throbber
AMEETANA
`[11] Patent Number:
`5,617,274
`[19]
`United States Patent
`Ruiz
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Apr. 1, 1997
`
`
`[54] LOW PROFILE INTEGRAL FLEXURE FOR
`CLOSELY PACKED DISKSIN A DISK DRIVE
`ASSEMBLY
`
`5,504,640
`5,530,605
`5,530,606
`
`4/1996 Hagen sccecsscsssesstusssuneusee 360/104
` 360/104
`6/1996 Hamaguchi etal.
`
`. 360/104
`6/1996 Baasch ct al.
`..............
`
`[75]
`
`[73]
`
`[21]
`
`[22]
`
`[51]
`[52]
`[58]
`
`[56]
`
`Inventor: Oscar J. Ruiz, San Jose, Calif.
`
`Assignee:
`
`International Business Machines
`Corporation, Armonk, N.Y.
`
`Appl. No.: 585,983
`
`Jan. 12, 1996
`Filed:
`
`. GIB 5/60
`Int. CL® ....
`
`wee 360/104
`US. Cl......
`
`Field of Search .....
`veneer 360/97.01, 98.01,
`360/104-106
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`...
`
`secon 360/103
`8/1988 Ainslie et al.
`4,761,699
`-- 360/104
`1/1989 Levy et al.
`...
`4,797,763
`.. 360/104
`2/1991 Erpelding etal.
`4,996,623
`360/104
`5/1992 Khan et al.
`..
`5,115,363
`360/104
`8/1992 Zarouri et al.
`5,138,507
`360/104
`2/1993 Blaeseret al.
`5,187,625
`360/104
`3/1993 Blaeseret al.
`5,198,945
`360/104
`7/1993
`5,225,950
`360/104
`1/1994
`5,282,102
`360/104
`1/1994 Hatch et al.
`5,282,103
`..-- 360/104
`7/1994 Johnson etal
`5,331,489
`. 360/104
`..
`7/1994 Prentice et al.
`5,333,085
`360/104
`5,377,064 12/1994 Yaginuma etal.
`360/104
`5,381,288
`1/1995 Karam,I...
`360/104
`5,428,489:
`6/1995 Takamure etal.
`
`360/104
`5,428,490
`6/1995 Hagen .......0..
`360/104
`.
`5,452,158
`9/1995 Harrison et al.
`
`eeessseoeeees 360/104
`5,491,597
`2/1996 Bennin et al...
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0487914A2
`6/1992
`European Pat. Off. .
`59-207065
`11/1984
`Japan .
`5-36035
`2/1993
`a 360/104
`Japan .
`5-314630
`11/1993
`- 360/104
`Japan ......
`WIPO .
`WO94/12974
`6/1994
`W094/16438
`7/1994 WIPO.
`W094/24664 10/1994 WIPO.
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`“Type 1650 Product Summary”, Hutchinson Technology
`Inc., Sep. 1992, pp. 1-9.
`
`Primary Examiner—Robert S. Tupper
`Assistant Examiner—Jefferson Evans
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Baker, Maxham,Jester & Meador
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A load beam having an integral flexure for coupling a
`transducer head in a disk drive assembly. The integral
`flexure includes a pair of bending bars connected to the main
`body of the load beam, a floating pad connected to the
`bending bars, and a dimple formed on the floating pad. A
`torsion bar connects the floating pad with a bonding pad. The
`transducer head is adhesively coupled to the bonding pad,
`and rests upon the dimple. In operation, the dimple provides
`preload and allows gimbaling along the pitch and roll axis,
`but yaw movementis substantially prevented by the geom-
`etry of the load beam design. The integral Hexure has a low
`profile and will
`fit within a very small space between
`closely-spaceddisks in a stacked multiple disk drive system.
`
`22 Claims, 8 Drawing Sheets
`
`362
` pitch axis
`
`
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!2!qh!27
`Page 1 of 16
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 1, 1997
`
`Sheet 1 of 8
`
`5,617,274
`
`CONTROLLER
`HosT
`|.
`
`160 SYSTEM|189UNIT
`
`
`
`ACTUATOR
`CONTROL/
`DRIVE
`
`READ/
`WRITE
`CHANNEL
`
`SPINDLE
`CONTROL/
`DRIVE
`
`170
`
`140=132 ij 150 452
`
`f]
`—
`} tr
`Ho pe t2
`
`14
`
`"
`
`\ asah 112
`{| Ss112
`
`112
`
`120
`
`110
`
`FIG. 2
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!3!qh!27
`Page 2 of 16
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 1, 1997
`
`Sheet 2 of 8
`
`5,617,274
`
`N i
`
`n
`
`©oO
`
`Qo
`w
`
`“NS
`
`©e
`
`y
`
`
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!4!qh!27
`Page 3 of 16
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 1, 1997
`
`Sheet 3 of 8
`
`362
`
`pitch axis
`629 630
`
`632
`
`5,617,274
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!5!qh!27
`Page 4 of 16
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 1, 1997
`
`Sheet 4 of 8
`
`5,617,274
`
`Compressive Contact Stress at Dimple Interface
`
`(ksi)
`MaxCompressiveStress
`
`
`
`250
`
`ND oO Oo
`
`—_ or oO
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`3
`4
`- Force at Dimple (gm)
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`FIG. 8
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!6!qh!27
`Page 5 of 16
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 1, 1997
`
`5,617,274
`
`Sheet 5 of 8
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!7!qh!27
`Page 6 of 16
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 1, 1997
`
`Sheet 6 of 8
`
`5,617,274
`
`
`
`1230
`
`1220
`
`1260
`4250 1232
`12,0—esOSFIG. 18
`
`15
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!8!qh!27
`Page 7 of 16
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 1, 1997
`
`5,617,274 FormLine
`
`Sheet 7 of 8
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!9!qh!27
`Page 8 of 16
`
`

`

`5,617,274
`
`Apr. 1, 1997
`
`Sheet 8 of 8
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`
`
`1532
`
`1610
`
`1520
`
`"600
`
`1502
`
`1504
`
`A506
`
`152
`
`FIG. 16
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!;!qh!27
`Page 9 of 16
`
`

`

`5,617,274
`
`5
`
`1
`LOW PROFILE INTEGRAL FLEXURE FOR
`CLOSELY PACKEDDISKSIN A DISK DRIVE
`ASSEMBLY
`
`2
`cxample U.S. Pat. No. 5,377,064 disclosesa flexure in FIG.
`12 that has a bonding pad including an upwardly facing
`dimple formed therein. The dimple is designed to be pushed
`against a portion of the load beam, thereby preloading the
`transducer head. Two-piece load beams with a dimple can
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`advantageously supply substantial preload because the
`dimple is very stiff. However, two-piece load beams have
`1. Field of the Invention
`disadvantages including increased cost of manufacturing.
`This invention relates generally to transducer suspension
`_—~Particularly, the two pieces each must be separately tracked
`systems for magnetic recording media, and more particu.
`larly to low-profile flexures that connect a transducer head jg 1 inventory control, additional tooling is required to handle
`with a load beam.
`cachPatt and each Part mustbe inspected. Furthermore,
`addition
`8 are necessary
`to manufacture a
`two-
`2. Description of the Related Art
`load beam andfiexure, and there is an increase in the number
`Direct access storage devices (DASDs) such as disk
`of rejected parts. Integral flexures can solve many of these
`drives store information on concentric tracks of a rotatable
`problems.
`magnetic recording disk. In order to read or record the 15
`Qpe example of an integral flexure is disclosed in U.S.
`desired information on a rotating disk, a magnetic head or
`Pat. No. 5,282,102 to Christianson, which shows two sepa-
`other transducer elementon a suspension arm is moved from
`rate bonding pads connected by a torsion bar. The transducer
`track to track by a rotary orlinear actuator, The suspension
`head is connected to both bonding pads. The bonding pad
`arm is part of a head suspension assembly that typically
`torsion bar is connected to a load beam torsion bar that
`includes a load beam attachedto an actuator arm,a flexible 20
`extends across an opening on thetip of the load beam. As
`member (known asa flexure) connected to the Joad beam,—_—_shown,for example in FIG. 7B ofU.S.Pat, No. 5,282,102,
`and a transducer head attached to the flexure. The magnetic
`the bonding pad andtorsion bar assembly stamped to allow
`heads, which actually read or write data on the disk, are
`clearance for pitching and rolling of the transducer head.
`positioned within an air-bearing slider. While the disk
`Integral flexures have advantages of simplicity and a low
`rotates, the slider “flies” slighily above the surface of the 25
`cost of manufacture because they can be formed by an
`rotating disk, the load beam supports the slider, and the
`etching processatlittle additional cost. One disadvantage is
`flexure allows it
`to gimbal
`io adjust
`its oriemation for
`that preloading the transducer head is usually accomplished
`unavoidable disk surface run outor flatness variations.
`by stamping (deforming the metal by pressure), a process
`Examples of suspension systems are shown in the fol-
`that is difficult to control precisely.
`lowing references: U.S. Pat. No. 5,377,064 to Yaginumaet 30
`One drawback of conventional integral flexures such as
`al.,
`issued Dec. 27, 1994; U.S. Pat. No. 5,282,102 to
`disclosed aboveis that, because the slider preload is deliv-
`Christianson, issued Jan. 25, 1994; U.S. Pat. No. 5,225,950
`ered by a thin partially etched feature acting in bending
`to Crane, issued Jul. 6, 1993; U.S. Pat. No. 5,198,945 io
`alone or in combination with in-plane forces, preload forces
`Blaeseretal., issued Mar. 30, 1993; U.S. Pat. No. 5,187,625 3s have been limited to small values. If preload were to be
`to Blaeser et al.,
`issued Feb. 16, 1993; U.S. Pat. No.
`increased in these conventional flexures, the flexure would
`5,115,363 to Khan et al., issued May 19, 1992; U.S. Pat. No.
`be either over-stressed or deflected beyond acceptable val-
`4,996,623 to Erpeldingetal., issued Feb. 26, 1991; U.S. Pat.
`ues, causing undesirable interference between the flexure
`No.4,797,763 to Levy etal., issued Jan. 10, 1989; U.S.Pat.
`and the slider. In a conventional integral! flexure,stiffness is
`No. 4,761,699 to Ainslie et al., issued Aug. 2, 1988. Euro- 4g directly related to its thickness, but stress relates to the
`pean Patent Application Publication No. 0487914A2 to“"square ofthickness and deflectionrelates to its to the cube.
`Footeet al., published Jun. 03, 1992; PCT Publication No.
`In general, this means that stress and, in particular, deficc-
`W094/24664 for Jurgenson, published Oct. 27, 1994; PCT
`tion, will often dominate the behavior of the flexure.
`Publication No. WO 94/16438 for Budde, published Jul. 21,
`Large capacity disk drives typically have multiple disks
`1994; PCT Publication No. WO 94/12974 for Budde, pub- 45 mounted on the same rotating spindle. The multiple disk
`ished Jun.9, 1994and Japanese Patent Publication No.
`configuration advantageously provides greater
`storage
`59-207065 for Hashimoto, published Nov. 24, 1984,
`within the fixed size constraints imposed by industry stan-
`A flexure mustprovide a proper pivotal connection for the
`dards such as the form factor package. Disk-to-disk spacing
`slider so that during operation,the slider can compensatefor
`in a range from 2.4 mm to 4.0 mm is near the limits of
`irregularities in manufacture and operation by pitching and/ 59 current technology and imposesa limit upon the number of
`or rolling slightly in order to maintain the air bearing while
`disks that can fit in a form factor package. In order to
`maintaining appropriate stiffness against yaw movement.
`accommodate even more disks within the same height, it
`Pitch is defined as rotation about an axis extending directly
`would be advantageous to reduce the disk-to-disk spacing
`out from the actuator arm in the plane of the disk, and roll
`even further.
`1s defined as rotation about an axis perpendicular to the pitch 55
`To provide closer disk-to-disk spacing it is important that
`axis butstill lying im the planeof the disk. Yaw 18 gyration
`a suspension system has a very low profile. In very small
`around an axis perpendicular to the air-bearing surface. In
`disk-to-disk spacing environments, the solid height of the
`order to be useful, any flexure must achieve low enough Ga (“Head Gimbal Assembly”) must be small enough to
`Pitch and roll stillness for the aur bearing flying height
`fit within the spacing between disks. The solid height of the
`tolerances while at the same time achieving high enough 4, 1A is defined as the distance from the slider’s air bearing
`yaw stifiness.
`surface to the most distant HGA feature abovetheslider. For
`Tn some suspension assemblies, the flexure is integral
`example, in a conventional two-piece suspension that has a
`with the load beam;i.e., it is formed from the same sheet of
`dimple to provide preload, the suspension profile includes
`metal. In other suspension assemblies, the flexure is manu-
`the flexure bond pad thickness, the dimple height, the load
`factured separately and then affixed to a load beam.
`65 beam thickness and the thickness of the load beam stiffen-
`Two-part load beams include a dimple to provide preload
`ers-or flanges-if they are oriented upwardly (away from the
`betweenthe flexure andthe main bodyofthe load beam. For
`slider). Of course, if the flanges are oriented downwardly,
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!21!qh!27
`Page 10 of 16
`
`

`

`5,617,274
`
`5
`
`4
`3
`then they do not contribute to the suspension profile. The
`FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a load beam having an
`integral
`flexure, also showing a transducer head to be
`solid height can be reduced by choosing the thinnest pos-
`sible slider and routing the signal wires on the suspension
`coupled thereto;
`side, instead of aboveit. Solid height can be reduced further
`FIG. 4 is a side perspective view ofthe load beam of FIG.
`3,illustrating the support flange formed thereon;
`by improving the profile of the suspension.
`FIG. 5 is a top plan view ofa preferred embodimentofan
`It would be an advantage to provide a load beam with an
`integral flexure;
`integral flexure that can provide substantial preload to allow
`FIG.6 is a cross-sectionof the center line of the integral
`pitching and rolling movements while substantially prevent-
`flexure of FIG. 5:
`ing yaw movement. It would be a further advantageif the
`integral flexure had a very low profile to be used in close 10 _ .
`.
`disk-to-disk spacing applications.
`FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view of the integral flexure of
`FIGS. 5 and 6, illustrating partially ctched areas;
`FIG.8 is a graphical depiction of the compressive contact
`at the dimple interface for two different radiuses of curvature
`SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`15 of a stainless steel dimple, and for a transducer head
`.
`oo.
`— .
`interfaces, one made of N58 and the other made ofsteel;
`In accordance with the objectives of this invention as
`FIG. 9is
`atop
`plan
`vi
`fan
`alternati
`bodiment
`of
`described above and to overcomethe limitations of the prior
`oe 718 a lop plan view Olan
`alternative embociment 0
`art, a suspension is provided that will fit between closely-
`an integral flexure;
`Le
`t

`.
`:
`:
`:
`.
`.
`.
`.
`spaced disks in a disk drive system having multiple stacked
`FIG.10 is a cross-section view of the alternative embodi-
`disks, For example, 2 suspension assembly having the 59
`ment of FIG. 9;
`integral flexure described herein will fit within a 1.4 mm
`FIG. 11 is a bottom plan view ofthe alternative embodi-
`space between disks, with a merge clearance of 0.2 mm for
`ment of FIG,9, illustrating the partially etched regions;
`each suspension. Furthermore, a preload range up to six
`FIG.12 is still another embodimentof an integral flexure
`grams or more can be obtaincd. The low profile suspension
`in which a spacer and an etched dimple are utilized;
`described herein combinesthe high preload advantage of the 25
`FIG. 13 is a cross-section of the central
`line of the
`stamped dimple with the low cost advantage of the integral
`alternative embodimentof FIG. 12;
`flexure. The yaw stiffness and in-plane strength are also
`FIG. 14is a illustration of a load beam having an integral
`greatly improved.
`.
`flexure formed from a laminated load beam with integrated
`In order to provide these advantages, a load beam for a
`head suspension assembly in a disk drive system is provided. 30 wire leads;
`
`
`The load beam has an integral flexure for coupling to a FIG. 15 isatop plan vi f the alternati bodiment
`
`
`
`
`transducer head, and a main body for coupling to an actuatorthealternative embocimen29 18 4 lop Plan view O°
`
`
`arm, The main body of the load beam hasa first elongated
`of FIG. 14 including integrated leads in a laminated assem-
`member and a second elongated member. A pair of bending
`bly, and
`.
`.
`'
`.
`bars are provided in the integral flexure, including a first 35
`FIG.16 is a cross-section exploded viewof the laminated
`bending bar coupled to the first elongated member and a
`assembly of FIGS. 14 and 15, also showing a transducer
`second bending bar coupled to the second elongated mem-
`head.
`ber. The integral flexure includes a floating pad connected to
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`the pair of bending bars. A dimple is formedin said floating
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
`pad, extending in a downward direction. A torsion bar is 40
`.
`.
`oo.
`oe
`-.
`connected on its first side to the floating pad and onits
`This invention is described in a preferred embodimentin
`second side to a bonding pad. The bondingpad has a lower
`the.forewing arscription withreference to the Figures, in
`surface for connecting to a transducer head. Preferably, the
`which
`like numbers represent
`the sameor similar elements.
`rsion
`d the bending bars are formed
`havi
`i
`thickneseby.for example.partial ciching.Alsoaably 45 While this invention is described in terms of the best mode
`the bending bars have a U-shape. A transducer head is
`for achieving this invention’s objectives,it will be appreci-
`connected to the bonding pad, and is allowed to rest against
`ated by thoseskilled in the art that variations may be
`the dimple. In operation, the torsion bar twists to allow the
`accomplished in view of these teachings without deviating
`transducer head to roll, while the bending bars allow pitch-
`from the spirit or scope of the invention.
`
`ing motion. Yaw movementis minimized due to the result- 59 FIGS. 1 and 2 showaside andatop view,respectively, of
`ing high yaw stiffness of the structure.
`a disk drive system designated by the general reference
`The foregoing, together with other objects, features and
`number 110. The disk drive system 110 comprisesa plurality
`advantages of this invention, will become more apparen.
`Of‘Stacked magnetic recording disks 112 mounted to a
`whenreferring to the followingspecification, claims and the
`Spindle 114. The disks 112 may be conventional particulate
`accompanying drawings.
`55 of thin film recording disks or, in other embodiments, they
`may be recently proposed liquid bearing disks. The spindle
`14 is attached to a spindle motor 116 which rotates the
`spindle 114 and disks 112. A chassis 120 provides a housing
`for the disk drive system 110. The spindle motor 116 and an
`69 actuator shaft 130 are attached to the chassis 120. A hub
`assembly 132 rotates about
`the actuator shaft 130 and
`supports a plurality of actuator arms 134. The stack of
`—_agtuator arms 134 is sometimesreferred to as a “comb”. A
`rotary voice coil motor 140is attached to chassis 120 and to
`a rear portion of the actuator arms 134.
`A plurality of head suspension assemblics 150 are
`attached to the actuator arms 134. A plurality of transducer
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`a _
`.
`For a more complete understanding of this invention,
`reference is now made to the following detailed description
`of the embodiments as illustrated in the accompanying
`drawing, whercin:
`FIG. 1 is a side view of a disk drive system and a ¢5
`controller unit in block form;
`FIG. 2 is a top view of a disk drive system;
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!22!qh!27
`Page 11 of 16
`
`

`

`5,617,274
`
`5
`6
`heads 152 are attached respectively to the suspension assem-
`transducer head 152. A torsion bar 334 connects the bonding
`blies 150. The heads 152 are located proximate to the disks
`pad 332 with a floating pad 336 that includes a downwardly-
`112 so that, during operation, they are in electromagnetic
`extending dimple 340. A pair of bending bars 350 and 352
`communication with the disks 112 for reading and writing.
`are formed betweenthe floating pad 336 and the main body
`of the load beam 150.Particularly,a first bending bar 350is
`The rotary voice coil motor 140rotates actuator arms 134 5
`connectedto thefirst- extended member 320onthe first side
`about the seae orderi Mere tne head
`of load beam 150, and a second bending bar 352 is con-
`suspension assembiles
`0
`the
`desired
`radial
`position on
`nected to the second extended member 322 on the second
`disks 112.The shaft 130, hub 132, arms 134, and motor 140
`side. The integral flexure 330 is described in more detail
`maybe referred to collectively as a rotary actuator assembly.
`subsequently with reference to FIGS. 5-7. Alternative
`A controller unit 160 provides overall control to system 19
`embodiments of the integral flexure 330 are described in
`110. Controller unit 160 typically includes (not shown) a
`subsequentfigures.
`central processing unit (CPU), a memory unit and other
`.
`.
`digital circuitry, although it should be apparent that these
`FIGS. 5, 6, and 7 show various views of the preferred
`aspects could also be enabled as hardware logic by one
`embodiment of the integral flexure330 shown in FIG,3.
`skilled in the computerarts. Controller unit 160 is connected
`to an actuator control/drive unit 166 which in tum is /° Particularly, FIG. 5 is a top plan view, FIG. 6 is a cross-
`connected to the rotary voice coil motor 140. This configu-
`section along the center of the integral flexure 330, and FIG.
`ration allowscontroller 160 to control rotation of the disks
`7 is a bottom plan view.
`112. A host system 180, typically a computer system, is
`In FIG.5, a transducer head 152 is shown in dotted lines
`connected to the controller unit 160. The host system 180
`where il is positioned on the integral fiexure 330. Particu-
`may send digital data to the controller 160 to be stored on 20
`larly, the transducer head 152 is bonded (o the bonding pad
`disks 112, or it may request that digital data at a specified
`332 on its lower surface by a suitable means, such as an
`location be read from the disks 112 and sent to the system
`adhesive. The transducer head 152 rests also on the bottom-
`180. The basic operation ofDASD units is well known in the
`most point ofthe dimple 340. The transducer headis allowed
`art and is described in moredetail in The Magnetic Record-
`19 roll and pitch as will be described. FIG. 5 shows the
`ing Handbook, C. Dennis Mee and Eric D. Daniel, McGraw- 25 orientationsfor the pitch, roll, and yaw axcs. Roll is defined
`Hill Book Company, 1990.
`b
`:
`.
`:
`.
`tae
`.
`y aroll axis 500 which extends approximately through the
`_ Reference is now made to FIG. 3 whichis a perspective
`conter line of the load beam and the center line of the
`view of a load beam 150 for onc embodiment. The load
`syansducer head. Asillustrated, the roll axis 500 is aligned
`beam comprises a generally flat planar structure that has
`with the torsion bar 334 which twists to allow rolling
`numerous features formed thereon by for example, etching. 30
`t. A pitch axis 502 is defined perpendicular to th
`Ononeend, the load beam 150 comprises a base section 300
`movement.
`Bie!
`eae OC
`perpencitcu.
`including an opening 304 for connection to the actuator arms
`‘Tl axis butstill in the middle planeof the flexure. A yaw
`134 (FIGS.1 and 2) by any suitable means. For cxample, a
`axis 504is defined extending directly out of the page. As can
`mounting plate (not shown) may be positioned opposite an
`be seen in FIG. 5, the roll axis 500 is approximately aligned
`actuator arm 134 andthe base section 300 in order to provide 4, with the torsion bar 334.
`a good support for connecting the load beam 150to the arm
`In operation, the transducer head 152 has freedom to
`134. The mounting plate is preferably made of a rigid
`move abcutthe roll axis 500 by rolling upon the dimple 340.
`material such asstainless steel, and attaches to the arm by a
`Furthermore, pitch movementis allowed alongthe pitch axis
`swage connection through opening 304 and into anopening—-$02. duetoflexing of thefirst and second bending arms 350
`in the arm 134 or an equivalent attachment. The support 4g
`and 352. The U-shaped bending arms 350 and 352 are
`plate and the load beam 150 maybeattached together by a
`“positioned approximately in the center of the transducer
`plurality of welds. The load beam 150 also includes a
`head. Advantageously, movement about the yaw axis 504 is
`plurality of holes 310, 312 and 314 formed into the load
`limited by the geometry of the design. Particularly, it is
`beam for purposesincluding tooling, positioning, and con-
`believed that the shape of the torsion bar 334 and the
`trolling the flexure location relative to the load beam.
`4s U-shape of the bending bars 352 operate together to sub-
`Flanges 316 and 318 are provided for stiffening the load
`Stantially restrict yaw movement.
`beam, one along each side of the length of the load beam.
`The U-shaped bending bars 350 and 352 comprise an
`Particularly, a first flange 316 is formed along a first side
`approximately straight section 510 extending from the fioat-
`extending from the base section 300, and a second flange
`—_—_ing pad 336,a curved section 512 definingthe bottom ofthe
`318 is formed extending along a second side from the basc so U-shape, and a secondstraight section 514 extending from
`section 300. FIG. 4 is a side perspective view of the load
`the U-shape’s bottom 512to thefirst elongated member 360.
`beam 150,illustrating the first flange 316. The flanges 316
`Anangle A is defined between the center line (conveniently
`and 318 may be conventionally manufactured by,
`for
`the roll axis 500) and a line 520 extendingparallel with the
`example, stamping.
`straight section 510 of the bending arm 350. In any given
`Thefirst side and the second side of the load beam 150 5, design, this angle A can be adjusted to optimize yaw and
`converge toward a tip that has a first elongated structural
`tangential stiffness. Of course, any adjustmentsto this angle
`member 320 on the first side, and a second elongated
`will also be made to the second bending bar 352,
`in
`member 322 on the second side. The extended members 320
`accordance with the symmetry of the design aboutthe center
`and 322 are connected to a flexure 330 that is integral in
`line.
`construction with the load beam 150. In other words, the ¢9
`The cross-section of FIG. 6 and the bottom plan view of
`flexure in the load beam is formedof a single sheet of metal
`FIG.7 illustrate several features formed bypartially etching
`utilizing an etching process. Preferably, the flexure’s fea-_selected areas so thatonly a portionoftheoriginal thickness
`tures, including the partially-etched features, are etched in
`remains. Particularly the torsion bar 334 includesa partially
`the same step with the other etched features on the load
`etched area 600 formed by partially etching along the
`beam.
`65 bottom side of the torsion bar 334. By controlling the
`With reference to FIG.3, the integral flexure'330 includes
`etching process and the area etched, the amount of flex
`a bonding pad 332 having a lower surface for coupling to the
`provided by the torsion bar 334 can be carefully controlled
`
`Nitto Ex. 1110
`Pkvvq!Gz/!2221
`IPR2018-00956
`KRT3129.11;67
`Rcig!23!qh!27
`Page 12 of 16
`
`€
`

`

`5,617,274
`
`8
`7
`illustrated in FIGS.3 to 7, the bonding pad and floating pad
`within predetermined tolerances. Typically, the remaining
`are reversedin position. Particularly, the bonding pad 930 in
`partial thickness is about 50% of the original. Optionally, an
`FIG.9 is positioned on the leading edgeof the slider, which
`adhesion pocket 610 is formed by partial etching within the
`has an advantage in that less flying height variations occur
`area of the bonding pad 332 in order to provide a trap for
`during operation because the bonding pad is located at the
`excess adhesive and provide a good bonding between the 5
`leading edge wherethereis less air bearing pressure buildup,
`transducer head 152 and the bonding pad 332.
`and thus, less sensitivity of flying heightto distortions in the
`In the embodimentillustrated in FIGS. 5-7, the dimple
`air bearing surface (ABS).
`340 is formed by a stamping process in which the metal is
`With reference to FIGS. 9, 10 and 11, a floating pad 900
`deformed to the desired shape. The bonding pad 332 is
`stamped to provide a step 620 downward from the torsion 1 is coupled to the load beam extensions 360 and 362 via
`bar to the bonding pad, so that the bottom surface 630 ofthe
`bending bars. Particularly, a first bending bar 910 couples
`bonding pad is appropriately aligned approximately level
`the floating pad 900 with the first extended section 360 and
`with the bottommostpoint 632 of the dimple 340. The height
`a second bending bar 912 couples the floating pad 900 with
`of the stamped step 620 is typically 0.025 mm andthis is
`the second extended section 362. The floating pad 900
`cnough to provide about 2 degrees of pitch androll static 15
`includes a dimple 902 formed facing downwardly. A torsion
`altitude. In an alternative embodiment discussed with ref-
`bar 920 couplesthe floating pad 900 with a bonding pad 930.
`erence to FIGS. 12 and 13, as will be discussed further,
`In an assembled suspension arm, the transducer head 152 is
`stamping the bonding pad may be unnecessary.
`bondedto the bonding pad by any suitable adhesive or other
`With reference to FIG.7, the bending arms 350 and 352_means. The transducer head 152 rests on a downwardly
`include areas having partial thickness formed by partial 20
`facing tip 932 of the dimple 902. Thus, during operation, the
`etching. Particularly, an area 700 extending along the first
`transducer 150 is free to pitch and roll as necessary. Par-
`bending arm 350 and an area 702 including the second
`ticularly, the torsion bar 920 twists to allow the transduccr
`bending arm 352 each has a partial thickness. The partially
`head 150 to pivot about the dimple 902 to allow forrolling
`thick areas 700 and 702 can be formedby a partial etching
`movement. To allow pitching movement, the bending bars
`process performed simultaneously with partially etching the 25 910 and 912 allow the transducer head 150 to move accord-
`torsion bar area 600 and the adhesive pocket 610. All
`ingly. Yaw movement, which is undesirable, is minimized.
`partially etched regions have the samethickness.
`Referring now to FIG. 11, several partially-etched areas,
`FIG. 8 is a graph of calculated values illustrating the
`each of which has a partial thickness, are illustrated. Par-
`compressive contact stress at
`the interface between the 4,
`tially etched areas have a remaining thickness of about 50%
`dimple 340 and the transducer head 152. Particularly, the
`of the original. Particularly,thefirst and secondbending bars
`maximum compressive stress is graphed as a function of the
`910 and 912 are etched to a partial thickness in areas 1100
`forceat the dimple, Four separate curvesillustrate the effects
`and 1102,respectively, andthe torsion bar 920 is also etched
`of varying the radius of curvature of the dimple onthe stress
`to a partial thickness in area 1110 in order to reduce stiffness.
`level in the head and the dimple material. The dimple itself 35 A step 950 in the bonding pad 930 is formed preferably by
`is assumed to be madeofstainless steel and the head of an
`a stamping processin orderto align the bottom surfaceof the
`intermetalic, such as N58. A first graph line 800 shows the
`bonding pad 930 with the bottom portion 932 of the dimple.
`effect on the compressive stress for variations in the force
`The dimple 902 could be stamped simultaneously with the
`applied to the dimple, tier a dimple radius of 0.25 mm and
`formed step.
`a steel-to-N58 interface. Graph line 810 illustrates that same go
`FIGS. 12 and 13illustrate still another embodiment, in
`stress versus applied forth to the dimple for a radius of 0.25
`which a thin spacer sheet 1240 is positioned between the
`mm buta steel-to-steel interface. Similarly, a third graph line
`flexure and slider. Referring first to FIG. 12, a floating pad
`820 plots stress versus force for a value of R=0.5 and an
`1200 is affixed to the main body of the load beam bya pair
`N58-to-stcel interface, and a fourth graph line 840 graphs
`of bending bars. Particularly, a first U-shaped bending bar
`those same values, but with a steel-to-steel interface.
`4s 1210 is formed to connect the bonding pad 1200 with a first
`Even though a steel-to-N58 interface produces the most
`elongated member 360 from the load beam. A second
`stress for this design, this stress is still lower than conven-
`bending bar 1210 connects the bonding pad 1200 with the
`tional systems because the dimple force is only a fraction|second elongated member 362 of the main body ofthe load
`(about 20%)ofthe total preload and thus, the contact forces
`beam. A bonding pad 1220 is connected to a torsion bar
`between the transducer head and the dimple are relatively 5, 1230, which is connected to the floating pad 1200.
`small. The rest of the preload force is transmitted through the
`Referring both to FIG. 12 and FIG. 13, a spacer bar 1240
`bonding pad. Reducing the dimple force to about 20% ofthe
`having an approximately tangular shape is connected to the
`preload has further advantages because the stresses that
`bonding pad 1220 by conventional means such as adhesive
`cause pitting and failure are generally shear and tension
`or weld spots. The floating pad 1200 includes a dimple 1250,
`forces, rather than compressive forces. Particularly,
`the 55 partially etched on the bottom facing surface. Advanta-
`shear stresses are 33% andtensile stresses are 13% of the
`geously, partial etching avoids the stamping step and there-
`compressive stress shown in FIG.8. Fretting between the
`fore does not require stamping the dimple nor forming the
`transducer head and the dimpleis directly proportional to the
`bonding pad, bec

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket