`
`
`
`KATHERINE L. MATTHEWS, COLORADO BAR NO. 53372
`Senior Counsel
`Environmental Enforcement Section
`United States Department of Justice
`999 18th Street, South Terrace, Room 370
`Denver, Colorado 80202
`Telephone: (303) 844-1365
`Facsimile: (303) 844-1350
`Katherine.Matthews@usdoj.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff United States
`
`LAWRENCE G. WASDEN
`Attorney General
`State of Idaho
`DARRELL G. EARLY
`Deputy Attorney General
`Chief, Natural Resources Division
`
`LISA J. O’HARA, ISB # 7452
`Deputy Attorney General
`Department of Environmental Quality
`1410 N. Hilton, 2nd Floor
`Boise, Idaho 83706
`Telephone (208) 373-0494
`lisa_ohara@deq.idaho.gov
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Idaho
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF IDAHO
`
`
`____________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and
`)
`the STATE OF IDAHO,
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`P4 PRODUCTION, L.L.C.,
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`____________________________________)
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`Case 4:21-cv-00092-CWD Document 1 Filed 03/01/21 Page 2 of 9
`
`
`
`
`The United States of America, by authority of the Attorney General of the United States
`
`and through the undersigned attorney, and at the request of the United States Environmental
`
`Protection Agency (EPA), and the State of Idaho, by the authority of the Idaho Attorney General
`
`and through the undersigned attorney, file this complaint and allege as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is a civil action brought under Sections 106, 107, and 113(g)(2)(B) of the
`
`Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as
`
`amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9606 and 9607, for injunctive relief and recovery of costs incurred and to
`
`be incurred in response to releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances into the
`
`environment at or from the Ballard Mine Site (Site) located in Caribou County, Idaho.
`
`2.
`
`The State of Idaho seeks additional relief under the Idaho Environmental
`
`Protection and Health Act (EPHA), Idaho Code § 39-101, et seq., for certain injunctive relief,
`
`declaratory relief, and reimbursement of costs it has incurred and will incur relating to the
`
`discharge of hazardous substances at the Site.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the
`
`parties under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345, and 1367 and Sections 106, 107, and 113(b) of
`
`CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9606, 9607, & 9613(b).
`
`4.
`
`Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) and Section
`
`113(b) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(b), because the releases or threatened releases of
`
`hazardous substances that gave rise to this claim occurred in this district, and because the Site is
`
`located in this district.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 4:21-cv-00092-CWD Document 1 Filed 03/01/21 Page 3 of 9
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`5.
`
`Defendant P4 Production, L.L.C. (Defendant) is a company formed in Delaware
`
`and registered to do business in the State of Idaho, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
`
`Monsanto Company, which is a subsidiary of Bayer AG.
`
`6.
`
`Defendant is a “person” as defined in Section 101(21) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 9601(21).
`
`7.
`
`Defendant currently owns the Site.
`
`STATUTORY BACKGROUND
`
`8.
`
`CERCLA was enacted in 1980 to provide a comprehensive governmental
`
`mechanism for abating releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances and other
`
`pollutants and contaminants, and for funding the costs of such abatement and related
`
`enforcement activities, which are known as “response” actions, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9604(a), 9601(25).
`
`9.
`
`Section 104(a)(1) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(a)(1), provides:
`
`Whenever (A) any hazardous substance is released or there is a
`substantial threat of such a release into the environment, or (B)
`there is a release or substantial threat of release into the
`environment of any pollutant or contaminant which may present an
`imminent and substantial danger to the public health or welfare,
`the President is authorized to act, consistent with the national
`contingency plan, to remove or arrange for the removal of, and
`provide for remedial action relating to such hazardous substance,
`pollutant, or contaminant at any time (including its removal from
`any contaminated natural resource), or take any other response
`measure consistent with the national contingency plan which the
`President deems necessary to protect the public health or welfare
`or the environment.
`
`Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), provides in pertinent part:
`
`10.
`
`Notwithstanding any other provision or rule of law, and subject
`only to the defenses set forth in subsection (b) of this Section –
`
`(1)
`
`the owner and operator of a vessel or a facility
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 4:21-cv-00092-CWD Document 1 Filed 03/01/21 Page 4 of 9
`
`
`
`
`
`shall be liable for –
`
`* * *
`
`
`(A)
`
`all costs of removal or remedial action incurred by the
`United States Government . . . not inconsistent with the
`National Contingency Plan . . . .
`
`Under Section 106(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9606(a), the United States is also
`
`11.
`
`authorized to seek injunctive relief necessary to abate the imminent and substantial
`
`endangerment to the public health or welfare, or the environment, that may result from an actual
`
`or threatened release of a hazardous substance at or from a facility.
`
`12.
`
`Section 113(g)(2) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(g)(2), provides: “In any such
`
`action described in this subsection, the court shall enter a declaratory judgment on liability for
`
`response costs or damages that will be binding on any subsequent action or actions to recover
`
`further response costs or damages.”
`
`13.
`
`The Idaho Environmental Protection and Health Act, Idaho Code §39-108,
`
`provides inter alia that:
`
`…any person who has determined to have violated the provisions
`of this act or the rules, permits, or order promulgated hereunder,
`shall be liable for any expense incurred by the state in enforcing
`the act, or in enforcing or terminating any nuisance source of
`environmental degradation, cause of sickness or health hazard.
`
`
`GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`14.
`
`The Site is a former open-pit phosphate mine located in the Phosphate Resource
`
`Area of southeastern Idaho. The Site is located approximately thirteen miles north of Soda
`
`Springs, Idaho, in Caribou County. To manage cleanup operations of the Site, EPA has divided
`
`response actions for the Site into portions referred to as “Operable Units.”
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 4:21-cv-00092-CWD Document 1 Filed 03/01/21 Page 5 of 9
`
`15.
`
`On September 24, 2019, EPA issued a Record of Decision for Operable Unit 1
`
`that called for, among other things, an engineered cover system over more than 500 acres of the
`
`Site where wastes are left in place, a series of permeable reactive barriers to intercept and treat
`
`contaminated groundwater, and wetland treatment cells to treat contaminated residual seeps and
`
`springs.
`
`16.
`
`The Site is a “facility” as defined in Section 101(9) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 9601(9).
`
`17.
`
`There has been a “release” or a “threatened release” of “hazardous substances,”
`
`including selenium and heavy metals, into the “environment” at or from the Site, as those terms
`
`are defined in Section 101 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601.
`
`18.
`
`In undertaking response actions to address the release or threat of release of
`
`hazardous substances at the Site, EPA has incurred and will continue to incur “response costs” as
`
`defined in Section 101(25) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(25).
`
`19.
`
`The United States has incurred at least $300,000 as of August 31, 2019, in
`
`response costs with respect to the Site that have not been reimbursed. These response costs are
`
`not inconsistent with the National Contingency Plan promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of
`
`CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9605, and codified at 40 C.F.R. Part 300.
`
`20.
`
`The State of Idaho has incurred and will continue to incur response costs within
`
`the meaning of CERCLA Section 107(a), which are not inconsistent with the National
`
`Contingency Plan, and expenses within the meaning of Idaho Code §39-108 associated with
`
`responding to and terminating a nuisance, source of environmental degradation, cause of
`
`sickness or health hazard associated with the Site.
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 4:21-cv-00092-CWD Document 1 Filed 03/01/21 Page 6 of 9
`
`FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`Cost Recovery Under CERCLA Section 107
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 1920 are re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`Defendant owns the Site, which is a facility, within the meaning of Section
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`107(a)(1) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(1).
`
`23.
`
`Hazardous substances have been released at and from the Facility into the
`
`environment within the meaning of Sections 101 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601, 9607.
`
`24.
`
`The United States’ actions in response to the release or threatened release of
`
`hazardous substances from the Facility constitute “removal” and “remedial” actions as defined
`
`by Sections 101(23) and 101(24) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601(23) and 9601(24), for which
`
`the United States has incurred costs.
`
`25.
`
`Defendant is therefore liable under Section 107(a)(1) and 113(g)(2) of CERCLA,
`
`42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a)(1), 9613(g)(2), for all costs incurred and to be incurred by the United
`
`States and the State of Idaho in response to releases and threatened releases of hazardous
`
`substances at and from the Site.
`
` SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`Injunctive Relief Under CERCLA Section 106
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 20 are re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`EPA has determined that there is or may be an imminent and substantial
`
`endangerment to the public health and welfare or the environment because of actual or
`
`threatened releases of hazardous substances at or from the Site.
`
`28.
`
`EPA has determined that the response actions selected in the Record of Decision
`
`are necessary to abate the danger or threat at or from the Site.
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 4:21-cv-00092-CWD Document 1 Filed 03/01/21 Page 7 of 9
`
`29.
`
`Under Section 106(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9606(a), Defendant is liable for
`
`injunctive relief to abate the danger or threat presented by a release or threatened release of
`
`hazardous substances into the environment at or from the Site.
`
`30.
`
`Under Section 106(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9606(a), Defendant is liable to
`
`undertake the response actions as described in the Record of Decision for the Site.
`
`THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`Response Costs/Expenses Under State Law
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 20 are re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`Pursuant to Idaho Code § 39-108(6), Defendant is liable to the State of Idaho for
`
`all expenses incurred by Idaho in connection with investigating and terminating a nuisance or
`
`source of environmental degradation, sickness or health hazard.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court:
`
`A.
`
`Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against the Defendant, jointly and
`
`severally, under Section 107(a)(4)(A) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4)(A), for unreimbursed
`
`response costs incurred and to be incurred by the United States relating to the Site, including
`
`enforcement costs and prejudgment interest;
`
`B.
`
`Enter an order under Section 106 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9606(a), requiring the
`
`Defendant to perform the response actions as described in the Record of Decision for the Site;
`
`C.
`
`Enter a declaratory judgment on Defendant’s liability that will be binding in any
`
`subsequent action for further response costs, pursuant to Section 113(g)(2) of CERCLA, 42
`
`U.S.C. § 9613(g)(2);
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 4:21-cv-00092-CWD Document 1 Filed 03/01/21 Page 8 of 9
`
`D.
`
`Order the Defendant to reimburse Plaintiff State of Idaho for all cleanup and
`
`removal costs Plaintiff State of Idaho has incurred and will incur at the Site, with applicable
`
`interest;
`
`E.
`
`Enter a declaratory judgment against the Defendant for all cleanup and removal
`
`costs Plaintiff State of Idaho may incur at the Site; and
`
`F.
`
`Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`JEAN E. WILLIAMS
`
`Acting Assistant Attorney General
`Environment and Natural Resources Division
`
`United States Department of Justice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Katherine L. Matthews
`
`
`
`KATHERINE L. MATTHEWS
`Senior Counsel
`Environmental Enforcement Section
`Environment and Natural Resources Division
`United States Department of Justice
`999 18th Street, Suite 370
`Denver, Colorado 80202
`303-844-1365
`Katherine.Matthews@usdoj.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RAFAEL M. GONZALEZ, JR.
`Acting United States Attorney
`CHRISTINE G. ENGLAND
`Assistant United States Attorney
`District of Idaho
`Washington Group Plaza IV
`800 East Park Boulevard, Suite 600
`Boise, ID 83712-7788
`Telephone: (208) 334-1211
`Facsimile: (208) 334-1414
`Email: Christine.England@usdoj.gov
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 4:21-cv-00092-CWD Document 1 Filed 03/01/21 Page 9 of 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LAWRENCE G. WASDEN
`Attorney General
`State of Idaho
`DARRELL G. EARLY
`Deputy Attorney General
`Chief, Natural Resources Division
`
`
`
`s/ Lisa O’Hara
`LISA O’HARA
`Deputy Attorney General
`Office of the Attorney General
`Environmental Quality Section
`1410 N. Hilton – 2nd Floor
`Boise, ID 83706
`Telephone: 208.373.0494
`Email: Lisa_Ohara@deq.idaho.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`