`571.272.7822
`
`Paper 64
`Entered: April 30, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIDELITY INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GROOVE DIGITAL, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2019-00050 and IPR2019-001931
`Patent 9,454,762 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before BRYAN F. MOORE, NORMAN H. BEAMER, and
`STACY B. MARGOLIES, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BEAMER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE
`Final Written Decision
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a)
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are common to both cases. We exercise our
`discretion to issue on Order to be filed in each case. The parties are not
`authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2019-00050 and IPR2019-00193
`Patent 9,454,762 B2
`
`I.
`
`NOTICE OF FINAL WRITTEN DECISION
`On April 30, 2020, we issued non-public versions of Final Written
`Decisions in cases IPR2019-00050 and IPR2019-00193 determining, for
`IPR2019-00050, that Petitioner has demonstrated by a preponderance of the
`evidence that claims 14, 18–20, 22, 24–25, 29–31, 33, 35, and 37 of U.S.
`Patent No. 9,454,762 B2 (the “’762 patent”) are unpatentable, and has not
`demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that claims 1, 3, 7–9, and 36
`of the ’762 patent are unpatentable; and for IPR2019-00193, Petitioner has
`established by a preponderance of the evidence that claims 15–17, 21, 23, 26–
`28, 32, and 34 of the ’762 patent are unpatentable, and has not established by a
`preponderance of the evidence that claims 2, 4–6, and 10–13 of the ’762
`patent are unpatentable. Public versions of the decisions will issue in due
`course.
`
`II. ORDER CONCERNING PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF
`FINAL WRITTEN DECISIONS
`The decisions have been entered as non-public documents because
`they may refer to information that is the subject of one or more motions to
`seal. No later than ten business days after entry of the decisions, the parties
`may identify which portions of the decisions, if any, should be redacted
`from public versions. The parties may make such an identification by
`jointly submitting via email to Trials@uspto.gov a PDF document for each
`decision containing all proposed redactions. The parties shall not file their
`proposed redactions in the dockets of the proceedings.
`If the parties agree that a decision may be made publicly available
`without any redactions, the parties may notify the Board via email stating
`such within the same time frame. In the absence of a communication from
`the parties about any alleged confidentiality of the decisions during the ten-
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2019-00050 and IPR2019-00193
`Patent 9,454,762 B2
`
`day period set forth above, the Board will issue public versions of the
`decisions as originally entered.
`It is SO ORDERED.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2019-00050 and IPR2019-00193
`Patent 9,454,762 B2
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Jeffrey Berkowitz
`Kevin Rodkey
`Kara Specht
`Erika Arner
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
`jeffrey.berkowitz@finnegan.com
`kevin.rodkey@finnegan.com
`kara.specht@finnegan.com
`erika.arner@finnegan.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kevin Greenleaf
`Joel N. Bock
`DENTONS US LLP
`kevin.greenleaf@dentons.com
`joel.bock@dentons.com
`
`George Schoof
`BUTZEL LONG, P.C.
`schoof@butzel.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
