IPR2022-01220, No. 1013-20 Exhibit - Exhibit 1013 (P.T.A.B. Jul. 1, 2022)

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`MARKFORGED INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CONTINUOUS COMPOSITES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Patent No. 9,987,798
`
`IPR Case Nos.: IPR2022-01218
`IPR2022-01220
`
`DECLARATION OF SYLVIA D. HALL-ELLIS, PH.D.
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`Page 1 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`1.
`My name is Sylvia D. Hall-Ellis. I have been retained as an expert by
`
`Markforged, Inc. (collectively, “Petitioner”).
`
`2.
`
`I submit this Declaration to provide my expert opinions regarding the
`
`date of public availability or accessibility of three publications attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit 1007: Solid Freedom Fabrication of Continuous Fiber Reinforced
`
`Composite Materials, a Ph.D. dissertation written by Erjian Ma, which was
`
`published in the summer of 2001 by Auburn University; Exhibit 1009: New
`
`Metal/Polymer Composites for Fused Deposition Modelling Applications, a Ph.D.
`
`dissertation written by Moustafa Nikzad, which was published in the spring of 2011
`
`by Swinburne University of Technology; and Exhibit 1010: UK Patent Application
`
`GB 2213793A, dated August 23, 1989. My Declaration sets forth my opinions in
`
`detail and provides the bases for my opinions.
`
`3.
`
`I reserve the right to supplement or amend my opinions, and bases for
`
`them, in response to any additional evidence, testimony, discovery, argument, and/or
`
`other additional information that may be provided to me after the date of this
`
`Declaration.
`
`4.
`
`I am being compensated for my time spent working on this matter at
`
`my normal consulting rate of $325 per hour, plus reimbursement for any additional
`
`reasonable expenses. My compensation does not in any way depend on the content
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`1
`
`Page 2 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`of this Declaration, the substance of my opinions, or the outcome of this litigation.
`
`I have no interest in this proceeding or in any of the parties.
`
`5.
`
`All of the materials that I considered are discussed explicitly in this
`
`Declaration.
`
`II. QUALIFICATIONS & BACKGROUND
`6.
`I am currently an Adjunct Professor in the School of Information at San
`
`José State University. I obtained a Master of Library Science from the University
`
`of North Texas in 1972, a Master of Professional Studies from the University of
`
`Denver in 2014, and a Ph.D. in Library Science and Information Science from the
`
`University of Pittsburgh in 1985. Over the last fifty years, I have held various
`
`positions in the field of library and information resources. I was first employed as a
`
`librarian in 1966 and have been involved in the field of library sciences since,
`
`holding numerous positions.
`
`7.
`
`I am a member of the American Library Association (ALA) and its
`
`Association for Library Collections & Technical Services (ALCTS) Division, and I
`
`served on the Committee on Cataloging: Resource and Description (which wrote the
`
`new cataloging rules) and as the chair of the Committee for Education and Training
`
`of Catalogers and the Competencies and Education for a Career in Cataloging
`
`Interest Group. I also served as the founding Chair of the ALCTS Division’s Task
`
`Force on Competencies and Education for a Career in Cataloging. Additionally, I
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`2
`
`Page 3 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`have served as the Chair for the ALA Office of Diversity’s Committee on Diversity,
`
`as a member of the REFORMA National Board of Directors, and as a member of the
`
`Editorial Board for the ALCTS premier cataloging journal, Library Resources and
`
`Technical Services. Currently I serve as a Co-Chair for the Library Research Round
`
`Table of the ALA.
`
`8.
`
`I have also given over one hundred presentations in the field, including
`
`several on library cataloging systems and Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC)
`
`standards. My current research interests include library cataloging systems,
`
`metadata, and organization of electronic resources.
`
`9.
`
`I have previously served as an expert witness in approximately 600
`
`cases over the course of the last decade. I have extensive experience opining on the
`
`publication status of printed references in patent litigations in federal district courts
`
`and in proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. I have been deposed
`
`twenty-one times. I have not testified at trial.
`
`10. During my career I have served as a Dissertation Committee Chair ten
`
`times, as a Dissertation Committee member three times, and as a Thesis (Capstone)
`
`Chair fourteen times. My personal experiences writing a master’s thesis and Ph.D.
`
`dissertation and those working with students as a tenured faculty member have
`
`provided me with in-depth experience and detailed knowledge of the standardized
`
`processes that students follow as part of the culminating process to earn a graduate
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`3
`
`Page 4 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`degree.
`
`11. The steps that a student takes in pursuit of a graduate degree are
`
`predictable and include a predefined number.1 The Dissertation Chair is responsible
`
`for guiding the student and overseeing formal coursework; reviewing research
`
`activities; the preparation and defense of the proposal; the selection of committee
`
`members; drafting the dissertation document; ensuring the completion of
`
`requirements for binding; filing in the institutional digital repository and library; and
`
`submitting paperwork with the Graduate Office before specified deadlines in
`
`anticipation of conferring the degree. While there are materials that one can read
`
`about the process, there is no substitute for going through the process personally,
`
`serving as a committee member, and chairing the committee for a student.
`
`Understanding the intricacies of the process is essential to determine institutional
`
`documents, deadlines, and requirements required at institutions other than the one at
`
`which someone works.
`
`12. My full curriculum vitae is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
`
`III.
`
`SCOPE OF OPINIONS
`13.
`I am not an attorney and will not offer opinions on the law. I am,
`
`however, rendering my expert opinion on the dates of public accessibility of the
`
`references discussed herein, including when and how each reference was
`
`1 https://study.com/how_to_get_your_phd.html
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`4
`
`Page 5 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`disseminated or otherwise made available to persons interested and ordinarily skilled
`
`in the subject matter or art, exercising reasonable diligence. In particular, I am
`
`rendering opinions on how such persons could have located, before August 29, 2012,
`
`the references discussed below.
`
`IV. LEGAL STANDARDS
`14.
`I am informed by counsel and understand that a printed publication is
`
`deemed publicly accessible as of the date it was disseminated or otherwise made
`
`available such that a person interested in and ordinarily skilled in the relevant subject
`
`matter could locate it through the exercise of ordinary diligence.
`
`15.
`
`I also understand
`
`that public accessibility
`
`is a case-by-case
`
`determination based on circumstances particular to an individual publication. I
`
`further understand, however, that a printed publication is rendered “publicly
`
`accessible” if a person of ordinary skill in the art, exercising reasonable diligence,
`
`would have located the publication, or would have known to look for it. I further
`
`understand that a printed publication is thus rendered “publicly accessible” if it is
`
`filed in an online database, like ProQuest’s Dissertations and Theses, that is
`
`cataloged and indexed such that a person interested in the relevant subject matter
`
`could locate it (i.e., I understand that cataloging and indexing by an online database
`
`is sufficient, though there are other ways that a printed publication may qualify as
`
`publicly accessible). One manner of sufficient indexing is indexing according to
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`5
`
`Page 6 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`subject matter category. I understand that the cataloging and indexing by a database
`
`of a single instance of a particular printed publication is sufficient, even if that
`
`database is hosted by a foreign country. I understand that, even if access to a
`
`database is restricted, a printed publication that has been cataloged and indexed
`
`therein is deemed publicly accessible if the public concerned with the relevant
`
`subject matter would know of the printed publication. I also understand that the
`
`cataloging and indexing of information that would guide a person interested in the
`
`relevant subject matter to the printed publication, such as the cataloging and
`
`indexing of an abstract for the printed publication, is sufficient to render the printed
`
`publication publicly accessible.
`
`16.
`
`I understand that routine business practices, such as general database
`
`and library cataloging and indexing practices, can be used to establish an
`
`approximate date on which a printed publication became publicly accessible.
`
`V.
`
`PERSONS OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART
`17.
`I am informed by counsel that the subject matter of this proceeding
`
`relates to additive manufacturing of three-dimensional objects.
`
`18.
`
`I am informed by counsel that a “person of ordinary skill in the art at
`
`the time of the inventions” is a hypothetical person who is presumed to be familiar
`
`with the relevant field and its literature at the time of the inventions. This
`
`hypothetical person is also a person of ordinary creativity, capable of understanding
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`6
`
`Page 7 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`the scientific principles applicable to the pertinent field.
`
`19.
`
`I am informed by counsel that Petitioners’ expert has opined that
`
`persons of ordinary skill in this subject matter or art would have had at least (1) a
`
`master’s degree in mechanical engineering, materials science, or a related degree,
`
`and at least 3-5 years of experience in composite materials or additive
`
`manufacturing; or (2) a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, materials
`
`science, or a related degree, and at least 5-6 years of experience in composite
`
`materials or additive manufacturing. I understand that a person with less education,
`
`but more relevant practical experience may also meet this standard.
`
`20.
`
`It is my opinion that such a person would have been engaged in
`
`research, learning, study, and practice in the field, and possibly formal instruction so
`
`that bibliographic resources relevant to his or her research would be familiar. Before
`
`August 29, 2012, such a person would have had access to an array of long-
`
`established print resources in mechanical and electrical engineering as well as online
`
`resources providing indexing information, abstracts, and full text services for
`
`computer science.
`
`VI. LIBRARY PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES
`21.
`In preparing this Declaration, I used authoritative databases, including
`
`the OCLC bibliographic database, the Library of Congress Online Catalog, the
`
`Library of Congress Subject Authorities, and ProQuest’s Dissertations and Theses,
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`7
`
`Page 8 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`and the UK’s Online Patent Information and Document Inspection Service database,
`
`to confirm citation details of the various publications discussed.
`
`22.
`
`Indexing. A researcher may discover material relevant to his or her
`
`topic in a variety of ways. One common means of discovery is to search for relevant
`
`information in an index of periodical and other publications. Having found relevant
`
`material, the researcher will then normally obtain it online, look for it in libraries, or
`
`purchase it from the publisher, a bookstore, a document delivery service, or other
`
`provider. Sometimes, the date of a document’s public accessibility will involve both
`
`indexing and library date information. However, date information for indexing
`
`entries is often unavailable. This is especially true for online indices.
`
`23.
`
`Indexing services use a wide variety of controlled vocabularies to
`
`provide subject access and other means of discovering the content of documents.
`
`The Library of Congress Subject Authorities includes standard forms of terms and
`
`cross references that are included in bibliographic records. Subject headings are
`
`terms that an individual seeking a document regardless of format can enter in the
`
`search bar of the online catalog. Subjects also connect an authenticated term (one
`
`included in the Library of Congress subject headings list) with related, broader, and
`
`narrower terms.
`
`24. Online indexing services commonly provide bibliographic information,
`
`abstracts, and full-text copies of the indexed publications, along with a list of the
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`8
`
`Page 9 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`documents cited in the indexed publication. These services also often provide lists
`
`of publications that cite a given document. A citation of a document is evidence that
`
`the document was publicly available and in use by researchers no later than the
`
`publication date of the citing document. Prominent indexing services include
`
`Scopus, the IEEE Xplore database, the ACM Digital Library, Google Scholar, the
`
`Internet Archive, and ProQuest databases for dissertations, theses, journals, and
`
`digital reference materials.
`
`25. Databases and digital repositories like those mentioned in paragraph 25
`
`provide search capabilities through title, author, subject, keyword, and standard
`
`numbers (ISBN and ISSN) that enable information professionals and individuals to
`
`locate books, articles, conference papers, and other publications. The databases and
`
`digital repositories include retrospective collections of scanned or digitized materials
`
`and are updated regularly. Collegiate and university studies at the undergraduate and
`
`graduate level require that students develop familiarity and proficiency using
`
`indexing services, databases, and digital repositories.
`
`VII. PUBLICATION
`Publication 1, Exhibit 1007, Solid Freedom Fabrication of
`A.
`Continuous Fiber Reinforced Composite Materials by Erjian Ma
`(“Ma”)
`
`26. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1007 is a dissertation, Solid Freedom
`
`Fabrication of Continuous Fiber Reinforced Composite Materials by Erjian Ma
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`9
`
`Page 10 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`(hereafter “Ma”). Exhibit 1007 includes a true and correct copy of the title page,
`
`table of contents, and text from the ProQuest2 database Dissertations and Theses.3
`
`The dissertation title page shows a date of August 6, 2001. I obtained this
`
`dissertation from UMI’s database Dissertations and Theses and made the copies
`
`which comprise Exhibit 1007. Specifically, the text is complete; no pages are
`
`missing, and the text on each page flows seamlessly from one page to the next;
`
`further, there are no visible alterations to the document. Exhibit 1007 was found
`
`within the custody of the custodian to whom the author granted permission to make
`
`copies and reproductions. Exhibit 1007 is a true and correct copy in a condition that
`
`creates no suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`27. A dissertation exhibits the following characteristics: the dissertation is
`
`attributed to a single creator or author (in this case Erjian Ma) who affixes a date of
`
`creation (in this case August 6, 2001), recognizes a committee of three or more
`
`faculty members with their affiliations (in this case Professors Bor. Z. Jang, Dan B.
`
`Marghitu and Sabit Adanur), a list of scholarly references (in this case 76 references
`
`2 ProQuest is the corporate global information-content and technology company
`founded as University Microfilms (UMI) in 1939. Over the last 80 years, the firm
`has grown through corporate acquisitions and product development to be a major
`supplier globally of databases and digital products (https://www.proquest.com/).
`3 https://about.proquest.com/en/products-services/pqdtglobal
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`10
`
`Page 11 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`in “References” on pages 221-227), and publishes the document through the higher
`
`education institute conferring the doctoral degree (in this case the Department of
`
`Mechanical Engineering at the Auburn University).
`
`28. Attached hereto as Attachment 1a is a true and correct copy of the
`
`online catalog record for this dissertation from the Auburn University Library. The
`
`catalog record indicates that copies of the dissertation are located in the Main Library
`
`and off-site in the Thesis Special Collection. I personally identified and retrieved
`
`the library catalog record which is Attachment 1a.
`
`29. Attached hereto as Attachment 1b is a true and correct copy of the
`
`MARC record for the dissertation, Solid Freedom Fabrication of Continuous Fiber
`
`Reinforced Composite Materials by Ma obtained from the OCLC bibliographic
`
`database. I personally identified and retrieved the MARC record that is Attachment
`
`1b. As previously noted, the library that created the record is recorded in field 040
`
`with a unique library code. For Attachment 1b, that library code is “AAA,” which
`
`means that the MARC record for this dissertation was created at the Auburn
`
`University Library. As can be seen in the “Entered” field in the MARC record for
`
`this exhibit, a cataloger at the Auburn University Library created OCLC record
`
`number 48433505 on November 15, 2001.
`
`30. Attachment 1b further includes an entry in field 050 (“TA418.9.C6 $b
`
`M2 2001”)—as described above, this includes a subject matter classification number
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`11
`
`Page 12 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`consistent with the Library of Congress classification system (analogous to the
`
`Dewey Decimal classification system). Attachment 1b includes three descriptor
`
`terms reading “Fibrous composites” (see Attachment 1c, Library of Congress subject
`
`heading sh85048037), “Composite materials” (see Attachment 1d, Library of
`
`Congress subject heading sh85029397), and “Solid freeform fabrication” (see
`
`Attachment 1e, Library of Congress subject heading sh93004626) in the 650 fields.
`
`Thus, as of its cataloging, the publication corresponding to the MARC record
`
`attached hereto as Attachment 1b was indexed by indexed according to its subject
`
`matter by virtue of at least two independently sufficient classifications: the field 050
`
`entry and the field 650 entries. Further, as of November 15, 2001, the MARC record
`
`attached hereto as Attachment 1b was accessible through any library with access to
`
`the OCLC bibliographic database or the online catalog at a library that added this
`
`book to its collection, which means that the corresponding publication was publicly
`
`available on or before that same date through any library with access to the OCLC
`
`bibliographic database or through an individual library.
`
`31. Attachment 1b indicates that the Ma dissertation as cataloged at the
`
`Auburn University is currently available from that institution. In view of above, this
`
`dissertation was publicly available no later than November 15, 2001, because by that
`
`date it had been received, cataloged, and indexed at the Auburn University Library,
`
`placed in the custody of UMI, and made part of the OCLC bibliographic database.
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`12
`
`Page 13 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`For these reasons, it is my opinion that Exhibit 1007 was published and accessible
`
`to the public no later than November 15, 2001.
`
`B.
`
`Publication 2, Exhibit 1009, New Metal/Polymer Composites for
`Fused Deposition Modelling Applications by Mostafa Nikzad
`(“Nikzad”)
`
`32. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1009 is a dissertation, New Metal/Polymer
`
`Composites for Fused Deposition Modelling Applications by Mostafa Nikzad
`
`(hereafter “Nikzad”). Exhibit 1009 includes a true and correct copy of the title page,
`
`table of contents, and text from the Swinburne Research Bank4 at the Swinburne
`
`University of Technology (Hawthorn, Melbourne, Australia). The dissertation title
`
`page shows a date of May 2011. I obtained this dissertation from the Swinburne
`
`Research Bank and made the copies which comprise Exhibit 1009. Specifically, the
`
`text is complete; no pages are missing, and the text on each page flows seamlessly
`
`from one page to the next; further, there are no visible alterations to the
`
`document. Exhibit 1009 was found within the custody of the custodian to whom the
`
`author granted permission to make copies and reproductions. Exhibit 1009 is a true
`
`and correct copy in a condition that creates no suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`33. A dissertation exhibits the following characteristics: the dissertation is
`
`attributed to a single creator or author (in this case Mostafa Nikzad) who affixes a
`
`4 https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/items/ffe96def-3bef-4387-9666-
`153a64e7d6d6/1/
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`13
`
`Page 14 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`date of creation (in this case May 2011), recognizes a committee of three or more
`
`faculty members with their affiliations (in this case Professors S. H. Masood, Igor
`
`Sbarski, and Andrew Groth), a list of scholarly references (in this case 324 references
`
`in “References” on pages 214-236), and publishes the document through the higher
`
`education institute conferring the doctoral degree (in this case the Department of
`
`Engineering & Industrial Sciences at the Swinburne University of Technology).
`
`34. Attached hereto as Attachment 2a is a true and correct copy of the
`
`online catalog record for this dissertation from the Swinburne University of
`
`Technology Library. The catalog record indicates that the dissertation is available
`
`as an open access document from the Swinburne research Bank. I personally
`
`identified and retrieved the library catalog record which is Attachment 2a.
`
`35. Attached hereto as Attachment 2b is a true and correct copy of the
`
`MARC record for the dissertation, New Metal/Polymer Composites for Fused
`
`Deposition Modelling Applications by Nikzad obtained from
`
`the OCLC
`
`bibliographic database. I personally identified and retrieved the MARC record that
`
`is Attachment 2b. As previously noted, the library that created the record is recorded
`
`in field 040 with a unique library code. For Attachment 2b, that library code is
`
`“LE0,” which means that the MARC record for this dissertation was created at the
`
`Swinburne University of Technology Library. As can be seen in the “Entered” field
`
`in the MARC record for this exhibit, a cataloger at the Swinburne University of
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`14
`
`Page 15 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Technology Library created OCLC record number 742215971 on September 28,
`
`2011.
`
`36. Attachment 2b
`
`includes five descriptor
`
`terms reading “Fused
`
`deposition,” “Manufacturing,” Metal/polymer composites,” “rapid prototyping,”
`
`and “Rapid tooling” in the 653 fields. Thus, as of its cataloging, the publication
`
`corresponding to the MARC record attached hereto as Attachment 2b was indexed
`
`by indexed according to its subject matter by virtue of the field 653 entries. Further,
`
`as of September 28, 2011, the MARC record attached hereto as Attachment 2b was
`
`accessible through any library with access to the OCLC bibliographic database or
`
`the online catalog at a library that added this book to its collection, which means that
`
`the corresponding publication was publicly available on or before that same date
`
`through any library with access to the OCLC bibliographic database or through an
`
`individual library.
`
`37. Attachment 2b indicates that the Nikzad dissertation as cataloged at the
`
`Swinburne University of Technology Library is currently available from that
`
`institution. In view of above, this dissertation was publicly available no later than
`
`September 28, 2011, because by that date it had been received, cataloged, and
`
`indexed at the Swinburne University of Technology Library, placed in the custody
`
`of the Swinburne Research Bank, and made part of the OCLC bibliographic
`
`database. For these reasons, it is my opinion that Exhibit 1009 was published and
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`15
`
`Page 16 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`accessible to the public no later than September 28, 2011.
`
`Publication 3, Exhibit 1010, Method for Manufacturing a Three-
`C.
`Dimensionally Twisted Rotor Blade Airfoil, GB 2213793 (“Wöhrl”)
`38.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 1010 is a UK patent application, Method
`
`for Manufacturing a Three-Dimensionally Twisted Rotor Blade Airfoil invented by
`
`Dr. Berhard Wöhrl and filed by MTU Motoren-und Turbinen-Union Müchen GmbH
`
`(hereafter “Wöhrl”). Exhibit 1010 includes a true and correct copy of the patent
`
`application from the UK Online Patent Information and Document Inspection
`
`Service database.5 The first page shows a filing date of November 10, 1988, and a
`
`publication date of August 23, 1989. I obtained this patent from the Espacenet Patent
`
`Search website6 and made the copies which comprise Exhibit 1010.7 Specifically,
`
`the text is complete; no pages are missing, and the text on each page flows
`
`seamlessly from one page to the next; further, there are no visible alterations to the
`
`document. Exhibit 1010 was found within the custody of the custodian to whom the
`
`author granted permission to make copies and reproductions. Exhibit 1010 is a true
`
`and correct copy in a condition that creates no suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`5https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/ApplicationNumber/GB8826325.6
`6https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?DB=EPODOC&PN=GB2213793
`&ST=advanced&compact=false
`7https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?FT=D&da
`te=19890823&DB=EPODOC&locale=&CC=GB&NR=2213793A&KC=A&ND=
`6
`
`
`ACTIVE/117258507
`
`16
`
`Page 17 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Page 18 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Page 19 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Attachment 1a
`
`Page 20 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Page 21 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Attachment 1b
`
`Page 23 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Page 24 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Attachment 1c
`
`Page 25 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Page 26 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`MARC Display (Library of Congress Authorities)
`
`https://authorities.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?AuthRecID=4699749...
`
`Email Text (Labelled Display) to:
`
`Press to SEND EMAIL
`
`Help - Search - Search History - Headings List - Start Over
`
`Library of Congress
`URL: https://www.loc.gov/
`
`Mailing Address:
`101 Independence Ave,
`S.E.
`Washington, DC 20540
`
`Library of Congress Authorities
`URL: http://authorities.loc.gov/
`Library of Congress Online Catalog
`URL: https://catalog.loc.gov/
`
`Questions, comments, error reports: Contact Us
`
`2 of 2
`
`10/1/2021, 1:02 PM
`
`Page 27 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Attachment 1d
`
`Page 28 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Page 29 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`MARC Display (Library of Congress Authorities)
`
`https://authorities.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?AuthRecID=4681673...
`
`Help - Search - Search History - Headings List - Start Over
`
`Library of Congress
`URL: https://www.loc.gov/
`
`Mailing Address:
`101 Independence Ave,
`S.E.
`Washington, DC 20540
`
`Library of Congress Authorities
`URL: http://authorities.loc.gov/
`Library of Congress Online Catalog
`URL: https://catalog.loc.gov/
`
`Questions, comments, error reports: Contact Us
`
`2 of 2
`
`10/1/2021, 1:03 PM
`
`Page 30 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Attachment 1e
`
`Page 31 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`MARC Display (Library of Congress Authorities)
`
`https://authorities.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?AuthRecID=4851548...
`
`The Library of Congress
`
`>> Go to Library of Congress Online
`Catalog
`
`The Library has opened access to the reading rooms by appointment only. More. The Jefferson Building has
`reopened to visitors via timed, ticketed entry. More.
`
`LC control no.: sh 93004626
`LCCN Permalink: https://lccn.loc.gov/sh93004626
`HEADING: Solid freeform fabrication
`000 01685cz a2200337n 450
`001 4851548
`005 20160511060009.0
`008 930618i| anannbabn |a ana
`010 __ |a sh 93004626
`035 __ |a (DLC)sh 93004626
`035 __ |a (DLC)198233
`040 __ |a DLC |c DLC |d DLC
`150 __ |a Solid freeform fabrication
`450 __ |a Fabrication, Solid freeform
`450 __ |a Freeform fabrication, Solid
`450 __ |a Layered manufacturing (Materials processing)
`450 __ |a Manufacturing, Solid freeform
`550 __ |w g |a Computer integrated manufacturing systems
`550 __ |w g |a Three-dimensional printing
`670 __ |a Work cat.: 93-642852: Solid freeform fabrication symposium proceedings (a fully
`integrated approach to design, materials processing, and manufacturing)
`670 __ |a Engr. index: |b v. 89, Pt. IX, p. 8784, under Solid freeform fabrication (several
`articles)
`670 __ |a Engineering Village, viewed February 12, 2016 |b (Solid freeform fabrication
`redirects to: Layered manufacturing)
`670 __ |a Wkipedia, viewed February 12, 2016 |b (Solid freeform fabrication redirects to 3D
`printing; electron beam freeform fabrication and laser freeform fabrication are listed as
`subtypes)
`670 __ |a Inspec, viewed Feb. 12, 2016 |b (uncontrolled term: Laser solid freeform
`fabrication)
`670 __ |a Applied science and technology abstracts, viewed February 12, 2016 |b (both
`headings are controlled: Three-dimensional printing; Solid freeform fabrication
`675 __ |a ASTI; |a NASA; |a Web. 3
`
`1 of 2
`
`10/1/2021, 1:04 PM
`
`Page 32 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Page 33 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`Attachment 2a
`
`Page 34 of 93
`
`Markforged Ex. 1013
`
`
`
`
`Markforged v. Continuous Composites, IPR2022-01220
`
`

`DISSERTATION
`New metal/polymer composites for fused deposition modelling applications
`Nikzad, Mostafa
`
`Swinburne University of Technology; 2011
`
`View Online
`Full text availability
`Link to Resource
`Details
`Title
`New metal/polymer composites for fused deposition modelling applications
`Author/Creator
`Nikzad, Mostafa
`Creation Date
`2011
`Publisher
`Swinburne University of Technology
`Description
`Fused Deposition M

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.

Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

Up-to-date information for this case.
Email alerts whenever there is an update.
Full text search for other cases.
Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.

Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

Supplemental Search

Search for PTAB Motions

PTAB Analytics

TTAB Analytics

Basic Search

Filters

Party Search

Advanced

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Find PTAB Decisions

PTAB Analytics

Special PTAB Alerts

Orange Book

Directly Search Federal Courts

Search Trademark ...

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

Still Working On It

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

This document could not be displayed.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

One Moment Please

Your document is on its way!

Sealed Document

We are redirecting youto a mobile optimized page.

Document Unreadable or Corrupt

We are unable to display this document.

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

Add your payment information

Login or Join

Enter your corporate Email

Thousands of your peers are saving time and gaining a competitive advantage with Docket Alarm.

Join Docket Alarm to perform smarter legal research.

Download this document and millions of others instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join Docket Alarm and start performing smarter legal research.

Start tracking this docket instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join thousands of your peers and start performing smarter legal research.

STEP 1 of 2

Millions of Documents | 15 Seconds to Signup

Hi !

Welcome to Docket Alarm

Welcome to Docket Alarm!

Explore Litigation Insights andManage Your Cases

Reset Password

What is PACER?

Why do I need it?

What will I be charged?

Do other courts have fees?

Basic Free Access

Welcome

Thank you

Check Firm Account

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

Explore Litigation Insights and
Manage Your Cases