throbber

`
`
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
` James R. Asperger (Bar No. 83188)
` jimasperger@quinnemanuel.com
` Stephen A. Broome (Bar No. 314605)
` stephenbroome@quinnemanuel.com
` Lauren B. Lindsay (Bar No. 280516)
` laurenlindsay@quinnemanuel.com
` Josef Ansorge (pro hac application pending)
` josefansorge@quinnemanuel.com
` William R. Sears (Bar No. 330888)
` willsears@quinnemanuel.com
`865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
`Telephone:
`(213) 443-3000
`Facsimile:
`(213) 443-3100
`
`Attorneys for Defendants TWC PRODUCT AND
`TECHNOLOGY, LLC and INTERNATIONAL
`BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
`
`COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
`
`
`THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
`CALIFORNIA,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`TWC PRODUCT AND TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`a Delaware corporation; INTERNATIONAL
`BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, a
`New York corporation; and DOES 2-50,
`inclusive,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No.: 19STCV00605
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT
`AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITH
`PREJUDICE
`
`Assigned for All Purposes to
`The Hon. Mark V. Mooney
`Dept. 68
`
`Action Filed: January 3, 2019
`Trial Date: May 17, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 19STCV00605
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE
`CASE WITH PREJUDICE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Electronically Received 08/10/2020 04:28 PM
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL
`
`Plaintiff, The People of the State of California (the “People”), represented by the Los
`
`Angeles City Attorney (“City Attorney”), and Defendants TWC Product and Technology, LLC
`
`(“TWC”) and International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) (collectively, “Defendants”),
`
`respectfully submit this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order regarding settlement and dismissal
`
`of the case with prejudice (the “Stipulation”):
`
`WHEREAS, on January 3, 2019, the People filed a Complaint against TWC alleging, inter
`
`alia, that, TWC violated the Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq.) (“UCL”)
`
`by employing deceptive, misleading, and unfair statements and omissions through The Weather
`
`Channel App (the “App”), including in the App’s location-access permission prompt, regarding
`
`Defendants’ advertising and commercial uses of location data collected through the App and the
`
`sharing of such data with third-parties;
`
`WHEREAS, on February 26, 2019, TWC filed an Answer to the Complaint asserting, inter
`
`alia, that the information that the People claim TWC allegedly omitted from the App’s location-
`
`access permission prompt was in fact disclosed in the App’s online privacy policy, in compliance
`
`with the California Online Privacy Protection Act (Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 22575, et seq.)
`
`(“CalOPPA”), and also in the App’s in-app Privacy Settings page;
`
`WHEREAS, on June 12, 2019, the People amended their Complaint to add TWC’s parent
`
`company, IBM, as a defendant, and on July 17, 2019, IBM answered the Complaint;
`
`WHEREAS, on April 10, 2020, Defendants amended their Answers to add the defense of
`
`equitable abstention;
`
`WHEREAS, since January 23, 2019, the parties have engaged in substantial discovery;
`
`WHEREAS, on June 11, 2020, Defendants filed two motions for summary judgment, one
`
`seeking summary judgment on the People’s UCL cause of action, and the other seeking summary
`
`judgment on Defendants’ equitable abstention defense;
`
`WHEREAS, the parties have reached agreement on terms for the settlement and dismissal
`
`of the case with prejudice;
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`Case No. 19STCV00605
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE
`CASE WITH PREJUDICE
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Defendants maintain that, at all relevant times, their disclosures to App users
`
`were transparent and fully complied with all applicable laws, including CalOPPA, the California
`
`Consumer Privacy Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798, et seq.) (“CCPA”), and, to the extent it could be
`
`argued to apply, the UCL, and, accordingly, Defendants deny liability or fault of any kind;
`
`WHEREAS, Defendants maintain that they routinely evaluate their disclosures to App users
`
`in light of evolving technologies, practices, laws, and regulations;
`
`WHEREAS, the People have requested that Defendants make certain changes to the App’s
`
`existing disclosures contained in the App’s “just-in-time” notices to highlight and clarify certain of
`
`Defendants’ practices relating to location data collected through the App, including certain practices
`
`that Defendants maintain previously were, and currently are, disclosed in the App’s online privacy
`
`policy;
`
`WHEREAS, Defendants maintain that, although the requested changes are not required
`
`under existing law, the requested changes are not inconsistent with existing law;
`
`ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT:
`
`1.
`
`The People release any and all claims against Defendants relating to the conduct
`
`alleged in the Complaint, including any claims that Defendants’ disclosures to App users regarding
`
`Defendants’ alleged use and sharing of location data collected through the App failed to comply
`
`with the UCL or any other applicable laws.
`
`2.
`
`Defendants release any and all claims against the People related to the above-
`
`captioned action.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`This case shall be dismissed with prejudice upon entry of this Stipulation.
`
`Defendants will revise the App’s existing “Blue Screen” disclosure to reflect the
`
`language in Exhibit A.1
`
`5.
`
`Defendants will revise the App’s existing “Learn More” page to reflect the language
`
`in Exhibit B (collectively with the revisions reflected in Exhibit A, the “Revisions”).2
`
`
`1 The Blue Screen is a prompt screen shown to users after they download the App, or when they update to the latest
`version of the App.
`2 The Learn More page is a page displayed to a user of the App when they click the “Learn More” hyperlink in the
`Blue Screen.
`
`
`-3-
`Case No. 19STCV00605
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE
`CASE WITH PREJUDICE
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`6.
`
`Defendants will make good faith efforts to implement the Revisions as soon as
`
`feasible, and in no event later than October 15, 2020.
`
`7.
`
`The parties agree that, as of the date of this Stipulation, the Blue Screens and Learn
`
`More page are subject to the CCPA.
`
`8.
`
`The parties agree that, as of the date of this Stipulation, the Blue Screens and Learn
`
`More page, as modified by the Revisions, comply with the CCPA.
`
`9.
`
`The parties recognize that Defendants may, in the near future, need to change their
`
`disclosures—including the Revisions—in light of, inter alia, changes to: (a) applicable disclosure
`
`laws (i.e., CCPA) and regulations; (b) changes to the operating systems’ (i.e., Android’s and
`
`Apple’s) terms of service, functions, and disclosures; and/or (c) Defendants’ practices.
`
`10.
`
`Defendants agree to give reasonable notice to the People (through the City Attorney)
`
`in advance of any future changes to the Revisions. In the event the People determine, in good faith,
`
`that Defendants’ proposed change violates the UCL, and Defendants are not willing to modify the
`
`proposed change in a manner that is mutually acceptable to all parties, the People may move this
`
`Court for appropriate relief. Nothing in this Stipulation shall prevent Defendants from making
`
`changes to the Revisions notwithstanding the People’s stated objection to such changes, or to the
`
`People’s filing of a motion regarding the changes.
`
`11.
`
`None of the terms of this Stipulation shall prevent Defendants from making changes
`
`to their disclosures to App users that do not materially change or omit the Revisions.
`
`12.
`
`Any obligations under this agreement will expire two (2) years from the date of this
`
`Stipulation (the “Settlement Period”). The parties recognize that future changes to: (a) applicable
`
`disclosure laws (i.e., CCPA) and regulations; (b) changes to the operating systems’ (i.e., Android’s
`
`and Apple’s) terms of service, functions, and disclosures; and/or (c) Defendants’ practices, may
`
`render certain
`
`terms herein
`
`impractical or unnecessary before
`
`the Settlement Period
`
`expires. Accordingly, the parties (either jointly or individually) may seek relief from the Court to
`
`shorten the Settlement Period in light of any such changes.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`Case No. 19STCV00605
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE
`CASE WITH PREJUDICE
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`13.
`
`The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties during the Settlement Period
`
`pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 664.6 solely for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this
`
`Stipulation.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-5-
`Case No. 19STCV00605
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE
`CASE WITH PREJUDICE
`
`

`

`1 Dated: August 10, 2020
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`By:
`-----=s..:.te'-IV--+-~c'-----------
`ey for Defendants TWC PRODUCT
`Att
`AND TECHNOLOGY, LLC and
`INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
`MACHINES CORPORATION
`
`8 Dated: August 10, 2020
`
`TWC PRODUCT AND TECHNOLOGY, LLC
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
`CORPORATION
`
`By: -------,----------
`R. Tulloss Delle
`Senior Counsel, IBM Corporation
`
`Dated: August 10, 2020
`
`OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY
`AFFIRMATIVE LITIGATION DIVISION
`
`By:
`--~A."I::~t:ei:;::te:nlbca::::um-:::=~=~-----
`ttomey for Plaintiff THE PEOPLE OF
`THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
`
`-6-
`Case No. 19STCV00605
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF TIIE
`f"/1 ~C UTTT'U' DDCTTTnTf"C
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 581 after full consideration of the Parties’
`
`stipulation in this matter and good cause appearing,
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
`
`The case is dismissed with prejudice.
`
`Defendants shall promptly make the changes reflected in Exhibits A and B.
`
`The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties for a period of two years following the
`
`date of the foregoing Stipulation pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 664.6 solely for the purpose of
`
`enforcing the settlement terms described above.
`
`
`
`__________________, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`__________________________________
`The Honorable Mark V. Mooney
`JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
`
`-7-
`Case No. 19STCV00605
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE
`CASE WITH PREJUDICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A – REVISED TEXT FOR BLUE SCREEN PROMPT
`
`Location and Your Weather
`
`Did you know that if you allow access to your device’s location and barometric pressure sensor
`data, it enables us automatically to provide you with more accurate local forecasts?
`
`As our Privacy Policy describes, if you grant permission, we use your device’s location to deliver
`forecasts and weather alerts. We also may use and share this information with trusted partners
`for ads, and to provide and improve our Services. Regardless of whether or not you allow
`location access, you can always receive accurate local forecasts by manually entering a location.
`You can change permissions at any time. Learn More.
`
`I Understand
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT B – REVISED TEXT FOR LEARN MORE PAGE
`
`How We Use and Share Location Information
`
`We collect your device’s location information and pressure sensor data through our
`applications so that we can offer you certain location-based features like forecasts, weather
`alerts, and ads, and to provide and improve our Services. The way we collect that information is
`different depending on whether you are accessing the Services through a website or mobile
`application.
`
`You can still use our application without giving us permission to access your device’s location
`services by manually entering a location in the search field. However, if you disable your
`device’s location services, you will not have access to some of our features like real-time
`weather alerts for an exact location.
`
`If you grant permission, we may use and share your device’s location to deliver you ads relevant
`to your location, and to provide and improve the Services. If you’ve also enabled personalized
`advertising, we may use and share your device’s location data with trusted partners to deliver
`ads that are relevant to you based on places you may have visited (for example, coffee shops).
`For more information on these trusted partners and the use and sharing of location data, you
`can review the section on sharing data in our Privacy Policy.
`
`To learn more about how we use and share your device’s data and our commitment to
`protecting your privacy, visit our Privacy Policy.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket