`
`Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 249075)
`jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`101 California Street, Suite 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel: (415) 291-6200
`Fax: (415) 291-6300
`
`Bryant C. Boren, Jr. (SBN 260602)
`bryant.c.boren@bakerbotts.com
`Elizabeth K. Boggs (SBN 280555)
`betsy.boggs@bakerbotts.com
`John F. Gaustad (SBN 279893)
`john.gaustad@bakerbotts.com
`Keith M. Jurek (SBN 310856)
`keith.jurek@bakerbotts.com
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`1001 Page Mill Road
`Building One, Suite 200
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`Phone: (650) 739-7500
`Fax: (650) 739-7699
`
`Jennifer C. Tempesta (admitted pro hac vice)
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`30 Rockefeller Plaza
`New York, NY 10112
`Phone: (212) 408-2500
`Fax: (212) 408-2501
`
`Attorneys for Defendant LYFT, INC.
`
`JEFFREY J. TONEY (pro hac vice)
`RALPH E. GASKINS (pro hac vice)
`JACKIE L. TONEY (pro hac vice)
`PAUL G. WILLIAMS (pro hac vice)
`HALA S. MOURAD (pro hac vice)
`KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES LLP
`1349 West Peachtree Street NW, Suite 1500
`Atlanta, Ga 30309
`Telephone: (404) 260-6080
`Facsimile: (404) 260-6081
`jtoney@kasowitz.com
`rgaskins@kasowitz.com
`jatoney@kasowitz.com
`pwilliams@kasowitz.com
`hmourad@kasowitz.com
`
`LYN R. AGRE (SBN 178218)
`MARGARET A. ZIEMIANEK (SBN
`233418)
`KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES LLP
`101 California Street, Suite 2300
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone: (415) 421-6140
`Facsimile: (415) 398-5030
`lagre@kasowitz.com
`mziemianek@kasowitz.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff RIDEAPP, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`
`Case No. 18-CV-07152-JST
`
`JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] FINAL
`JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`RIDEAPP, INC.
`
`
`v.
`
`
`LYFT, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`
`Case No. 18-CV-07152-JST
`
`
`
`Case 4:18-cv-07152-JST Document 121 Filed 10/31/19 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Joint Stipulation for
`
`Entry of Final Judgment (the “Stipulation”) between Plaintiff RideApp, Inc. (“RideApp”) and
`
`Defendant Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”), the Court hereby directs entry of final judgment in conformity with
`
`the Court’s October 16, 2019 Claim Construction Order (ECF No. 117) (the “Order”) as follows:
`
`1.
`
`The Court hereby enters, in favor of Lyft, Final Judgment of invalidity of Claims 2,
`
`3, and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 6,697,730 for the reasons stated in the Order (ECF No.
`
`117).
`
`2.
`
`The Court dismisses without prejudice any remaining affirmative defenses raised by
`
`Lyft. These defenses shall be reinstated in the event this Judgment is reversed, in
`
`whole or in part.
`
`3.
`
`The Court dismisses as moot Lyft’s Motion to Dismiss RideApp, Inc.’s Second
`
`Amended Complaint (ECF No. 89). In the event this Judgment is reversed, in whole
`
`or in part, Lyft may again raise—in a motion to dismiss or otherwise—any argument
`
`that Claims 2, 3, and 6 are invalid and/or unenforceable under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The
`
`Court dismisses as moot any other pending motions.
`
`4.
`
`This Judgment dismisses with prejudice all claims brought by RideApp, and it is
`
`ordered that RideApp recover nothing by its claims against Lyft.
`
`5.
`
`This Judgment denies any other requested relief not granted in this judgment with
`
`the exception of any application or motion for costs and/or attorneys’ fees filed by
`
`Lyft. The Court retains jurisdiction to hear any application or motion for costs and/or
`
`attorneys’ fees filed by Lyft pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, Local
`
`Rules 54-1 through 54-5, and any other applicable statute or rule.
`
`6.
`
`This Judgment and the Stipulation are without any waiver of, or prejudice to,
`
`RideApp’s or Lyft’s rights to challenge the Order on appeal and to appeal this
`
`Judgment on any ground relating to the Order.
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
`1
`
`Case No. 18-CV-07152-JST
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`
`
`Case 4:18-cv-07152-JST Document 121 Filed 10/31/19 Page 3 of 3
`
`7.
`
`This Final Judgment resolves all claims between all parties and is therefore
`
`appealable.
`
`Dated:
`
`October 31, 2019
`
`_______________________________________
`JON S. TIGAR
`United States District Judge
`
`JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
` 2
`
`Case No. 18-CV-07152-JST
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`