throbber
Case 1:18-cv-02830-JPO Document 250-1 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 93
`1 of 93
`Case 1:18-cv-02830-JPO Document 250-1 Filed 09/09/21 Page
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-02830-JPO Document 250-1 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 93
`IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE CLASS
`FORWARD TO CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS/LEGAL COUNSEL
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`In re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigation
`
`No. 18-cv-02830 (JPO)
`
`NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTS,
`SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 FAIRNESS HEARING THEREON AND CLASS MEMBERS’ RIGHTS
`TO: ALL PERSONS THAT ENTERED INTO A MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BOND TRANSACTION1 AT ANY TIME
`BETWEEN AT LEAST JANUARY 1, 2006, AND APRIL 19, 2017, WHERE SUCH PERSONS WERE EITHER
`DOMICILED IN THE UNITED STATES OR ITS TERRITORIES OR, IF DOMICILED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
`OR ITS TERRITORIES, TRANSACTED IN THE UNITED STATES OR ITS TERRITORIES.
`A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
`You are not being sued.
`PLEASE READ THIS ENTIRE NOTICE CAREFULLY. A UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT AUTHORIZED THIS
`NOTICE. YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROCEEDINGS IN THIS ACTION. THIS NOTICE ADVISES YOU
`OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS WITH RESPECT TO THIS ACTION, INCLUDING WHAT YOU MUST DO IF YOU WISH
`TO SHARE IN THE PROCEEDS OF THE SETTLEMENTS. TO CLAIM YOUR SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENTS, YOU MUST
`ELECTRONICALLY SUBMIT YOUR CLAIM ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 13, 2021 OR MAIL YOUR CLAIM TO THE
`ADDRESS IN SECTION VIII POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 13, 2021.
`If you are a brokerage firm, swaps dealer, or trustee through whom Mexican Government Bonds (“MGBs”)2 were traded
`from January 1, 2006 through April 19, 2017, inclusive, on behalf of customers that are members of the Settlement Class as defined
`in Section I.C. below, you must provide the name and last known address of such customers to the Settlement Administrator at the
`address listed in Section VIII below within two weeks of receiving this Notice. The Settlement Administrator will cause copies of this
`Notice to be forwarded to each customer identified at the address so designated.
`This Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement, September 13, 2021 Fairness Hearing Thereon and Class Members’ Rights
`(“Notice”) is given pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District Court for the
`Southern District of New York (the “Court”). It is not junk mail, an advertisement, or a solicitation from a lawyer. You have not been
`sued. The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the pendency of the above-captioned class action and your rights in connection with
`the proposed Settlements and release of the claims asserted.
`A class action is a lawsuit in which one or more representative plaintiffs (in this case, Plaintiffs) bring a lawsuit on behalf of
`themselves and other similarly situated persons (i.e., a class) who have similar claims against the defendants. The representative
`plaintiffs, the court, and counsel appointed to represent the class have a responsibility to make sure that the interests of class members
`are adequately represented.
`You are receiving this Notice because records indicate that you may have transacted in one or more Mexican Government Bond
`Transactions during the Class Period and may be a Settlement Class Member in this class action.
`PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE. Inquiries concerning this Notice, the Proof
`of Claim and Release (the “Claim Form”), or any other questions from Settlement Class Members should be directed to:
`
`Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Settlement
` c/o A.B. Data, Ltd.
`P.O. Box 173123
`Milwaukee, WI 53217
`Tel.: 877-829-2941
`(if calling from outside the United States or Canada, call 1-414-961-6592)
` Email: info@MGBAntitrustSettlement.com
`Website: www.MGBAntitrustSettlement.com
`The Settling Defendants are Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Barclays Capital Securities Limited,
`Barclays Bank México, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Barclays México, and Grupo Financiero Barclays
`
`1 “Mexican Government Bond Transaction” means any purchase, sale, or exchange of Mexican Government Bonds, whether
`in the primary, secondary, or any other market.
`2 “Mexican Government Bonds” means any debt securities issued by the United Mexican States (“Mexico”) that are Mexican
`Peso-denominated, including, but not limited to, CETES, Bondes D, UDIBONOS, and BONOS.
`
`QUESTIONS? CALL 1-877-829-2941 OR VISIT WWW.MGBANTITRUSTSETTLEMENT.COM PAGE 1 OF 8
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-02830-JPO Document 250-1 Filed 09/09/21 Page 3 of 93
`México, S.A. de C.V. (collectively “Barclays”) and JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Broker-Dealer Holdings Inc., J.P. Morgan
`Securities LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Banco J.P. Morgan, S.A. Institución de Banca Múltiple, J.P. Morgan
`Grupo Financiero, and J.P. Morgan Securities plc (collectively “JPMorgan”). Barclays and JPMorgan have denied and continue to deny
`Plaintiffs’ claims.
`To resolve all Released Claims against all Released Parties, Barclays has agreed to pay a total of $5.7 million dollars and JPMorgan
`has agreed to pay a total of $15 million dollars.3 Plaintiffs entered into a settlement agreement with Barclays on March 27, 2020 and entered
`into a separate settlement agreement with JPMorgan on March 27, 2020 (the “Settlement Agreements”).4 The two settlements contained in the
`Settlement Agreements are referred to as the “Settlements,” and are jointly addressed by this Notice for efficiency and convenience.
`Settling Defendants have also agreed to certain cooperation obligations, which will assist Plaintiffs in prosecuting the claims
`against the remaining Defendants. Barclays and JPMorgan have each agreed to provide interbank chat communications, transaction
`data, and documents or information from the Class Period relevant to the allegations made in the Action.
`The Court has preliminarily approved the Settlements with Barclays and JPMorgan. The Court has appointed the lawyers listed
`below to represent you and the Settlement Class in this Action (“Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel”):
`Vincent Briganti
`LOWEY DANNENBERG, P.C.
`44 S. Broadway, Suite 1100
`White Plains, NY 10601
`Telephone: (914) 733-7221
`vbriganti@lowey.com
`
`Only Members of the Settlement Class Who Submit a Valid Claim Form in Response to this Notice Will Be Eligible to
`Participate in the Net Settlement Funds. Assuming final approval by the Court, the twenty million seven-hundred thousand dollars
`($20,700,000), plus interest, in Settlement Funds obtained from the Settling Defendants, net of such attorneys’ fees, costs, fees, taxes,
`and other deductions as are approved by the Court (the “Net Settlement Funds”), will be distributed to the members of the Settlement
`Class who properly complete and timely return a valid Claim Form, and are entitled to distribution under the Distribution Plan.
`Fairness Hearing and Right to Object. The Court has scheduled a public hearing on final approval of the Settlements for
`September 13, 2021 (“Fairness Hearing”). The purpose of the Fairness Hearing is to determine, among other things, whether the
`Settlements, the Distribution Plan, and the application by Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel for attorneys’ fees and payment of expenses are fair,
`reasonable, and adequate. If you remain in the Settlement Class, then you may object to any aspect of the Settlements, the Distribution
`Plan, Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel’s request for attorneys’ fees and payment of expenses, or any other matters. See Section III.B below. All
`objections must be made in accordance with the instructions set forth below and must be filed with the Court and served on
`Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel, Barclays’ Counsel, and JPMorgan’s Counsel on or before August 9, 2021 or they will not be
`considered. See Section III.B below.
`Right to Exclude Yourself from the Settlement Class for Either or Both of the Settlements. The Court will exclude you
`from the Settlement Class if you make a written request for exclusion from either or both of the Settlements that is postmarked to the
`Settlement Administrator (A.B. Data, Ltd.) at the address set forth in Section VIII no later than August 9, 2021. See Section
`III.C. To be valid, the request for exclusion must comply with the requirements set forth in the Court’s Order dated December
`16, 2020 (the “Preliminary Approval Order”) and summarized in Section III.C below. If you exclude yourself from the Settlement
`Class, you will not be entitled to share in the Net Settlement Funds.
`
`I.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE LITIGATION
`
`A. The Nature of the Litigation
`Plaintiffs allege that each Defendant,5 from January 1, 2006 through April 19, 2017, inclusive, conspired to fix the prices for
`Mexican Government Bonds issued by the Mexican government through the Bank of Mexico (“Banxico”). Plaintiffs allege that each
`
`3 Capitalized terms, not otherwise defined herein, shall have the same meanings assigned to them in the Settlement
`Agreements, as applicable.
`4 The Settlement Agreements are not settlements with any other Defendant and thus are not dispositive of any of Plaintiffs’
`claims against the remaining Defendants.
`5 “Defendants” are Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., BBVA Securities, Inc., BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc., BBVA
`Bancomer S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer, Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer, S.A. de
`C.V., Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc., Banco Santander (Mexico) S.A.
`Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Santander Mexico, Santander Investment Bolsa, Sociedad de Valores, S.A.U., Bank
`of America N.A., Bank of America Corporation, BankAmerica International Financial Corporation, Bank of America Mexico, S.A.,
`Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Citigroup
`Inc., Barclays Bank Mexico, S.A., Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Capital Securities Limited, Grupo Financiero Barclays Mexico, S.A.
`
`
`
`QUESTIONS? CALL 1-877-829-2941 OR VISIT WWW.MGBANTITRUSTSETTLEMENT.COM.
`
`PAGE 2 OF 8
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-02830-JPO Document 250-1 Filed 09/09/21 Page 4 of 93
`Defendant transacted in price-fixed MGBs at artificial prices with market participants like Plaintiffs and the Class. Plaintiffs’ lawsuit
`contends that Defendants fixed MGB prices through several interrelated means.
`First, Defendants allegedly rigged MGB primary market auctions through collusive bidding and information sharing to control the
`flow of MGB supply. As the sole authorized market makers for MGBs, Defendants agree to participate in the government run- primary market
`auctions for newly issued MGBs and to make MGBs available for purchase and sale to investors in the secondary market. Plaintiffs allege that
`Defendants shared the prices at which they planned to submit fixed bids in MGB primary market auctions, against explicit Banxico rules
`requiring that bids be confidential. Plaintiffs contend that Defendants’ bid-rigging allowed them to buy large volumes of MGBs at artificially
`low prices, increasing Defendants’ ability to dominate the MGB market and impose artificial prices.
`Second, Defendants allegedly sold newly issued MGBs purchased at auction into the secondary market at artificially high,
`price-fixed terms. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants controlled a significant market share of MGBs through their illegal bid-rigging and
`through privileges associated with their market maker status. Defendants allegedly manipulated the MGB market by communicating
`prices, pooling information about expected customer flows, and exchanging other confidential bank information through interbank
`chatrooms, telephone calls, and in-person meetings. Plaintiffs claim that Defendants’ conspiracy caused Plaintiffs and the Class to pay
`higher prices for newly issued MGBs sold into the secondary market than they otherwise would have.
`Third, Defendants allegedly agreed to fix the “bid-ask spread” artificially wider when offering to buy or sell MGBs in secondary
`market trading with Plaintiffs and the Class. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants fixed bid-ask spreads by communicating prices, expected
`customer flows, and sensitive bank information through interbank chatrooms, telephone calls, and in-person meetings. Plaintiffs claim
`that the result of Defendants’ alleged conspiracy was that investors were underpaid by Defendants’ suppression of the “bid price,” the
`price at which Defendants offered to buy MGBs from investors, and overcharged by Defendants’ inflation of the “ask price,” the price
`at which Defendants offered to sell MGBs to investors.
`Plaintiffs have asserted legal claims under federal antitrust law and common law.
`Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel believe that Settlement Class Members have been damaged by Defendants’ alleged
`conduct. Barclays and JPMorgan do not agree with the allegations made by Plaintiffs, believe that they have meritorious defenses to
`Plaintiffs’ allegations, and believe that Plaintiffs’ claims would have been rejected prior to trial, at trial (had Plaintiffs successfully
`certified a class and survived summary judgment motions), or on appeal. As a result, Settling Defendants believe Settlement Class
`Members would have received nothing if the litigation had continued to trial.
`The Court has not decided in favor of Plaintiffs, Barclays or JPMorgan. Instead, Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel engaged in separate
`negotiations with Barclays and JPMorgan to reach negotiated resolutions of the claims against Settling Defendants in this Action. The
`Settlements allow Plaintiffs, Barclays and JPMorgan to avoid the risks and costs of lengthy litigation and the uncertainty of pre-trial
`proceedings, a trial, and appeals. If approved, the Settlements would permit eligible Settlement Class Members who file timely and valid
`Claim Forms, to receive some compensation, rather than risk ultimately receiving nothing. Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel believe
`the Settlements are in the best interest of all Settlement Class Members.
`Barclays has agreed to pay a total of $5.7 million and JPMorgan has agreed to pay a total of $15 million (the “Settlement
`Funds”) in cash for the benefit of the proposed Settlement Class. If the Settlements are approved, the Settlement Funds, plus interest
`earned from the date it was established, less any Taxes, any Notice and Administration Costs, any Court-awarded attorneys’ fees,
`litigation costs and expenses, and service awards for Plaintiffs, and any other costs or fees approved by the Court (the “Net Settlement
`Fund”), will be divided among all Settlement Class Members who file valid Claim Forms.
`If the Settlements are approved, the Action will conclude against the Settling Defendants. If the Settlements are not approved, Settling
`Defendants will remain as defendants in the Action, and Plaintiffs will continue to pursue their claims against Settling Defendants.
`B. Procedural History
`On March 30, 2018, Plaintiffs Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund
`Local 103, I.B.E.W. filed the first class action complaint in this Action against the Settling Defendants and other defendants. ECF No.
`1.6 On April 25, 2018, the Court issued a stay of discovery pending resolution of Defendants’ anticipated motions to dismiss. ECF No.
`
`
`de C.V., Barclays plc, Barclays Capital Inc., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Barclays México, Citigroup Global Markets
`Inc., Citigroup Financial Products Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., Banco Nacional de México, S.A., Institución de Banca
`Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Banamex, S.A. de C.V., Credit Suisse Group AG, Credit Suisse AG, Grupo Financiero Credit Suisse (Mexico),
`S.A. de C.V., Banco Credit Suisse (Mexico), S.A., Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Deutsche Bank Americas Holding
`Corp., Deutsche Bank México, S.A. Institución de Banca Múltiple, HSBC Holdings plc, HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.,
`HSBC Markets (USA) Inc., HSBC México, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero HSBC, HSBC North America Holdings
`Inc., HSBC Latin America Holdings (UK) Limited, ING Groep N.V., ING Bank, N.V., and ING Financial Markets LLC, JPMorgan Chase
`& Co., J.P. Morgan Broker-Dealer Holdings Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Banco J.P.
`Morgan, S.A. Institución de Banca Múltiple, J.P. Morgan Grupo Financiero, and J.P. Morgan Securities plc.
`6 Unless otherwise noted, all docket citations are to In re Mexican Government Bonds, 18-cv-02830 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y.).
`
`QUESTIONS? CALL 1-877-829-2941 OR VISIT WWW.MGBANTITRUSTSETTLEMENT.COM.
`
`PAGE 3 OF 8
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-02830-JPO Document 250-1 Filed 09/09/21 Page 5 of 93
`11. Five additional class action complaints relating to the same facts and circumstances of this Action were filed in May 2018 against
`Settling Defendants and other defendants. On June 18, 2018, the Court granted an order consolidating the six related class action
`complaints and appointing Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. as interim class counsel. ECF No. 49. Thereafter, on July 18, 2018, Plaintiffs filed
`a first amended consolidated class action complaint, adding Plaintiffs Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan,
`Metropolitan Transportation Authority Defined Benefit Pension Plan Master Trust, Boston Retirement System, Southeastern
`Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Pension Plan, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry
`Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, and Government Employees’ Retirement System of the Virgin Islands. ECF No. 75.
`Defendants filed their motions to dismiss and two separate memoranda of law on September 17, 2018. ECF Nos. 113-44.
`Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss on November 16, 2018. ECF Nos. 145-46. Defendants filed their joint
`reply memoranda on December 20, 2018. ECF Nos. 150-51.
`On September 30, 2019, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
`for failure to state a claim and directed Plaintiffs to file a letter seeking leave to file a Second Consolidated Amended Complaint within twenty-
`one days. ECF No. 158. Plaintiffs submitted a letter motion seeking leave to file a Proposed Second Amended Class Action Complaint on
`October 21, 2019. ECF No. 159. Defendants filed a letter in response to Plaintiffs’ motion on October 23, 2019. ECF No. 161. On October 25,
`2019, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ letter motion. ECF No. 162. On December 9, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Consolidated Class
`Action Complaint (“SAC”). ECF No. 163. Defendants filed their motion to dismiss the SAC on February 21, 2020. ECF Nos. 176, 178-91.
`Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss the SAC on April 21, 2020. ECF Nos. 199, 201, 203.
`C. The Definition of the Settlement Class
`In the Preliminary Approval Order, the Court preliminarily approved the following Settlement Class, defined as:
`All Persons that entered into a Mexican Government Bond Transaction at any time between at least
`January 1, 2006, and April 19, 2017, where such persons were either domiciled in the United States
`or its territories or, if domiciled outside the United States or its territories, transacted in the United
`States or its territories, provided that if, prior to moving for Final Approval of the Settlement,
`Plaintiffs expand the Class in any subsequent amended complaint, class motion or in any other
`stipulation or settlement agreement Plaintiffs reach with any other Defendant involving this Action,
`the defined Class in this Settlement Agreement shall be expanded so as to be coterminous with such
`expansion. Excluded from the Class are Defendants and their employees, agents, affiliates, parents,
`subsidiaries and co-conspirators, whether or not named in the Complaint in this Action, and the
`United States and Mexican governments; provided, however, that Investment Vehicles shall not be
`excluded from the definition of “Class” or “Settlement Class” solely on the basis of being deemed
`to be Defendants or affiliates or subsidiaries of Defendants.
`Notwithstanding the sentence above that “[e]xcluded from the Class are the Defendants and their employees, agents, affiliates,
`parents, subsidiaries, and co-conspirators, whether or not named in the Complaint in this Action, and the United States and Mexican
`governments,” and solely for purposes of this Settlement and this Settlement Class, Investment Vehicles shall not be excluded from the
`Settlement Class solely on the basis of being deemed to be Defendants or affiliates or subsidiaries of Defendants; provided, however,
`that under no circumstances may a Defendant (or any of its direct or indirect parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, or divisions) receive a
`distribution from the Settlement Fund through an Investment Vehicle.
`If you are not sure whether you are included in the Class, you can ask for free help. You can call toll-free 1-877-829-2941 (if calling
`from outside the United States or Canada, call 1-414-961-6592) or visit www.MGBAntitrustSettlement.com for more information.
`
`II.
`SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
`A. Settlements with Barclays and JPMorgan
`On behalf of the Settlement Class, Plaintiffs entered into the Settlement Agreement with Barclays on March 27, 2020 and
`entered into the Settlement Agreement with JPMorgan on March 27, 2020. The following description of the proposed Settlements is
`only a summary. This description and this Notice are qualified in their entirety by the Settlement Agreements which are on file with the
`Court at
`the address
`indicated
`in
`this Notice and are available at
`the official website for
`the Settlements, at
`www.MGBAntitrustSettlement.com (the “Settlement Website”). In the event of any conflict between the Settlement Agreements and
`this Notice, the terms of the Settlement Agreements shall control.
`1. Barclays’ and JPMorgan’s Payments for the Benefit of the Settlement Class
`a. No Right to Reversion
`The Settlement Agreements do not provide Barclays or JPMorgan with a right of reversion. That is, no matter how many Settlement
`Class Members fail to file a Claim Form or choose to opt-out, if the Settlements are not terminated and are finally approved by the Court, none
`of the Settlement monies will revert to Barclays or JPMorgan. This is not a claims-made settlement; there will be no reversion.
`
`
`
`QUESTIONS? CALL 1-877-829-2941 OR VISIT WWW.MGBANTITRUSTSETTLEMENT.COM.
`
`PAGE 4 OF 8
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-02830-JPO Document 250-1 Filed 09/09/21 Page 6 of 93
`b. Barclays’ and JPMorgan’s Potential Right To Termination
`Sections 21 and 23 of the Settlement Agreements describe Barclays’ and JPMorgan’s right to terminate if certain events occur.
`With respect to each such event, Barclays and JPMorgan each has the right (as qualified in their respective Settlement Agreement), but
`not the obligation, to determine to exercise, in its sole discretion, its right to terminate if the event occurs.
`c. Distribution Plan
`The Distribution Plan is available for review on the Settlement Website at www.MGBAntitrustSettlement.com. Changes, if
`any, to the Distribution Plan based on newly available data or information will be promptly posted on the Settlement Website. Please
`see the Settlement Website for the most up-to-date information about the Distribution Plan. Members of the Settlement Class are strongly
`encouraged to review the Settlement Website for any changes to the Distribution Plan.
`d. Changes or Further Orders by the Court
`Any change by the Court of the Distribution Plan, the time and place of the Fairness Hearing, or any other matter and all further
`orders or requirements by the Court will be posted on the Settlement Website at www.MGBAntitrustSettlement.com as soon as practicable.
`It is important that you refer to the Settlement Website as no other notice may be published of such changes.
`2. The Release and Covenant Not to Sue under the Settlement Agreements
`IF YOU HAVE NOT VALIDLY REQUESTED TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE SETTLEMENT CLASS, WHEN THE
`SETTLEMENTS BECOME FINAL YOU WILL BE RELEASING THE CLAIMS DESCRIBED BELOW, AND YOU WILL
`BE BOUND BY THE RELEASES IN THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS INCLUDING THE COVENANT NOT TO
`SUE—EVEN IF YOU DO NOT FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE.
`Unless you exclude yourself, you remain a Settlement Class Member. That means you can’t sue, continue to sue, or be part of
`any other lawsuit about the Released Claims in this Action against Settling Defendants or any of the Released Parties. Upon the Effective
`Date, the Releasing Parties shall release and be deemed to release and forever discharge and shall be forever enjoined from prosecuting
`the Released Claims against the Released Parties, regardless of whether such Releasing Party executes and delivers a Claim Form.
`The capitalized terms used in this paragraph are defined in the Settlement Agreements, Preliminary Approval Order, or this
`Notice. For easy reference, certain of these terms are copied below:
`• “Released Parties” means Settling Defendants and each of their respective past and present
`direct and indirect corporate parents (including holding companies), subsidiaries, related entities,
`affiliates, associates (all as defined in SEC Rule 12b-2 promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange
`Act of 1934), divisions, joint ventures, predecessors, and successors, and each of their respective past or
`present officers, directors, partners, members, managers, managing directors, employees, agents,
`contractors, attorneys, legal or other representatives, trustees, trusts, heirs, beneficiaries, estates,
`executors, administrators, insurers, shareholders, advisors, and assigns of each of the foregoing.
`• “Releasing Parties” means, individually and collectively, Plaintiffs and each Settling
`Class Member, on behalf of themselves and any of their respective predecessors, successors and
`assigns, direct and indirect parents, subsidiaries and affiliates, and on behalf of their respective past
`or present officers, directors, stockholders, agents, employees, legal representatives, partners,
`principals, members, participants, associates, trustees, beneficiaries, parents, subsidiaries, divisions,
`affiliates, and the heirs, executors, administrators, purchasers, predecessors, successors, and assigns
`of each of the foregoing, whether or not they object to the Settlement and whether or not they make
`a claim for payment from the Net Settlement Fund.
`• “Released Claims” means any and all manner of claims, rights, demands, obligations,
`damages, actions or causes of action, cross-claims, counterclaims, judgments, suits, obligations, debts,
`setoffs, rights of recovery, charges or liabilities of any kind whatsoever (however denominated), of
`every nature and description, whether known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, asserted or
`unasserted, whether class, derivative or individual, whether fixed or contingent, in law or in equity,
`whether arising under federal, state, common, statutory or foreign law or regulation (including FED.
`R. CIV. P. 11), whether directly, representatively, derivatively, or in any other capacity, which any
`member of the Settlement Class ever had, now have, or hereafter can, shall, or may have that arise out
`of or relate in any way to the acts, facts, statements, or omissions that were or could have been alleged
`or asserted by Plaintiffs or any member of the Settlement Class in the Action, including, but not limited
`to, any claims arising from or related to(a) any purported conspiracy, collusion, racketeering activity,
`or other improper conduct related to Mexican Government Bonds or Mexican Government Bond
`Transactions, (b) any alleged manipulation of the prices of Mexican Government Bonds or Mexican
`Government Bond Transactions, or (c) the sharing or exchange of customer information or confidential
`information, including, but not limited to, customer identity, trading patterns, net positions, or orders
`with respect to Mexican Government Bonds or Mexican Government Bond Transactions. For the
`avoidance of doubt, Released Claims do not include claims relating to enforcement of the Settlement
`
`
`
`QUESTIONS? CALL 1-877-829-2941 OR VISIT WWW.MGBANTITRUSTSETTLEMENT.COM.
`
`PAGE 5 OF 8
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-02830-JPO Document 250-1 Filed 09/09/21 Page 7 of 93
`and do not include claims arising under foreign law based solely on transactions executed entirely
`outside of the United States by members of the Settlement Class domiciled outside the United States.
`You are automatically a member of a Settlement Class if you fit the Settlement Class description. However, if you do not submit
`a timely and valid Claim Form, you will not receive any payment from the Settlements. You will be bound by past and any future Court
`rulings, including rulings on the Settlements and Released Claims. Unless you exclude yourself, you will not be able to start a lawsuit,
`continue with a lawsuit, or be a part of any other lawsuit against Settling Defendants or any of the other Released Parties on the basis of
`the Released Claims.
`
`*****
`The Settlement Agreements do not settle or compromise any claims other than those set out therein. All rights of the Plaintiffs
`or any Settlement Class Member against any person or entity other than the parties released in the Settlement Agreements are specifically
`reserved by the Plaintiffs and the Class Members.
`
`III.
`YOUR OPTIONS
`A. Claim Form for the Settlement Agreements
`To participate in and receive your share of the Net Settlement Funds, you must submit a valid and timely Claim Form
`demonstrating that you are an Authorized Claimant as set forth in the Settlement Agreements. You may obtain and submit a Claim Form
`on the Settlement Website at www.MGBAntitrustSettlement.com no later than October 13, 2021. Claim Forms, if sent by mail, must be
`addressed to the Settlement Administrator (see address in Section VIII below) and postmarked no later than October 13, 2021. A copy
`of the Claim Form is attached hereto.
`Any Settlement Class Member who fails to submit a Claim Form by October 13, 2021 in the manner specified, will be barred
`from receiving any payment from the Net Settlement Funds (unless, by Order of the Court, an untimely Claim Form submitted by such
`member of the Settlement Class is approved), but will in all other respects be bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreements and by the
`Final Judgment(s) entered on the Settlement Class’ claims.
`B. Object to the Settlements
`If you are a Settlement Class Member and you do not exclude yourself, you can tell the Court what you think about the
`Settlements. You can object to all or any part of the Settlements, Distribution Plan, and/or application for attorneys’ fees, reimbursement
`of litigation costs and expenses, and any service awards for Plaintiffs. You can give reasons why you think the Court should approve
`them or not. The Court will consider your views. You may also ask to intervene in the Action.
`If you want to make an objection or intervene in the Action, you may enter an appearance in the Action, at your own expense,
`individually or through counsel of your own choice, by filing with the Clerk of Court a notice of appearance and your objection, and
`serving copies of your objection on Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel, Barclays’ Counsel, and JPMorgan’s Counsel by August 9, 2021 to the
`following mailing addresses:
`
`Vincent Briganti
`LOWEY DANNENBERG, P.C.
`44 S. Broadway, Suite 1100
`White Plains, NY 10601-2310
`
`Jeffrey T. Scott
`SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
`125 Broad Street
`New York, NY 10004
`
`Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel
`
`Counsel for Barclays
`
`Robert D. Wick
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Ave.,
`New York, NY 10018
`Counsel for JPMorgan
`
`Any Settlement Class Member who does not enter an appearance and does not object will be represented by Plaintiffs’ Lead
`Counsel.
`
`If you choose to object, you must file a written objection with the Clerk of the Court. You cannot file an objection by telephone
`or email. Your written objection must include a statement of the objection or motion to intervene, as well as the specific legal and factual
`reasons for each

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket