` Entered: May 2, 2019
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ZSCALER, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2018-00929
`Patent 6,285,658 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JEFFREY S. SMITH, BRYAN F. MOORE, and NEIL T. POWELL,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Motion for Admission
`Pro Hac Vice of Jared Bobrow
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00929
`Patent 6,285,658 B1
`
`
`Petitioner filed a Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jared
`Bobrow in this proceeding. Paper 19 (“Motion”). The Motion is
`unopposed. The Motion is granted.
`In its Motion, Petitioner states that there is good cause for the Board
`to recognize Mr. Bobrow during this proceeding because “Mr. Bobrow has
`been litigating patent cases for over 28 of those years,” and because “Mr.
`Bobrow has familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding.”
`Motion 2. The Motion includes a Declaration made by Mr. Bobrow,
`attesting to and sufficiently explaining these facts. Paper 20. In addition,
`Mr. Bobrow acknowledges his understanding that he will be subject to the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq. and to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). Id.
`Upon consideration, Petitioner has demonstrated sufficiently that
`Mr. Bobrow has sufficient legal and technical qualifications to represent
`Petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s unopposed motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Jared Bobrow is granted; Mr. Bobrow is authorized to
`represent Petitioner only as back-up counsel in the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bobrow is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00929
`Patent 6,285,658 B1
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bobrow is to be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00929
`Patent 6,285,658 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jeremy Jason Lang
`Don Daybell
`Jared Bobrow
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
`PTABDocketJJL2@orrick.com
`D2DPTABDocket@orrick.com
`PTABDocketJ3B3@orrick.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Chad C. Walters
`Kurt M. Pankratz
`Bryan D. Parrish
`Katherine A. Juffa
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`chad.walters@bakerbotts.com
`kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com
`bryan.parrish@bakerbotts.com
`Katie.juffa@bakerbotts.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`