`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`THE BOEING COMPANY
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`SEYMOUR LEVINE
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case No. IPR201_5-01341
`U.S. Patent No. RE39,618
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`92067566.l
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015—0l341
`
`U.S. Patent No. RE39,6l8
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Scheduling Order (Paper 9),
`
`Petitioner submits this Request for Oral Argument on all instituted grounds of
`
`unpatentability of U.S. Patent No. RE3 9,618 and related issues. Petitioner
`
`specifically requests, without waiving consideration of any issue not listed below,
`
`to address the following issues at Oral Argument:
`
`1.
`
`Whether claims 4, 5, 14, and 16 are obvious under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103 (a) over Wardl in view of ARINC 624-12.
`
`2.
`
`Whether claims 8, 9, and 10 are obvious under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103 (a) over Ward in view of ARINC 624-l in further View of
`
`Monroe3.
`
`3.
`
`Whether claims 4, 5, 14, and 16 are obvious under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103 (a) over Dyson4 in view of Chetail5.
`
`‘Ex. 1015.
`
`2
`
`Ex. 1014.
`
`3Ex. 1017.
`
`4
`
`Ex. 1019.
`
`5Ex. 1018.
`
`92067566.l
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR20l5-01341
`
`U.S. Patent No. RE39,6l 8
`
`Whether claims 8, 9, and 10 are obvious under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103 (a) over Dyson in View of Chetail in further View of
`
`Monroe.
`
`Whether claims 4, 5, 14, and 16 are obvious under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103(a) over Dowling6 in View of ARINC 624-1.
`
`Whether claims 8, 9, and 10 are obvious under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103 (a) over Dowling in View of ARINC 624-1 in further View
`
`of Monroe.
`
`Whether claims 8, 9, and 10 are obvious under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103 (a) over Ward in View of ARINC 624-1, ARINC 702-67,
`
`and FAA, Increased FDR Parameterss.
`
`Whether claims 8, 9, and 10 are obvious under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103 (a) over Ward in View of ARINC 624-1, FAA, Increased
`
`FDR Parameters, and Farmakis9.
`
`6Ex. 1013.
`
`7Ex. 1016.
`
`8 Ex. 1011.
`
`9Ex. 1021.
`
`92067566.1
`
`
`
`Case No.IPR2015—01341
`
`U.S. Patent No. RE39,618
`
`9.
`
`Petitioner’s Motion to Exclude, which is being filed
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`contemporaneously with this Request for Oral Argument.
`
`Any motions to exclude evidence filed by Patent Owner.
`
`Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters.
`
`Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification.
`
`The Board has already scheduled a Hearing for September 14,
`
`2016 (Paper 24).
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests one hour per side of oral argument time with
`
`the right to reserve 20 minutes of its time for rebuttal. One hour is necessary and
`
`reasonable given the number of grounds upon which the Board instituted trial, the
`
`number of references at issue, and the other issues raised in the parties’ papers.
`
`Petitioner also respectfully requests the ability to use audio visual equipment to
`
`display demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen that
`
`connects to a laptop computer.
`
`Dated: August 22, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Ryan J. McBrayer/
`Ryan J. McBrayer (Reg. No. 54,299)
`Perkins Coie LLP
`
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
`
`Seattle, WA 98101
`
`Attorneys for The Boeing Company
`
`92067566.l
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR20l5-01341
`
`U.S. Patent No. RE39,6l8
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT was served in its entirety on August 22, 2016, upon the following
`
`counsel for Patent Owner via e-mail, pursuant to the parties’ agreement concerning
`
`service:
`
`Bruce R. Zisser
`
`Amar L. Thakur
`
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`brucezisser@quinnemanuel.corn
`amarthakur@quinnemanuel.com
`Attorneys for Patent Owner Seymour Levine
`
`Dated: August 22, 2016
`
`/Ryan J. McBrayer/
`Ryan J. McBrayer (Reg. No. 54,299)
`Perkins Coie LLP
`
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
`
`Seattle, WA 98101
`
`Attorneys for The Boeing Company
`
`92067566.]
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
