throbber
Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 1 of 12 - Page ID#: 7
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1
`
`

`

`108DEF3B-C293-4B24-B75C-64CE74717815 : 000001 of 000012
`
`Presiding Judge: HON. PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD (648260)
`
`COM : 000001 of 000009
`000001 of 000009
`
`Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 2 of 12 - Page ID#: 8
`
`COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
`FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT
`CASE NO. _________
`DIVISION ____
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD
`
`RESPONDENT
`
`
`LIFEPOINT CORPORATE SERVICES GENERAL
`PARTNERSHIP AND LAKE CUMBERLAND
`REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`WELLCARE HEALTH INSURANCE CO. OF KENTUCKY
`
`
`SERVE: WellCare Insurance Co. of Kentucky
`
`
`c/o C T Corporation System
`
`
`306 W. Main Street
`
`
`Suite 512
`
`
`Frankfort, KY 40601
`
`
`* * * * *
`
`
`
`
`Through its counsel of record, and pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9
`
`U.S.C. § 10, and alternatively the Kentucky Uniform Arbitration Act (“KUAA”), Ky. Rev. Stat.
`
`§ 417.160, Petitioners LifePoint Corporate Services General Partnership and Lake Cumberland
`
`Regional Hospital, LLC respectfully move this Court to vacate the arbitration award issued in
`
`LifePoint Corporate Services General Partnership v. Wellcare Health Insurance Co. of Kentucky,
`
`AAA Case No. 01-20-0014-7102, on May 18, 2022. In support of this Petition, Petitioners state:
`
`PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
`
`1.
`
`Petitioner LifePoint Corporate Services General Partnership facilitates the
`
`operation of a national hospital system. It is a Delaware general partnership with its main offices
`
`located at 330 Seven Springs Way, Brentwood, Tennessee 37027.
`
`1
`
`

`

`108DEF3B-C293-4B24-B75C-64CE74717815 : 000002 of 000012
`
`Presiding Judge: HON. PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD (648260)
`
`COM : 000002 of 000009
`000002 of 000009
`
`Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 3 of 12 - Page ID#: 9
`
`2.
`
`Petitioner Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital, LLC is hospital owned by
`
`LifePoint located at 305 Langdon Street, Somerset, Kentucky 42503. Lake Cumberland Regional
`
`Hospital is a Delaware limited liability company.
`
`3.
`
`Respondent WellCare Health Insurance Co. of Kentucky is a managed care
`
`organization that provides managed care services for the Commonwealth of Kentucky Department
`
`of Medicaid Services. WellCare is a Kentucky corporation located at 13551 Triton Park
`
`Boulevard, Suite 1800, Louisville, Kentucky 40223.
`
`4.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over this action because it arises from a contractual
`
`dispute affecting interstate commerce and is therefore subject to and governed by the Federal
`
`Arbitration Act. See, e.g., Ford v. E*TRADE Sec., Inc., No. 2003-CA-001480-MR, 2004 WL
`
`2071411, at *2 (Ky. Ct. App. Sept. 17, 2004) (Minton, J.) (holding that Kentucky trial court had
`
`jurisdiction to consider petition to vacate arbitration award under the FAA because underlying
`
`contract affected interstate commerce). Moreover, the parties’ Participating Provider Agreement
`
`(to be filed separately under seal) expressly states that federal law, if applicable, governs any
`
`matters arising out of or in connection with the Agreement. See Participating Provider Agreement
`
`§ 9.1.
`
`5.
`
`Alternatively, even if the FAA did not apply, jurisdiction would be proper under
`
`the KUAA. See Ky. Rev. Stat. §§ 417.160, 417.200.
`
`6.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court because the parties’ Participating Provider
`
`Agreement, as amended, specifies this Court as a proper venue for claims involving matters arising
`
`out of or in connection with the Agreement. See Participating Provider Agreement § 9.1. The
`
`parties also agreed to be subject to the jurisdiction and venue of this Court on any such claim. Id.
`
`2
`
`

`

`108DEF3B-C293-4B24-B75C-64CE74717815 : 000003 of 000012
`
`Presiding Judge: HON. PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD (648260)
`
`COM : 000003 of 000009
`000003 of 000009
`
`Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 4 of 12 - Page ID#: 10
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`7.
`
`Several LifePoint-affiliated hospitals (“LifePoint Facilities”), including Lake
`
`Cumberland Regional Hospital, brought a civil action in Jefferson Circuit Court against WellCare
`
`challenging its failure to pay claims for emergency services pursuant to provider agreements
`
`between the LifePoint Facilities and WellCare. The action was styled Bourbon Community
`
`Hospital, LLC, et al. v. WellCare Health Insurance Company of Illinois, Inc. d/b/a WellCare of
`
`Kentucky, Inc., Case No. 18-CI-00 1136 (Jefferson Cir. Ct.).
`
`8.
`
`The LifePoint Facilities and WellCare executed a Settlement Agreement and
`
`Release resolving the claims. Because the Settlement Agreement is confidential, a true and correct
`
`copy will be provided separately under seal.
`
`9.
`
`The Settlement Agreement materially relied upon certain information regarding
`
`governing rates to be provided by WellCare. Because Petitioners did not have access to this
`
`information, they had to rely upon WellCare providing accurate information.
`
`10. WellCare provided incorrect information and this information was included in the
`
`Settlement Agreement.
`
`11.
`
`Following execution of the Settlement Agreement, WellCare sent a letter to Lake
`
`Cumberland seeking to recover an overpayment to which it claimed it was entitled to pursuant to
`
`the Settlement Agreement. Because Respondent’s letter seeking recoupment from Lake
`
`Cumberland relies upon the confidential Settlement Agreement, a true and correct copy will be
`
`provided separately under seal.
`
`12.
`
`In seeking recoupment, WellCare relied on the incorrect information it provided in
`
`the Settlement Agreement.
`
`3
`
`

`

`108DEF3B-C293-4B24-B75C-64CE74717815 : 000004 of 000012
`
`Presiding Judge: HON. PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD (648260)
`
`COM : 000004 of 000009
`000004 of 000009
`
`Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 5 of 12 - Page ID#: 11
`
`13.
`
`Petitioners responded to WellCare’s notice of recoupment by correspondence dated
`
`January 13, 2020, and disputed the recoupment amount.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`The Settlement Agreement requires disputes to be resolved by binding arbitration.
`
`The Parties’ Participating Provider Agreement, as amended, provides that the
`
`agreements shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the state in which
`
`the facility providing services is located, except where Federal law applies.
`
`16.
`
`Petitioners initiated arbitration in September of 2020, captioned LifePoint
`
`Corporate Services General Partnership v. Wellcare Health Insurance Co. of Kentucky, AAA
`
`Case No. 01-20-0014-7102. Because the arbitration was confidential, true and correct copies of
`
`the arbitration documents referenced herein will be provided separately under seal.
`
`17.
`
`Petitioners asserted that the Parties agreed to certain terms in the Settlement
`
`Agreement and WellCare memorialized incorrect information either by mistake or fraud and
`
`WellCare cannot now rely on this incorrect information to seek recoupment.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`Both Petitioners and WellCare moved for summary judgment.
`
`In short, Petitioners argued that the information WellCare provided was incorrect
`
`based on a mutual mistake and that the Settlement Agreement should be reformed on that ground.
`
`Petitioners also alternatively argued that WellCare fraudulently misrepresented information
`
`memorialized in the Settlement Agreement, Petitioners reasonably relied on that information, and
`
`the Settlement Agreement should be reformed to reflect the Parties’ agreement.
`
`20.
`
`In further support of these arguments, Petitioners cited to binding Kentucky law
`
`permitting reformation of contracts based upon mutual mistake or unilateral mistake involving
`
`fraudulent or intentional misrepresentation. Petitioners also submitted evidence in the form of
`
`deposition testimony and affidavits to support fraud and mistake.
`
`4
`
`

`

`108DEF3B-C293-4B24-B75C-64CE74717815 : 000005 of 000012
`
`Presiding Judge: HON. PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD (648260)
`
`COM : 000005 of 000009
`000005 of 000009
`
`Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 6 of 12 - Page ID#: 12
`
`21.
`
`The Arbitrator denied Petitioners’ motion for summary judgment and granted
`
`WellCare’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of contract liability.
`
`22.
`
`In granting WellCare’s motion, the Arbitrator ignored Petitioners’ material
`
`evidence and disregarded well-established Kentucky law.
`
`23.
`
`The Arbitrator did not conduct a hearing on the merits of liability, despite making
`
`findings of fact in the Arbitrator’s Order.
`
`24.
`
`Petitioners filed a Motion to Revise the Arbitrator’s Interlocutory Order on
`
`Claimants’ and Respondent’s Motions for Summary Disposition, reiterating that Kentucky allows
`
`reformation of fully integrated written contracts to correct both mutual mistakes of fact and
`
`unilateral mistakes coupled with fraud, even when the written contract contains an integration or
`
`merger clause.
`
`25.
`
`In the Motion to Revise, Petitioners also reiterated material evidence they provided
`
`in support of their motion for summary judgment which the Arbitrator did not consider.
`
`26.
`
`Petitioners argued that, at the very least, these facts established a genuine issue of
`
`material fact regarding whether the Settlement Agreement accurately reflected the parties’ mutual
`
`intent at the time of contracting because the incorrect information at least reflected a mistake,
`
`thereby precluding summary judgment in favor of WellCare.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`The Arbitrator summarily denied the Motion to Revise without any explanation.
`
`The Parties submitted a joint stipulation regarding the amount of damages, thereby
`
`resolving the only remaining issue left for hearing, but preserving Petitioners’ ability to seek
`
`vacatur of the Arbitrator’s award.
`
`29.
`
`On May 18, 2022, the Arbitrator entered an arbitration award in WellCare’s favor.
`
`A copy of the Arbitrator’s award will be filed separately under seal.
`
`5
`
`

`

`108DEF3B-C293-4B24-B75C-64CE74717815 : 000006 of 000012
`
`Presiding Judge: HON. PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD (648260)
`
`COM : 000006 of 000009
`000006 of 000009
`
`Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 7 of 12 - Page ID#: 13
`
`GROUNDS FOR VACATUR
`
`COUNT I: VACATUR OF THE ARBITRATION AWARD UNDER
`THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT
`
`Petitioners adopt by reference the paragraphs set forth above.
`
`The FAA authorizes a court to vacate an arbitrator’s award if the arbitrator exceeds
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`its powers by manifestly disregarding the law. See 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(4).
`
`32.
`
`The Arbitrator’s Order was in manifest disregard of the law, and flies in the face of
`
`clearly established precedent holding that contracts can be reformed based on mutual mistake or a
`
`unilateral mistake plus fraud.
`
`33.
`
`The Arbitrator refused to adhere to that clearly defined legal principle by holding
`
`that the review was limited to the four-corners of the contract despite allegations supported by
`
`evidence showing that the Settlement Agreement was predicated on either mutual mistake or a
`
`unilateral mistake plus fraud and granting summary judgment to WellCare.
`
`34.
`
`An arbitrator’s award can also be vacated under the FAA where the arbitrator
`
`refuses to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy or any other misbehavior by
`
`which the rights of any party have been prejudiced. See 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(3).
`
`35.
`
`In granting summary judgment to Wellcare on the issue of contract liability, the
`
`Arbitrator refused to consider evidence that was material to this controversy.
`
`36.
`
`The Arbitrator granted WellCare’s motion for summary judgment on liability
`
`without conducting a hearing on the merits.
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`This refusal to consider this evidence prejudiced Petitioners.
`
`In granting WellCare’s motion for summary judgment despite material evidence to
`
`the contrary, making findings of fact in WellCare’s favor without conducting a hearing, and
`
`6
`
`

`

`108DEF3B-C293-4B24-B75C-64CE74717815 : 000007 of 000012
`
`Presiding Judge: HON. PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD (648260)
`
`COM : 000007 of 000009
`000007 of 000009
`
`Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 8 of 12 - Page ID#: 14
`
`grossly misapplying clearly established law, the Arbitrator exhibited evident partiality in
`
`WellCare’s favor. See 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(2)
`
`39.
`
`Accordingly, the Court should vacate the arbitration award issued in the Arbitration
`
`pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(2), (3), & (4).
`
`COUNT II: VACATUR OF THE ARBITRATION AWARD UNDER
`THE KENTUCKY UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT
`
`Petitioners adopt by reference the allegations set forth above.
`
`If the FAA does not apply, under the KUAA, an arbitrator’s award can also be
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`vacated if the arbitrator exceeds its powers. See Ky. Rev. Stat. 417.160(1)(c).
`
`42.
`
`The Arbitrator’s Order exceeded its authority because it was in manifest disregard
`
`of the law such that the award was not fairly and honestly made.
`
`43.
`
`The law of reformation of fully integrated written contracts to correct mutual
`
`mistakes of fact and unilateral mistakes coupled with fraud is clearly defined and not subject to
`
`reasonable debate.
`
`44.
`
`The Arbitrator refused to adhere to that clearly defined legal principle by holding
`
`that the review was limited to the four-corners of the contract despite evidence showing that the
`
`Settlement Agreement was predicated on either mutual mistake or a unilateral mistake plus fraud
`
`and granting summary judgment to WellCare.
`
`45.
`
`An arbitrator’s award can also be vacated under the KUAA where the arbitrator
`
`refuses to hear evidence material to the controversy or otherwise conducted the hearing contrary
`
`to the KUAA’s hearing requirements as to prejudice substantially the rights of a party. See Ky.
`
`Rev. Stat. § 417.160(1)(d).
`
`46.
`
`The Arbitrator refused to consider evidence that was material to this controversy.
`
`7
`
`

`

`108DEF3B-C293-4B24-B75C-64CE74717815 : 000008 of 000012
`
`Presiding Judge: HON. PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD (648260)
`
`COM : 000008 of 000009
`000008 of 000009
`
`Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 9 of 12 - Page ID#: 15
`
`47.
`
`The Arbitrator granted WellCare’s motion for summary judgment on liability
`
`without conducting a hearing on the merits.
`
`48.
`
`49.
`
`This refusal to consider this evidence prejudiced Petitioners.
`
`In granting WellCare’s motion for summary judgment despite material evidence to
`
`the contrary, making findings of fact in WellCare’s favor without conducting a hearing, and
`
`grossly misapplying clearly established law, the Arbitrator exhibited evident partiality in
`
`WellCare’s favor. See Ky. Rev. Stat. 417.160(1)(b).
`
`50.
`
`Accordingly, the Court should vacate the arbitration award issued in the Arbitration
`
`pursuant to Ky. Rev. Stat. 417.160(1)(b), (c), & (d).
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Petitioners respectfully requests that the Court:
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`Set a schedule for the parties to submit briefing on the issues raised in this Petition;
`
`Issue an order vacating the arbitration award dated May 18, 2022, and either resolve
`
`the issues presented or direct the Arbitrator to conduct rehearing; and
`
`C.
`
`Award Petitioners such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`108DEF3B-C293-4B24-B75C-64CE74717815 : 000009 of 000012
`
`Presiding Judge: HON. PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD (648260)
`
`COM : 000009 of 000009
`000009 of 000009
`
`Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 10 of 12 - Page ID#: 16
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP
`
`
`
`By: s/ Edmund S. Sauer
` Russell B. Morgan (No. 85355)
`
`Edmund S. Sauer (No. 90392)
`
`1600 Division Street, Suite 700
` Nashville, Tennessee 37203
`
`Tel: (615) 252-2311
`
`Fax: (615) 252-6311
`
`rmorgan@bradley.com
`
`esauer@bradley.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 11 of 12 - Page ID#: 17
`AOC-E-105           Sum Code: CI
`22-CI-00391
`Case #:
`Rev. 9-14
`CIRCUIT
`FRANKLIN
`
`Court:
`
`County:
`
`Commonwealth of Kentucky
`Court of Justice Courts.ky.gov
`
`108DEF3B-C293-4B24-B75C-64CE74717815 : 000010 of 000012
`
`Presiding Judge: HON. PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD (648260)
`
`CI : 000001 of 000001
`000001 of 000001
`
`CR 4.02; Cr Official Form 1
`
`CIVIL SUMMONS
`
`Plantiff, LIFEPOINT CORPORATE SERVICES GP ET AL VS. WELLCARE HEALTH IN, Defendant
`
`TO: WELLCARE HEALTH INSURANCE CO. OF KENTUCKY
`13551 TRITON PARK BLVD.
`SUITE 1800
`LOUISVILLE, KY 40223
`
`Memo: Registered Agent of Service exists.
`
`The Commonwealth of Kentucky to Defendant:
`
` You are hereby notified that a legal action has been filed against you in this Court demanding relief as shown on
`the document delivered to you with this Summons.  Unless a written defense is made by you or by an attorney
`on your behalf within twenty (20) days following the day this paper is delivered to you, judgment by default may be
`taken against you for the relief demanded in the attached complaint.
`
`The name(s) and address(es) of the party or parties demanding relief against you or his/her (their) attorney(s) are shown on the
`document delivered to you with this Summons.
`
`Franklin Circuit Clerk
` Date: 5/18/2022
`
`This Summons was:
`
`o
`
`Served by delivering a true copy and the Complaint (or other initiating document)
`
`Proof of Service
`
`To:
`o Not Served because:
`
`Date:
`
`, 20
`
`Summons ID: @00001076350 ,
`CIRCUIT: 22-CI-00391 Sheriff Service
`LIFEPOINT CORPORATE SERVICES GP ET AL VS. WELLCARE HEALTH IN
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`Served By
`
`Title
`
`

`

`Case: 3:22-cv-00029-GFVT Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 05/19/22 Page: 12 of 12 - Page ID#: 18
`AOC-E-105           Sum Code: CI
`22-CI-00391
`Case #:
`Rev. 9-14
`CIRCUIT
`FRANKLIN
`
`Court:
`
`County:
`
`Commonwealth of Kentucky
`Court of Justice Courts.ky.gov
`
`108DEF3B-C293-4B24-B75C-64CE74717815 : 000011 of 000012
`
`Presiding Judge: HON. PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD (648260)
`
`CI : 000001 of 000001
`000001 of 000001
`
`CR 4.02; Cr Official Form 1
`
`CIVIL SUMMONS
`
`Plantiff, LIFEPOINT CORPORATE SERVICES GP ET AL VS. WELLCARE HEALTH IN, Defendant
`
`TO: CT CORPORATION SYSTEM
`306 W. MAIN STREET
`SUITE 512
`FRANKFORT, KY 40601
`
`Memo: Related party is WELLCARE HEALTH INSURANCE CO. OF KENTUCKY
`
`The Commonwealth of Kentucky to Defendant:
`WELLCARE HEALTH INSURANCE CO. OF KENTUCKY
`
` You are hereby notified that a legal action has been filed against you in this Court demanding relief as shown on
`the document delivered to you with this Summons.  Unless a written defense is made by you or by an attorney
`on your behalf within twenty (20) days following the day this paper is delivered to you, judgment by default may be
`taken against you for the relief demanded in the attached complaint.
`
`The name(s) and address(es) of the party or parties demanding relief against you or his/her (their) attorney(s) are shown on the
`document delivered to you with this Summons.
`
`Franklin Circuit Clerk
` Date: 5/18/2022
`
`This Summons was:
`
`o
`
`Served by delivering a true copy and the Complaint (or other initiating document)
`
`Proof of Service
`
`To:
`o Not Served because:
`
`Date:
`
`, 20
`
`Summons ID: @00001076351 ,
`CIRCUIT: 22-CI-00391 Sheriff Service
`LIFEPOINT CORPORATE SERVICES GP ET AL VS. WELLCARE HEALTH IN
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`Served By
`
`Title
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket