New Feature Aids Litigation by Exporting and Extracting Deadlines from Dockets
Washington, DC(March 14, 2019) –Docket Alarm by Fastcase, a leader in litigation analytics and docket research, today debuted “deadline display” – a new docket feature that extracts and exports deadlines from dockets.
A New Category of Tools for the Growing Class of “Makers” in U.S. Law Firms
|
Docket Alarm is excited to announce the release of visual search
history, allowing you to easily track and browse your past research activity. Having
search history at your fingertips means you never have to waste time reconstructing
a previous search or digging up a document you previously found. If you find a
great case or formulate a good search string, it will be automatically saved in
your history log.
 |
| Search History on Docket Alarm |
Continue Reading
Posted in:
Sept.
5
Docket Alarm's latest article,Gender Analytics: Using Litigation Data to
Evaluate Law Firm Diversity,explores how legal analytics can be used to conduct an in depth analysis of gender imbalances at law firms. By analyzing the gender of attorney appearances, Docket Alarm's analytics use litigation data to identify firms that are making a real commitment to gender diversity.
Read the full article atPatently-O.
Read the full article atPatently-O.
Posted in:
Just in time for the annual AALL conference, Docket Alarm is excited to announce the addition of attorney analytics to its analytics platform. Now, along
with being able to view analytics on parties, judges, and law firms, users can see
how individual attorneys are performing in the PTAB.
The attorney analytics tool allows users to identify top attorneys based on the number of proceedings in which they have
participated, along with the parties they typically represent, the tech centers
they focus on, their success rate.
Continue Reading
Posted in:
Docket Alarm is excited to
announce a new search feature that makes researching damages awards and jury
verdicts fast and easy.
Researching dollar amounts in
litigation is a common task, as parties often seek to understand their
potential financial exposure or recovery by analyzing cases similar to their
own. Previously, researching jury
verdicts, damages, or other types of amounts in controversy was arduous. Researchers needed to either go through each
case one-by-one or search for language that was often used in close proximity,
such as the terms “damages” or “award.” Unfortunately, manually reviewing each
document is extremely time consuming, and using too many shortcuts may result
in overlooking relevant documents.
Docket Alarm has solved this
problem.
Continue Reading
Posted in:
Docket Alarm is excited to announce new search features that
make finding relevant cases easier than ever before.
Range and numerical
filters allow you to search by specifying ranges of the number of parties,
firms, or attorneys involved in a case. These filters function the same way as
other filters by paring down results to only the most relevant.
For example, you can use a numerical range filter to find large
class action lawsuits using the party number filter.
Continue Reading
Posted in:
As we approach the end of 2016, it’s a good time to look
ahead to the cases that may have a significant impact on patent law in the
coming year. Here is a preview of some of the important patent decisions on the
Supreme Court’s docket for 2017.
Over the last 15 years, the Federal Circuit has continued to
expand the scope of the extraterritorial effect of U.S. patent law.
Continue Reading
Posted in:
Dec.
9
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled
on Tuesday in favor of Samsung in their ongoing case against Apple over design
patent damages. The Court’s decision reversed an earlier ruling by the Federal
Circuit that awarded Apple $399 million in damages.
The central argument in the case was over the language of 35
U.S.C. §289, which stated that a defendant found infringing on a patented
“article of manufacture” was “liable to the owner to the extent of his total
profit.” See Samsung Electronics
Co. v. Apple Inc., 580 U.S. ___ (2016).
The court held that the term “article of manufacture” should
not necessarily be construed to mean only an end product sold to consumers, but
could also be construed more broadly to mean infringing components of a product.
Continue Reading
Posted in:
On October 6, 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit will hear
oral arguments in the biggest hacking case of the century, United States v.Ulbricht. Ross William Ulbricht is appealing the life sentence he is currently serving after a jury convicted himon seven charges, including money laundering, computer hacking, conspiracy to
traffic narcotics, conspiracy to traffic fraudulent identity documents, and
procuring murder.
Ulbricht, also known by his alias, the Dread Pirate Roberts,
is the former ringleader of the now defunct Silk Road.
Docket Alarm has announced a new partnership with data-sharing platform, Zapier. With this partnership, Docket Alarm members will be able to access U.S. court data from over 500 different apps, opening a world of exciting integration possibilities.
As more software is being delivered over the internet, it is becoming increasingly difficult for legal professionals to sync data across systems.
Continue Reading
Posted in:
Attorney in
the PTAB? Do you wish you could know ahead of time whether your judge was
likely to institute your petition, grant your motion, or rule in your
favor?
Short of your reading
your judge’s thoughts, the next best thing is Docket Alarm’s Analytics Platform
for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Continue Reading
Posted in:
Docket Alarm
gives attorneys the ability to take their docket research to the next level.
With a suite of tools that streamlines your search process and maximizes your
results, Docket Alarm makes legal research more accurate and relevant than ever
before. Here are five ways attorneys can use Docket Alarm to conduct better
docket research.
1. Search Across All of PACER
Instead of
searching individual databases, use Docket Alarm to search all of PACERat once. Docket Alarm searches
all federal court cases simultaneously.
Continue Reading
Posted in:
On March 30th,
the Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against drug manufacturer Endo
Pharmaceuticals, alleging that Endo is paying generic drug manufacturers in order to
delay the release of lower cost generic versions of their drugs, Opana ER and
Lidoderm.
Generic drugs
come to market when the patents on name brand drugs expire.
Continue Reading
Posted in:
Stay Connected