throbber
Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 1 of 55
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
`
`
`
`MARK J. PATANE, JULIE HARDING,
`HEATHER HARRIGAN, STEPHEN S.
`SHAPIRO, CATHERINE PORTER, ERICA
`RUSSELL, TINA MORETTI, BRIDGET
`KOPET, JENNIFER S. COLE, BENJAMIN A.
`FLETCHER, DIANE BOGDAN, and
`PARESHKUMAR BRAHMBHATT,
`Individually and on Behalf of All Others
`Similarly Situated,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`
`NESTLÉ WATERS NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 17-cv-1381-JAM
`
`ECF Case
`
`CLASS ACTION
`
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM IN
`OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
`MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
`JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`August 3, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Oral Argument Requested
`
`

`

`
`
`I. 
`II. 
`III. 
`
`IV. 
`
`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 2 of 55
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`B. 
`
`C. 
`
`2. 
`
`3. 
`
`INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 
`STATEMENT OF FACTS ................................................................................................. 1 
`ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................................... 2 
`The Court Should Deny Nestlé’s Motion As An Improper Successive
`A. 
`Motion. .................................................................................................................... 3 
`Nestlé’s Application of Connecticut Limitations Periods and Tolling
`Doctrines to Plaintiffs’ Foreign Statutory Claims Is Wrong. ................................. 4 
`Nestlé Is Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Its Limitations Defense. .......... 10 
`Nestlé Has Failed to Carry Its Burden of Identifying Applicable
`1. 
`Statutes of Limitation. ............................................................................... 10 
`Nestlé Miscalculates the Applicable Limitations Periods and Fails
`to Account for Numerous Applicable Tolling Doctrines. ......................... 11 
`a. 
`Consumer Protection Claims ........................................................ 12 
`b. 
`Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) ............................................... 17 
`c. 
`Common Law Fraud ..................................................................... 21 
`Factual Disputes Preclude Summary Judgment. ....................................... 22 
`a. 
`The Record Supports Application of the Discovery Rule. ........... 22 
`Plaintiffs Discovered Their Claims Within
`i. 
`Applicable Limitations Periods. ........................................ 22 
`Plaintiffs Were Not On Inquiry Notice Of Their
`Claims Before 2015. ......................................................... 23 
`Plaintiffs Could Not Have Discovered Their Claims
`In The Exercise Of Reasonable Diligence. ....................... 29 
`The Record Supports Tolling Due to Fraudulent
`Concealment. ................................................................................ 32 
`The Record Supports Application of Equitable Tolling
`Under New York and New Hampshire Law. ................................ 36 
`The Record Supports Applying the Continuing Course of
`Conduct Doctrine to Toll Plaintiffs’ Claims. ................................ 38 
`In the alternative, the Court should defer ruling on all or
`part of Defendants’ Motion under Rule 56(d). ............................. 39 
`CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 40 
`
`ii. 
`
`iii. 
`
`b. 
`
`c. 
`
`d. 
`
`e. 
`
`i
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 3 of 55
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`
`
`Page(s)
`
`
`
`Cases
`
`Alarmax Dist., Inc. v. New Canaan Alarm Co.,
`61 A.3d 1142 (Conn. Ct. App. 2013) .......................................................................................18
`
`Argabright v. Rheem Mfg. Co.,
`258 F. Supp. 3d 470 (D.N.J. 2017) ..........................................................................................20
`
`Aspinall v. Philip Morris Cos., Inc.,
`813 N.E.2d 476 (Mass. 2004) ....................................................................................................9
`
`Axiom Inv. Advisors, LLC v. Deutsche Bank AG,
`234 F. Supp. 3d 526 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) ......................................................................................20
`
`Bartner v. Carter,
`405 A.2d 194 (Me. 1979) ...........................................................................................................9
`
`Bartone v. Robert L. Day Co.,
`656 A.2d 221 (Conn. 1995) .....................................................................................................19
`
`Baxter v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.,
`644 A.2d 1297 (Conn. 1994) .........................................................................................5, 6, 7, 8
`
`Begley v. Windsor Surry Co.,
`2018 WL 1401796 (D.N.H. Mar. 19, 2018) ......................................................................19, 32
`
`Belmont Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Geibel,
`74 A.3d 10 (N.J. App. Div.) .....................................................................................................16
`
`Bennett v. Fiorillo,
`2017 WL 3175937 (Conn. Super. Ct. June 16, 2017) .............................................................36
`
`Berman v. LaBonte,
`622 B.R. 503 (D. Conn. 2020) .................................................................................................10
`
`Blackwood v. Atrium Med. Corp.,
`2019 WL 3779698 (D.N.H. Aug. 12, 2019) ........................................................................9, 15
`
`Blouin v. Surgical Sense, Inc.,
`2008 WL 2227781 (R.I. Super. Ct. May 12, 2008) .................................................................34
`
`Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass’n v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC,
`417 F. Supp. 3d 531 (E.D. Pa. 2019) .....................................................................21, 22, 28, 30
`
`ii
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 4 of 55
`
`
`
`Blue Cross of Cal. v. SmithKline Beecham Clinical Labs, Inc.,
`108 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Conn. 2000) .............................................................................. passim
`
`Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.,
`964 A.2d 741 (N.J. 2009)...........................................................................................................9
`
`Bougopoulos v. Altria Grp., Inc.,
`954 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D.N.H. 2013) ...........................................................................................12
`
`Brawn v. Oral Surgery Assocs.,
`819 A.2d 1014 (Me. 2003) .......................................................................................................13
`
`Bricker v. Putnam,
`512 A.2d 1094 (N.H. 1986) .....................................................................................................15
`
`Brown v. City of Syracuse,
`673 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 2012).......................................................................................................3
`
`Cabrera v. Automax Preowned, Inc.,
`2020 WL 2198048 (Mass. Super. Ct. Feb. 27, 2020) ..............................................................19
`
`Cadoret v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.,
`323 F. Supp. 3d 319 (D. Conn. 2018) ......................................................................................11
`
`Cameron v. Olin Corp.,
`838 F. Supp. 2d 59 (D. Conn. 2012) ..........................................................................................6
`
`Canfield v. FCA US LLC,
`2019 WL 1089798 (D. Del. Mar. 8, 2019) ..............................................................................33
`
`Caravaggio v. D’Agostini,
`765 A.2d 182 (N.J. 2001).........................................................................................................16
`
`Celotex Corp. v. Catrett,
`477 U.S. 317 (1986) .................................................................................................................39
`
`Chapco v. Woodway,
`2018 WL 3581694 (D. Conn. July 24, 2018) ............................................................................3
`
`Com. v. DeCotis,
`316 N.E.2d 748 (Mass. 1974) ....................................................................................................9
`
`Connell v. Colwell,
`571 A.2d 116 (Conn. 1990) .....................................................................................................19
`
`Corinth Pellets, LLC v. Andritz, Inc.,
`2020 WL 5578412 (D. Me. Sept. 17, 2020) ............................................................................19
`
`iii
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 5 of 55
`
`
`
`Corsello v. Verizon N.Y., Inc.,
`967 N.E.2d 1177 (N.Y. 2012) ..................................................................................................17
`
`Council v. Better Homes Depot, Inc.,
`No. 04 CV 5620 NGG KAM, 2006 WL 2376381 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2006) ........................16
`
`Cover v. Windsor Surry Co.,
`2016 WL 520991 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2016) .....................................................................21, 32
`
`Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.,
`647 A.2d 454 (N.J. 1994)...........................................................................................................9
`
`D'Angelo v. Miller Yacht Sales,
`619 A.2d 689 (N.J. App. Div. 1993) ........................................................................................12
`
`Dagley v. Murphy,
`2014 WL 916667 (Mass App. Ct. 2014)..................................................................................31
`
`Daniels v. Esson,
`2001 WL 100306 (Conn. Super. Ct. Jan. 16, 2001)...................................................................6
`
`De Sole v. Knoedler Gallery, LLC,
`974 F. Supp. 2d 274 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) ......................................................................................16
`
`Dilworth v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.,
`418 F.3d 345 (3d Cir. 2005).....................................................................................................17
`
`Drelles v. Mfrs. Life Ins. Co.,
`881 A.2d 822 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2005) .........................................................................................17
`
`Drilling & Blasting Rock Specialists, Inc. v. Rheaume,
`147 A.3d 824 (Me. 2016) .........................................................................................................13
`
`Elderkin v. Gaster,
`288 A.2d 771 (Pa. 1972) ............................................................................................................7
`
`Engles v. Jones,
`405 F. Supp. 3d 397 (W.D.N.Y. 2019) ....................................................................................37
`
`Epperson v. Entertainment Express, Inc.,
`338 F. Supp. 2d 328 (D. Conn. 2005) ......................................................................................36
`
`Essex Ins. Co. v. William Kramer & Assocs., LLC,
`205 A.3d 534 (Conn. 2019) .....................................................................................................12
`
`Evanston Ins. Co. v. William Kramer & Assocs.,
`890 F.3d 40 (2d Cir. 2018).......................................................................................................13
`
`iv
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 6 of 55
`
`
`
`Falls Church Grp., Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper and Alcorn, LLP,
`912 A.2d 1019 (Conn. 2007) .......................................................................................19, 22, 34
`
`Fannie Mae v. Jessup,
`1999 WL 624453 (Conn. Super. Aug. 3, 1999) .........................................................................9
`
`Fazio v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.,
`62 A.3d 396 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2012) .............................................................................................8
`
`Feldt v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.,
`721 F. Supp. 403 (D. Conn. 1989) .............................................................................................6
`
`Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.,
`541 A.2d 472 (Conn. 1988) .....................................................................................................12
`
`Fine v. Checcio,
`870 A.2d 850 (Pa. 2005) ..........................................................................................................17
`
`First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. v. Toyobo Am., Inc.,
`717 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D. Mass. 2010) ..........................................................................14, 25, 34
`
`Flannery v. Singer Asset Fin. Co., LLC,
`17 A.3d 509 (Ct. App. Ct. 2011) ..............................................................................................12
`
`Flannery v. Singer Asset Fin. Co., LLC,
`94 A.3d 553 (Conn. 2014) .......................................................................................................12
`
`Foodtown v. Sigma Mktg. Sys., Inc.,
`518 F. Supp. 485 (D.N.J. 1980) .........................................................................................20, 34
`
`Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.,
`110 P.3d 914 (Cal. 2005) .........................................................................................................24
`
`Gaidon v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.,
`750 N.E.2d 1078 (N.Y. 2001) ....................................................................................................8
`
`Gennari v. Weichert Co. Realtors,
`691 A.2d 350 (N.J. 1997)...........................................................................................................9
`
`Geo. Knight & Co. v. Watson Wyatt & Co.,
`170 F.3d 210 (1st Cir. 1999) ....................................................................................................15
`
`Gibson v. Metropolis of CT LLC,
`2020 WL 956981 (D. Conn. Feb. 27, 2020) ............................................................................12
`
`Giulietti v. Giulietti,
`784 A.2d 905 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001) .......................................................................................22
`
`v
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 7 of 55
`
`
`
`Gregg v. Ameriprise Fin., Inc.,
`245 A.3d 637 (Pa. 2021) ............................................................................................................9
`
`Haas v. Haas,
`48 A.3d 713 (Conn. App. Ct. 2012) .........................................................................................12
`
`Hair Excitement, Inc. v. L'Oreal U.S.A., Inc.,
`965 A.2d 1032 (N.H. 2009) .......................................................................................................9
`
`Harkness v. Fitzgerald,
`701 A.2d 370 (Me. 1997) ...................................................................................................13, 14
`
`Haseman v. Gerber Prod. Co.,
`331 F.R.D. 239 (E.D.N.Y. 2019) ...............................................................................................9
`
`Hawkins v. Kroger Co.,
`2021 WL 210843 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2021) .............................................................................24
`
`Haymond v. Statewide Grievance Comm.,
`723 A.2d 821 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1997) ......................................................................................4
`
`Hodges v. Glenholme Sch.,
`713 F. App’x 49 (2d Cir. 2017) ...............................................................................................35
`
`In re A.N. Frieda Diamonds, Inc.,
`616 B.R. 295 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2020) .....................................................................................36
`
`In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litig.,
`261 F. Supp. 2d 188 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) .....................................................................................36
`
`In re DaimlerChrysler AG Sec Lit.,
`269 F. Supp. 2d 508 (D. Del. 2003) .........................................................................................28
`
`In re Risperdal Litig.,
`223 A.3d 633 (Pa. 2019) ....................................................................................................28, 31
`
`In re U.S. Foodservice Inc. Pricing Litig.,
`2011 WL 6013551 (D. Conn. Nov. 29, 2011),
`aff’d, 729 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2013) ...........................................................................................18
`
`Izzarelli v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co,
`117 F. Supp. 2d (D. Conn. 2000) .................................................................................33, 38, 39
`
`Johnson v. State Judicial Dep’t,
`2012 WL 3176431 (Conn. Super. Ct. July 9, 2012) ................................................................36
`
`King v. Volvo Excavators AB,
`215 A.3d 149 (Conn. 2019) ...................................................................................................6, 8
`
`vi
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 8 of 55
`
`
`
`Kleinman v. Golden Apples Candy Co.,
`2004 WL 2757658 (Conn. Super. Ct. Nov. 2, 2004) ...............................................................18
`
`Knit With v. Knitting Fever, Inc.,
`2008 WL 5381349 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 18, 2008),
`aff’d 625 F. App’x 27 (3d Cir. 2015) .......................................................................6, 23, 24, 30
`
`Lamprey v. Britton Constr., Inc.,
`37 A.3d 359 (N.H. 2012) .........................................................................................................16
`
`Langan v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Cos.,
`897 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2018).......................................................................................................17
`
`Langlois v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.,
`2019 WL 2140589 (D.N.H. May 16, 2019) .............................................................................15
`
`Lesoon v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.,
`898 A.2d 620 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006) .........................................................................................17
`
`Lockheed Martin Corp. v. RFI Supply, Inc.,
`440 F.3d 549 (1st Cir. 2006) ....................................................................................................20
`
`Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Dillon Co.,
`9 F. App’x 81 (2d Cir. 2001) .....................................................................................................4
`
`M & T Mortg. Corp. v. Miller,
`323 F. Supp. 2d 405 (E.D.N.Y. 2004) .....................................................................................16
`
`Mansir v. United States,
`299 F. Supp. 3d 203 (D. Me. 2018) .........................................................................................14
`
`Mantikas v. Kellogg Co.,
`910 F.3d 633 (2d Cir. 2018)...............................................................................................24, 25
`
`Martin v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.,
`2010 WL 3928707 (D. Mass. Sept. 30, 2010) ...........................................................................9
`
`McClancy v. Rotunno Const., Inc.,
`2014 WL 6805318 (Conn. Super. Ct. Oct. 28, 2014) ..............................................................12
`
`McIntyre v. United States,
`367 F.3d 38 (1st Cir. 2004) ......................................................................................................25
`
`McKinnon v. Honeywell Int’l, Inc.,
`977 A.2d 420 (Me. 2009) ...................................................................................................12, 36
`
`McLaughlin v. Bayer Essure, Inc.,
`No. 14-7316, 2019 WL 1382710 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2019) ....................................................21
`
`vii
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 9 of 55
`
`
`
`Mountaindale Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Zappone,
`757 A.2d 608 (Conn. 2000) .....................................................................................................27
`
`New York v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc.,
`840 F.2d 1065 (2d Cir. 1988).............................................................................................17, 37
`
`Nicolaou v. Martin,
`195 A.3d 880 (Pa. 2018) ....................................................................................................29, 30
`
`Overall v. Estate of Klotz,
`52 F.3d 398 (2d Cir. 1995).......................................................................................................10
`
`Paddington Partners v. Bouchard,
`34 F.3d 1132 (2d Cir. 1994).....................................................................................................39
`
`Patane v. Nestle Waters N. Am., Inc.
`478 F.Supp.3d 318 (D. Conn. 2020) ..........................................................................................2
`
`Pearl v. City of Long Beach,
`296 F.3d 76 (2d Cir. 2002).......................................................................................................16
`
`People v. Wilco Energy Corp.,
`728 N.Y.S.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001) .................................................................................9
`
`Perry v. City of Stamford,
`996 F. Supp. 2d 74 (D. Conn. 2014) ........................................................................................36
`
`Perry v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.,
`No. 18-CV-1190-JD, 2019 WL 2106391 (D.N.H. May 14, 2019) ..........................................15
`
`Personis v. Oiler,
`889 F.2d 424 (2d Cir. 1989).......................................................................................................5
`
`Peters v. Flores,
`2021 WL 838274 (Conn. Super. Ct. Feb. 16, 2021) ..................................................................6
`
`Ponzio v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC,
`447 F. Supp. 3d 194 (D.N.J. 2020) ....................................................................................16, 37
`
`Portsmouth Country Club v. Town of Greenland,
`883 A.2d 298 (N.H. 2005) .................................................................................................19, 37
`
`Protective Life Ins. Co. v. Sullivan,
`682 N.E.2d 624 (1997).............................................................................................................20
`
`Puritan Med. Ctr. v. Cashman,
`596 N.E.2d 1004 (Mass. Super. Ct. 1980) ...............................................................................15
`
`viii
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 10 of 55
`
`
`
`Recine v. Davol Inc.,
`2019 R.I. Super. LEXIS 3 (Super. Ct. Jan. 7, 2019) ................................................................34
`
`Reclaimant Corp. v. Deutsch,
`211 A.3d 976 (Conn. 2019) ...........................................................................................5, 7, 8, 9
`
`Ret. Sys. v. ANZ Sec., Inc.,
`137 S. Ct. 2042 (2017) ...............................................................................................................6
`
`Rodrigues v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
`751 F. App’x 312, 318 (3d Cir. 2018) .....................................................................................16
`
`Ryan v. Roman Cath. Bishop,
`941 A.2d 174 (R.I. 2008) .........................................................................................................21
`
`Santana Prod., Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equip., Inc.,
`401 F.3d 123 (3d Cir. 2005).....................................................................................................12
`
`Sejin Precision Indus. Co. v. Citibank, N.A.,
`726 F. App’x 27 (2d Cir. 2018) ...............................................................................................27
`
`Sherwood v. Stamford Health Sys., Inc.,
`2018 WL 915051 (Conn. Super. Ct. Jan. 16, 2018).................................................................19
`
`Siemens WestingHouse Power Corp. v. Dick Corp.,
`219 F.R.D. 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) ...............................................................................................4
`
`Singleton v. Grade A Mkt., Inc.,
`2009 WL 10689210 (D. Conn. Sept. 21, 2009) .....................................................................3, 4
`
`Slainte Invs. Ltd. P’ship v. Jeffrey,
`142 F. Supp. 3d 239 (D. Conn. 2015) ................................................................................22, 35
`
`Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.,
`322 N.E.2d 768 (Mass. 1975) ....................................................................................................9
`
`Soroof Trading Dev. Co. v. GE Microgen Inc.,
`No. 10 CIV. 01391 LGS, 2013 WL 5827698 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2013) .................................20
`
`Spencer v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.,
`256 F.R.D. 284 (D. Conn. 2009)............................................................................................7, 8
`
`State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Omega Flex, Inc.,
`2015 WL 6453084 (D. Conn. Oct. 21, 2015) ............................................................................6
`
`State v. Weinschenk,
`868 A.2d 200 (Me. 2005) ...........................................................................................................9
`
`ix
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 11 of 55
`
`
`
`Statler v. Dell, Inc.,
`775 F. Supp. 2d 474 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) ...............................................................................16, 37
`
`Stephens v. Norwalk Hosp.,
`162 F. Supp. 2d 36 (D. Conn. 2001) ..........................................................................................5
`
`Szymanski v. Boston Mut. Life Ins. Co.,
`778 N.E.2d 16 (Mass. Ct. App. 2002) .....................................................................................14
`
`Szynkowicz v. Bonauito-O’Hara,
`154 A.3d 61 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017) ...................................................................................12, 38
`
`Tagliente v. Himmer,
`949 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1991) ........................................................................................................14
`
`Taygeta Corp. v. Varian Assocs., Inc.,
`763 N.E.2d 1053 (Mass. 2002) ..........................................................................................14, 31
`
`Thomas Iron Co. v. Ensign-Bickford-Co.,
`42 A.2d 145 (Conn. 1945) .........................................................................................................7
`
`Town of Princeton v. Monsanto Co.,
`202 F. Supp. 3d 181 (D. Mass. 2016) ......................................................................................25
`
`Varacallo v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co.,
`752 A.2d 807 (N.J. App. Div. 2000) ..........................................................................................8
`
`Village Mortgage Co. v. Veneziano,
`167 A.3d 430 (Conn. 2017) .....................................................................................................27
`
`Vision Pharma, LLC v. Sunrise Pharm., Inc.,
`2018 WL 3085213 (D.N.J. June 20, 2018) ..............................................................................20
`
`W. Dermatology Consultants, P.C. v. VitalWorks, Inc.,
`153 A.3d 574 (Conn. 2016) .......................................................................................................4
`
`Wai Chu v. Samsung Elecs. Am., Inc.,
`No. 1:18-CV-11742-GHW, 2020 WL 1330662 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2020) ............................12
`
`Webb v. Haas,
`665 A.2d 1005 (Me. 1995) .......................................................................................................13
`
`Westman v. Armitage,
`215 A.2d 919 (Me. 1966) .........................................................................................................13
`
`Wilson v. Bodnar,
`2010 WL 3730199 (D. Me. Sept. 14, 2010) ............................................................................13
`
`x
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 12 of 55
`
`
`
`Wood v. United States,
`2018 WL 1037636 (D. Me. Feb. 23, 2018) .............................................................................14
`
`Zirvi v. Flatley,
`838 F. App'x 582 (2d Cir. 2020) ..............................................................................................27
`
`Statutes
`
`14 M.R.S.A. § 752 .........................................................................................................................12
`
`14 M.R.S.A. § 859 ...................................................................................................................13, 19
`
`73 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 201-9.2 ..............................................................................................................9
`
`9 R.I. Gen. Laws Ann. § 9-1-20 .....................................................................................................21
`
`13 Pa. Stat. and Cons. Stat. Ann. § 2314(a) .....................................................................................7
`
`42 Pa. Stat. and Cons. Stat. Ann. § 5527(b)...................................................................................12
`
`Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 42-110g ...................................................................................................12
`
`Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 52-577 .....................................................................................................22
`
`Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 52-595 .....................................................................................................22
`
`G.L. c. 93A.....................................................................................................................................14
`
`M.G.L.A. 106 § 2-725(1) ...............................................................................................................19
`
`M.G.L.A. 106 § 2-725(4) ...............................................................................................................18
`
`M.G.L.A. 260 § 5A ........................................................................................................................12
`
`M.G.L.A. 260 § 12 .........................................................................................................................14
`
`Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (“MUTPA”) ........................................................................9, 12
`
`Mass. Consumer Protection Law .................................................................................................8, 9
`
`Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 93A, § 9(3), (4) .....................................................................................9
`
`Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 260, § 5A ..............................................................................................8
`
`Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 213(1)...........................................................................................................9
`
`N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 358-A:3(IV-a) ...........................................................................................15
`
`N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 508:4(I) ...............................................................................................12, 15
`
`xi
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-01381-JAM Document 335 Filed 08/03/21 Page 13 of 55
`
`
`
`N.H. Rev. Stat. § 358-A:10(I) ..........................................................................................................9
`
`N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2A:14-1 ...............................................................................................................16
`
`N.J. Stat. Ann. § 56:8-19..................................................................................................................9
`
`N.J. Stat. Ann. §§A:14-1 ................................................................................................................12
`
`N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349 ...............................................................................................8, 9, 12, 16
`
`N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349(h) ..........................................................................................................9
`
`N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 350 ...................................................................................................9, 12, 16
`
`New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act ................................................................................9, 15
`
`New York General Business Law ....................................................................................................8
`
`NJ UCC § 275(1) ...........................................................................................................................20
`
`Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law .............................................8
`
`UCC § 2-314 ....................................................................................................................................7
`
`UCC § 2-725 ..................................................................................................................................17
`
`UCC § 2725(a) ...............................................................................................................................21
`
`Uniform Commercial Code............................................

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket