`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`Oracle Corp.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`Guada Technologies LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00598
`Patent No. 7,231,379
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE
`INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT 7,231,379
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.72, Petitioner Oracle Corp. and Patent
`
`Owner Guada Technologies LLC jointly request dismissal and termination of the
`
`petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent 7,231,379 in IPR2020-00598.
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner have entered into a written confidential settlement
`
`agreement that fully resolves this matter. The parties are concurrently filing a copy
`
`of the settlement agreement as Exhibit 2001 and the single collateral agreement as
`
`Exhibit 2002 along with a request to treat it as confidential business information
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). The undersigned represent that there are no other
`
`agreements, oral or written, between the parties made in connection with, or in
`
`contemplation of, the termination of the present proceeding and that Exhibit 2001
`
`represents a true and accurate copy of the agreement between the parties that
`
`resolves the present proceeding, and that Exhibit 2002 is the only related collateral
`
`agreement.
`
`On May 22, 2020, the parties informed the Board of the settlement via
`
`e-mail and requested authorization to file a joint motion to terminate the
`
`petition with respect to both the Patent Owner and the Petitioner. As set forth
`
`in an e-mail dated June 3, 2020, the Board authorized the filing of the
`
`requested joint motion to terminate this petition. Accordingly, Petitioner and
`
`Patent Owner jointly request termination of the present proceeding.
`
`
`
`On June 10, 2020 (Paper 8), the Board directed the parties to re-file the
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`Motions to include any “related collateral agreements”, and denied the Motions
`
`without prejudice. The parties have now, upon the Board’s request, submitted all
`
`related collateral agreements (see Exhibit 2002).
`
`Public policy favors terminating the present petition for inter partes
`
`review. Congress and federal courts have expressed a strong interest in
`
`encouraging settlement in litigation. See, e.g., Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August,
`
`450 U.S. 346, 352 (1981) (“The purpose of [Fed. R. Civ. P.] 68 is to encourage
`
`the settlement of litigation.”); Bergh v. Dept. of Transp., 794 F.2d 1575, 1577
`
`(Fed. Cir. 1986) (“The law favors settlement of cases.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S.
`
`950 (1986). The Federal Circuit places a particularly strong emphasis on
`
`settlement. See Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. U.S., 806 F.2d 1046, 1050 (Fed.
`
`Cir. 1986) (noting that the law favors settlement to reduce antagonism and
`
`hostility between parties). And, the Board’s Trial Practice Guide stresses that
`
`“[t]here are strong public policy reasons to favor settlement between the
`
`parties to a proceeding.” Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48,756, 46,768 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Ending this petition for IPR early promotes the Congressional goal of
`
`establishing a more efficient patent system by limiting unnecessary and
`
`counterproductive costs. See Changes to Implement Inter Partes Review
`
`Proceedings, Post-Grant Review Proceedings, and Transitional Program for
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`Covered Business Method Patents, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,680 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Permitting termination provides certainty and fosters an environment
`
`that promotes settlements, creating a timely, cost-effective alternative to
`
`litigation.
`
`Additionally, termination of this petition for IPR is appropriate as the
`
`Board has not yet “decided the merits of the proceeding.” See, e.g., Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48768 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Petitioner filed its petition for inter partes review on February 19, 2020 and filed
`
`Petitioner’s Motion For Joinder on February 20, 2020 seeking to join IPR 2020-
`
`01304. The Board has not yet ruled on Petitioner’s Motion For Joinder. IPR 2020-
`
`01304 was terminated on March 25, 2020.
`
`The parties have now settled their dispute and have reached agreement to
`
`terminate this proceeding. The USPTO can conserve its resources through
`
`terminating now, removing the need for the Board to further consider the
`
`arguments and to render a Final Written Decision.
`
`There are no other pending USPTO proceedings regarding the patent-at-
`
`issue. Therefore, the Parties respectfully request termination of this Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent 7,231,379 (IPR2020-00598).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 1, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`
`/s/ Isaac Rabicoff________
`Isaac Rabicoff
`Reg. No. 74,147
`RABICOFF LAW LLC
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`/s/ James M. Heintz
`James M. Heintz (Reg. No. 41,828)
`DLA Piper LLP
`11911 Freedom Dr., Suite 300, Reston VA 20190
`Telephone: 703-773-4000
`Fax: 703-773-5200
`Email: jim.heintz@dlapiper.com
`
`
`Lead counsel for Petitioners
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate, IPR2020-00598
`U.S. Patent 7,231,379
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on July 1,
`2020 the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE INTER PARTES
`REVIEW was served via electronic filing with the Board and via Electronic
`Mail on the following representative of record for Petitioner:
`
`James M. Heintz (Reg. No. 41,828)
`DLA Piper LLP
`11911 Freedom Dr., Suite 300, Reston VA 20190
`Telephone: 703-773-4000
`Fax: 703-773-5200
`Email: jim.heintz@dlapiper.com
`
`Alireza Babaei
`DLA Piper LLP
`11911 Freedom Dr., Suite 300, Reston VA 20190
`Telephone: 703-773-4000
`Fax: 703-773-5200
`Email: alireza.babaei@dlapiper.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Isaac Rabicoff________
`Isaac Rabicoff
`Reg. No. 74,147
`RABICOFF LAW LLC
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`