`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 13
`Entered: January 18, 2019
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`INTIMIDATOR, INC. and RF PRODUCTS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BAD BOY, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-01632
`Patent 9,730,386 B1
`____________
`
`
`Before FRANCES L. IPPOLITO, KEVIN W. CHERRY, and
`PAUL J. KORNICZKY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KORNICZKY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Granting Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Bradley Trammell
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01632
`Patent 9,730,386 B1
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Intimidator, Inc. and RF Products, Inc.
`
`(collectively, “Petitioner”) filed a motion for pro hac vice admission of Bradley
`
`Trammell (Paper 10, “Motion”), as well as a supporting affidavit from Mr.
`
`Trammell (Exhibit 1016). Petitioner represents that Bad Boy, Inc. (“Patent
`
`Owner”) does not oppose the Motion. Paper 10, 2. Having reviewed the Motion
`
`and supporting affidavit, we determine that good cause exists for granting pro hac
`
`vice admission to Mr. Trammell. See 37 CFR § 42.10(c); Unified Patents, Inc. v.
`
`Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7) (“Order
`
`– Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” setting forth requirements for
`
`pro hac vice admission).
`
`According, it is:
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for pro hac vice admission of Mr.
`
`Trammell is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Trammell is authorized to represent
`
`Petitioner only as back-up counsel in the instant proceeding and Petitioner must
`
`continue to have a registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel in the instant
`
`proceeding;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Trammell must comply with the Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, as updated by the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`August 2018 Update, 83 Fed. Reg. 39,989 (Aug. 13, 2018), and the Board’s Rules
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01632
`Patent 9,730,386 B1
`
`of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal
`
`Regulations;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must file an updated mandatory
`
`notice identifying Mr. Trammell as back-up counsel; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Trammell is subject to the Office’s
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules of
`
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01632
`Patent 9,730,386 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Warner J. Delaune
`Lea H. Speed
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.
`wdelaune@bakerdonelson.com
`lspeed@bakerdonelson.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Christopher L. Drymalla
`Chad Ennis
`Patrick Connolly
`BRACEWELL LLP
`chris.drymalla@bracewell.com
`chad.ennis@bracewell.com
`Patrick.connolly@bracewell.cm
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
