`Wednesday, April 28, 2021 7:48 PM
`Thomas Derbish
`aabsher@kilpatricktownsend.com; tom@gillamsmithlaw.com; arinehart@kilpatricktownsend.com;
`Bryan Kohm; Chris Larson; ddacus; Geoff Miller; gil@gillamsmithlaw.com; travis@gillamsmithlaw.com;
`Jeffrey Ware; Jennifer Bush; Jessica Kaempf; jalemanni@kilpatricktownsend.com; Jon McMichael;
`jlee@kilpatricktownsend.com; kkoballa@kilpatricktownsend.com; melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com;
`Michael Sacksteder; mmorlock@kilpatricktownsend.com; nboothe@kilpatricktownsend.com;
`rgupta@kilpatricktownsend.com; sdacus@dacusfirm.com; smoore@kilpatricktownsend.com;
`taludlam@kilpatricktownsend.com; tpfingst@kilpatricktownsend.com; Winnie Wong;
`pam@tacticallawgroup.com; William Nilsson; Steven Laxton
`GREE Inc. v. Supercell OY (2:19-cv-200; -237; -310; -311) - Case Narrowing
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Mr. Derbish,
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s instructions asking the parties to advise of any case narrowing between the pretrial conference
`and jury selection, Supercell writes to inform the Court that Supercell does not intend to assert at trial invalidity under
`35 USC §§ 102 & 103 as to U.S. Patent Nos. 10,076,708 and 10,413,832, which are the asserted patents in Case No. 2:19‐
`cv‐00310.
`
`Best regards,
`Shannon
`
`Shannon Turner
`Fenwick | Associate | 650‐335‐7844 | sturner@fenwick.com
`
`1
`
`Supercell
`Exhibit 1045
`Page 1
`
`