`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 16
`Entered: May 17, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00060
`Patent 8,992,608 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before NEIL T. POWELL, JAMES A. TARTAL, and
`ROBERT L. KINDER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TARTAL, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Marc A. Cohn,
`Matthew M. Wolf, and Edward Han
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00060
`Patent 8,992,608 B2
`
`As authorized by the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to the Petition
`
`(Paper 3), Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., (“Patent Owner”) filed three
`motions: (1) “Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Marc A. Cohn”
`(Paper 12); (2) “Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Matthew M. Wolf”
`(Paper 13); and (3) “Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Edward Han”
`(Paper 14).1 Patent Owner represents that Petitioner does not oppose the
`Motions. Paper 12, 9; Paper 13, 9; Paper 14, 9.
`Patent Owner’s Motions are granted. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c); see
`also Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Order
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission, Paper 7 (October 15,
`2003) (setting forth requirements for pro hac vice admission).2
`It is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission
`are granted, and Mr. Cohn, Mr. Wolf, and Mr. Han are authorized to
`represent Patent Owner as back-up counsel in IPR2017-00060;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in this inter partes review proceeding;
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Cohn, Mr. Wolf, and Mr. Han are to
`comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of
`
`1 Patent Owner also filed affidavits in support of each Motion: Declaration
`of Marc A. Cohn in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`(Ex. 2009); Declaration of Matthew M. Wolf in Support of Motion for Pro
`Hac Vice Admission (Ex. 2010); Declaration of Edward Han in Support of
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission (Ex. 2011).
`2 Available at http://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/appealing-
`patent-decisions/decisions-and-opinions/representative-orders.
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00060
`Patent 8,992,608 B2
`
`Practice for Trials, as set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal
`Regulations, and that Mr. Cohn, Mr. Wolf, and Mr. Han are subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00060
`Patent 8,992,608 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Gregory S. Cordrey
`JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL, LLP
`gcordrey@jmbm.com
`
`Brian Egan
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`began@mnat.com
`
`Catherine Nyarady
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP
`cnyarady@paulweiss.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jennifer A. Sklenar
`Wallace Wu
`ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
`jennifer.sklenar@aporter.com
`wallace.wu@porter.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
