throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01404
`Patent 6,968,459
`
`____________________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR OBSERVATIONS ON CROSS-
`EXAMINATION OF DR. PAUL FRANZON
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`IPR2016-01404
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`Observation No. 1 ...................................................................................................... 1
`Observation No. 2 ...................................................................................................... 1
`Observation No. 3 ...................................................................................................... 2
`
`
`
`
`
`- i -
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01404
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`Description
`
`Microsoft Dictionary
`Schneier, B., Applied Cryptography, 2d. Ed., Wiley, 1996
`Franzon Deposition Transcript (May 4, 2017)
`Declaration of David M. Goldschlag, Ph.D.
`Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Goldschlag
`Definition of “specific”, Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary,
`Eleventh Edition (2008)
`Conference Call Transcript (May 4, 2017)
`Second Franzon Deposition Transcript (September 13, 2017)
`
`Exhibit #
`2001
`2002
`2003
`2004
`2005
`2006
`2007
`2008
`
`- ii -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01404
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`Patent Owner hereby submits observations on Patent Owner’s September 13,
`
`2017 cross-examination of Petitioners’ expert, Dr. Paul Franzon, regarding his
`
`August 30, 2017 Supplemental Declaration (Ex. 1012) in support of Petitioners’
`
`Reply dated August 30, 2017 (Paper 23). Exhibit 2008 is a transcript of that
`
`deposition and is used as the basis for the observations below.
`
`Observation No. 1
`
`
`
`In Exhibit 2008, page 51, line 9– 11, Dr. Franzon was asked “in Column 6,
`
`Line 7 through 11, when Bensimon uses the term password string, which type of
`
`class of password is Bensimon referring to?” Dr. Franzon response was that “is
`
`referring to either the write protection password or read-write protection
`
`password” Ex. 2008, 51:13-15. This relevant because it directly contradicts Dr.
`
`Franzon’s “Supplemental” Declaration at ¶ 24, where he states “my understanding
`
`is that Bensimon does not disclose the type of “password string” the Password-
`
`Disable command sends to the storage device using the disable command.” Dr.
`
`Franzon’s repeated contradictions are highly relevant to his credibility and the
`
`weight that the Board should give to Dr. Franzon’s opinions.s.
`
`Observation No. 2
`
`In Exhibit 2008, page 57, lines 14-58, Dr. Franzon agrees that Bensimon does not
`
`explicitly disclose what happens when an error condition is set, stating “Bensimon
`
`doesn't give further detail on what happens to the error conditions set.” This
`
`1
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01404
`
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`
`testimony is relevant to Petitioner’s anticipation ground because it contradicts Dr.
`
`Franzon opinion at ¶ 30 of his “Supplemental” declaration that Bensimon teaches
`
`that “write commands” are disabled when an “error condition” is set. When
`
`pressed at deposition, faced with the lack of explicit teaching in Bensimon that
`
`“write commands” must always be disabled after an “error condition” is set, Dr.
`
`Franzon repeatedly refused to answer the question. See Exhibit 2008, p. 57:14-
`
`71:4. Dr. Franzon’s shifting and inconsistent positions and refusal to answer
`
`questions related to those opinions is relevant to weight that the Board should
`
`assign to his opinions.
`
`Observation No. 3
`
`
`
`In Exhibit 2008, page 19, line 19– page 25, line 25, Dr. Franzon was asked
`
`repeatedly “Do you know whether or not your opinions changed between your
`
`supplemental report and your original report?,” and Dr. Franzon repeatedly refused
`
`to answer this question other than to say that “My supplemental report builds on
`
`top of the opinions in the original report.” This testimony is relevant to Dr.
`
`Franzon’s credibility as an expert witness. Dr. Franzon’s refusal to answer this
`
`question indicates that he was not properly prepared to discuss his opinions during
`
`the deposition, thereby depriving Patent Owner a fair opportunity to cross-examine
`
`Dr. Franzon, and thus the Board should assign little weight to Dr. Franzon’s
`
`opinions in his Supplemental Declaration.
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01404
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Lori A. Gordon/
`
`
`
`Lori A. Gordon (Reg. No. 50,633)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Date: September 18, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`IPR2016-01404
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,459
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e))
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S
`
`MOTION FOR OBSERVATION ON CROSS-EXAMINATION OF DR.
`
`PAUL FRANZON and Exhibit 2008 were served electronically via e-mail on
`
`September 18, 2017 in their entirety on the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lionel Lavenue (Lead Counsel)
`James D. Stein (Back-up Counsel)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
`IV459-IPR@finnegan.com
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`james.stein@finnegan.com
`
`Roshan Suresh Mansinghani (Back-up Counsel)
`Jonathan Stroud (Back-up Counsel)
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`/Lori A. Gordon/
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
`Lori A. Gordon (Reg. No. 50,633)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Date: September 18, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`8265817_1.docx
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket