throbber

`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`Ericsson Inc.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Patent No. 9,496,976
`Filing Date: July 7, 2015
`Issue Date: November 15, 2016
`
`Title: CELL SEARCH METHOD, FORWARD LINK FRAME TRANSMISSION
`METHOD, APPARATUS, USING THE SAME AND FORWARD LINK FRAME
`STRUCTURE
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019- 00240
`
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`UNDER 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-319 AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.100 ET SEQ.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Table of Contents
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`Preliminary Statement .................................................................................. 1
`
`Standards Background .................................................................................. 2
`
`III. Technological Background ........................................................................... 3
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`The location of the P-SCH and S-SCH in prior art 3G frames ............. 6
`
`The location of the P-SCH and S-SCH in prior art 4G frames ............. 7
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4G proposals disclosed sending the P-SCH and S-SCH
`multiple times per frame, similar to 3G ...................................... 8
`
`4G proposals disclosed sending the P-SCH and S-SCH in
`consecutive OFDM symbols within the subframe ...................... 9
`
`Prior art cellular devices also used the P-SCH and S-SCH
`to determine the base station’s Cell ID .....................................11
`
`IV. The ’976 Patent ............................................................................................12
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`Challenged Claims ..............................................................................14
`
`Priority Date and Prosecution History ................................................15
`
`V.
`
`Prior Art .......................................................................................................18
`
`A. U.S. Patent No. 8,031,745 (“TI Patent”) .............................................18
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`The TI Patent is Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) ..................18
`
`The Teachings of the TI Patent .................................................23
`
`The Teachings of the TI Provisional .........................................24
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`The text of the TI Provisional discloses the frame
`structure of the ’976 Patent .............................................25
`
`Figure 6 of the TI Provisional discloses multiple
`embodiments of the frame structure of the ’976
`Patent ..............................................................................25
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`B.
`
`R1-060812 (“Samsung”) .....................................................................31
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Samsung is Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) ......................31
`
`The Teachings of Samsung .......................................................32
`
`C.
`
`R1-061144 (“CHTTL”) .......................................................................33
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`CHTTL is Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) ........................33
`
`The Teachings of CHTTL .........................................................34
`
`VI. Statement of Precise Relief Requested ......................................................36
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`Claims for Which Review is Requested ..............................................36
`
`Statutory Grounds of Challenge ..........................................................36
`
`Level of Ordinary Skill .......................................................................36
`
`Claim Construction..............................................................................37
`
`VII. Claims 9, 10, and 16 are Unpatentable ......................................................38
`
`A. Ground #1: Claims 9, 10, and 16 are anticipated under 35
`U.S.C. § 102(a) by the TI Patent, or in the alternative, are
`obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the TI Patent .............................38
`
`1.
`
`Claim 9 ......................................................................................38
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`[9.1] A method of generating and transmitting
`downlink transmission by a base station in a
`wireless communication system, the method
`comprising: .....................................................................38
`
`[9.2] generating a first primary synchronization
`sequence: .........................................................................39
`
`[9.3] generating a second primary synchronization
`sequence: .........................................................................40
`
`[9.4] generating a first secondary synchronization
`sequence: .........................................................................42
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`
`
`[9.5] generating a second secondary
`synchronization sequence: ..............................................42
`
`[9.6a] transmitting the downlink transmission
`including the first and second primary
`synchronization sequences and the first and second
`secondary synchronization sequences, wherein the
`downlink transmission comprises a plurality of
`subframes sequentially arranged in time domain,
`each of the plurality of subframes containing a
`plurality of symbols sequentially arranged in time
`domain, ...........................................................................44
`
`[9.6b] wherein a first subframe in the downlink
`transmission includes a first symbol representing
`the first primary synchronization sequence, and
`wherein a second subframe in the downlink
`transmission includes a second symbol
`representing the first secondary synchronization
`sequence: .........................................................................47
`
`[9.7] wherein a first indicator is identified based on
`the first primary synchronization sequence, a
`second indicator is identified based on the first
`secondary synchronization sequence, and a cell
`identifier is identified based on the first indicator
`and the second indicator: ................................................49
`
`[9.8] wherein the first subframe includes a third
`symbol representing a second secondary
`synchronization sequence, the third symbol being
`directly adjacent to the first symbol, and wherein
`the second subframe includes a fourth symbol
`representing a second primary synchronization
`sequence, the fourth symbol being directly
`adjacent to the second symbol ........................................50
`
`2.
`
`Claim 10 ....................................................................................55
`
`a.
`
`[10.1] The method of claim 9, wherein the first
`primary synchronization sequence is the same as
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`the second primary synchronization sequence, and
`the first secondary synchronization sequence is
`different from the second secondary
`synchronization sequence. ..............................................55
`
`3.
`
`Claim 16 ....................................................................................57
`
`a.
`
`[16.1] The method of claim 9, wherein the
`downlink transmission comprises a frame, and the
`first and second primary synchronization
`sequences and the first and second secondary
`synchronization sequences are contained in the
`frame. ..............................................................................57
`
`The TI Patent discloses this limitation. For example, in
`Figure 8, the first and second P-SCHs and first and
`second S-SCHs are in the first and sixth
`subframes, all within the same frame: ............................58
`
`B. Ground #2: Claims 9, 10, and 16 are anticipated under 35
`U.S.C. § 102(a) by Samsung, or in the alternative, are obvious
`under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Samsung .................................................59
`
`1.
`
`Claim 9 ......................................................................................59
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`[9.1] A method of generating and transmitting
`downlink transmission by a base station in a
`wireless communication system, the method
`comprising: .....................................................................59
`
`[9.2] generating a first primary synchronization
`sequence: .........................................................................59
`
`[9.3] generating a second primary synchronization
`sequence: .........................................................................61
`
`[9.4] generating a first secondary synchronization
`sequence: .........................................................................62
`
`[9.5] generating a second secondary
`synchronization sequence: ..............................................63
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`
`
`[9.6a] transmitting the downlink transmission
`including the first and second primary
`synchronization sequences and the first and second
`secondary synchronization sequences, wherein the
`downlink transmission comprises a plurality of
`subframes sequentially arranged in time domain,
`each of the plurality of subframes containing a
`plurality of symbols sequentially arranged in time
`domain, ...........................................................................65
`
`[9.6b] wherein a first subframe in the downlink
`transmission includes a first symbol representing
`the first primary synchronization sequence, and
`wherein a second subframe in the downlink
`transmission includes a second symbol
`representing the first secondary synchronization
`sequence: .........................................................................67
`
`[9.7] wherein a first indicator is identified based on
`the first primary synchronization sequence, a
`second indicator is identified based on the first
`secondary synchronization sequence, and a cell
`identifier is identified based on the first indicator
`and the second indicator: ................................................68
`
`[9.8] wherein the first subframe includes a third
`symbol representing a second secondary
`synchronization sequence, the third symbol being
`directly adjacent to the first symbol, and wherein
`the second subframe includes a fourth symbol
`representing a second primary synchronization
`sequence, the fourth symbol being directly
`adjacent to the second symbol ........................................69
`
`2.
`
`Claim 10 ....................................................................................70
`
`a.
`
`[10.1] The method of claim 9, wherein the first
`primary synchronization sequence is the same as
`the second primary synchronization sequence, and
`the first secondary synchronization sequence is
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`different from the second secondary
`synchronization sequence. ..............................................70
`
`3.
`
`Claim 16 ....................................................................................72
`
`a.
`
`[16.1] The method of claim 9, wherein the
`downlink transmission comprises a frame, and the
`first and second primary synchronization
`sequences and the first and second secondary
`synchronization sequences are contained in the
`frame. ..............................................................................72
`
`C. Ground #3: Claim 16 is obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
`the TI Patent in view of CHTTL .........................................................73
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`A POSITA would have been motivated to combine TI
`with CHTTL ..............................................................................73
`
`Claim 16 ....................................................................................75
`
`a.
`
`[16.1] The method of claim 9, wherein the
`downlink transmission comprises a frame, and the
`first and second primary synchronization
`sequences and the first and second secondary
`synchronization sequences are contained in the
`frame ...............................................................................75
`
`D. Ground #4: Claim 16 is obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
`Samsung in view of CHTTL ...............................................................73
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`A POSITA would have been motivated to combine
`Samsung with CHTTL ..............................................................73
`
`Claim 16 ....................................................................................75
`
`a.
`
`[16.1] The method of claim 9, wherein the
`downlink transmission comprises a frame, and the
`first and second primary synchronization
`sequences and the first and second secondary
`synchronization sequences are contained in the
`frame ...............................................................................75
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`VIII. Conclusion ....................................................................................................80
`IX. Mandatory Notices Under 37 C.F.R. §42.8 .............................................810
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`Real Parties-In-Interest ........................................................................80
`
`Related Matters ....................................................................................80
`
`Lead and Back-Up Counsel .................................................................80
`
`Service Information .............................................................................80
`
`X. Certification Under 37 C.F.R. §42.24(d) ...................................................81
`
`XI. Payment of Fees ...........................................................................................81
`
`XII. Time for Filing Petition ...............................................................................81
`
`XIII. Grounds for Standing ..................................................................................81
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`Exhibit #
`
`
`
`Table of Exhibits
`
`Description
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`Declaration of Dr. Alexander Haimovich
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Alexander Haimovich
`
`Declaration of Craig Bishop
`
`United States Patent No. 9,496,976
`
`File History of U.S. Patent No. 9,496,976
`
`English Translation of Korean Patent Application No. 10-2006-
`0069800
`
`English Translation of Korean Patent Application 10-2007-0006230
`
`English Translation of Korean Patent Application 10-2007-0074705
`
`United States Patent No. 8,031,745
`
`United States Provisional Application No. 60/745,250
`
`R1-060812
`
`R1-050707
`
`R1-060860
`
`R1-062990
`
`R1-070650
`
`R1-061144
`
`R1-051357
`
`R1-060072
`
`TR 25.814 v0.5
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`TR 25.814 v1.0.3
`
`TR 25.814 v1.2.2
`
`TS 125 211 v6.7.0 (2005-12)
`
`TS 125 214 v6.7.1 (2005-12)
`
`Cell Searching in WCDMA by Sanat Kamal Bahl
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`Table of Authorities
`
`
`CASES
`
`In re Giacomini,
`612 F.3d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2010)................................................................................................16
`
`Dynamic Drinkware, LLC v. Nat’l Graphics, Inc.,
`800 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2015)................................................................................................17
`
`Dow Chem. Co. v. Sumitomo Chem. Co.,
`257 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2001)................................................................................................35
`
`Phillips v. AWH Corp.,
`415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc)................................................................................35
`
`
`STATUTES
`
`35 U.S.C. §102 ....................................................................................................................... passim
`
`35 U.S.C. § 103 ...................................................................................................................... passim
`
`35 U.S.C. §§ 311-319 ......................................................................................................................1
`
`35 U.S.C. §§ 311 ............................................................................................................................34
`
`
`OTHER AUTHORITIES
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b) ................................................................................................................1, 35
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.100 et seq. ................................................................................................................1
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.101(b) .....................................................................................................................35
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.8 ..............................................................................................................................76
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.24(d) .......................................................................................................................77
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.102(a)(1) .................................................................................................................77
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.104(a)......................................................................................................................77
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`I.
`
`Preliminary Statement
`
`
`
`Petitioner Ericsson Inc. (“Ericsson”) respectfully requests inter partes
`
`review and cancellation of claims 9, 10, and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 9,496,976 (“the
`
`’976 Patent”) under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.100 et seq.
`
`The ’976 Patent relates to the wireless communication between cellular
`
`devices and base stations and, in particular, a concept called cell search. The patent
`
`explains that cell search is the process by which cellular devices search nearby
`
`base stations to find the base station with the strongest signal and synchronize with
`
`that base station. See, e.g., Ex. 1004 at 40:10-14. All of the concepts claimed in the
`
`’976 Patent were developed during the 4G LTE standard-setting process by Texas
`
`Instruments (“TI”), Samsung, Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories (“CHTTL”), and
`
`others, and included in printed publications that were submitted to the standard-
`
`setting body, emailed to a listserv of participants and, in the case of TI, patented.
`
`Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (“ETRI”), the entity that
`
`filed the application that issued as the ’976 Patent, did not contribute any of this
`
`technology to the 4G standard, but participated in conversations on the listserv in
`
`which these contributions were distributed.1 Shortly thereafter, ETRI filed a patent
`
`
`1 See, e.g., https://list.etsi.org/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0603C&L=3GPP_
`
`TSG_RAN_WG1&O=D&P=173320
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`application on these ideas in South Korea. Ex. 1006. As shown below, the TI
`
`Patent and Samsung contribution taught all aspects of the challenged claims before
`
`ETRI filed its patent application.
`
`This Petition, supported by the Declaration of Dr. Alexander Haimovich
`
`(“Haimovich” or “Ex. 1001”), explains why there is a reasonable likelihood that
`
`claims 9, 10, and 16 of the ’976 Patent are unpatentable as anticipated by or
`
`obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art (“POSITA”) in view of the prior art
`
`cited herein, the knowledge and understanding of a POSITA, and the ’976 Patent
`
`itself. Accordingly, claims 9, 10, and 16 of the ’976 Patent should be cancelled.
`
`II.
`
`Standards Background
`
`The technology at issue in this petition was developed by members of the
`
`Third Generation Partnership Project (“3GPP”) during the 4G standard setting
`
`process. 3GPP is the standard setting organization responsible for creating and
`
`maintaining the 4G cellular standard. Many of the most innovative cellular
`
`companies in the world are members of 3GPP and participated in this process.
`
`To create the 4G standard, 3GPP held standard setting meetings at which
`
`3GPP members proposed technology to include in the standard. These proposals
`
`were typically submitted in documents called “contributions.” The 3GPP members
`
`emailed their contributions to a 3GPP email list and posted them to the publicly
`
`available 3GPP FTP site before each meeting.
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`III. Technological Background2
`The concepts claimed in the ’976 Patent were well known before its alleged
`
`priority date. In prior art cellular systems, each base station was assigned one or
`
`more geographical coverage areas called a “cell,” represented by the hexagons in
`
`the figure below.3
`
`
`
`The collection of base station cells made up the cellular network. Each cell was
`
`assigned a cell identifier (“Cell ID”) that the base station used to scramble its
`
`2 This Technological Background section is supported by the Declaration of Dr.
`
`Alexander Haimovich Ex. 1001 at ¶¶ 30-52.
`
`3 Base station cells are often not in a hexagonal layout, but are shown that way here
`
`for ease of understanding.
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`messages. Thus phones needed to learn the base station’s cell identifier to decode
`
`signals from that base station. Phones also needed to synchronize with the base
`
`station in time and frequency . This process is called “cell search.”
`
`Prior art designers recognized that they could make the cell search procedure
`
`easier for cellular devices by dividing the Cell IDs into groups. For example, in the
`
`table below, the 512 Cell IDs 4 are divided into 16 “Cell Groups,” each group
`
`consisting of 32 “Cell IDs within the Group.”
`
`Cell Groups
`Cell Group 1 =
`Cell Group 2 =
`Cell Group 3 =
`. . .
`Cell Group 16 =
`
`Cell ID within the Group
`(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, . . . 31, 32)
`(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, . . . 31, 32)
`(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, . . . 31, 32)
`. . .
`(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, . . . 31, 32)
`
`Cell ID
`(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, . . . 31, 32)
`(33, 34, 35, . . ., 63, 64)
`(65, 66, 67, . . ., 95, 96)
`. . .
`(481, 482, . . ., 511, 512)
`
`
`
`If a cellphone received a signal indicating a cell was in “Cell Group 3” and had a
`
`“Cell ID within the Group” of “31,” then the cellphone could determine that the
`
`“Cell ID” for that cell was “95.”
`
`
`4 In prior art 3G networks, each base station cell was assigned one of 512 different
`
`Cell IDs. Designers determined 512 Cell IDs was enough Cell IDs to minimize the
`
`risk that two base station cells in the same geographic area would have the same
`
`Cell ID.
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`If Cell IDs are not divided into cell groups, then when cellular devices
`
`received a Cell ID signal, they would have to compare the received signal to a list
`
`of every possible Cell ID in the system (512 in the example above) to find the best
`
`match. By separating the cell IDs into 16 groups of 32 cell IDs within the group, a
`
`cellular device could first determine the cell ID group (one of only 16 possibilities)
`
`and then determine the cell ID within the group (one of only 32 possibilities). This
`
`allowed cellular devices to perform two simple correlations instead of one difficult
`
`correlation.
`
`Prior art designers accomplished cell search through the use of two repeating
`
`signals broadcast in each base station cell: the Primary Synchronization Signal
`
`(commonly referred to as “P-SCH”) and Secondary Synchronization Signal
`
`(commonly referred to as “S-SCH”). The P-SCH enabled cellular devices to detect
`
`the base station and begin the process of synchronizing their time and frequency
`
`with the base station. The S-SCH allowed the devices to complete the
`
`synchronization process.
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`A. The location of the P-SCH and S-SCH in prior art 3G frames
`
`A frame is a logical structure that can be used to organize data for
`
`transmission in a wireless communication system. The figure below, excerpted
`
`from a 2003 IEEE journal article, depicts a 3G5 frame:
`
`
`
`Ex. 1024 at 18. The text below the figure discloses that the frame spans 10 msec
`
`and is divided into 15 equal parts called “slots.” Each slot spans 0.67 msec. The
`
`
`5 3G used wideband code division multiple access (“WCDMA”) technology, as
`
`indicated in the figure.
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`top two rows of the figure are labeled “P-SCH” and “S-SCH” and indicate that the
`
`P-SCH and S-SCH were sent at the beginning of each slot. Each of the P-SCH
`
`blocks in the figure is light blue, indicating that the P-SCH was the same in every
`
`slot. The S-SCH blocks in the figure change colors from slot to slot, indicating that
`
`the S-SCH changed from slot to slot. The S-SCH changed from slot to slot to
`
`enable cellular devices to synchronize in time with the base station. Cellular
`
`devices could determine a base station’s timing by figuring out which S-SCH they
`
`received. For example, if a cellular device received the green S-SCH in the figure
`
`above, it could determine when the second slot in the frame began and use that
`
`information to determine the base station’s “frame timing.”6
`
`B.
`
`The location of the P-SCH and S-SCH in prior art 4G frames
`
`In 2005, about a year before ETRI filed its provisional patent application,
`
`the industry began specifying cell search for the new 4G cellular system. 3G used a
`
`technology called “Wideband Code Division Multiple Access” (“WCDMA”),
`
`which allowed multiple cellular devices to send data at the same time and
`
`frequency. Thus, as described above, in 3G, the P-SCH and S-SCH were sent at the
`
`
`6 Though the figure shows colors repeating within the frame, e.g., a green S-SCH
`
`in slots 2 and 14, the S-SCH in WCDMA was different in every slot. See Ex. 1001
`
`at ¶ 45.
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
`same time and frequency. The 4G cellular system used a different technology
`
`called orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (“OFDM”), in which the P-SCH
`
`and S-SCH would be sent at different times and/or frequencies.
`
`1.
`
`4G proposals disclosed sending the P-SCH and S-SCH
`multiple times per frame, similar to 3G
`
`An LTE frame, similar to the 3G frame, spans 10 msec. In 3G, the 10 msec
`
`frame was divided into 15 equal parts called “slots.” In 4G, the 10 msec frame was
`
`divided into equal parts called “subframes.” In 3G, the P-SCH and S-SCH were
`
`sent 15 times per frame, at the beginning of each slot. In early 4G prior art
`
`proposals, companies proposed sending the P-SCH and S-SCH less frequently than
`
`in 3G. For example, in R1-050707, NTT Docomo, NEC, and Sharp proposed
`
`sending the P-SCH and S-SCH two or four times per frame, rather than 15 times
`
`per frame like 3G:
`
`See Ex. 1012 at 12. This figure represents two different proposals for a 10
`
`millisecond LTE frame. Each red line represents a “synchronization channel.” In
`
`the top proposal, the synchronization channel was sent two times per frame. In the
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`bottom proposal, the synchronization channel was sent four times per frame. The
`
`contribution further proposed that the synchronization channels can include a P-
`
`SCH and S-SCH:
`
`Id. at 11-12.
`
`
`
`2.
`
`4G proposals disclosed sending the P-SCH and S-SCH in
`consecutive OFDM symbols within the subframe
`
`In LTE, each 10 msec frame consisted of 10 subframes, each subframe
`
`consisted of two slots, and each slot consisted of seven OFDM symbols.7 ETRI
`
`claims that it invented the idea of placing the P-SCH and S-SCH in consecutive
`
`OFDM symbols within the subframe, but, as shown below, this was disclosed in
`
`multiple printed publications before ETRI filed its patent.
`
`For example, in March 2006, approximately four months before ETRI filed
`
`its application, Samsung proposed placing
`
`the primary and secondary
`
`synchronization signals in consecutive OFDM symbols in R1-060812, Figure 4:
`
`
`7 Under a special condition known as “extended cyclic prefix,” each subframe
`
`consisted of six OFDM symbols instead of seven OFDM symbols.
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Similarly in May 2006, two months before ETRI filed its application,
`
`Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories (“CHTTL”) proposed placing the P-SCH and S-
`
`SCH in consecutive OFDM symbols in R1-061144. Figure 1 shows the placement
`
`of the P-SCH and S-SCH in consecutive OFDM symbols at the end of the
`
`subframe (red circles added):
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ETRI received the Samsung and CHTTL contributions by email, but did not
`
`disclose them to the USPTO during prosecution of the ’976 Patent.
`
`And, as will be explained in detail below, TI filed a patent application three
`
`months before ETRI filed its application disclosing the concept of placing the P-
`
`SCH and S-SCH in consecutive OFDM symbols.
`
`3.
`
`Prior art cellular devices also used the P-SCH and S-SCH to
`determine the base station’s Cell ID
`
`In 3G prior art systems, cellular devices looked to the S-SCH and another set
`
`of signals called “pilot signals” to determine a base station’s Cell ID. The S-SCH
`
`contained the base station’s Cell Group ID and the pilot signals contained the base
`
`station’s Cell ID within the Group. The cellular devices could use the Cell Group
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`
`ID and Cell ID within the Group to determine the base station’s Cell ID, as shown
`
`in Section III above. Ex. 1001 at ¶¶ 34-38.
`
`For 4G prior art systems, Texas Instruments (“TI”) and Samsung proposed
`
`moving the Cell ID information from the pilot signals to the P-SCH. That is, Cell
`
`ID information was to be included in the P-SCH and S-SCH, rather than the S-
`
`SCH and pilot signals. See, e.g., TI contribution R1-061434 (disclosing that “P-
`
`SCH and S-SCH are used jointly to obtain the full cell ID”); Samsung contribution
`
`R1-060812 (disclosing that “cell code group sequence may possibly be carried in
`
`P-SCH. S-SCH (Secondary SCH) would carry cell specific code.”).
`
`IV. The ’976 Patent
`
`The ’976 Patent is titled “Cell Search Method, Forward Link Frame
`
`Transmission Method, Apparatus Using the Same and Forward Link Frame
`
`Structure” and claims priority to a South Korean Provisional Application filed on
`
`July 25, 2006. Similar to 3G and the 4G proposals above, the ’976 Patent describes
`
`sending the P-SCH multiple times per frame, as shown in Figure 10 (red circles
`
`added).
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Each red circle includes a P-SCH, labeled 160, and an S-SCH, labeled 170.
`
`As shown here, the P-SCH and S-SCH are in consecutive OFDM symbols, like the
`
`Samsung and CHTTL 4G proposals above. The ’976 Patent also discloses using
`
`the P-SCH and S-SCH to determine the Cell ID, similar to the Samsung and TI
`
`proposals above. See, e.g., ’976 Patent at 10:48-52 (“[I]nformation about the cell
`
`groups . . . is sent through the primary synchronization channel and information
`
`about the cell sub-groups 30 is sent through the secondary synchronization
`
`channel.”).
`
`As disclosed by the ’976 Patent, the multiple S-SCHs in a frame together
`
`form a single “hopping code” that cellular devices use to determine a base station’s
`
`Cell ID within the Group. Ex. 1004 at 7:36-38. A cellular device could not
`
`determine the Cell ID within the Group by decoding one of multiple S-SCHs in a
`
`13
`
`

`

`frame, but rather had to decode all S-SCHs in the frame to determine the Cell ID
`
`
`
`within the Group. Ex. 1001 at ¶¶ 53-59.
`
`A. Challenged Claims
`
`The Challenged Claims are claims 9, 10, and 16 of the ’976 Patent. Claim 9,
`
`the only challenged independent claim, discloses:
`
`9. [9.1] A method of generating and
`transmitting downlink
`transmission by a base station in a wireless communication system,
`the method comprising;
`
`[9.2] generating a first primary synchronization sequence;
`
`[9.3] generating a second primary synchronization sequence;
`
`[9.4] generating a first secondary synchronization sequence;
`
`[9.5] generating a second secondary synchronization sequence; and
`
`[9.6] transmitting the downlink transmission including the first and
`second primary synchronization sequences and the first and second
`secondary
`synchronization
`sequences, wherein
`the downlink
`transmission comprises a plurality of subframes sequentially arranged
`in time domain, each of the plurality of subframes containing a
`plurality of symbols sequentially arranged in time domain, wherein a
`first subframe in the downlink transmission includes a first symbol
`representing the first primary synchronization sequence, and wherein
`a second subframe in the downlink transmission includes a second
`symbol representing the first secondary synchronization sequence,
`
`[9.7] wherein a first indicator is identified based on the first primary
`synchronization sequence, a second indicator is identified based on
`the first secondary synchronization sequence, and a cell identifier is
`identified based on the first indicator and the second indicator,
`
`[9.8] wherein the first subframe includes a third symbol representing a
`second secondary synchronization sequence, the third symbol being
`
`14
`
`

`

`
`
`direct

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket