throbber
1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 1 of 115
`
`
`
`ROGER I. TEICH
`California State Bar No. 147076
`290 Nevada Street
`San Francisco, CA 94110
`Telephone: (415) 948-0045
`E-Mail Address: rteich@juno.com
`
`ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.
`MARY HOLLAND
`Children’s Health Defense
`1227 North Peachtree Parkway, Suite 202
`Peachtree City, GA 30269
`Telephone: (917) 743-3868
`E-Mail Address: mary.holland@childrenshealthdefense.org
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE,
`a Georgia non-profit organization,
`
`
`
`
`
`FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation;
`MARK ZUCKERBERG, a California resident;
`SCIENCE FEEDBACK, a French corporation;
`POYNTER INSTITUTE, a Florida corporation;
`POLITIFACT, a Florida-corporation; and
`DOES 1-20,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. _________________________
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`
`1) FIRST AND FIFTH AMENDMENTS
`(BIVENS);
`2) LANHAM ACT (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a));
`3) RICO FRAUD (18 U.S.C. § 1962);
`4) DECLARATORY RELIEF.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMAND
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 2 of 115
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page #
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................................................................... iii
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT ............................................................................................................ 1
`
`INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 2
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE ................................................................................................... 5
`
`PARTIES AND RELATED ENTITIES ...................................................................................... 6
`
`STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS ..................................................................................... 8
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`CHD’s Interest in Vaccine and 5G and Wireless Network Safety. ........................8
`
`CHD’s Facebook Page. .........................................................................................12
`
`Defendant’s Scheme to Defraud. ..........................................................................14
`
`1.
`
`Overview. ..................................................................................................14
`
`2. Means and Methods of Defendants’ Scheme. ...........................................22
`
`3.
`
`Falsely Disparaging Warning Label. .........................................................25
`
`4. Materially Deceptive use of “Fact-Checkers.”..........................................27
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`Disabling CHD’s Fundraising and Ads. ....................................................39
`
`Disabling CHD’s Right to “Appeal” These Actions. ................................40
`
`Concealment of the Overall Scheme. ........................................................40
`
`Continuing Injuries to CHD. .....................................................................48
`
`D. Material Questions of Vaccine Safety. .................................................................50
`
`E. Material Questions of 5G Network Safety. ..........................................................55
`
`F.
`
`Facebook’s Adverse Motives. ...............................................................................59
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Zuckerberg’s Corporate Biases. ................................................................59
`
`Vaccine-Maker Ad Revenue. ....................................................................62
`
`Vaccine Development. ..............................................................................63
`
`5G Networks. ............................................................................................65
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION -
`
`28
`
`(FIRST AND FIFTH AMENDMENTS — BIVENS VIOLATIONS) ....................................... 67
`
`i
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 3 of 115
`
`
`
`SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION -
`
`(LANHAM ACT VIOLATIONS — 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)) ....................................................... 73
`
`A. No Affirmative Defense of CDA “Immunity.” ....................................................86
`
`B.
`
`The May 28, 2020 Executive Order. .....................................................................86
`
`THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION - (RICO — WIRE FRAUD VIOLATIONS) ............................ 87
`
`FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION - (DECLARATORY RELIEF) ............................................. 92
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL .................................................................................................. 93
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF ............................................................................................................. 94
`
`VERIFICATION ........................................................................................................................ 95
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`ii
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 4 of 115
`
`
`
`Federal Cases
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`Abrams v. United States,
`250 U.S. 616 (1919) .......................................................................................................... 4, 45
`
`Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition,
`535 U. S. (2002) .................................................................................................................... 71
`
`Bass v. Facebook, Inc.,
`394 F. Supp. 3d 1024 (N.D. Cal. 2019) .................................................................................. 3
`
`Batzel v. Smith,
`333 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) .............................................................................................. 86
`
`Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
`403 U.S. 388 (1971) .............................................................................................................. 68
`
`Blum v. Yaretsky,
`457 U.S. 991 (1982) .............................................................................................................. 71
`
`Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth,
`408 U.S. 564 (1972) .............................................................................................................. 72
`
`Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.,
`463 U.S. 60 (1983) ................................................................................................................ 75
`
`Boston Chamber of Commerce v. Boston,
`217 U.S. 189 (1910) .............................................................................................................. 73
`
`Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indem. Co.,
`553 U.S. 639 (2008) .................................................................................................. 45, 50, 90
`
`Bridges v. California,
`314 U.S. 252 (1941) .............................................................................................................. 21
`
`Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC,
`562 U.S. 223 (2011) .............................................................................................................. 50
`
`Coastal Abstract Serv., Inc. v. First Am. Title Ins. Co.,
`173 F.3d 725 (9th Cir. 1999) ................................................................................................ 74
`
`Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Intra Brokers, Inc.,
`24 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 1994) ................................................................................................ 92
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`iii
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 5 of 115
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Cook, Perkiss, and Liehe, Inc. v. N. Cal. Collection Serv.,
`911 F.2d 242 (9th Cir. 1990) ................................................................................................ 75
`
`Corr. Servs. Corp. v. Malesko,
`534 U.S. 61 (2001) ................................................................................................................ 68
`
`Davis v. Passman,
`442 U.S. 228 (1979) .............................................................................................................. 68
`
`Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories,
`399 F.2d 121 (9th Cir. 1968) ................................................................................................ 50
`
`Del’s Big Saver Foods, Inc. v. Carpenter Cook, Inc.,
`795 F.2d 1344 (7th Cir. 1986) .............................................................................................. 72
`
`Dodds v. Am. Broad. Co.,
`145 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 1998) ........................................................................................ 82, 84
`
`Elrod v. Burns,
`427 U.S. 347 (1976) .............................................................................................................. 92
`
`Fair Hous. Council v. Roommates.com, LLC,
`521 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc) ........................................................................ 22, 86
`
`Fed. Agency of News LLC v. Facebook, Inc.
`2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6159 (N.D. Cal. 2020) .............................................................. 69, 70
`
`Fonda v. Gray,
`707 F.2d 435 (9th Cir. 1983) ................................................................................................ 71
`
`Fraley v. Facebook,
`830 F. Supp. 2d 785 (N.D. Cal. 2011) ............................................................................ 62, 86
`
`Franklin v. Fox,
`312 F.3d 423 (9th Cir. 2002) ................................................................................................ 69
`
`Freedman v. Maryland,
`380 U.S. 51 (1965) ................................................................................................................ 68
`
`Garrison v. Louisiana,
`379 U.S. 64 (1964) ............................................................................................................ 4, 84
`
`Gorenc v. Salt River Project Agric. Improvement & Power Dist.,
`869 F.2d 503 (9th Cir. 1989) ................................................................................................ 69
`
`iv
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 6 of 115
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Grasshopper House, LLC v. Clean & Sober Media LLC,
`394 F. Supp. 3d 1073 (C.D. Cal. 2019) ................................................................................ 74
`
` Grosjean v. American Press Co.,
`297 U.S. 233 (1936) ............................................................................................................ 2, 3
`
`Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Metcalf,
`240 U.S. 403 (1916) .............................................................................................................. 50
`
`Harmoni Int’l Spice, Inc. v. Hume,
`914 F.3d 648 (9th Cir. 2019) ................................................................................................ 91
`
`Harte-Hanks Communication, Inc. v. Connaughton,
`491 U.S. 657 (1989) .............................................................................................................. 84
`
`Herbert v. Lando,
`441 U.S. 153 (1979) .............................................................................................................. 84
`
`In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep EcoDiesel Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.
`295 F. Supp. 3d 927 (N.D. Cal. 2018) .................................................................................. 91
`
`Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.,
`419 U.S. 345 (1974) .............................................................................................................. 71
`
`Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc. (In re Neurontin Mktg. &
`Sales Practices Litig.),
`712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013) ................................................................................................... 91
`
`Kelly v. United States,
`140 S. Ct. 1565 (2020) .......................................................................................................... 50
`
`Knievel v. ESPN,
`393 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2005) .................................................................................. 78, 79, 81
`
`Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.,
`572 U.S. 118, 134 S. Ct. 1377 (2014) ................................................................................... 50
`
`Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.,
`457 U.S. 922 (1982) .............................................................................................................. 69
`
`Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp. v. Halleck,
`139 S. Ct. 1921 (2019) .......................................................................................................... 69
`
`Manufactured Home Communities, Inc. v. County of San Diego,
`544 F.3d 959 (9th Cir. 2008) ................................................................................................ 82
`
`v
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 7 of 115
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.,
`501 U.S. 496 (1991) ............................................................................................ 80, 82, 83, 84
`
`Mendoza v. Zirkle Fruit Co.,
`301 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2002) .............................................................................................. 91
`
`Metabolife Int’l Inc. v. Wornick,
`264 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2001) .......................................................................................... 82, 85
`
`Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.,
`497 U.S. 1 (1990) ...................................................................................................... 77, 82, 83
`
`Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n. v. Tarkanian,
`488 U.S. 179, 102 L. Ed. 2d 469, 109 S. Ct. 454 (1988) ...................................................... 71
`
`National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Schiedler,
`510 U.S. 249 (1994) .............................................................................................................. 88
`
`New York Times Co. v. Sullivan,
`376 U.S. 254 (1964) .............................................................................................................. 77
`
`Newton v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.,
`930 F.2d 662 (9th Cir. 1990) ................................................................................................ 84
`
`Packingham v. North Carolina,
`137 S. Ct. 1730 (2017) ............................................................................................................ 5
`
`Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps,
`475 U.S. 767 (1986) .............................................................................................................. 84
`
`Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation,
`524 U.S. 156 (1998) .............................................................................................................. 72
`
`Rent-A-Ctr., Inc. v. Canyon TV and Appliance Rental, Inc.,
`944 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1991) ................................................................................................ 92
`
`Resolute Forest Prods. v. Greenpeace Int’l.,
`2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10263 (N.D. Cal. 2019) .................................................................. 91
`
`Rice v. Fox Broad Co.,
`33 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2003) ................................................................................................ 74
`
`River City Mkts., Inc. v. Fleming Foods W., Inc.,
`960 F.2d 1458 (9th Cir. 1992) .............................................................................................. 88
`
`vi
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 8 of 115
`
`
`
`Sambreel Holdings LLC v. Facebook, Inc.,
`906 F. Supp. 2d 1070 (S.D. Cal. 2016) ................................................................................. 22
`
`Speiser v. Randall,
`357 U.S. 513 (1958) .............................................................................................................. 68
`
`St. Amant v. Thompson,
`390 U.S. 727 (1968) .............................................................................................................. 84
`
`Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc.,
`698 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 2012) .............................................................................................. 68
`
`United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Okla. v. FCC,
`933 F.3d 728 (D.C. Cir. 2019) ........................................................................................ 55, 56
`
`United States v. Reyes,
`660 F.3d 454 (9th Cir. 2011) ................................................................................................ 89
`
`Villegas v. Gilroy Garlic Festival Ass’n,
`541 F.3d 950 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc) ................................................................................ 69
`
`Xcentric Ventures, LLC v. Borodkin,
`798 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2015) .............................................................................................. 91
`
`California Cases
`
`Bently Reserve LP v. Papaliolios,
`218 Cal. App. 4th 418 (2013) ............................................................................................... 79
`
`Carney v. Santa Cruz Women Against Rape,
`221 Cal. App. 3d 1009 (1990) .............................................................................................. 77
`
`Couch v. San Juan Unified Sch. Dist.,
`33 Cal.App.4th 1491 (1995) ................................................................................................. 82
`
`Ferlauto v. Hamsher,
`74 Cal. App. 4th 1294 (1999) ............................................................................................... 79
`
`Gilbert v. Sykes,
`147 Cal. App. 4th 13 (2007) ................................................................................................. 77
`
`Gomes v. Fried,
`136 Cal. App. 3d 924 (1982) ................................................................................................ 78
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`vii
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 9 of 115
`
`
`
`Graybill v. De Young,
`140 Cal. 323 (1902) .............................................................................................................. 85
`
`Hecimovich v. Encinal Sch. Parent Teacher Org.,
`203 Cal. App. 4th 450 (2012) ............................................................................................... 77
`
`MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.,
`52 Cal. 2d 536 (1959) ........................................................................................................... 81
`
`Ringler Associates, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.,
`80 Cal. App.4th 1165 (2000) ................................................................................................ 81
`
`Rosenberg v. J.C. Penney Co.,
`30 Cal. App. 2d 609 (1939) ............................................................................................ 82, 83
`
`Selleck v. Globe International, Inc.,
`166 Cal. App. 3d 1123 (1985) .............................................................................................. 79
`
`Slaughter v. Friedman,
`32 Cal. 3d 149 (1982) ........................................................................................................... 83
`
`Vedovi v. Watson & Taylor,
`104 Cal. App. 80 (1930)........................................................................................................ 79
`
`United States Constitution
`
`First Amendment ........................................................................................................ 2, passim
`Fifth Amendment ............................................................................................ 5, 67, 68, 72, 73
`Fourth Amendment ............................................................................................................... 68
`
`Federal Statutes
`
`15 U.S.C.
`§ 1125(a) ........................................................................................................................... 5, 73
`§ 1125(a)(1)(B) ..................................................................................................................... 73
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`viii
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 10 of 115
`
`
`
`18 U.S.C.
`§ 1343 .............................................................................................................................. 88, 89
`§ 1951 .................................................................................................................................... 90
`§ 1951(2) ............................................................................................................................... 90
`§ 1961(1)(B) .................................................................................................................... 88, 90
`§ 1961(3) ................................................................................................................................. 7
`§ 1961(4) ............................................................................................................................... 88
`§ 1962(c) ................................................................................................................... 87, 88, 90
`§ 1964(a) ........................................................................................................................... 5, 67
`§ 1964(c) ........................................................................................................... 5, 6, 67, 88, 91
`§ 1965(a) ................................................................................................................................. 5
`
`26 U.S.C.
`§ 501(c)(3) ............................................................................................................................... 6
`
`28 U.S.C.
`§ 1331 ................................................................................................................................ 5, 68
`§ 1332(a) ................................................................................................................................. 5
`§ 1391(b) ................................................................................................................................. 5
`§ 2201 ...................................................................................................................................... 5
`§ 2201(a) ............................................................................................................................... 92
`§ 2202 ...................................................................................................................................... 5
`
`42 U.S.C.
`§§ 300aa-1 - 300aa-34........................................................................................................... 50
`§ 300aa-11 ............................................................................................................................. 50
`§ 300aa-12 ............................................................................................................................. 52
`§ 300aa-27 ............................................................................................................................. 52
`§ 300aa-27(a) ........................................................................................................................ 51
`§ 1983 .................................................................................................................................... 68
`
`47 U.S.C.
`§ 230 ................................................................................................................ 2, 20, 71, 86, 87
`§ 230(c)(1) ....................................................................................................................... 18, 86
`§ 230(c)(2)(A) ................................................................................................................. 18, 86
`§ 230(f)(3) ............................................................................................................................. 86
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`ix
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 11 of 115
`
`
`
`California Statutes
`
`California Civil Code
`§ 45 ........................................................................................................................................ 77
`§ 45a ...................................................................................................................................... 77
`§ 48a ...................................................................................................................................... 78
`§ 48a (a) ................................................................................................................................ 85
`§ 48a (d)(5) ............................................................................................................................ 85
`§ 1668 .................................................................................................................................... 13
`§ 659641.1 (f) ........................................................................................................................ 58
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
`
`Rule 9(b) ............................................................................................................................... 90
`
`Electronic and Web Sources
`
`2019 Vaccines for Children, State of Georgia, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS AND
`BIDS, https://www.govcb.com/government-bids/vaccines-for-children-
`NBD00159022703927119.htm (last accessed Aug. 15, 2020) ............................................. 51
`
`2019 Vaccines for Children, State of Georgia, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS,
`https://www.governmentcontracts.us/government-contracts/opportunity-
`details/NBD00159991194385117.htm (last accessed Aug. 15, 2020) ................................. 51
`
`5G, WIKIPEDIA, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G (last accessed Aug. 14, 2020) ..................... 56
`
`A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for
`Electromagnetic Fields (Extremely Low Frequency and Radio Frequency),
`BIO-INITIATIVE REPORT, https://bioinitiative.org/ ................................................................ 56
`
`About A/B Testing, Business Help Center, FACEBOOK FOR BUSINESS,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/1738164643098669?id=445653312
`788501 (last accessed Aug. 14, 2020) .................................................................................. 43
`
`About, 5G APPEAL, http://www.5gappeal.eu/about/ (last accssed Aug. 14, 2020) .................... 59
`
`Adam Burt, Can Facebook Ever Be Fixed?, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW (April
`8, 2019), https://hbr.org/2019/04/can-facebook-ever-be-fixed ............................................. 75
`
`Alexis C. Madrigal & Robinson Meyer, How Could the CDC Make That
`Mistake?, THE ATLANTIC (May 21, 2020),
`https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/05/cdc-and-states-are-
`misreporting-covid-19-test-data-pennsylvania-georgia-texas/611935/ ................................ 54
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`x
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 12 of 115
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Andrew Ward, Vaccines are among big pharma’s best-selling products,
`FINANCIAL TIMES (Apr. 24, 2016), https://www.ft.com/content/93374f4a-
`e538-11e5-a09b-1f8b0d268c39 ............................................................................................ 54
`
`Anonymous – Facebook, PROJECT VERITAS (Apr. 6, 2020),
`https://www.projectveritas.com/news/anonymous-facebook/ .............................................. 43
`
`Basic Documents, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (49th Ed. 2020),
`https://apps.who.int/gb/bd/pdf_files/BD_49th-en.pdf#page=1 ...................................... 20, 69
`
`Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H, et al., EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the
`prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and
`illnesses, REV. ENVIRON HEALTH. 2016, 31(3), 363-397,
`https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27454111/ ........................................................................ 56
`
`Beth Snyder Bulik, Bayer blazes new trails for pharma with Betaseron Facebook
`ad, FIERCEPHARMA (Oct. 30, 2016),
`https://www.fiercepharma.com/marketing/bayer-s-first-facebook-ad-
`campaign-features-first-scrolling-isi-a-pharma-ad-facebook-ad .......................................... 62
`
`Bijan Khosravi, Facebook’s New Focus On 5G and Golden Opportunity for
`Entrepreneurs, FORBES (Apr. 30, 2018), https://www.forbes.com/sites/
`bijankhosravi/2018/04/30/todays-black-clouds-over-facebook-will-part-look-
`at-their-golden-ideas-in-5g/#37c15fdd313b ......................................................................... 65
`
`California Medical Association House of Delegates Resolution, Wireless
`Standards Reevaluation, 2014 Resolution 107, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL
`ASSOCIATION (adopted Dec. 7, 2014),
`https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1092989731923/30-Attachment%2030-
`%20California%20Medical%20Association%20Resolution.pdf ......................................... 58
`
`Carl Elliott, An Ethical Path to a Covid Vaccine, NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS
`(July 20, 2020), https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2020/07/02/ethical-path-
`covid-19-vaccine/ .................................................................................................................. 54
`
`CDC and WHO Corrupt Financial Entanglements with the Vaccine Industry [and
`other articles], CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE,
`https://childrenshealthdefense.org/cdc-who/ (last accessed Aug. 14, 2020) ........................ 11
`
`CDPH Issues Guidelines on How to Reduce Exposure to Radio Frequency
`Energy from Cell Phones, Office of Public Affairs, CALIF. DEPT. OF PUBLIC
`HEALTH, (Dec. 13, 2017),
`https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/OPA/Pages/NR17-086.aspx ........................................ 58
`
`xi
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook et al.
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05787-SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/20 Page 13 of 115
`
`
`
`Children’s Health Defense page, FACEBOOK,
`https://www.facebook.com/ChildrensHealthDefense (last accessed Aug. 15,
`2020) ..................................................................................................................................... 79
`
`Christina D.Bethell, PhD, et al., A National and State Profile of Leading Health
`Problems and Health Care Quality for US Children: Key Insurance
`Disparities and Across-State Variations, ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, Volume 11,
`Issue 3, Supplement, May–June 2011, pp. S22-S33,
`https://ww

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket