throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`Oracle Corp.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`Guada Technologies LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00598
`Patent No. 7,231,379
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE
`INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT 7,231,379
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.72, Petitioner Oracle Corp. and Patent
`
`Owner Guada Technologies LLC jointly request dismissal and termination of the
`
`petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent 7,231,379 in IPR2020-00598.
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner have entered into a written confidential settlement
`
`agreement that fully resolves this matter. The parties are concurrently filing a copy
`
`of the settlement agreement as Exhibit 2001 and the single collateral agreement as
`
`Exhibit 2002 along with a request to treat it as confidential business information
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). The undersigned represent that there are no other
`
`agreements, oral or written, between the parties made in connection with, or in
`
`contemplation of, the termination of the present proceeding and that Exhibit 2001
`
`represents a true and accurate copy of the agreement between the parties that
`
`resolves the present proceeding, and that Exhibit 2002 is the only related collateral
`
`agreement.
`
`On May 22, 2020, the parties informed the Board of the settlement via
`
`e-mail and requested authorization to file a joint motion to terminate the
`
`petition with respect to both the Patent Owner and the Petitioner. As set forth
`
`in an e-mail dated June 3, 2020, the Board authorized the filing of the
`
`requested joint motion to terminate this petition. Accordingly, Petitioner and
`
`Patent Owner jointly request termination of the present proceeding.
`
`
`
`On June 10, 2020 (Paper 8), the Board directed the parties to re-file the
`
`

`

`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`Motions to include any “related collateral agreements”, and denied the Motions
`
`without prejudice. The parties have now, upon the Board’s request, submitted all
`
`related collateral agreements (see Exhibit 2002).
`
`Public policy favors terminating the present petition for inter partes
`
`review. Congress and federal courts have expressed a strong interest in
`
`encouraging settlement in litigation. See, e.g., Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August,
`
`450 U.S. 346, 352 (1981) (“The purpose of [Fed. R. Civ. P.] 68 is to encourage
`
`the settlement of litigation.”); Bergh v. Dept. of Transp., 794 F.2d 1575, 1577
`
`(Fed. Cir. 1986) (“The law favors settlement of cases.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S.
`
`950 (1986). The Federal Circuit places a particularly strong emphasis on
`
`settlement. See Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. U.S., 806 F.2d 1046, 1050 (Fed.
`
`Cir. 1986) (noting that the law favors settlement to reduce antagonism and
`
`hostility between parties). And, the Board’s Trial Practice Guide stresses that
`
`“[t]here are strong public policy reasons to favor settlement between the
`
`parties to a proceeding.” Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48,756, 46,768 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Ending this petition for IPR early promotes the Congressional goal of
`
`establishing a more efficient patent system by limiting unnecessary and
`
`counterproductive costs. See Changes to Implement Inter Partes Review
`
`Proceedings, Post-Grant Review Proceedings, and Transitional Program for
`
`

`

`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`Covered Business Method Patents, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,680 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Permitting termination provides certainty and fosters an environment
`
`that promotes settlements, creating a timely, cost-effective alternative to
`
`litigation.
`
`Additionally, termination of this petition for IPR is appropriate as the
`
`Board has not yet “decided the merits of the proceeding.” See, e.g., Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48768 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Petitioner filed its petition for inter partes review on February 19, 2020 and filed
`
`Petitioner’s Motion For Joinder on February 20, 2020 seeking to join IPR 2020-
`
`01304. The Board has not yet ruled on Petitioner’s Motion For Joinder. IPR 2020-
`
`01304 was terminated on March 25, 2020.
`
`The parties have now settled their dispute and have reached agreement to
`
`terminate this proceeding. The USPTO can conserve its resources through
`
`terminating now, removing the need for the Board to further consider the
`
`arguments and to render a Final Written Decision.
`
`There are no other pending USPTO proceedings regarding the patent-at-
`
`issue. Therefore, the Parties respectfully request termination of this Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent 7,231,379 (IPR2020-00598).
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Dated: July 1, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`
`/s/ Isaac Rabicoff________
`Isaac Rabicoff
`Reg. No. 74,147
`RABICOFF LAW LLC
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`/s/ James M. Heintz
`James M. Heintz (Reg. No. 41,828)
`DLA Piper LLP
`11911 Freedom Dr., Suite 300, Reston VA 20190
`Telephone: 703-773-4000
`Fax: 703-773-5200
`Email: jim.heintz@dlapiper.com
`
`
`Lead counsel for Petitioners
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on July 1,
`2020 the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE INTER PARTES
`REVIEW was served via electronic filing with the Board and via Electronic
`Mail on the following representative of record for Petitioner:
`
`James M. Heintz (Reg. No. 41,828)
`DLA Piper LLP
`11911 Freedom Dr., Suite 300, Reston VA 20190
`Telephone: 703-773-4000
`Fax: 703-773-5200
`Email: jim.heintz@dlapiper.com
`
`Alireza Babaei
`DLA Piper LLP
`11911 Freedom Dr., Suite 300, Reston VA 20190
`Telephone: 703-773-4000
`Fax: 703-773-5200
`Email: alireza.babaei@dlapiper.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Isaac Rabicoff________
`Isaac Rabicoff
`Reg. No. 74,147
`RABICOFF LAW LLC
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket