Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 1 of 15 PageID.1554
`
`7520
`
`COX FRICKE LLP
`A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP LLP
`
`JOACHIM P. COX
`
`jcox@cfhawaii.com
`RANDALL C. WHATTOFF 9487
`
`rwhattoff@cfhawaii.com
`800 Bethel Street, Suite 600
`Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96813
`Telephone: (808) 585-9440
`Facsimile: (808) 275-3276
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
`
`
`In Re: Lahaina Wildfire Litigation
`
`1:24-CV-00259-JAO-WRP
`(Class Action)
`JOINT STIPULATION BY
`ALL PARTIES TO DISMISS
`Trial:
`None set
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION BY ALL PARTIES TO DISMISS UNDER F.R.C.P.
`41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
`
`The undersigned parties (“Parties”), by and through their respective counsel
`
`of record, stipulate as follows:
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on August 2, 2024, the Parties entered into a Term Sheet
`
`contemplating a global resolution of all Maui Fires Claims (as defined in the Term
`
`Sheet);
`
`
`52387806.5
`
`
`
`7520
`
`COX FRICKE LLP
`A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP LLP
`
`JOACHIM P. COX
`
`jcox@cfhawaii.com
`RANDALL C. WHATTOFF 9487
`
`rwhattoff@cfhawaii.com
`800 Bethel Street, Suite 600
`Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96813
`Telephone: (808) 585-9440
`Facsimile: (808) 275-3276
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
`
`
`In Re: Lahaina Wildfire Litigation
`
`1:24-CV-00259-JAO-WRP
`(Class Action)
`JOINT STIPULATION BY
`ALL PARTIES TO DISMISS
`Trial:
`None set
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION BY ALL PARTIES TO DISMISS UNDER F.R.C.P.
`41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
`
`The undersigned parties (“Parties”), by and through their respective counsel
`
`of record, stipulate as follows:
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on August 2, 2024, the Parties entered into a Term Sheet
`
`contemplating a global resolution of all Maui Fires Claims (as defined in the Term
`
`Sheet);
`
`
`52387806.5
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 2 of 15 PageID.1555
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the Term Sheet contemplated that the Parties would further
`
`negotiate and memorialize a definitive set of Settlement Agreements (as defined in
`
`the Term Sheet) (“Settlement Agreement”);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the Term Sheet contemplated that the Settlement Agreement
`
`would include a class action settlement;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the State of Hawai‘i, which is a defendant in other Maui Fires
`
`litigation and party to the Term Sheet, is not a defendant in this action;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiffs intend to file a new state action in the Second Circuit
`
`Court of the State of Hawai‘i that will ultimately reflect the agreed-upon settlement
`
`class in the Settlement Agreement and will name the State of Hawai‘i as a
`
`defendant (the “State Class Action”);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, this pending consolidated class action in federal court is
`
`currently stayed;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to dismiss this action without a Court
`
`order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, dismissal of this action to effectuate settlement is consistent
`
`with the existing stay;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, although the Parties are dismissing this action in light of the
`
`proposed class settlement to be filed in State court that will include the State of
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 3 of 15 PageID.1556
`
`Hawai‘i as a party to the settlement, Defendants, Class Plaintiffs1, and Class
`
`Counsel2 intend that, in the event that the Settlement Agreement is not effectuated
`
`and finally approved, 1) any rights Defendants may have to subsequently remove
`
`the State Class Action and, generally, to a federal forum under the Class Action
`
`Fairness Act or any other applicable statute, not be prejudiced or in any way
`
`impaired by the Parties’ agreement to dismiss this action and allow the class
`
`settlement to be effectuated in State court, and; 2) any right Class Plaintiffs may
`
`have to object to any subsequent removal or seek remand not be prejudiced or in
`
`any way impaired by the Parties’ agreement to dismiss this action and allow the
`
`class settlement to be effectuated in State court, except as stated herein;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, under Smith v. Mylan Inc., 761 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2014),
`
`timeliness requirements for removal are procedural and, thus, objections to
`
`timeliness of removal may be waived by parties;
`
`
`1 “Class Plaintiffs” refers to those individual plaintiffs purporting to represent
`classes in this action, including Nova Burnes; Maui Concierge Aesthetics, LLC;
`Lani Chadli, individually and as Trustee of the Aotaki Family Irrevocable Trust;
`Monica I. Eder; Rede S. Eder; Candace Faust; Peter Faust; David Heymes;
`Kathryn Llamas; Jennifer Lynn McNamee; Chardell Naki; Barret Procell; and
`Rolland Williams Jr.
`2 “Class Counsel” refers to all plaintiffs’ counsel of record in this action, including
`Lexi J. Hazam; Patrick I. Andrews; Nicholas W. Lee; Kelly K. McNabb; Terrance
`M. Revere; Paul V.K. Smith; Richard E. Wilson; Patrick Kyle Smith; Kenneth S.
`Kasdan; Christopher K. Hikida; Graham B. LippSmith; MaryBeth LippSmith;
`Jaclyn L. Anderson; Celene Chan Andrews; Robert A. Curtis; and Alexander
`Robertson, IV.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 4 of 15 PageID.1557
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Class Plaintiffs and Class Counsel, as a condition to this
`
`stipulation of dismissal, shall waive any timeliness objection to any later removal
`
`of the State Class Action in the event that the Settlement Agreement does not
`
`become final, but do not intend for Class Plaintiffs and Class Counsel to waive any
`
`other basis for objection to later removal;
`
`
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between all
`
`Parties to this action, as follows:
`
`1.
`
`This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal
`
`Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). No fees and/or costs are sought
`
`by any party at this time; this dismissal applies to all claims on this case;
`
`and all parties who have appeared have signed this stipulation.
`
`2.
`
`Class Counsel will file the State Class Action in the Second Circuit Court
`
`of the State of Hawai‘i, and it will be identical to the class action
`
`currently pending in this Court save for the addition of the State of
`
`Hawai‘i as a party defendant, subject to future amendment to conform to
`
`the settlement class definition agreed upon by the Parties in the executed
`
`Settlement Agreement. Class Counsel agree they will not seek to amend
`
`the State Class Action while the settlement is pending without agreement
`
`of the Parties.
`
`3.
`
`In the event that (i) the Settlement Agreement does not become final and
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 5 of 15 PageID.1558
`
`thus there is no class settlement with all of the Parties in the Second
`
`Circuit Court, and (ii) any Defendant thereafter removes the State Class
`
`Action to federal court; then Class Plaintiffs and Class Counsel shall not
`
`and may not make—and expressly waive and forfeit—any argument for
`
`remand:
`
`(x) on the basis that removal is untimely under any applicable legal
`
`rule, statutory provision or otherwise, including, but not limited to, 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1446(a), 1446(b)(1), 1446(b)(2)(B), 1446(b)(3), 1446(c)(1),
`
`1446(c)(3)(A), 1446(c)(3)(B), 1446(g), and 28 U.S.C. § 1453(b); or
`
`(y) on the basis that Defendants otherwise waived or forfeited their
`
`right to remove because of any action they take or have taken to
`
`effectuate dismissal of this case or to litigate or negotiate settlement in
`
`the State Class Action.
`
`4.
`
`Other than as stated in Paragraph 3, Class Plaintiffs and Class Counsel do
`
`not waive any other basis to object to removal or argue for remand if (i)
`
`the Settlement Agreement does not become final and thus there is no class
`
`settlement with all of the Parties in the Second Circuit Court, and (ii) any
`
`Defendant thereafter removes the State Class Action to federal court.
`
`5.
`
`The Parties understand that Defendants are agreeing to dismissal of
`
`the consolidated class action in federal court in reliance on the
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 6 of 15 PageID.1559
`
`enforceability of the waivers set forth in Paragraph 3 of this
`
`Stipulation.
`
`6.
`
`Defendants’ agreement to this Stipulation shall not be construed to be
`
`an admission that any class can or should be certified, under federal or
`
`Hawai‘i law, or an admission as to the merits of the consolidated class
`
`action complaint or contemplated State Class Action.
`
`DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, October 29, 2024.
`
`TERRANCE M. REVERE
`PAUL V.K. SMITH
`RICHARD E. WILSON
`PATRICK KYLE SMITH
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`NOVA BURNES; MAUI CONCIERGE
`AESTHETICS, LLC; LANI CHADLI, individually
`and as Trustee of the AOTAKI FAMILY
`IRREVOCABLE TRUST; BARRETT PROCELL;
`KATHRYN LLAMAS
`
`GRAHAM B. LIPPSMITH
`MARYBETH LIPPSMITH
`JACLYN L. ANDERSON
`CELENE CHAN ANDREWS
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`MONICA I. EDER; REDE S. EDER; CANDICE
`FAUST; PETER FAUST; DAVID HEYMES;
`JENNIFER LYNN MCNAMEE; ROLAND
`WILLLIAMS, JR.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 7 of 15 PageID.1560
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KENNETH S. KASDAN
`CHRISTOPHER K. HIKIDA
`D. KAENA HOROWITZ
`SHARLA ANN MANLEY
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`CHARDELL NAKI
`
`
`
`
`PAUL ALSTON
`NICKOLAS A. KACPROWSKI
`WENDY F. HANAKAHI
`MADISSON L. HEINZE
`NATHAN P. SHIMODOI
`Attorneys for Defendants
`TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF BERNICE
`PAUAHI BISHOP
`
`
`
`ERIC H. TSUGAWA
`ALAN K. LAU
`TEDSON H. KOJA
`Attorneys for Defendants
`HAWAIIAN TELCOM; HAWAIIAN
`TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.; HAWAIIAN
`TELCOM, INC.
`
`
`
`GREGORY K. MARKHAM
`KEITH K. KATO
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SPECTRUM OCEANIC, LLC
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 8 of 15 PageID.1561
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KENNETH S. KASDAN
`CHRISTOPHER K. HIKIDA
`D. KAENA HOROWITZ
`SHARLA ANN MANLEY
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`CHARDELL NAKI
`
`
`
`
`PAUL ALSTON
`NICKOLAS A. KACPROWSKI
`WENDY F. HANAKAHI
`MADISSON L. HEINZE
`NATHAN P. SHIMODOI
`Attorneys for Defendants
`TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF BERNICE
`PAUAHI BISHOP
`
`
`
`ERIC H. TSUGAWA
`ALAN K. LAU
`TEDSON H. KOJA
`Attorneys for Defendants
`HAWAIIAN TELCOM; HAWAIIAN
`TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.; HAWAIIAN
`TELCOM, INC.
`
`
`
`GREGORY K. MARKHAM
`KEITH K. KATO
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SPECTRUM OCEANIC, LLC
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 9 of 15 PageID.1562
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 10 of 15 PagelD.1563
`
`KENNETH S. KASDAN
`CHRISTOPHER K. HIKIDA
`D. KAENA HOROWITZ
`SHARLA ANN MANLEY
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`CHARDELL NAKI
`
`PAUL ALSTON
`NICKOLAS A. KACPROWSKI
`WENDYF. HANAKAHI
`MADISSONL. HEINZE
`NATHANP. SHIMODOI
`Attorneys for Defendants
`TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF BERNICE
`PAUAHI BISHOP
`
`ERIC H. TSUGAWA
`ALAN K. LAU
`TEDSON H. KOJA
`Attorneys for Defendants
`HAWAIIAN TELCOM; HAWAIIAN
`TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.; HAWAIIAN
`TELCOM,INC.
`
`XS =GORY K. MARKHAM_|
`
`KEITH K. KATO
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SPECTRUM OCEANIC, LLC
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 11 of 15 PagelD.1564
`
` WESLEYH.H.
`
`SHEREE KON-
`DARA 8. NAKAGAWA
`JONATHANL. ORTIZ
`CATHY 8. JUHN
`ERIN I. MACDONALD
`Attorneys for Defendants
`PETER KLINT MARTIN; PETER KLINT
`MARTIN REVOCABLE TRUST
`
`
` WESLEY H.H.
`
`SHEREE KON-HERRERA
`DARA 8. NAKAGAWA
`Attorneys for Defendants
`HOPE BUILDERS HOLDING LLC, HOPE
`BUILDERSINC.; HOPE BUILDERSLLC;
`KAUAULA LAND COMPANYLLC; KIPA
`CENTENNIAL, LLC; WAINEE LAND &
`HOMES, LLC; WEST MAUI LAND COMPANY,
`INC.; MAKILA RANCHES, INC.; MAKILA
`LAND CO., LLC; JV ENTERPRISES, LLC
`
`JAMES W. GEIGER
`Attorneys for Defendants
`JAMESC. RILEY TRUST; JEANNE A. RILEY
`TRUST
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 12 of 15 PageID.1565
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WESLEY H.H. CHING
`SHEREE KON-HERRERA
`DARA S. NAKAGAWA
`JONATHAN L. ORTIZ
`CATHY S. JUHN
`ERIN I. MACDONALD
`Attorneys for Defendants
`PETER KLINT MARTIN; PETER KLINT
`MARTIN REVOCABLE TRUST
`
`
`
`WESLEY H.H. CHING
`SHEREE KON-HERRERA
`DARA S. NAKAGAWA
`Attorneys for Defendants
`HOPE BUILDERS HOLDING LLC; HOPE
`BUILDERS INC.; HOPE BUILDERS LLC;
`KAUAULA LAND COMPANY LLC; KIPA
`CENTENNIAL, LLC; WAINEE LAND &
`HOMES, LLC; WEST MAUI LAND COMPANY,
`INC.; MAKILA RANCHES, INC.; MAKILA
`LAND CO., LLC; JV ENTERPRISES, LLC
`
`
`
`JAMES W. GEIGER
`Attorneys for Defendants
`JAMES C. RILEY TRUST; JEANNE A. RILEY
`TRUST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 13 of 15 PageID.1566
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RALPH J. O’NEILL
`MATTHEW A. HEMME
`JOSEPH F. KOTOWSKI
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MAKILA RANCHES HOMEOWNERS
`ASSOCIATION, INC.
`
`
`
`VICTORIA J. TAKAYESU
`THOMAS KOLBE
`DAVID J. MINKIN
`JORDAN K. INAFUKU
`SARA M. HAYDEN
`KAMRIE J. KOI
`JENNIFER LAUREN RIGGS
`Attorneys for Defendant
`COUNTY OF MAUI
`
`
`
`JOACHIM P. COX
`RANDALL C. WHATTOFF
`Attorneys for Defendants
`HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.;
`MAUI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LIMITED;
`HAWAII ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY, INC.;
`HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In Re: Lahaina Wildfire Litigation, 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP,
`Joint Stipulation to Dismiss
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 14 of 15 PageID.1567
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP Document 59 Filed 10/29/24 Page 15 of 15 PageID.1568
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RALPH J. O’NEILL
`MATTHEW A. HEMME
`JOSEPH F. KOTOWSKI
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MAKILA RANCHES HOMEOWNERS
`ASSOCIATION, INC.
`
`
`
`VICTORIA J. TAKAYESU
`THOMAS KOLBE
`DAVID J. MINKIN
`JORDAN K. INAFUKU
`SARA M. HAYDEN
`KAMRIE J. KOI
`JENNIFER LAUREN RIGGS
`Attorneys for Defendant
`COUNTY OF MAUI
`
`
`
`JOACHIM P. COX
`RANDALL C. WHATTOFF
`Attorneys for Defendants
`HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.;
`MAUI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LIMITED;
`HAWAII ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY, INC.;
`HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In Re: Lahaina Wildfire Litigation, 1:24-cv-00259-JAO-WRP,
`Joint Stipulation to Dismiss
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
