throbber
Case 1:20-cv-23872-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 1 of 10
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`MIAMI DIVISION
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`
`WINDY LUCIUS,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`GENERAL WIRELESS OPERATIONS INC.
`d/b/a RADIOSHACK,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Plaintiff, WINDY LUCIUS, (“Plaintiff”), hereby sues the Defendant, GENERAL
`
`WIRELESS OPERATIONS INC. d/b/a RADIOSHACK (“Defendant”), a foreign limited liability
`
`company doing business in Florida, for Injunctive Relief, and attorney’s fees, litigation expenses,
`
`and costs pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq. (“ADA”).
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff is a Florida resident, lives in Miami-Dade County, is sui juris, and qualifies
`
`as an individual with disabilities as defined by the ADA. Plaintiff is blind and therefore unable to
`
`fully engage in and enjoy the major life activity of seeing.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff also utilizes the internet. Plaintiff is unable to read computer materials
`
`and/or access and comprehend internet website information without software specially designed
`
`for the visually impaired. Specifically, Plaintiff utilizes the JAWS Screen Reader software, which is
`
`one of the most popular reader Screen Reader Software ("SRS") utilized worldwide.
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff is also an advocate of the rights of similarly situated disabled persons and
`
`is a “tester” for the purpose of asserting her civil rights and monitoring, ensuring, and determining
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-23872-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 2 of 10
`
`whether places of public accommodation and/or their websites are in compliance with the ADA.
`
`4.
`
`Defendant owns, leases, leases to, or operates a place of public accommodation as
`
`defined by the ADA and the regulations implementing the ADA, 28 CFR 36.201(a) and 36.104. The
`
`place of public accommodation that the Defendant owns, operates, or leases is located in Miami-
`
`Dade County.
`
`5.
`
`Subsequent to the effective date of the ADA, Defendant constructed, or caused to be
`
`constructed, a website located at https://radioshack.com (hereinafter “website”). Defendant is the
`
`owner, operator, lessor and/or lessee of the website. This website supports, is an extension of, is
`
`in conjunction with, is complementary and supplemental to, the above-referenced public
`
`accommodation. This website provides information about Defendant's public accommodation,
`
`including information about the special sales, goods, services, accommodations, privileges, benefits
`
`and facilities available to patrons at physical locations. The website also allows customers to view
`
`pricing, order products, locate stores and more. On information and belief, Defendant also
`
`continually and/or periodically updates and maintains the website.
`
`VENUE AND JURISDICTION
`
`6.
`
`Venue lies in the Southern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), and
`
`Local Rule 3.1, in that the original transaction or occurrence giving rise to this cause of action
`
`occurred in this District.
`
`7.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over GENERAL WIRELESS OPERATIONS
`
`INC. d/b/a RADIOSHACK, pursuant to, inter alia, Florida’s long arm statute F.S. § 48.193, in
`
`that Defendant: (a) operates, conducts, engages in, and/or carries on a business or business
`
`ventures (s) in Florida and/or has an office or agency in Florida; (b) has committed one or more
`
`tortious acts within Florida; (c) was and/or is engaged in substantial and not isolated activity within
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-23872-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 3 of 10
`
`Florida; and/or (d) has purposely availed itself of Florida’s laws, services and/or benefits and
`
`therefore should reasonably anticipate being hailed into one or more of the courts within the State
`
`of Florida.
`
`8.
`
`Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343, this Court has been given
`
`original jurisdiction over actions which arise from the Defendant’s violations of Title III of the
`
`Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq. See also 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and § 2202
`
`and supplemental jurisdiction of Plaintiff’s state law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
`
`COUNT ONE - VIOLATION OF
`TITLE III OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILTITIES ACT
`
`The website is an extension of Defendant's place of public accommodation. By and
`
`9.
`
`through this website, Defendant extends its public accommodation into individual persons' homes,
`
`portable devices and personal computers wherever located. The website is a service, facility,
`
`privilege, advantage, benefit and accommodation of Defendant's place of accommodation. The
`
`website also provides access to the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages or
`
`accommodations of the place of public accommodation. For example, the website provides a store
`
`locator, a list of items available for sale in the brick and mortar stores and the ability to purchase
`
`items to be shipped. Like many people during this pandemic, Plaintiff would like to pre-shop the
`
`Defendant’s stores to determine whether certain items are available at the store before she leaves
`
`home. Defendant’s website provides access to benefits of Defendant’s physical stores and Plaintiff
`
`was denied those benefits when she could not access Defendant’s website. For example, the
`
`website allows customers to order products online, sign up for exclusive discounts and news by
`
`email, get information about the store’s return policy and product warranties. As such, the website
`
`has integrated with and is a nexus to the brick and mortar location. Therefore, it is governed by
`
`the following provisions:
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-23872-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 4 of 10
`
`a.
`
`42 U.S.C. Section 12182(a) provides: “No individual shall be discriminated
`
`against on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities,
`
`privileges, advantages, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation by any person
`
`who owns, leases (or leases to), or operates a place of public accommodation.”
`
`b.
`
`42 U.S.C. Section 12182(b)(1)(A)(i) provides: “It shall be discriminatory to
`
`subject an individual or class of individuals on the basis of a disability or disabilities of such
`
`individual or class, directly, or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements, to a denial
`
`of the opportunity of the individual or class to participate in or benefit from the goods, services,
`
`facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of an entity[.]”
`
`c.
`
`42 U.S.C. Section 12182(b)(1)(A)(ii) provides: “It shall be discriminatory to
`
`afford an individual or class of individuals, on the basis of a disability or disabilities of such
`
`individual or class, directly, or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements with the
`
`opportunity to participate in or benefit from a good, service, facility, privilege, advantage, or
`
`accommodation that is not equal to that afforded to other individuals[.]”
`
`d.
`
`42 U.S.C. Section 12182(b)(1)(A)(ii) provides: “It shall be discriminatory to
`
`provide an individual or class of individuals, on the basis of a disability or disabilities of such
`
`individual or class, directly, or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements with a good,
`
`service, facility, privilege, advantage, or accommodation that is different or separate from that
`
`provided to other individuals, unless such action is necessary to provide the individual or class of
`
`individuals with a good, service, facility, privilege, advantage, or accommodation, or other
`
`opportunity that is as effective as that provided to others[.]”
`
`e.
`
`42 U.S.C. Section 12182(b)(1)(B) provides: “Goods, services, facilities,
`
`privileges, advantages, and accommodations shall be afforded to an individual with a disability in
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-23872-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 5 of 10
`
`the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of the individual.”
`
`f.
`
`42 U.S.C. Section 12182(b)(1)(C) provides: “Notwithstanding the existence
`
`of separate or different programs or activities provided in accordance with this section, an
`
`individual with a disability shall not be denied the opportunity to participate in such programs or
`
`activities that are not separate or different.”
`
`g.
`
`42 U.S.C. Section 12182(b)(2)(ii) describes as discrimination: “a failure to
`
`make reasonable modifications in policies, practices, or procedures, when such modifications are
`
`necessary to afford such goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations to
`
`individuals with disabilities, unless the entity can demonstrate that making such modifications
`
`would fundamentally alter the nature of such goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or
`
`accommodations[.]”
`
`h.
`
`42 U.S.C. Section 12182(b)(2)(iii) describes as discrimination: “a failure to
`
`take such steps as may be necessary to ensure that no individual with a disability is excluded,
`
`denied services, segregated or otherwise treated differently than other individuals because of the
`
`absence of auxiliary aids and services, unless the entity can demonstrate that taking such steps
`
`would fundamentally alter the nature of the good, service, facility, privilege, advantage, or
`
`accommodation being offered or would result in an undue burden[.]”
`
`10.
`
`As the owner or operator of the subject website, Defendant is required to comply
`
`with the ADA and the provisions cited above. This includes an obligation to create and maintain a
`
`website that is accessible to and usable by visually impaired persons so that they can enjoy full and
`
`equal access to the website and the content therein, including the ability to place orders through
`
`the website for pickup at a designated location.
`
`11.
`
`Plaintiff attempted to access and/or utilize Defendant's website, but was unable to,
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-23872-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 6 of 10
`
`and she continues to be unable to enjoy full and equal access to the website and/or understand the
`
`content therein because numerous portions of the website do not interface with and are not
`
`readable by SRS. More specifically, features of the website that are inaccessible to the visually
`
`impaired include, but are not limited to, the following: screen reader users cannot create an account
`
`because the input fields do not have accessible labels. The visible labels are not programmatically
`
`associated with the input fields so screen reader users hear "edit blank" for each of the Create
`
`Account fields. Screen reader users cannot hear the locations results. After entering their ZIP code,
`
`the search results are displayed, but the section is skipped so the results are not announced. There
`
`is no skip to content link. Keyboard focus order is not working sequentially. The focus order does
`
`not go to the sub links of the header so these items are not announced. The "Filter by store type"
`
`is shown onscreen but is not announced. After searching for a location, users are taken into this
`
`unlabeled section and hear radio button options but it's not clear why since the label is not
`
`announced. The Search button is not labeled. Users only hear "button."
`
`12.
`
`Plaintiff continues to attempt to utilize the website and/or plans to continue to
`
`attempt to utilize the website in the near future. In the alternative, Plaintiff intends to monitor the
`
`website in the near future, as a tester, to ascertain whether it has been updated to interact properly
`
`with screen reader software.
`
`13.
`
`As more specifically set forth above, Defendant has violated the above cited
`
`provisions of the ADA by failing to interface its website with software utilized by visually
`
`impaired individuals. Thus, Defendant has violated the following provisions either directly or
`
`through contractual, licensing or other arrangements with respect to Plaintiff and other similarly
`
`situated individuals on the basis of their disability:
`
`a.
`
`by depriving them of the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services,
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-23872-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 7 of 10
`
`facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of its place of public accommodation (42
`
`U.S.C. § 12182(a));
`
`b.
`
`in the denial of the opportunity to participate in or benefit from the goods,
`
`services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations (42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(1)(A)(i));
`
`c.
`
`in affording them the opportunity to participate in or benefit from a good,
`
`service, facility, privilege, advantage, or accommodation that is not equal to that afforded to other
`
`individuals (42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(1)(A)(ii));
`
`d.
`
`by providing them a good, service, facility, privilege, advantage, or
`
`accommodation that is different or separate from that provided to other individuals, unless such
`
`action is necessary to provide the individual or class of individuals with a good, service, facility,
`
`privilege, advantage, or accommodation, or other opportunity that is as effective as that provided
`
`to others (42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(1)(A)(iii));
`
`e.
`
`by failing to afford them goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages,
`
`and accommodations in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of the individual (42
`
`U.S.C. § 12182(b)(1)(B));
`
`f.
`
`notwithstanding the existence of separate or different programs or activities
`
`provided in accordance with this section, by denying them the opportunity to participate in such
`
`programs or activities that are not separate or different. (42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(1)(C));
`
`g.
`
`by a failure to make reasonable modifications in policies, practices, or
`
`procedures, when such modifications are necessary to afford such goods, services, facilities,
`
`privileges, advantages, or accommodations to individuals with disabilities, unless the entity can
`
`demonstrate that making such modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of such goods,
`
`services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations (42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(2)(ii)); and,
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-23872-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 8 of 10
`
`h.
`
`by a failure to take such steps as may be necessary to ensure that they are not
`
`excluded, denied services, segregated or otherwise treated differently than other individuals
`
`because of the absence of auxiliary aids and services, unless the entity can demonstrate that taking
`
`such steps would fundamentally alter the nature of the good, service, facility, privilege, advantage,
`
`or accommodation being offered or would result in an undue burden (42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(2)(iii)).
`
`14.
`
`Plaintiff would like to be a customer at Defendant’s brick and mortar location but
`
`before she goes to the store, she would like to determine what is available for her purchasing, what
`
`promotions are being offered and what new items are currently available. In that regard, Plaintiff
`
`continues to attempt to utilize the website and/or plans to continue to attempt to utilize the website
`
`on a monthly basis to make selections for purchasing online or in the store.
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiff is continuously aware of the violations at Defendant's website and is aware
`
`that it would be a futile gesture to attempt to utilize the website as long as those violations exist
`
`unless she is willing to suffer additional discrimination.
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, frustration and humiliation as the result
`
`of the discriminatory conditions present at Defendant's website. By continuing to operate its
`
`website with discriminatory conditions, Defendant contributes to Plaintiff's sense of isolation and
`
`segregation and deprives Plaintiff the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities,
`
`privileges and/or accommodations available to the general public. By encountering the
`
`discriminatory conditions at Defendant's website, and knowing that it would be a futile gesture to
`
`attempt to utilize the website unless she is willing to endure additional discrimination, Plaintiff is
`
`deprived of the meaningful choice of freely visiting and utilizing the same accommodations readily
`
`available to the general public and is deterred and discouraged from doing so. By maintaining a
`
`website with violations, Defendant deprives plaintiff the equality of opportunity offered to the
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-23872-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 9 of 10
`
`general public.
`
`17.
`
`Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer direct and indirect injury as a result
`
`of the Defendant’s discrimination until the Defendant is compelled to comply with the
`
`requirements of the ADA.
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiff has a realistic, credible, existing and continuing threat of discrimination
`
`from the Defendant’s non-compliance with the ADA with respect to this website as described
`
`above. Plaintiff has reasonable grounds to believe that she will continue to be subjected to
`
`discrimination in violation of the ADA by the Defendant. Plaintiff desires to access the website to
`
`avail herself of the benefits, advantages, goods and services therein, and/or to assure herself that
`
`this website is in compliance with the ADA so that she and others similarly situated will have full
`
`and equal enjoyment of the website without fear of discrimination.
`
`19.
`
`The Plaintiff and all others similarly situated will continue to suffer such
`
`discrimination, injury and damage without the immediate relief provided by the ADA as requested
`
`herein.
`
`20.
`
`Plaintiff is without adequate remedy at law and is suffering irreparable harm.
`
`Plaintiff has retained the undersigned counsel and is entitled to recover attorney’s fees, costs and
`
`litigation expenses from the Defendant pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12205 and 28 CFR 36.505.
`
`21.
`
`Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12188, this Court is provided with authority to grant Plaintiff
`
`Injunctive Relief, including an order to require the Defendant to alter its website to make it readily
`
`accessible to and usable by Plaintiff and other persons with vision impairment.
`
`22.
`
`As a result of the foregoing, Plaintiff has been obligated to retain the undersigned
`
`counsel for the filing and prosecution of this action. Plaintiff is entitled to have her reasonable
`
`attorneys' fees, costs and litigation expenses paid by Defendant pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12205.
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-23872-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 10 of 10
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests:
`
`a.
`
`
`b.
`
`
`c.
`
`
`d.
`
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court issue a Declaratory Judgment that determines that the Defendant's website
`at the commencement of the subject lawsuit is in violation of Title III of the
`Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.;
`
`The Court issue a Declaratory Judgment that determines that the Defendant's website
`is in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181
`et seq.;
`
`The Court issue a Declaratory Judgment that Defendant has violated the ADA by
`failing to monitor and maintain its website to ensure that it is readily accessible to
`and usable by persons with vision impairment;
`
`That this Court issue an Order directing Defendant to alter its website to make it
`accessible to, and useable by, individuals with disabilities to the full extent required
`by Title III of the ADA within 45 days of the Court entering an order;
`
`That this Court enter an Order directing Defendant to evaluate and neutralize its
`policies and procedures towards persons with disabilities for such reasonable time
`so as to allow Defendant to undertake and complete corrective procedures;
`
`That this Court enter an Order directing Defendant to continually update and
`maintain its website to ensure that it remains fully accessible to and usable by
`visually impaired individuals;
`
`An award of attorney’s fees, costs and litigation expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
`12205; and,
`
`Such other relief as the Court deems just and proper, and/or is allowable under Title
`III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
`
`
`Dated: September 21, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ J. Courtney Cunningham
`J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.
`J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC
`FBN: 628166
`8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201
`Miami, FL 33156
`T: 305-351-2014
`cc@cunninghampllc.com
`
`
`10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket