throbber
To:
`Subject:
`Sent:
`Sent As:
`
`Ashly Valenzuela(ashly@avlegalent.com)
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 97754620 - ASPECT ZAVI
`October 18, 2023 07:27:54 PM EDT
`tmng.notices@uspto.gov
`
`Attachments
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
`
`U.S. Application Serial No.  97754620
`
`Mark:   ASPECT ZAVI
`
`Correspondence Address:  
`ASHLY VALENZUELA
`AV LEGAL & ENTERTAINMENT
`108
`901 N. FAIRFAX AVE.
`WEST HOLLYWOOD CA 90046
`UNITED STATES
`
`Applicant:   Za'Vier M. James
`
`Reference/Docket No.  N/A
`
`Correspondence Email Address:   ashly@avlegalent.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
`
`Response deadline.  File a response to this nonfinal Office action within three months of the “Issue
`date” below to avoid abandonment of the application. Review the Office action and respond using one
`of the links to the appropriate electronic forms in the “How to respond” section below.
`
`Request an extension.  For a fee, applicant may request one three-month extension of the response
`deadline prior to filing a response. The request must be filed within three months of the “Issue date”
`below. If the extension request is granted, the USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter
`within six months of the “Issue date” to avoid abandonment of the application.
`
`Issue date:   October 18, 2023
`
`
`The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant
`must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a),
`2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
`
`
`

`

`SEARCH OF USPTO DATABASE OF MARKS
`
`The trademark examining attorney has searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks
`and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15
`U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
`
`SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
`
`
`•
`•
`•
`
`Section 2(c) Refusal – Name of a Living Individual
`Domicile Address Required
`Processing Fee Required – Considered TEAS Standard Application
`
`
`SECTION 2(c) REFUSAL – NAME OF A LIVING INDIVIDUAL
`
`Applicant must provide a written consent to register the name/pseudonym appearing in the mark,
`personally signed by the named individual.  15 U.S.C. §1052(c); TMEP §§813, 1206.04(a).
`Specifically, the specimen indicates the mark is a name or pseudonym.
`
`To register a mark that includes or comprises the name of a particular living individual, including a first
`name, pseudonym, stage name, or nickname, an applicant must provide the individual’s written consent
`to register the name, personally signed by the named individual.  15 U.S.C. §1052(c); TMEP §§813,
`1206.04(a). 
`
`Consent to register the name of a particular individual identified in a mark is presumed only when that
`particular individual signed the application.  TMEP §1206.04(b) (citing Alford Mfg. Co. v. Alfred
`Elecs., 137 USPQ 250, 250 (TTAB 1963), aff’d, 333 F.3d 912, 142 USPQ 168 (C.C.P.A. 1964); Ex
`parte Dallioux, 83 USPQ 262, 263 (Comm’r Pats. 1949)).  In this case, although the name in the mark
`identifies the name of the individual applicant, the individual did not sign the application and the
`application does not include a personally signed written consent from the individual. 
`
`Accordingly, applicant must submit both of the following: 
`
`
`(1)   A statement identifying the actual name of the individual and indicating that the name in the
`mark identifies this individual.  TMEP §§813.01(a), 1206.04(a). 
`
`The following format is suggested:  “ The name shown in the mark identifies <specify actual
`name>, a living individual whose consent to register is made of record.”    
`
`If the name is a pseudonym, stage name, or nickname, the following format is suggested: 
`“ASPECT ZAVI identifies <specify actual name>, a living individual whose consent to
`register is made of record.” 
`
`AND
`
`(2)   A written consent for applicant to register the name, personally signed by the named
`individual.  
`
`The following format is suggested:  “ I, <specify name>, consent to the registration of my
`name, ASPECT ZAVI, as a trademark and/or service mark with the USPTO.”
`
`

`

`
`For an overview of the requirements for names appearing in marks, and instructions on how to satisfy
`the above requirements using the online Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response
`form, see the Name or Likeness of a Particular Living Individual in a Trademark webpage.  
`
`DOMICILE ADDRESS REQUIRED
`
`Domicile address cannot be accepted.  Applicant must provide its current domicile street address
`because the domicile address of record is for a U.S. third-party commercial mail receiving agency (a
`private business that accepts mail from the U.S. Postal Service on behalf of third parties), as identified
`by the U.S. Postal Service Coding Accuracy Support System (CASS), and is not acceptable for an
`individual applicant.  That is, this address is not an acceptable type of domicile address as it does not
`identify applicant’s permanent legal place of residence.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o)-(p), 2.11(b), 2.189;
`TMEP §601.01(b)(1).  All applications must include an applicant’s domicile address.  See 37 C.F.R.
`§§2.32(a)(2), 2.189. 
`
`Response option(s)
`
`Applicant must provide an acceptable domicile street address; that is, the location where applicant
`resides and intends to be applicant’s principal home.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o)-(p), 2.32(a)(2), 2.189;
`TMEP §803.05(a). 
`
`If applicant cannot provide a domicile street address due to an extraordinary situation, applicant may
`file a petition to the Director to request the Director waive this requirement.  See 37 C.F.R.
`§§2.146(a)(5), 2.148.  The petition must include the required fee as well as (a) a verified statement of
`facts explaining the extraordinary situation, and (b) the state, or foreign equivalent, and country of
`applicant’s domicile, to determine whether applicant must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney. 
`See 37 C.F.R. §§2.11(a)-(b), 2.146(c)(1); TMEP §601.  However, filing a petition is not considered a
`response to an Office action.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.146(g); TMEP §§711, 1705.06.  Applicant must still file
`a timely response to this Office action to avoid abandonment of the application.  The response should
`indicate that a petition has been filed, specify the reason(s) for filing the petition (e.g., to request a
`waiver of the domicile address requirement), and request suspension of the application pending
`disposition of the petition.  See TMEP §§716.02, 1705.06.
`
`Instructions for responding
`
`To provide applicant’s domicile street address.  After opening the correct Trademark Electronic
`Application System (TEAS) response form and entering the serial number, (1) answer “yes” to question
`5 and click “Continue;” (2) on the “Owner Information” page, in the “Domicile Address” fields,
`uncheck the box stating the domicile and mailing address are not the same; and (3) below the checkbox
`provide applicant’s domicile street address.  The address provided in the “Domicile Address” fields
`will be hidden from public view.  However, any street address listed in the “Mailing Address” fields
`will be publicly viewable.
`
`PROCESSING FEE REQUIRED – CONSIDERED TEAS STANDARD APPLICATION
`
`Processing fee required.  Applicant must submit an additional processing fee of $100 per class
`because the application as originally filed did not meet the TEAS Plus application filing requirements. 
`See 37 C.F.R. §2.22(c); TMEP §§819.01-.01(q), 819.03.  Specifically, applicant failed to meet the
`
`

`

`following requirement(s):  a consent to register the mark from the person identified in the mark (or
`conversely, if appropriate, a statement that the name or portrait in the mark does not identify a living
`individual) was not provided. 
`
`The additional processing fee is required regardless of whether applicant satisfies these application
`requirements.
`
`Accordingly, the application will no longer be treated as TEAS Plus; it is now considered a TEAS
`Standard application.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.22(c); TMEP §819.03.
`
`
`HOW TO RESPOND.   File a response form to this nonfinal Office action or file a request form
`for an extension of time to file a response.  
`
`
`/John LaMont/
`Examining Attorney
`LO123--LAW OFFICE 123
`(571) 270-0404
`John.LaMont@USPTO.GOV
`
`
`
`RESPONSE GUIDANCE
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`Missing the deadline for responding to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A
`response or extension request must be received by the USPTO before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time
`of the last day of the response deadline.  Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS)
`system availability could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  For help resolving
`technical issues with TEAS, email TEAS@uspto.gov.
`
`Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to
`abandon.  If applicant does not have an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual
`applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant.  If
`applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.
`
`If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the
`signature block.
`
`

`

`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`
`USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE
`
`Office Action (Official Letter) has issued
`on October 18, 2023 for
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No.  97754620
`
`A USPTO examining attorney has reviewed your trademark application and issued an Office
`action.  You must respond to this Office action to avoid your application abandoning.  Follow
`the steps below.  
`
`(1)   Read the Office action.  This email is NOT the Office action.  
`
`(2)  Respond to the Office action by the deadline using the Trademark Electronic Application
`System (TEAS).  Your response, or extension request, must be received by the USPTO on or
`before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time of the last day of the response deadline.  Otherwise, your
`application will be abandoned.  See the Office action itself regarding how to respond.  
`
`(3)  Direct general questions about using USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the
`application process, the status of your application, and whether there are outstanding deadlines
`to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).  
`
`After reading the Office action, address any question(s) regarding the specific content to the
`USPTO examining attorney identified in the Office action.  
`
`GENERAL GUIDANCE
`Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status &
`•
`Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.  
`
`•
`
`•
`
`Update your correspondence email address to ensure you receive important USPTO
`notices about your application.  
`
`Beware of trademark-related scams .  Protect yourself from people and companies that
`may try to take financial advantage of you.  Private companies may call you and pretend
`to be the USPTO or may send you communications that resemble official USPTO
`documents to trick you.  We will never request your credit card number or social security
`number over the phone.  Verify the correspondence originated from us by using your
`serial number in our database, TSDR, to confirm that it appears under the “Documents”
`tab, or contact the Trademark Assistance Center.  
`
`•
`
`Hiring a U.S.-licensed attorney .   If you do not have an attorney and are not required to
`
`

`

`have one under the trademark rules, we encourage you to hire a U.S.-licensed attorney
`specializing in trademark law to help guide you through the registration process.  The
`USPTO examining attorney is not your attorney and cannot give you legal advice, but
`
`rather works for and represents the USPTO in trademark matters.   
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket