throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00935, Paper 53
`IPR2014-00936, Paper 57
`IPR2014-00938, Paper 58
`Entered: August 26, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD., JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (USA) LTD.,
`SHENZHEN JIAWEI PHOTOVOLTAIC LIGHTING CO., LTD., ATICO
`INTERNATIONAL (ASIA) LTD., ATICO INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.,
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN FLORIDA),
`CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. (CHIEN LUEN CHINA),
`COLEMAN CABLE, LLC, NATURE’S MARK, RITE AID CORP., SMART
`SOLAR, INC., AND TEST RITE PRODUCTS CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`IPR2014-00935 (Patent 8,089,370 B2)
`IPR2014-00936 (Patent 7,196,477 B2)
`IPR2014-00938 (Patent 7,429,827 B2)
`_______________
`
`
`Before WILLIAM V. SAINDON, JUSTIN T. ARBES, and
`BARRY L. GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SAINDON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Request for Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00935 (Patent 8,089,370 B2)
`IPR2014-00936 (Patent 7,196,477 B2)
`IPR2014-00938 (Patent 7,429,827 B2)
`
`
`The Scheduling Order for these cases sets the date for oral hearing as
`
`September 21, 2015, if a hearing is requested by the parties and granted by the
`
`Board. Both parties have requested an oral hearing. The parties’ request for oral
`
`hearing is GRANTED.
`
`Time & Format
`
`Each side will have 90 minutes to present arguments. The 90 minutes may
`
`be apportioned between the cases as the presenting party sees fit; all of the cases
`
`will be heard together and at once. Petitioner will present its case first, and may
`
`reserve time for rebuttal. Patent Owner will then respond to Petitioner’s case, and
`
`may also present its case, if it chooses, for any motions it has made. Petitioner
`
`may use any time it has reserved to rebut Patent Owner’s response to Petitioner’s
`
`case, and, if Patent Owner argued any of its motions, Petitioner may then respond
`
`to Patent Owner’s arguments. Patent Owner may then rebut Petitioner’s arguments
`
`regarding Patent Owner’s motions.
`
`The hearing will commence at 9 AM Eastern Standard Time on
`
`September 21, 2015, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany
`
`Street, Alexandria, Virginia. The Board will provide a court reporter for the
`
`hearing and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the
`
`hearing. The hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance that will
`
`be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. Available seating is limited.
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00935 (Patent 8,089,370 B2)
`IPR2014-00936 (Patent 7,196,477 B2)
`IPR2014-00938 (Patent 7,429,827 B2)
`
`
`Demonstratives
`
`The parties are reminded that, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative
`
`exhibits must be served at least five business days before the hearing date. The
`
`parties must file any objections to the demonstratives with the Board at least two
`
`business days before the hearing. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is
`
`not presented timely will be considered waived. The objections should identify
`
`with particularity which demonstratives are subject to objection, and include a
`
`short (one sentence or less) statement of the reason for each objection. No
`
`argument or further explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the
`
`objections and schedule a conference if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board
`
`will reserve ruling on the objections until after the oral argument. The parties are
`
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of
`
`the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041, Paper 65 (PTAB January 27, 2014),
`
`for guidance regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits.
`
`Lead Counsel
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person at the
`
`oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s argument. If
`
`either party expects that its lead counsel will not be attending the oral argument,
`
`the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference with the Board no later than
`
`two business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`Audio/Visual Equipment Requests
`
`Any requests for special audio/visual equipment should be directed in a
`
`separate email to Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for equipment, including requests
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00935 (Patent 8,089,370 B2)
`IPR2014-00936 (Patent 7,196,477 B2)
`IPR2014-00938 (Patent 7,429,827 B2)
`
`
`already made, will not be honored unless presented in a separate communication
`
`not less than five days before the hearing directed to the above email address.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`5
`
`IPR2014-00935 (Patent 8,089,370 B2)
`IPR2014-00936 (Patent 7,196,477 B2)
`IPR2014-00938 (Patent 7,429,827 B2)
`
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Mark Nelson
`Mark.nelson@dentons.com
`
`Daniel Valenzuela
`Daniel.valenzuela@dentons.com
`
`Lissi Mojica
`Lissi.mojica@dentons.com
`
`Kevin Greenleaf
`Kevin.greenleaf@dentons.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Theodore Shiells
`tfshiells@shiellslaw.com
`
`Marcus Benavides
`marcusb@tlpmb.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket