`
`DANIEL J KRAMER (NY SBN: 1979392;
`Pro Hac Vice)
`dkramer@paulweiss.com
`AUDRA J SOLOWAY (NY SBN: 4113536;
`Pro Hac Vice)
`asoloway@paulweiss.com
`HARRIS FISCHMAN (NY SBN: 4380598;
`Pro Hac Vice )
`hfischman@paulweiss.com
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
`GARRISON LLP
`1285 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10019-6064
`Telephone: (212) 373-3503
`Facsimile: (212) 757-3990
`
`JAMES N. KRAMER (SBN 154709)
`jkramer@orrick.com
`MICHAEL D. TORPEY (SBN 79424)
`mtorpey@orrick.com
`ALEXANDER K. TALARIDES (SBN
`268068)
`atalarides@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone:
`+1 (415) 773-5700
`Facsimile:
`+1 (415) 773-5759
`MELINDA L. HAAG (SBN: 132612)
`mhaag@paulweiss.com
`WALTER F. BROWN JR. (SBN: 130248)
`wbrown@paulweiss.com
`MEREDITH R. DEARBORN (SBN: 268312)
`mdearborn@paulweiss.com
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
`GARRISON LLP
`535 Mission Street. 24th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: (628) 432-5100
`Facsimile: (628) 232-3101
`Attorneys for Defendants Apple Inc.,
`Timothy Cook, and Luca Maestri
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`IN RE APPLE INC. SECURITIES
`LITIGATION
`______________________________________
`This Document Relates To:
`ALL ACTIONS.
`
`Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-02033-YGR
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN
`PART LEAD PLAINTIFF’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
`PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
`SEALED (DKT. NO. 389)
`
`Judge: Honorable Joseph C. Spero
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
`C.A. NO. 4:19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 404 Filed 08/25/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`On July 18, 2023, Lead Plaintiff filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether
`Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed (Dkt. No. 389, the “Administrative Motion”).
`Defendants Apple Inc., Timothy Cook, and Luca Maestri (collectively, “Defendants”), have
`submitted a declaration in support of their request that certain material presented in connection
`with the Administrative Motion remain under seal. Having considered the papers and the
`contentions of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court HEREBY GRANTS IN PART
`the Administrative Motion as follows:
`Defendants have demonstrated that good cause exists to seal Exhibit 1 to the Declaration
`of Kenneth J. Black in Support of Lead Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Review and Production of
`Non-Privileged Documents (Dkt. No. 389-5). The Clerk of the Court shall maintain the
`“sealed/unredacted” version of this document. Only this Court, court personnel, and parties to
`this case may inspect the records sealed by this Order.
`Defendants have stated that they do not seek to maintain under seal Lead Plaintiff’s
`Motion to Compel Review and Production of Non-Privileged Documents (the “Motion to
`Compel”) (Dkt. No. 389-3). Accordingly, the Administrative Motion is DENIED as to the
`Motion to Compel.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Date: __________, 2023
`August 25
`
` __________________________________
`HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO
`UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`1
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
`C.A. NO. 4:19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
