`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`
`Case No. 2:22-CV-37
`
`
`PREPARED FOOD PHOTOS, INC. f/k/a
`ADLIFE MARKETING &
`COMMUNICATIONS CO., INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`JACK’S FOODS OF MENOMINEE, INC.
`d/b/a JACK’S FRESH MARKET,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff Prepared Food Photos, Inc. f/k/a Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
`
`(“Plaintiff”) sues defendant Jack’s Foods of Menominee, Inc. d/b/a Jack’s Fresh Market
`
`(“Defendant”), and alleges as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1. Plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
`
`Florida with its principal place of business located in Palm Beach County, Florida.
`
`2. Defendant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
`
`Michigan with its principal place of business located at 735 East Lake Shore Drive, Manistique,
`
`MI 49854. Defendant’s agent for service of process is Jacob Ziminski, 735 East Lake Shore
`
`Drive, Manistique, MI 49854.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`1331 and 1338(a).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 02/23/22 Page 2 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because it has maintained
`
`sufficient minimum contacts with Michigan such that the exercise of personal jurisdiction over it
`
`would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
`
`5. Venue properly lies in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400(a) because
`
`Defendant or its agents reside or may be found in this district. “[A]n individual defendant ‘may
`
`be found’ in any federal district in which he or she is subject to personal jurisdiction.” J4
`
`Promotions, Inc. v. Splash Dogs, LLC, No. 08 CV 977, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11023, at *79
`
`(N.D. Ohio Feb. 13, 2009). In other words, venue is proper in his District because Defendant is
`
`subject to personal jurisdiction in this District. See Big Guy's Pinball, LLC v. Lipham, No. 14-
`
`CV-14185, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89512, at *2 (E.D. Mich. July 10, 2015).
`
`I.
`
`Plaintiff’s Business and History
`
`FACTS
`
`6. Plaintiff is in the business of licensing high-end, professional photographs for the
`
`food industry.
`
`7. Through its commercial website (www.preparedfoodphotos.com), Plaintiff offers
`
`a monthly subscription service which provides access to/license of tens of thousands of
`
`professional images.
`
`8. As of the date of this pleading, Plaintiff charges its clients (generally, grocery
`
`stores, restaurant chains, food service companies, etc.) a monthly fee of $999.00 for access to its
`
`library of professional photographs.
`
`9. Plaintiff does not license individual photographs or otherwise make individual
`
`photographs available for purchase. Plaintiff’s business model relies on its recurring monthly
`
`subscription service such that Plaintiff can continue to maintain its impressive portfolio.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 02/23/22 Page 3 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10. Plaintiff owns each of the photographs available for license on its website and
`
`serves as the licensing agent with respect to licensing such photographs for limited use by
`
`Plaintiff’s customers. To that end, Plaintiff’s standard terms include a limited, non-transferable
`
`license for use of any photograph by the customer only. Plaintiff’s license terms make clear that
`
`all copyright ownership remains with Plaintiff and that its customers are not permitted to transfer,
`
`assign, or sub-license any of Plaintiff’s photographs to another person/entity.
`
`II.
`
`The Work at Issue in this Lawsuit
`
`11. In 1999,
`
`a professional photographer
`
`created
`
`a photograph
`
`titled
`
`“PieStrawberry006.jpg” (the “Work”). A copy of the Work is exhibited below.
`
`
`
`12. The Work was registered by Plaintiff (pursuant to a work-for-hire agreement with
`
`the author that transferred all rights and title in the photograph to Plaintiff) with the Register of
`
`Copyrights on August 5, 2016 and was assigned Registration No. VA 2-012-581. A true and
`
`correct copy of the Certification of Registration pertaining to the Work is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit “A.”
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 02/23/22 Page 4 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13. Plaintiff is the owner of the Work and has remained the owner at all times material
`
`hereto.
`
`III. Defendant’s Unlawful Activities
`
`14. Defendant owns and operates multiple full-line grocery stores in Michigan in the
`
`following cities: Manistique, Marinette, and Menominee.
`
`15. Defendant advertises/markets
`
`its business primarily
`
`through
`
`its website
`
`(https://www.jacksfreshmarket.com/stores/manistique),
`
`its
`
`social
`
`media
`
`(e.g.
`
`https://www.facebook.com/JacksFreshMarket/), and other forms of advertising such as print
`
`circulars for its weekly ads.
`
`16. On multiple dates after Plaintiff’s above-referenced copyright registration of the
`
`Work, Defendant published the Work in its weekly ads for various of its stores:
`
`(https://s3.grocerywebsite.com/production/pdf_ad_images/48853/original/Jacks082018MMweb
`
`.pdf),
`
`(https://s3.grocerywebsite.com/production/pdf_ad_images/48854/original/Jacks082018MANwe
`
`b.pdf),
`
`(https://s3.grocerywebsite.com/production/pdf_ad_images/47299/original/Jacks061818MMweb
`
`.pdf) in connection with the sale of its “Strawberry Rhubarb Pie”:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.5 Filed 02/23/22 Page 5 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17. A true and correct copy of screenshots of the foregoing weekly ads, displaying the
`
`copyrighted Work, is attached hereto as Exhibit “B.”
`
`18. Defendant is not and has never been licensed to use or display the Work. Defendant
`
`never contacted Plaintiff to seek permission to use the Work in connection with its website or for
`
`any other purpose – even though the Work that was copied is clearly professional stock
`
`photography that would put Defendant on notice that the Work was not intended for public use.
`
`19. Defendant utilized the Work for commercial use – namely, in connection with the
`
`marketing of its business.
`
`20. Upon information and belief, Defendant located a copy of the Work on the internet
`
`and, rather than contact Plaintiff to secure a license, simply copied the Work for its own
`
`commercial use.
`
`21. Through its ongoing diligent efforts to identify unauthorized use of its photographs,
`
`Plaintiff first discovered Defendant’s unauthorized use/display of the Work in approximately
`
`November of 2021. Following Plaintiff’s discovery, Plaintiff notified Defendant in writing of
`
`such unauthorized use. To date, Plaintiff has been unable to negotiate a reasonable license for
`
`the past/existing infringement of its Work.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 02/23/22 Page 6 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22. All conditions precedent to this action have been performed or have been waived.
`
`COUNT I – COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`
`23. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 22 as set forth above.
`
`24. The Work is an original work of authorship, embodying copyrightable subject
`
`matter, that is subject to the full protection of the United States copyright laws (17 U.S.C. § 101
`
`et seq.).
`
`25. Plaintiff owns a valid copyright in the Work, having registered the Work with the
`
`Register of Copyrights and owning sufficient rights, title, and interest to such copyright to afford
`
`Plaintiff standing to bring this lawsuit and assert the claim(s) herein.
`
`26. As a result of Plaintiff’s reproduction, distribution, and public display of the Work,
`
`Defendant had access to the Work prior to its own reproduction, distribution, and public display
`
`of the Work on its website and its print advertising.
`
`27. Defendant reproduced, distributed, and publicly displayed the Work without
`
`authorization from Plaintiff.
`
`28. By its actions, Defendant infringed and violated Plaintiff’s exclusive rights in
`
`violation of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 501, by reproducing, distributing, and publicly
`
`displaying the Work for its own commercial purposes.
`
`29. Defendant’s infringement was willful as it acted with actual knowledge or reckless
`
`disregard for whether its conduct infringed upon Plaintiff’s copyright. Defendant has operated in
`
`the grocery store business for years and has utilized hundreds (if not thousands) of professional
`
`stock imagery during that time. Further, Defendant itself utilizes a copyright disclaimer on its
`
`website (“© 2022 Jack’s Fresh Market”), indicating that Defendant understands the importance
`
`of copyright protection and intellectual property rights. Defendant clearly understands that high-
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.7 Filed 02/23/22 Page 7 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`end food photography is not generally available for free or that such can simply be copied from
`
`the internet.
`
`30. Plaintiff has been damaged as a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s
`
`infringement.
`
`31. Plaintiff is entitled to recover its actual damages resulting from Defendant’s
`
`unauthorized use of the Work and, at Plaintiff’s election (pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(b), Plaintiff
`
`is entitled to recover damages based on a disgorgement of Defendant’s profits from infringement
`
`of the Work, which amounts shall be proven at trial.
`
`32. Alternatively, and at Plaintiff’s election, Plaintiff is entitled to statutory damages
`
`pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), in such amount as deemed proper by the Court.
`
`33. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505, Plaintiff is further entitled to recover its costs and
`
`attorneys’ fees as a result of Defendant’s conduct.
`
`34. Defendant’s conduct has caused and any continued infringing conduct will continue
`
`to cause irreparable injury to Plaintiff unless enjoined by the Court. Plaintiff has no adequate
`
`remedy at law. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502, Plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction
`
`prohibiting infringement of Plaintiff’s exclusive rights under copyright law.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant as follows:
`
`a. A declaration that Defendant has infringed Plaintiff’s copyrights in the Work;
`
`b. A declaration that such infringement is willful;
`
`c. An award of actual damages and disgorgement of profits as the Court deems proper or, at
`
`Plaintiff’s election, an award of statutory damages for willful infringement up to
`
`$150,000.00 for each infringement of the Work;
`
`d. Awarding Plaintiff its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505;
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.8 Filed 02/23/22 Page 8 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`e. Awarding Plaintiff interest, including prejudgment interest, on the foregoing amounts;
`
`f. Permanently enjoining Defendant, its employees, agents, officers, directors, attorneys,
`
`successors, affiliates, subsidiaries and assigns, and all those in active concert and
`
`participation with Defendant, from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiff’s copyrights
`
`or continuing to display, transfer, advertise, reproduce, or otherwise market any works
`
`derived or copied from the Work or to participate or assist in any such activity; and
`
`g. For such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`
`Demand For Jury Trial
`
`Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issued so triable.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 23, 2022.
`
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. University Drive
`Suite 301
`Coral Springs, FL 33065
`Telephone: (877) 437-6228
`dan@copycatlegal.com
`
`By: /s/ Daniel DeSouza, Esq.______
`Daniel DeSouza, Esq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`COPYCAT LEGAL PLLC
`3111 N. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 301 • CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33065
`TELEPHONE (877) 437-6228
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.9 Filed 02/23/22 Page 9 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.10 Filed 02/23/22 Page 10 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.11 Filed 02/23/22 Page 11 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.12 Filed 02/23/22 Page 12 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.13 Filed 02/23/22 Page 13 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.14 Filed 02/23/22 Page 14 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.15 Filed 02/23/22 Page 15 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.16 Filed 02/23/22 Page 16 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.17 Filed 02/23/22 Page 17 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.18 Filed 02/23/22 Page 18 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.19 Filed 02/23/22 Page 19 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.20 Filed 02/23/22 Page 20 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.21 Filed 02/23/22 Page 21 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.22 Filed 02/23/22 Page 22 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.23 Filed 02/23/22 Page 23 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.24 Filed 02/23/22 Page 24 of 25
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00037-PLM-MV ECF No. 1, PageID.25 Filed 02/23/22 Page 25 of 25
`
`