`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`BOT M8, LLC
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`
`Case No. IPR2020-01288
`U.S. Patent No. 7,664,988
`____________
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s February 16, 2021, Scheduling Order (Paper 12),
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument for the trial currently scheduled on
`
`November 10, 2021. If the Board is conducting in-person hearings, Petitioner further
`
`requests that the hearing take place in Alexandria, Virginia.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner respectfully proposes 45 minutes of
`
`time per side and specifies the following issues, without intent to waive consideration
`
`of any issue not requested, to be argued for this proceeding:
`
`1. Whether Claims 1-9 are unpatentable under § 103(a) over Japanese
`
`Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. JP 2000-35888 to Sugiyama
`
`(“Sugiyama”) in view of International Publication No. WO 2004/004855 to Gatto, et
`
`al. (“Gatto”);
`
`2. Whether Claims 1-9 are unpatentable under § 103(a) over U.S. Patent
`
`Publication No. 2004/0054952 to Morrow (“Morrow”) in view of U.S. Patent
`
`Publication No. 2003/0064771 to Morrow (“Morrow ’771”);
`
`3. Whether Claims 2 and 7 are unpatentable under § 103(a) over Sugiyama
`
`in view of Gatto, in further view of U.S. Patent No. 5,844,776 to Yamaguchi
`
`(“Yamaguchi”);
`
`4. Whether Claims 2 and 7 are unpatentable under § 103(a) over Morrow in
`
`view of Morrow ’771, in further view of Yamaguchi;
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`5. Whether Claim 8 is unpatentable under § 103(a) over Sugiyama in view
`
`of Gatto and Yamaguchi, in further view of International Publication No. WO 00/73904
`
`to Proudler (“Proudler”);
`
`6. Whether Claim 8 is unpatentable under § 103(a) over Morrow in view of
`
`Morrow ’771 and Yamaguchi, in further view of Proudler;
`
`7. Whether Claim 10 is unpatentable under § 103(a) over Sugiyama in view
`
`of Gatto, in further view of U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0135350 to Cheston
`
`(“Cheston”);
`
`8. Whether Claim 10 is unpatentable under § 103(a) over Morrow in view
`
`of Morrow ’771, in further view of Cheston;
`
`9.
`
`Any claim constructions raised in the Petition or Petitioner Reply, the
`
`Patent Owner Preliminary Response, Patent Owner Response, or the Patent Owner Sur-
`
`Reply, or the Board’s Institution Decision;
`
`10. Any issues specified in the Patent Owner Response and Patent Owner Sur-
`
`Reply;
`
`11. Any issues specified in the Petitioner Reply;
`
`12. Response to any issues specified by Patent Owner in its request for oral
`
`argument; and
`
`13. Any issues otherwise raised by the Board.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` BY: /s/ Eric A. Buresh
`
`Eric A. Buresh, Reg. No. 50,394
`Jason R. Mudd, Reg. No. 57,700
`Callie Pendergrass, Reg. No. 63,949
`
`COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 1, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on October 1,
`
`2021, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s Request for Oral
`
`Argument were served by electronic mail on Patent Owner’s lead and backup
`
`counsel at the following email addresses:
`
`James Hannah: jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`
`Jonathan S. Caplan: jcaplan@kramerlevin.com
`
`Jeffrey H. Price: jprice@kramerlevin.com
`
`Aaron M. Frankel: afrankel@kramerlevin.com
`
`svdocketing@kramerlevin.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY: /s/ Eric A. Buresh
`
`Eric A. Buresh, Reg. No. 50,394
`
`COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
