throbber
United States Patent
`Birch et al.
`
`[19]
`
`[54] NUCLEICACIDAMPLIFICATION USINGA
`REVERSIBLY INACTIVATED
`THERMOSTABLE ENZYME
`
`[75] Inventors: David Edward Birch, Berkeley;
`Walter Joseph Laird, Pinole; Michael
`Anthony Zoccoli, Moraga, all of Calif.
`[73] Assignee: Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.,
`Branchburg, N.J.
`
`[*] Notice:
`
`The term of this patent shall not extend
`beyond the expiration date of Pat. No.
`5,677,152.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 680,283
`[22] Filed:
`Jul. 11, 1996
`Related U.S. Application Data
`[60] Provisional application No. 60/002,673, Aug. 25, 1995.
`[51] Int. Cl." .............................. C12P 19/34; C12N 9/00;
`C12N 9/99
`[52] U.S. Cl. ......................... 435/91.2, 435/183; 435/184;
`435/810
`[58] Field of Search .................................... 435/91.2, 810,
`435/183, 184
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`5,262,525 11/1993 Bonnaffe et al. ....................... 530/411
`5,338,671
`8/1994 Scalice et al. ......................... 435/91.2
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Atassi et al. Reaction of Proteins with Citraconic Anhydride,
`Methods in Enzymology, vol. XXV, pp. 546–553, 1972.
`Goldberger and Anfinsen, May, 1962, “The Reversible
`Masking of Amino Groups in Ribonuclease and Its Possible
`Usefulness in the Synthesis of the Protein” Biochemistry
`1(3):401–405.
`
`US005773258A
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,773,258
`*Jun. 30, 1998
`
`Hunter and Ludwig, Sep., 1962, “The Reaction of Imi
`doesters With Proteins and Related Small Molecules” Imi
`doesters With Proteins 84:3491—3504.
`Habeeb, 1966, “Determination of Free Amino Groups in
`Proteins by Trinitrobenzenesulfonic Acid” Analytical Bio
`chemistry 14:328–336.
`Bailey et al., 1967, “Liver Enzyme Changes in the Devel
`oping Rats” Proceedings of the Biochemical Society
`103.78p–79p.
`Marzotto et al., 1967, “Acetcacetylation of Ribonuclease A”
`Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
`26(5):517–521.
`Marzotto et al., 1968, “Reversible Acetoacetylation of
`Amino Groups in Proteins” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta
`154:450–456.
`Braunitzer et al., Feb., 1968, “Tetrafluorbernsteinsaure—an
`hydrid, ein neues Reagens zur Spezifischen und reversiblen
`Maskierung der Aminogruppen in Proteinen” Hoppe-Sey
`ler’s Z. Physiol. Chem. 349; 265.
`Dixon and Perham, 1968, “Reversible Blocking of Amino
`Groups with Citraconic Anhydride” Biochem. J.
`109:312–314.
`(List continued on next page.)
`Primary Examiner—Kenneth R. Horlick
`Assistant Examiner—Joyce Tung
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—George W Johnston; Dennis P.
`Tramaloni; Douglas A. Petry
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`The present invention provides methods for the amplifica
`tion of nucleic acids using a reversibly inactivated thermo
`stable enzyme. The reversibly inactivated enzyme is the
`result of a chemical modification of the protein which
`inactivates the enzyme. The activity of the inactivated
`enzyme is recovered by an incubation of the reaction mix
`ture at an elevated temperature prior to, or as part of, the
`amplification reaction. Non-specific amplification is reduced
`because the reaction mixture does not support the formation
`of extension products prior to the activating incubation.
`13 Claims, 5 Drawing Sheets
`
`citraconic anhydride
`
`cis-aconitic anhydride
`
`A scheme for the reversible reaction of citraconic anhydride
`With lysine residues
`
`NH,
`çH.
`CH3
`ÇH2
`ÇHe
`orio 'o - gº 3–
`.
`.
`Citraconic
`anhydride
`
`H H
`
`MYR 1029
`Myriad Genetics, Inc. et al. (Petitioners) v. The Johns Hopkins University (Patent Owner)
`IPR For USPN 7,824,889
`
`Page 1 of 20
`
`

`

`5,773,258
`Page 2
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Habeeb and Atassi, 1970, “Enzymatic and Immunochemical
`Properties of Lysozyme—Evaluation of Several Amino
`Group Reversible Blocking Reagents” Biochemistry
`9(25):4939–4944.
`Atassi and Habeeb, 1972, “Reaction of Proteins with Cit
`raconic Anhydride” Methods in Enzymology 25(Part
`B):546–553.
`Shetty and Kinsella, 1980, “Ready Separation of Proteins
`from Nucleoprotein Complexes by Reversible Modifieda
`tion of Lysine Residues” Biochem. J. 191:269–272.
`Rozovskaya et al., 1981, “Modification of Escherichia coli
`RNA Polymerase by Diethyl Procarbonate” Molecular biol
`ogy 15(1):61–66.
`Naithani and Gattner, Dec., 1982, “Preparation and Proper
`ties of Citraconylinsulins.” Hoppe-Seyler’s Physiol. Chem.
`363:1443–1448.
`
`de la Escalera and Palacian, 1989, “Dimethylmaleic Anhy
`dride, a Specific Reagent for Protein Amino Groups” Bio
`chem. Cell. Biol. 67:63–66.
`
`Nieto and Palacian, 1989, “Effects of Temperature and pH
`on the Regeneration of the Amino Groups of Ovalbumin
`After Modification with Citraconic and Dimethylmaleic
`Anhydrides” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 749:204–210.
`Palacian et al., 1990, Dicarboxylic Acid Anhydrides as
`Dissociating Agents of Protein–Containing Structures
`Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 97:101–111.
`Lundblad, R.L., Chemical Reagents for Protein Modifica
`tion, second edition, Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press, 1991,
`Chapter 10, entitled “The Modification of Lysine”.
`
`Page 2 of 20
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 30, 1998
`
`Sheet 1 of 5
`
`5,773,258
`
`Fig. 1
`
`citraconic anhydride
`
`fº
`
`O’ SO SO
`
`cis-aconitic anhydride
`H.Q
`
`A. "
`
`O’ SO SO
`
`A scheme for the reversible reaction of citraconic anhydride
`with lysine residues
`
`NH2
`ÇH2
`CH
`|
`2
`J.S. #9
`CH2
`o o 'o -º-; 3–
`-
`it
`C| raconic
`anhydride
`
`CH3
`
`H H
`
`O
`Q
`C-OH -?
`Hºc
`Hºc OH
`Ç-H
`HAC-Q
`C=O
`C=O
`—º- i
`t
`N-H
`+
`N–H
`ÇH2
`ÇHe
`QH2
`QH2
`ÇH2
`ÇH2
`ÇH2 Q
`ÇH2 Q
`––N–C–C– —N–C–C–
`H H
`H H
`
`NHe
`CH2
`CH2
`ÇH2
`QH2 Q
`—N-C-C-
`
`Q
`ç-OH
`+ HAC-Q
`ç-H
`ç-OH
`O
`
`Page 3 of 20
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 30, 1998
`
`Sheet 2 of 5
`
`5,773,258
`
`Tag
`
`Ta.HS
`
`cn £2 of ee cy
`
`ZEaseaes
`
`~~Target
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 20
`
`Page 4 of 20
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 30, 1998
`Jun. 30, 1998
`
`Sheet 3 of 5
`Sheet 3 of 5
`
`5,773,258
`5,773,258
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 20
`
`Page 5 of 20
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 30, 1998
`
`Sheet 4 of 5
`
`5,773,258
`
`
`
`*-alget
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 20
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 30, 1998
`
`Sheet 5 of 5
`
`5,773,258
`
`tit & £it #8%
`& 3% tig 48%
`gººd isºgg Bºis 43395660484.3396,8048.4336
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 20
`
`

`

`1
`NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION USING A
`REVERSIBLY INACTIVATED
`THERMOSTABLE ENZYME
`
`This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional
`Application No. 60/002,673, filed Aug. 25, 1995.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`1. Field of the Invention
`This invention relates generally to the field of nucleic acid
`chemistry. More specifically, it relates to methods of ampli
`fying nucleic acid sequences and to methods of reducing
`non-specific amplification.
`2. Description of the Related Art
`The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) process for ampli
`fying nucleic acid sequences is well known in the art and
`disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,683,202; 4,683,195; and 4,965,
`188; each incorporated herein by reference. Commercial
`vendors, such as Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, Conn., market
`PCR reagents and publish PCR protocols.
`In each cycle of a PCR amplification, a double-stranded
`target sequence is denatured, primers are annealed to each
`strand of the denatured target, and the primers are extended
`by the action of a DNA polymerase. Specificity of amplifi
`cation depends on the specificity of primer hybridization.
`Primers are selected to be complementary to, or substan
`tially complementary to, sequences occurring at the 3' end of
`each strand of the target nucleic acid sequence. Under the
`elevated temperatures used in a typical PCR, the primers
`hybridize only to the intended target sequence. However,
`amplification reaction mixtures are typically assembled at
`room temperature, well below the temperature needed to
`insure primer hybridization specificity. Under such less
`stringent conditions, the primers may bind non-specifically
`to other only partially complementary nucleic acid
`sequences (or even to other primers) and initiate the syn
`thesis of undesired extension products, which can be ampli
`fied along with the target sequence. Amplification of the
`non-specific primer extension products can compete with
`amplification of the desired target sequences and can sig
`nificantly decrease the efficiency of the amplification of the
`desired sequence. Problems caused by non-specific ampli
`fication are discussed further in Chou et al., 1992, Nucleic
`Acids Research 2007):1717–1723, incorporated herein by
`reference.
`Non-specific amplification can be reduced by reducing the
`formation of extension products from primers bound to
`non-target sequences prior to the start of the reaction. In one
`method, referred to as a “hot-start” protocol, one or more
`critical reagents are withheld from the reaction mixture until
`the temperature is raised sufficiently to provide the neces
`sary hybridization specificity. In this manner, the reaction
`mixture cannot support primer extension during the time that
`the reaction conditions do not insure specific primer hybrid
`ization.
`Hot-start methods can be carried out manually by opening
`the reaction tube after the initial high temperature incubation
`step and adding the missing reagents. However, manual
`hot-start methods are labor intensive and increase the risk of
`contamination of the reaction mixture. Hot-start methods
`which use a heat labile material, such as wax, to separate or
`sequester reaction components are described in U.S. Pat. No.
`5,411,876, incorporated herein by reference, and Chou et al.,
`1992, supra. In these methods, a high temperature pre
`reaction incubation melts the heat labile material, thereby
`allowing the reagents to mix.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5,773.258
`
`2
`Another method of reducing the formation of extension
`products from primers bound to non-target sequences prior
`to the start of the reaction relies on inhibition of the DNA
`polymerase using a compound which non-covalently binds
`to the DNA polymerase a heat-reversible manner. U.S. Pat.
`No. 5,338,671, incorporated herein by reference, describes
`the use of antibodies specific for a thermostable DNA
`polymerase to inhibit the DNA polymerase activity. The
`antibodies must be incubated with the DNA polymerase in
`a buffer at room temperature prior to the assembly of the
`reaction mixture in order to allow formation of the antibody
`DNA polymerase complex. Antibody inhibition of DNA
`polymerase activity is inactivated by a high temperature
`pre-reaction incubation. A disadvantage of this method is
`that the production of antibodies specific to the DNA poly
`merase is expensive and time-consuming, especially in large
`quantities. Furthermore, the addition of antibodies to a
`reaction mixture may require redesign of the amplification
`reaction.
`The formation of extension products can also be inhibited
`by the addition of a compound which non-covalently binds
`to the primers in a heat-reversible manner, thereby prevent
`ing the primers from hybridization to any sequence, target or
`otherwise. For example, single-stranded binding protein
`added to a reaction mixture will bind the primers, thereby
`preventing primer hybridization and inhibiting primer exten
`sion. Improvements in the yield of PCR products using gene
`32 protein are described in Schwarz et al., 1990, Nucleic
`Acids Research 18(4):10, incorporated herein by reference.
`Non-specific amplification can be reduced by degrading
`extension products formed from primers bound to non-target
`sequences prior to the start of the reaction, such as using the
`methods described in copending U.S. Ser. No. 07/960,362,
`now allowed, which is incorporated herein by reference. The
`degradation of newly-synthesized extension products is
`achieved by incorporating into the reaction mixture duTP
`and UNG, and incubating the reaction mixture at 45°-60° C.
`prior to carrying out the amplification reaction. A disadvan
`tage of this method is that the degradation of extension
`product competes with the formation of extension product
`and the elimination of non-specific primer extension product
`is likely to be less complete.
`Conventional techniques of molecular biology, protein
`chemistry, and nucleic acid chemistry, which are within the
`skill of the art, are fully explained fully in the literature. See,
`for example, Sambrook et al., 1989, Molecular Cloning—A
`Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold
`Spring Harbor, N.Y.; Oligonucleotide Synthesis (M. J. Gait,
`ed., 1984); Nucleic Acid Hybridization (B. D. Hames and S.
`J. Higgins, eds., 1984); Chemical Reagents for Protein
`Modification (CRC Press); and a series, Methods in Enzy
`mology (Academic Press, Inc.), all of which are incorporated
`herein by reference. All patents, patent applications, and
`publications mentioned herein, both supra and infra, are
`incorporated herein by reference.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention provides methods and reagents for
`amplifying nucleic acid using a primer-based amplification
`reaction which provide a simple and economical solution to
`the problem of non-specific amplification. The methods use
`a reversibly inactivated thermostable enzyme which can be
`reactivated by incubation in the amplification reaction mix
`ture at an elevated temperature. Non-specific amplification
`is greatly reduced because the reaction mixture does not
`support primer extension until the temperature of the reac
`
`Page 8 of 20
`
`

`

`3
`tion mixture has been elevated to a temperature which
`insures primer hybridization specificity.
`One aspect of the present invention relates to reversibly
`inactivated thermostable enzymes which are produced by a
`reaction between a thermostable enzyme which catalyzes a
`primer extension reaction and a modifier reagent. The reac
`tion results in a significant, preferably essentially complete,
`reduction in enzyme activity. Incubation of the modified
`enzyme in an aqueous buffer at alkaline pH at a temperature
`which is less than about 25° C. results in essentially no
`increase in enzyme activity in less than about 20 minutes.
`Incubation of the modified enzyme in an aqueous buffer,
`formulated to pH 8–9 at 25°C., at a temperature greater than
`about 50° C. results in at least a two-fold increase in primer
`extension activity in less than about 20 minutes. The revers
`ibly inactivated thermostable enzymes of the invention, in
`their active state, either catalyze primer extension or are
`necessary for primer extension to occur. Preferred enzymes
`include thermostable DNA polymerases and ligases.
`Preferred modifier reagents are dicarboxylic acid anhy
`drides of the general formula:
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`5,773.258
`
`4
`wherein incubation of the modified enzyme in an aqueous
`buffer, formulated to pH 8–9 at 25° C., at a temperature
`greater than about 50° C. results in at least a two-fold
`increase in enzyme activity in less than about 20 minutes;
`and
`(b) incubating the resulting mixture of step (a) at a
`temperature which is greater than about 50° C. for a time
`sufficient to reactivate the enzyme and allow formation of
`primer extension products.
`As a preferred method, the present invention provides a
`method for the amplification of a target nucleic acid con
`tained in a sample, comprising:
`(a) contacting the sample with an amplification reaction
`mixture containing a primer complementary to the target
`nucleic acid and a modified thermostable enzyme, wherein
`the modified thermostable enzyme is produced by a reaction
`of a mixture of a thermostable enzyme and a dicarboxylic
`acid anyhydride of the general formula:
`
`where R1 and R2 are hydrogen or organic radicals, which
`may be linked, or of the general formula:
`
`where R1 and R2 are organic radicals, which may be linked,
`and the hydrogen are cis. The organic radical may be directly
`attached to the ring by a carbon-carbon bond or through a
`carbon-hereoatom bond, such as a carbon-oxygen, carbon
`nitrogen, or carbon-sulphur bond. The organic radicals may
`also be linked to each other to form a ring structure as in, for
`example, 3,4,5,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride.
`Preferred reagents include maleic anhydride; substituted
`maleic anhydrides such as citraconic anhydride, cis-aconitic
`anhydride, and 2,3-dimethylmaleic anhydride; exo-cis-3,6
`endoxo-A"-tetrahydropthalic anhydride; and 3,4,5,6
`tetrahydrophthalic anhydride. In particular, citraconic anhy
`dride and cis-aconitic anhydride are preferred for the
`preparation of reversibly inactivated DNA polymerases for
`use in PCR amplifications.
`Another aspect of the present invention relates to methods
`for carrying out a nucleic acid amplification reaction using
`a reversibly-inactivated thermostable enzyme of the present
`invention. The present invention provides methods for the
`amplification of a target nucleic acid contained in a sample
`comprising the steps of:
`(a) contacting the sample with an amplification reaction
`mixture containing a primer complementary to the target
`nucleic acid and a modified thermostable enzyme, wherein
`the modified thermostable enzyme is produced by a reaction
`of a mixture of a thermostable enzyme which catalyzes a
`primer extension reaction and a modifier reagent, wherein
`the reaction is carried out at alkaline pH at a temperature
`which is less than about 25°C., wherein the reaction results
`in a chemical modification of the enzyme which results in
`essentially complete inactivation of enzyme activity, and
`
`25
`
`where R1 and R2 are hydrogen or organic radicals, which
`may be linked, or of the general formula:
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`where R, and R2 are organic radicals, which may be linked,
`and the hydrogen are cis, wherein the reaction results in
`essentially complete inactivation of enzyme activity; and
`(b) incubating the resulting mixture of step (a) at a
`temperature which is greater than about 50° C. for a time
`sufficient to reactivate the enzyme and allow formation of
`primer extension products.
`Preferred embodiments of the methods use reversibly
`modified enzymes modified using the preferred modifier
`reagents. In some embodiments of the invention, the incu
`bation step, step (b), is carried out prior to the start of the
`amplification reaction. In other embodiments, the incubation
`which results in reactivation of the enzyme is an integral step
`in the amplification process. For example, the denaturation
`step carried out in each PCR cycle can function simulta
`neously to reactivate a modified DNA polymerase.
`In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the amplifi
`cation reaction is a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and a
`reversibly-inactivated thermostable DNA polymerase is
`used. The reaction mixture is incubated prior to carrying out
`the amplification reaction at a temperature which is higher
`than the annealing temperature of the amplification reaction.
`Thus, the DNA polymerase is inactivated until the tempera
`ture is above the temperature which insures specificity of the
`amplification reaction, thereby reducing non-specific ampli
`fication.
`Another aspect of the invention relates to amplification
`reaction mixtures which contain a reversibly-inactivated
`thermostable enzyme of the present invention along with
`reagents for carrying out the amplification reaction. In a
`preferred embodiment, the amplification reaction mixture
`contains oligonucleotide primers for carrying out a PCR.
`Another aspect of the invention relates to kits which
`comprise a reversibly inactivated thermostable enzyme of
`the invention and one or more amplification reagents.
`
`Page 9 of 20
`
`

`

`5,773.258
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`5
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`FIG. 1 shows the structures of citraconic anhydride,
`cis-aconitic anhydride, and 2,3-dimethylmaleic anhydride,
`and the reaction between citraconic anhydride and lysine.
`FIG. 2 shows the results of amplifications carried out
`using citraconylated Taq DNA polymerase as described in
`Example 4.
`FIG. 3 shows the results of amplifications carried out
`using citraconylated DNA polymerases as described in
`Example 6.
`FIG. 4 shows the results of varying the pre-reaction
`incubation time in amplifications carried out using citraco
`nylated and cis-aconitylated DNA polymerases as described
`in Example 9.
`FIG. 5 shows the results of varying the amplification cycle
`number in amplifications carried out using citraconylated
`and cis-aconitylated DNA polymerases as described in
`Example 10.
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`To aid in understanding the invention, several terms are
`defined below.
`The terms “nucleic acid” and “oligonucleotide” refer to
`primers, probes, and oligomer fragments to be detected, and
`shall be generic to polydeoxyribonucleotides (containing
`2-deoxy-D-ribose), to polyribonucleotides (containing
`D-ribose), and to any other type of polynucleotide which is
`an N glycoside of a purine or pyrimidine base, or modified
`purine or pyrimidine base. There is no intended distinction
`in length between the terms “nucleic acid” and
`“oligonucleotide”, and these terms will be used interchange
`ably. These terms refer only to the primary structure of the
`molecule. Thus, these terms include double- and single
`stranded DNA, as well as double- and single-stranded RNA.
`Oligonucleotide can be prepared by any suitable method. A
`review of synthesis methods is provided in Goodchild, 1990,
`Bioconjugate Chemistry 1(3):165–187, incorporated herein
`by reference.
`The term “hybridization” refers the formation of a duplex
`structure by two single-stranded nucleic acids due to
`complementary base pairing. Hybridization can occur
`between fully complementary nucleic acid strands or
`between “substantially complementary” nucleic acid strands
`that contain minor regions of mismatch. Conditions under
`which only fully complementary nucleic acid strands will
`hybridize are referred to as “stringent hybridization condi
`tions” or “sequence-specific hybridization conditions”.
`Stable duplexes of substantially complementary sequences
`can be achieved under less stringent hybridization condi
`tions. Those skilled in the art of nucleic acid technology can
`determine duplex stability empirically considering a number
`of variables including, for example, the length and base pair
`concentration of the oligonucleotides, ionic strength, and
`incidence of mismatched base pairs, following the guidance
`provided by the art (see, e.g., Sambrook et al., 1989, supra).
`Generally, stringent hybridization conditions are selected
`to be about 5° C. lower than the thermal melting point (Tm)
`for the specific sequence at a defined ionic strength and pH.
`The Tm is the temperature (under defined ionic strength and
`pH) at which 50% of the base pairs have dissociated.
`Relaxing the stringency of the hybridization conditions will
`allow sequence mismatches to be tolerated; the degree of
`mismatch tolerated can be controlled by suitable adjustment
`of the hybridization conditions.
`
`6
`The term “primer” refers to an oligonucleotide, whether
`natural or synthetic, capable of acting as a point of initiation
`of DNA synthesis under conditions in which synthesis of a
`primer extension product complementary to a nucleic acid
`strand is induced, i.e., in the presence of four different
`nucleoside triphosphates and an agent for polymerization
`(i.e., DNA polymerase or reverse transcriptase) in an appro
`priate buffer and at a suitable temperature. Oligonucleotide
`analogues, such as “peptide nucleic acids”, can act as
`primers and are encompassed within the meaning of the term
`“primer” as used herein. A primer is preferably a single
`stranded oligodeoxyribonucleotide. The appropriate length
`of a primer depends on the intended use of the primer but
`typically ranges from 6 to 50 nucleotides. Short primer
`molecules generally require cooler temperatures to form
`sufficiently stable hybrid complexes with the template. A
`primer need not reflect the exact sequence of the template
`nucleic acid, but must be sufficiently complementary to
`hybridize with the template.
`The term “primer extension” as used herein refers to both
`to the synthesis of DNA resulting from the polymerization of
`individual nucleoside triphosphates using a primer as a point
`of initiation, and to the joining of additional oligonucle
`otides to the primer to extend the primer. As used herein, the
`term “primer extension” is intended to encompass the liga
`tion of two oligonucleotides to form a longer product which
`can then serve as a target in future amplification cycles. As
`used herein, the term “primer” is intended to encompass the
`oligonucleotides used in ligation-mediated amplification
`processes which are extended by the ligation of a second
`oligonucleotide which hybridizes at an adjacent position.
`Primers can incorporate additional features which allow
`for the detection or immobilization of the primer but do not
`alter the basic property of the primer, that of acting as a point
`of initiation of DNA synthesis. For example, primers may
`contain an additional nucleic acid sequence at the 5' end
`which does not hybridize to the target nucleic acid, but
`which facilitates cloning of the amplified product. The
`region of the primer which is sufficiently complementary to
`the template to hybridize is referred to herein as the hybrid
`izing region.
`The terms “target region” and “target nucleic acid” refers
`to a region or subsequence of a nucleic acid which is to be
`amplified. The primer hybridization site can be referred to as
`the target region for primer hybridization.
`As used herein, an oligonucleotide primer is “specific” for
`a target sequence if the number of mismatches present
`between the oligonucleotide and the target sequence is less
`than the number of mismatches present between the oligo
`nucleotide and non-target sequences which may be present
`in the sample. Hybridization conditions can be chosen under
`which stable duplexes are formed only if the number of
`mismatches present is no more than the number of mis
`matches present between the oligonucleotide and the target
`sequence. Under such conditions, the oligonucleotide can
`form a stable duplex only with a target sequence. Thus, the
`use of target-specific primers under suitably stringent ampli
`fication conditions enables the specific amplification of
`those target sequences which contain the target primer
`binding sites. The use of sequence-specific amplification
`conditions enables the specific amplification of those target
`sequences which contain the exactly complementary primer
`binding sites.
`The term “non-specific amplification” refers to the ampli
`fication of nucleic acid sequences other than the target
`sequence which results from primers hybridizing to
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Page 10 of 20
`
`

`

`5,773.258
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`7
`sequences other than the target sequence and then serving as
`a substrate for primer extension. The hybridization of a
`primer to a non-target sequence is referred to as “non
`specific hybridization”, and can occur during the lower
`temperature, reduced stringency pre-reaction conditions.
`The term “thermostable enzyme” refers to an enzyme that
`is relatively stable to heat. The thermostable enzymes can
`withstand the high temperature incubation used to remove
`the modifier groups, typically greater than 50° C., without
`suffering an irreversible loss of activity. Modified thermo
`stable enzymes usable in the methods of the present inven
`tion include thermostable DNA polymerases and thermo
`stable ligases.
`The term “thermostable DNA polymerase” refers to an
`enzyme that is relatively stable to heat and catalyzes the
`polymerization of nucleoside triphosphates to form primer
`extension products that are complementary to one of the
`nucleic acid strands of the target sequence. The enzyme
`initiates synthesis at the 3' end of the primer and proceeds in
`the direction toward the 5' end of the template until synthesis
`terminates. Purified thermostable DNA polymerases are
`described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,889,818; U.S. Pat. No. 5,352,
`600; U.S. Pat. No. 5,079,352; PCT/US90/07639; PCT/
`US 91/05753; PCT/US91/0703; PCT/US 91/07076;
`co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/062,368;
`WO 92/09689; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,210,036; each incorpo
`rated herein by reference.
`An enzyme “derived” from an organism herein refers to
`an enzyme which is purified from the organism or a recom
`binant version of an enzyme which is purified from the
`organism, and includes enzymes in which the amino acid
`sequence has been modified using techniques of molecular
`biology.
`The term “reversibly inactivated”, as used herein, refers to
`an enzyme which has been inactivated by reaction with a
`compound which results in the covalent modification (also
`referred to as chemically modification) of the enzyme,
`wherein the modifier compound is removable under appro
`priate conditions. The reaction which results in the removal
`of the modifier compound need not be the reverse of the
`modification reaction. As long as there is a reaction which
`results in removal of the modifier compound and restoration
`of enzyme function, the enzyme is considered to be revers
`ibly inactivated.
`The term “reaction mixture” refers to a solution contain
`ing reagents necessary to carry out a given reaction. An
`“amplification reaction mixture”, which refers to a solution
`containing reagents necessary to carry out an amplification
`reaction, typically contains oligonucleotide primers and a
`DNA polymerase or ligase in a suitable buffer. A “PCR
`reaction mixture” typically contains oligonucleotide
`primers, a thermostable DNA polymerase, d\TP's, and a
`divalent metal cation in a suitable buffer. A reaction mixture
`is referred to as complete if it contains all reagents necessary
`to enable the reaction, and incomplete if it contains only a
`subset of the necessary reagents. It will be understood by
`one of skill in the art that reaction components are routinely
`stored as separate solutions, each containing a subset of the
`total components, for reasons of convenience, storage
`stability, and to allow for independent adjustment of the
`concentrations of the components depending on the
`application, and, furthermore, that reaction components are
`combined prior to the reaction to create a complete reaction
`mixture.
`The methods of the present invention involve carrying out
`an amplification reaction using a heat-activated thermo
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`8
`stable enzyme, wherein the active enzyme is required for
`primer extension. Prior to the high temperature incubation
`which activates the enzyme, the amplification reaction mix
`ture does not support primer extension and no extension
`products, non-specific or otherwise, are formed. Following
`the high temperature incubation which reactivates the
`enzyme, the amplification reaction is maintained at elevated
`temperatures which insure reaction specificity. Thus, primer
`extension products are formed only under conditions which
`insure amplification specificity.
`In the methods of the present invention, the heat-activated
`enzyme, in its active state, catalyzes the primer extension
`reaction. For use in a typical amplification reaction, e.g., a
`PCR, the heat-activated thermostable enzyme possesses, in
`its active state, DNA polymerase activity. For use in ligase
`mediated amplification systems, the heat-activated thermo
`stable enzyme possesses, in its active state, DNA ligase
`activity.
`In a ligase-meditated amplification system, an “extension
`product” is formed by the ligation of a first oligonucleotide
`(herein encompassed by the term “primer”) to a second
`oligonucleotide which hybridizes adjacent to the 3' end of
`the first oligonucleotide. The second oligonucleotide may be
`hybridized immediately adjacent to the primer, in which
`case only ligation is required, or may be hybridized one or
`more bases away from the primer, in which case polymerase
`activity is required to extend the primer prior to ligation. In
`either case, the joining of two oligonucleotides which
`hybridize to adjacent regions of the target DNA is intended
`to be herein encompassed by the term “primer extension”.
`Reversibly Inactivated Thermostable Enzymes
`The reversibly inactivated thermostable enzymes of the
`invention are produced by a reaction between the enzyme
`and a modifier reagent, which results in a reversible chemi
`cal modification of the enzyme, which results in the loss of
`all, or nearly all, of the enzyme activity. The modification
`consists of the covalent attachment of the modifier group to
`the protein. The modifier compound is chosen such that the
`modification is reversed by incu

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket