throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 11
`Entered: May 5, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`BATTERY-BIZ, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`COMARCO WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00630 (Patent 7,863,770 B2)
`Case IPR2016-00632 (Patent 7,460,381 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Mr. Charles Quinn
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`Patent Owner, Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc., filed a revised
`motion for pro hac vice admission of Mr. Charles Quinn. Paper 10
`(“Mot.”).2 Patent Owner also filed a declaration from Mr. Quinn in support
`
`
`1 We use this caption in this paper to indicate that this Order applies to, and
`is entered in, both cases. The parties are not authorized to use this caption.
`2 Papers filed thus far in IPR2016-00630 and IPR2016-00632 have identical
`paper numbers.
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-00630 (Patent 7,863,770 B2)
`Case IPR2016-00632 (Patent 7,460,381 B2)
`
`of its motion. Mot., Ex. A.3 Patent Owner states that the parties have
`conferred and Petitioner, Battery-Biz, Inc., does not oppose Patent Owner’s
`revised motion. Mot. 2.
`Having reviewed the Motion and the declaration of Mr. Quinn, we
`conclude that Mr. Quinn has sufficient qualifications to represent Patent
`Owner in this proceeding and that Patent Owner has shown good cause for
`Mr. Quinn’s pro hac vice admission. See Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel
`Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (setting forth the
`requirements for pro hac vice admission) (Paper 7). Mr. Quinn will be
`permitted to appear pro hac vice in this proceeding as back-up counsel only.
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`ORDER
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion for pro hac vice admission of
`Charles Quinn is granted, and Mr. Quinn is authorized to represent Patent
`Owner only as back-up counsel in this proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in this proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Quinn is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`
`3 In the future, all exhibits in these proceedings must be filed as numbered
`exhibits in the PTAB’s Patent Review Process System (“PRPS”).
`Information regarding the use of PRPS, including contact information for
`questions, may be found at http://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-
`process/appealing-patent-decisions/trials/patent-review-processing-system-
`prps-0.
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-00630 (Patent 7,863,770 B2)
`Case IPR2016-00632 (Patent 7,460,381 B2)
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Quinn is subject to the USPTO’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO’s Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth at 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`David A. Dillard
`Sami I. Schilly
`LEWIS ROCA ROTHBERGER CHRISTIE, LLP
`ddillard@lrrc.com
`sschilly@lrrc.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Harris A. Wolin
`GRAHAM CURTIN, PA
`hwolin@grahamcurtin.com
`
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket