Download Docs
Export

3IP

97666258 | Trademark

Interested in this case?

Request a Demo Track this case, and find millions of cases like it, let us show you how.
Filed Nov. 7, 2022
Serial No. 97666258
Examining Attorney AMY MARCY
Class Copyright licensing; Copyright management; Copyright management consultation; Legal services; Legal advisory services; Legal consultation services; Legal information services; Patent and industrial property consultation; Patent licensing; Patent watch services; Attorney services, namely, representation of clients in state and federal trademark matters; Consultancy in the field of management of intellectual property and of copyright; Consultancy relating to copyright licensing; Consultancy relating to patent licensing; Consultancy relating to the management of intellectual property and copyright; Granting of licences to others for the use of industrial property rights and copyright; Granting of licenses to others for the use of industrial property rights and copyright; Intellectual property consultancy services in the field of patents and patent applications; Legal consultancy relating to patent mapping; Legal services in the nature of trademark monitoring; Legal services relating to granting of patents; Legal services relating to issuing of trademark registrations; Legal services relating to the registration of trademarks; Legal services, namely, trademark maintenance services; Legal services, namely, trademark searching and clearance services; Legal services, namely, preparation of applications for trademark registration; Licensing of copyright; Licensing of patent applications; Licensing of patents; Licensing of trademarks; Licensing of design patents; Licensing of intellectual property in the field of intellectual property; Providing assistance in the prosecution of trademark applications; Providing online searchable databases in the field of patent applications, issued patents and title thereto; 100; 101
3IP
Case Type Service mark
Status A final Office action refusing registration has been sent (issued) because the applicant neither satisfied nor overcame all requirements and/or refusals previously raised. The applicant may respond by filing (1) a request for reconsideration; and/or (2) an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. To view all documents in this file, click on the Trademark Document Retrieval link at the top of this page.
Last Updated: 4 months ago
Filing Date # Docket Text