`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01404
`Patent 6,968,459
`
`____________________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR OBSERVATIONS ON CROSS-
`EXAMINATION OF DR. PAUL FRANZON
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`IPR2016-01404
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`Observation No. 1 ...................................................................................................... 1
`Observation No. 2 ...................................................................................................... 1
`Observation No. 3 ...................................................................................................... 2
`
`
`
`
`
`- i -
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01404
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`Description
`
`Microsoft Dictionary
`Schneier, B., Applied Cryptography, 2d. Ed., Wiley, 1996
`Franzon Deposition Transcript (May 4, 2017)
`Declaration of David M. Goldschlag, Ph.D.
`Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Goldschlag
`Definition of “specific”, Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary,
`Eleventh Edition (2008)
`Conference Call Transcript (May 4, 2017)
`Second Franzon Deposition Transcript (September 13, 2017)
`
`Exhibit #
`2001
`2002
`2003
`2004
`2005
`2006
`2007
`2008
`
`- ii -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01404
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`Patent Owner hereby submits observations on Patent Owner’s September 13,
`
`2017 cross-examination of Petitioners’ expert, Dr. Paul Franzon, regarding his
`
`August 30, 2017 Supplemental Declaration (Ex. 1012) in support of Petitioners’
`
`Reply dated August 30, 2017 (Paper 23). Exhibit 2008 is a transcript of that
`
`deposition and is used as the basis for the observations below.
`
`Observation No. 1
`
`
`
`In Exhibit 2008, page 51, line 9– 11, Dr. Franzon was asked “in Column 6,
`
`Line 7 through 11, when Bensimon uses the term password string, which type of
`
`class of password is Bensimon referring to?” Dr. Franzon response was that “is
`
`referring to either the write protection password or read-write protection
`
`password” Ex. 2008, 51:13-15. This relevant because it directly contradicts Dr.
`
`Franzon’s “Supplemental” Declaration at ¶ 24, where he states “my understanding
`
`is that Bensimon does not disclose the type of “password string” the Password-
`
`Disable command sends to the storage device using the disable command.” Dr.
`
`Franzon’s repeated contradictions are highly relevant to his credibility and the
`
`weight that the Board should give to Dr. Franzon’s opinions.s.
`
`Observation No. 2
`
`In Exhibit 2008, page 57, lines 14-58, Dr. Franzon agrees that Bensimon does not
`
`explicitly disclose what happens when an error condition is set, stating “Bensimon
`
`doesn't give further detail on what happens to the error conditions set.” This
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01404
`
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`
`testimony is relevant to Petitioner’s anticipation ground because it contradicts Dr.
`
`Franzon opinion at ¶ 30 of his “Supplemental” declaration that Bensimon teaches
`
`that “write commands” are disabled when an “error condition” is set. When
`
`pressed at deposition, faced with the lack of explicit teaching in Bensimon that
`
`“write commands” must always be disabled after an “error condition” is set, Dr.
`
`Franzon repeatedly refused to answer the question. See Exhibit 2008, p. 57:14-
`
`71:4. Dr. Franzon’s shifting and inconsistent positions and refusal to answer
`
`questions related to those opinions is relevant to weight that the Board should
`
`assign to his opinions.
`
`Observation No. 3
`
`
`
`In Exhibit 2008, page 19, line 19– page 25, line 25, Dr. Franzon was asked
`
`repeatedly “Do you know whether or not your opinions changed between your
`
`supplemental report and your original report?,” and Dr. Franzon repeatedly refused
`
`to answer this question other than to say that “My supplemental report builds on
`
`top of the opinions in the original report.” This testimony is relevant to Dr.
`
`Franzon’s credibility as an expert witness. Dr. Franzon’s refusal to answer this
`
`question indicates that he was not properly prepared to discuss his opinions during
`
`the deposition, thereby depriving Patent Owner a fair opportunity to cross-examine
`
`Dr. Franzon, and thus the Board should assign little weight to Dr. Franzon’s
`
`opinions in his Supplemental Declaration.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01404
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Lori A. Gordon/
`
`
`
`Lori A. Gordon (Reg. No. 50,633)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Date: September 18, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01404
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e))
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S
`
`MOTION FOR OBSERVATION ON CROSS-EXAMINATION OF DR.
`
`PAUL FRANZON and Exhibit 2008 were served electronically via e-mail on
`
`September 18, 2017 in their entirety on the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lionel Lavenue (Lead Counsel)
`James D. Stein (Back-up Counsel)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
`IV459-IPR@finnegan.com
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`james.stein@finnegan.com
`
`Roshan Suresh Mansinghani (Back-up Counsel)
`Jonathan Stroud (Back-up Counsel)
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`/Lori A. Gordon/
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
`Lori A. Gordon (Reg. No. 50,633)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Date: September 18, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`8265817_1.docx
`
`
`
`