`
`
`EXHIBIT 14
`EXHIBIT 14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Entered: March 25, 2020
`
`BoxInterferences@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-9797
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`Anatoli Ledenev
`and
`Robert M. Porter
`Junior Party
`(Patent 7,843,085),
`
`v.
`
`Meir Adest,
`Yoav Galin, Lior Handelsman,
`Amir Fishelov,
`and
`Guy Sella,
`Senior Party
`(Application 13/308,517)
`
`
`Patent Interference No. 106,112 (JTM)
`(Technology Center 2800)
`
`
`Before SALLY GARDNER LANE, JAMES T. MOORE, and DEBORAH KATZ,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge
`
`
`JUDGMENT - Bd. R. 127(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`Interference 106112 (JTM) – Ledenev v. Adest
`Judgment
`
`
`A decision granting Motion 2 of senior party Meir Adest, Yoav Galin, Lior
`Handelsman, Amir Fishelov, and Guy Sella, has been entered. (Decision, Paper
`137). As a result of this Decision, junior party Anatoli Ledenev and Robert M.
`Porter cannot prevail on priority. Accordingly, we enter judgment against
`Ledenev.
`
`Order
`
`It is
`ORDERED that judgment on priority is entered against junior party Ledenev
`as to Count 1, the sole Count of the interference (Declaration, Paper 1, 4);
`FURTHER ORDERED that claims 1–57 of Ledenev patent 7,843,085,
`which correspond to Count 1, are CANCELED. (Declaration, Paper 1, 4); 35
`U.S.C. § 135(a);1
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are directed to 35 USC § 135(c) and
`Bd. R. 205 regarding the filing of settlement agreements;
`FURTHER ORDERED that a party seeking judicial review timely serve
`notice on the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office;
`37 C.F.R. §§ 90.1 and 104.2. See also Bd. R. 8(b). Attention is directed to Biogen
`Idec MA, Inc., v. Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 785 F.3d 648,
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`
`
`1
`Any reference to a statute in this Judgment is to the statute that was in effect
`on March 15, 2013 unless otherwise indicated. See Pub. L. 112-29, § 3(n), 125
`Stat. 284, 293 (2011).
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`
`Interference 106112 (JTM) – Ledenev v. Adest
`Judgment
`
`654–57 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (determining that pre-AIA § 146 review was eliminated
`for interference proceedings declared after September 15, 2012); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be entered into the
`administrative records of the involved Ledenev patent and involved Adest
`application.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`Interference 106112 (JTM) – Ledenev v. Adest
`Judgment
`
`Attorney for Ledenev:
`Luke Santangelo
`Alfred K. Wiedmann Jr.
`Nicole Ressue
`Misha Gregory Macaw
`SANTANGELO LAW OFFICES, P.C.
`lukes@idea-asset.com
`awiedmann@idea-asset.com
`nicoler@idea-asset-com
`misham@idea-asset.com
`
`W. Todd Baker
`Charles L. Gholz
`OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, LLP
`tbaker@oblon.com
`cgholz@oblon.com
`
`Attorney for Adest:
`Frederic M. Meeker
`Michael S. Cuviello
`John H. Curry
`Blair A. Silver
`BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.
`fmeeker@bannerwitcoff.com
`mcuviello@bannerwitcoff.com
`jcurry@bannerwitcoff.com
`bsilver@bannerwitcoff.com
`SolaredgeInterference@bannerwitcoff.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`