`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 60
`Date: June 19, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`ERICSSON INC. and TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`IPR2017-01186 (Patent 8,774,309 B2)
`IPR2017-01197 (Patent 7,251,768 B2)
`IPR2017-01200 (Patent 8,718,185 B2)
`IPR2017-01213 (Patent 8,588,317 B2)
`IPR2017-01214 (Patent RE45,230 E)
`IPR2017-01219 (Patent RE45,230 E)1
`_______________
`
`Before JENNIFER S. BISK, ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, and
`CHARLES J. BOUDREAU, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WEINSCHENK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`1 These cases have not been joined or consolidated. Rather, this Order
`governs each case based on common issues. The parties shall not employ
`this heading style.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01186 (Patent 8,774,309 B2)
`IPR2017-01197 (Patent 7,251,768 B2)
`IPR2017-01200 (Patent 8,718,185 B2)
`IPR2017-01213 (Patent 8,588,317 B2)
`IPR2017-01214 (Patent RE45,230 E)
`IPR2017-01219 (Patent RE45,230 E)
`
`
`I. ANALYSIS
`Petitioner previously filed motions to seal Exhibit 1065 and portions
`of its Reply in each of the captioned cases. See, e.g., IPR2017-01186, Paper
`37. We denied that motion without prejudice because 1) Petitioner did not
`explain sufficiently why the information in Exhibit 1065 and its Replies is
`confidential; and 2) certain information in Exhibit 1065 appeared to be
`public information. See, e.g., IPR2017-01186, Paper 45, 3. Rather than file
`a revised motion to seal, Petitioner filed entirely public versions of Exhibit
`1065 and its Replies. See, e.g., IPR2017-01186, Paper 47. As a result, the
`original sealed versions of Exhibit 1065 and the original sealed and redacted
`versions of the Replies can be expunged from the record in the captioned
`cases.
`Also, we previously issued a sealed Decision Denying Institution of
`Inter Partes Review in each of the captioned cases. We requested that the
`parties jointly submit redacted public versions of the Decisions, and the
`parties did so via email. We find it appropriate to enter the redacted public
`versions of the Decisions in each of the captioned cases.
`II. ORDER
`
`It is hereby
`FURTHER ORDERED that the original sealed versions of the Replies
`(IPR2017-01186, Paper 38; IPR2017-01197, Paper 37; IPR2017-01200,
`Paper 39; IPR2017-01213, Paper 37; IPR2017-01214, Paper 37; IPR2017-
`01219, Paper 38) are expunged;
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01186 (Patent 8,774,309 B2)
`IPR2017-01197 (Patent 7,251,768 B2)
`IPR2017-01200 (Patent 8,718,185 B2)
`IPR2017-01213 (Patent 8,588,317 B2)
`IPR2017-01214 (Patent RE45,230 E)
`IPR2017-01219 (Patent RE45,230 E)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the original public versions of the Replies
`(IPR2017-01186, Paper 39; IPR2017-01197, Paper 38; IPR2017-01200,
`Paper 40; IPR2017-01213, Paper 38; IPR2017-01214, Paper 38; IPR2017-
`01219, Paper 39) are expunged;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the original sealed versions of Exhibit
`1065 are expunged; and
`FURTHERED ORDERED that a redacted public version of the
`Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review is entered in the record.
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01186 (Patent 8,774,309 B2)
`IPR2017-01197 (Patent 7,251,768 B2)
`IPR2017-01200 (Patent 8,718,185 B2)
`IPR2017-01213 (Patent 8,588,317 B2)
`IPR2017-01214 (Patent RE45,230 E)
`IPR2017-01219 (Patent RE45,230 E)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`J. Andrew Lowes
`John Russell Emerson
`Greg Webb
`Clint Wilkins
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`andrew.lowes.ipr@haynesboone.com
`russ.emerson@haynesboone.com
`greg.webb.ipr@haynesboone.com
`clint.wilkins.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`W. Karl Renner
`Lawrence K. Kolodney
`Christopher Hoff
`Andrew B. Patrick
`Andrew Dommer
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`kolodney@fr.com
`hoff@fr.com
`patrick@fr.com
`dommer@fr.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
