Quantity:
`1
`v
`
`ADD TO CART
`
`WISHLIST
`
`SHARE
`Sign Up to see wnat your menus like.
`
`flip:J'Mww.umgmagimfiascmn-fimagmmmmmeeflB RDfiARISNENOthLmHhPlDDSDWMMHUIIWU4VID3VthSVnguib7MaAoKLEALVLWCB
`
`

`

`1:16:06 PM 9l12f2019
`n
`‘ Contact Us 855$9078334 ‘ B My Bag
`
`My Amount ‘ My Wishlist
`
`)@
`SOUTHERN TIDE
`
`MEN
`
`WOMEN
`
`KIDS
`
`BOLLEEIATE
`
`AEBESSORIES
`
`HllME
`
`BULLABIJRATNINS
`
`Q
`
`HOME > SOUTHERN TEDE SKIPIACK"
`
`SOUTHERN TIDE SKIPJACK BANNER
`STYLE: 2500
`
`0
`
`III] REVIEWS
`
`$22.00
`
`llllANTlT‘l
`
`»
`
`‘l
`
`+
`
`Om Ifl msnusnm
`SOUTHERN 1:];DE
`flips ”Smlhamde colelodlflslmfllem—IideskiphdcbaflleflgcictqflKCinIQeIIBRDiiARISAEmmulDXqufloLE?NbigNSQSILHFPLZQOHnF20lE3ngZpALln35hAaAnRAEALw7WCB
`
`

`

`1:1400 PM 9I12f2019
`
`WQW ="~Ew
`PASSPORT AND LUGGAGE TAG TRAVEL
`SET
`$48
`***** 5 (3)
`
`PRINTS + COLORS
`
`DRESSES
`
`CLOTHING
`
`SWIM
`
`GIFTS + ACCESSORIES
`
`TO DO PLANNER
`325
`*****sm
`
`LARGE PILLOW
`$42
`**** 4 (I)
`
`Q o @
`GIRLS
`LEATHERETTE VALET TRAY
`$18
`***** 5 (5)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ACRYLIC WINE GLASS SET
`$24
`*ttii 5 (7)
`
`Connect with a Stylist
`9 Alexandria
`
`
`
`
`
`LARGE JAR CANDLE
`$20
`****1 4.5 (2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SEWICK CANDLE
`$24
`***** 5 a)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LARGE JAR CANDLE
`520
`****i 4.5 (2)
`
`"1115:”va ilyptimrcadgtammfiafgflsfimedecmlmasw
`
`

`

`_Il
`PRINTS + COLORS
`MW 'NEW
`Gifts + Accessories /Agendas & Planners / Monthly Agendas ll Planners
`
`1.110!) PM 9121201!)
` n9 & Free Returns on a” orders
`
`Enjoy Free Sh
`
`
`
`CATALOG
`
`DRESSES
`
`CLOTHING
`
`swm
`
`GIFTS + ACCESSORIES
`
`GIRLS
`
`Q o 6
`
`._
`+
`4'
`
`FILTER
`
`‘
`
`SORT BY
`
`V
`
`MONTHLY AGENDAS 8: PLANNERS
`
`1, 3 of3 Items
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I in
`
`
`
`
`
`3 ll
`
`
`
`’22
`k**** 43 (31)
`
`201972020 MONTHLY PLANNER 712 MONTH 201972020 MONTHLY PLANNER 712 MONTH
`$28
`528
`0 (0)
`0 (D)
`
`flips Muww ilypti'zficondgfls—accfismialagerdfi-phmshmlfly-agetmsphms!
`
`d _
`exan rla
`F.
`
`9 Al
`
`
`
`

`

`To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`Henrietta Letailleur (hennylet@gmail.com)
`
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88483920 - SCARF FACE LIT CITY BY SCARF FACE - N/A
`
`September 12, 2019 02:04:12 PM
`
`ecom127@uspto.gov
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`
`USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE
`
`Office Action (Official Letter) has issued
`on September 12, 2019 for
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88483920
`
`Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an
`official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.
`
`(1)  Read the official letter.
`
`(2)   Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below.   
`
`/Megan Mischler/
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`Law Office 127
`(571) 272-9997
`megan.mischler@uspto.gov
`
`Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or
`whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).
`
`(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from September 12, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic
`Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response
`period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond.
`
`GENERAL GUIDANCE
`·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical
`deadlines.
`
`·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.
`
`·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use
`public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  
`All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`   
` 
` 
`   
`