throbber
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF RT-LPCVD AND LPCVD POLVSILICON THIN
`FILMS: APPLICATION TO EMITTER SOLAR CELL.
`
`M. Lemiti ·, B. Semmache *, Q. N. Le**, D. Barbier*, A.Laugier *
`
`* LPM - INSA de Lyon - 20 Av. Albert Einstein - 69621 Villeurbanne - France.
`
`** Photowatt International - 33, rue Saint-Honore - Z.I. Champfleuri
`
`38300 Bourgoin-Jallieu - France
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`This investigation was implemented in the framework
`of a novel all-low thermal budget polysilicon emitter solar
`cells fabrication technology. A comparative study of
`structural and electrical properties of thin silicon layer
`deposited by silane pyrolisis in a classical hot-wall
`furnace (LPCVD) and a cold-wall ATP reactor (RT-LPCVD)
`has been made. Deposition conditions and rapid thermal
`anneals were varied in order to improve the physical
`properties of RT-LPCVD polysilicon films. The structural
`properties have been characterized by means of grazing
`X-ray diffraction and cross-sectional TEM analysis.
`Sheet resistivity measurements performed on POCIJ(cid:173)
`doped and subsequently rapid thermal annealed films
`showed the feasibility of low resistivity films particularly
`when the polysilicon layers are initially deposited in the
`amorphous state. Finally, RTCVD polysilicon emitter solar
`cells with various thicknesses were tested by spectral
`photo-response analysis.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Polysilicon
`thin
`films are widely used
`in
`microelectronic technology, especially as contact(cid:173)
`emitter in bipolar devices [1]. The interesting physical
`properties of this material allowed several investigations
`on polysilicon emitter solar cells [2,3,4]. From this
`litterature, it appeared that the tight control of polysilicon
`emitter properties, namely the thickness and the sheet
`resistance
`is necessary to avoid
`front surface
`recombination and consequently to preserve long
`minority carrier lifetimes.
`Up to date, polysilicon films used in these structures
`are realized in conventional hot-wall furnaces (CFP) by
`combination of low temperature processes including
`LPCVD with in-situ doping followed by a drive-in thermal
`treatment (2,5]. It is well-known that the latter process
`produces a relatively high contact sheet resistance due
`to incomplete electrical activation. So, low thermal
`budget-Rapid Thermal Annealing (RT A) seems to be a
`potential alternative way guaranteeing at one, sufficient
`electrical activation and at the same time suppressing
`undesirable dopant profile broadening. Furthermore, it is
`clearly established that the polysilicon/silicon substrate
`interface control constitutes the key parameter for poly-
`
`emitter device performance. Indeed, the presence of a
`good quality ultra-thin interfacial oxide allows to reduce
`back-injection current and also to increase the open
`circuit voltage, Voe [4]. For this purpose, thermally grown
`oxide is often chosen owing to its thermal stability with
`respect to native or chemical oxide. However, the
`oxidation kinetics must be greatly reduced as the
`interfacial oxide layer must be carrefully kept in the 1-3
`nm thickness range [6]. This condition can be partly
`satisfied by using Rapid Thermal Oxidation in 02 [7] or
`N2O ambient [8]. Besides, in order to protect the oxide
`layer from any external contamination, one may suggest
`to insert the polysilicon LPCVD sequence in the same
`reactor without handling of the wafer. This deposition
`technique is commonly called Rapid Thermal LPCVD (RT(cid:173)
`LPCVD) [9]. Therefore, taking into account all these
`above-mentioned process steps, we may suggest a
`novel approach of an all-low thermal budget poly-emitter
`solar cells technology. This attractive concept was
`already introduced in microelectronic technologies (MOS,
`BiCMOS, ... ) and is familiarly called : integrated Rapid
`Thermal Multiprocessing (RTMP) [1 OJ.
`In the present paper, we attempt to estimate
`separately each of the different steps in order to
`demonstrate the feasibility of such solar-cell devices
`fabrication. Polysilicon films deposition was studied as a
`function of process parameters (pressure, temperature).
`Structural and electrical polysilicon films properties were
`respectively characterized by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD),
`Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and four-point
`probe sheet resistivity measurements. Finally, photo(cid:173)
`responses of RT-LPCVD polysilicon emitter solar-cells
`are also given.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
`
`Two different types of substrates (P: 1 n .cm) were
`used according to whether films have been directly
`formed on virgin 2-in. {111) Cz-grown Si wafers (series #
`1) or on the same substrates initially covered with 100 nm
`of thermally grown SiO2 (series# 2). ATP treatments were
`carried out in a Jipelec™ cold-wall reactor. This machine
`is a non load-locked system which consists on a
`cylindrical stainless steel chamber designed to process
`wafers up to 4 in. diameter. Wafer front-heating is made
`through a quartz window by means of a single bank of
`
`CH3365-4/94/0000-1375 $4.00 © 1994 IEEE
`
`First WCPEC; Dec. 5-9, 1994; Hawaii
`
`1375
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: Sidley Austin LLP. Downloaded on June 22,2024 at 02:49:13 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`

`

`12 W-halogen lamps allowing to reach heating rates of
`few 100 °C/s. Temperature is monitored with an optical
`pyrometer viewing the wafer underside. This pyrometer is
`periodically K-thermocouple calibrated. A base pressure
`in the 1 o-4 - 1 o- 5 mbar range can be achieved in few
`minutes by using a combination of rotary and
`turbomolecular pumps
`insuring a fast turnaround
`process. RT-LPCVD polysilicon layers were prepared by
`silane pyrolisis using a SiH4/Ar mixture (10%) at fixed
`flow rate (50-100 seem) and process pressure ranging
`from 1 mbar to 5 mbar. After this, the samples were POCl3
`doped at 850°C for 15 minutes.
`On the other hand, comparative LPCVD polysilicon
`films (450 nm) were elsewhere formed in a conventional
`furnace at 670°C from N2-diluted silane/phosphine
`mixture (250/1) and a total pressure of 1 Torr.
`Both types of samples were subsequently submitted
`respectively to a dry oxidation at 800°C/1 0min and a
`drive-in RTA under atmospheric N2 ambient for 20s at
`various temperatures (950 °C, 1000°c, 1050 °C).
`Polysilicon film thicknesses have been determined
`by mechanical profilometry after an appropriate chemical
`etching. Resistivity measurements were made by using
`the conventional four-point probe technique. Further
`details on the overall deposition operation and analysis
`procedures are described elsewhere [11] .
`
`RES UL TS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Deposition rates
`
`The deposition kinetics of polysilicon films were
`studied for the series 2 at a process pressure of 1 mbar.
`An Arrhenius plot of the deposition rates versus the
`deposition temperature is shown in figure 1. The two
`usual deposition regimes are observed with a transition
`temperature at 750°C. This temperature emphasizes a
`particular advantage of cold wall reactors which allow to
`achieve deposition rates up to 200 nm/min in the reaction
`limited regime wherein thickness homogeneity over large
`diameter wafers is mostly thermally controlled . Indeed,
`cold-walled systems limit parasitic gas-phase nucleation
`commonly observed at relatively lower temperatures
`(620°C-650°C) in classical hot wall furnaces[12] .
`Besides, an activation energy corresponding to the
`silane chemistry (1. 7eV) is obtained in the surface
`reaction limited regime. This typical value has been
`reported by others [13] for polysilicon RT-LPCVD and well
`agrees with LPCVD results. Above 750°C, the deposition
`becomes less dependent on the wafer temperature, as it
`is mainly controlled by the diffusional transfer of reactant
`molecules through the boundary layer at the wafer
`surface.
`Furthermore, thin oxide films were achieved taking
`into account the growth kinetics results obtained in our
`group by using a stagnant ambient of 02 or N20 with a
`0. 15 bar overpressure and a process temperature fixed
`in the 1000 °c-1200 °C [14]. From this study, it is
`noteworthy that the growth rate is greatly enhanced at
`the initial stage of Si oxidation. This fact is usually
`ascribed to a faster diffusion of oxidizing species
`through the very thin oxide layer. So, as suggested by
`Kermani et al. (6], it appears preferable in the future to
`work at a lower oxidation temperature and/or oxygen
`
`process pressure. Nevertheless, we have evidenced
`among others the ability of our system to achieve
`reproducible
`in-situ oxide/polysilicon stack with
`acceptable MOS device performance [15].
`
`103T(•C)
`
`800
`
`700
`
`600
`
`C:
`
`.E
`
`} 102
`
`2:!
`"' a::
`.g
`C: 10 1
`·;;;
`0
`0..
`<I) a
`
`10°
`0.8
`
`Ea= 1.7eV
`
`0.9
`
`1.0
`1000 IT (K)
`
`1.1
`
`1.2
`
`Figure 1: RT-LPCVD deposition rates as a function of the
`deposition temperature. 1 mbar, 10 % SiH4 in Ar,
`100 seem.
`
`Structural properties
`
`In previous works, we have shown that amorphous to
`crystalline temperature transition occurs at above 650°C
`[16]. This relatively higher value with respect to LPCVD
`films (580°C-600°C) denotes a retarded crystallization
`likely due to the residual water vapor which limits the
`vacant sites surface density and consequently slows
`down the reactive species diffusion. This discrepancy is
`probably linked to the way by which deposition is started.
`Gas-switching in classical furnaces allows previous
`thermal desorption of both substrates and internal wall
`whereas temperature-switching in RTP reactors does
`not.
`In addition, both XRD analysis and electron(cid:173)
`drffraction patterns (TEM) have shown the appearance of
`a dominant <111 > grain orientation instead of the <220>
`one as usually reported for LPCVD polysilicon layers
`depicts a solid phase
`(12]. In general, <111> texture
`crystallization of initially amorphous deposited layer.
`Between 650 °C and 750 °C, we expected that the RT(cid:173)
`LPCVD polysilicon films are partially crystalline (mixte)
`with a reduced degree of amorphicity as the deposition
`temperature increases. Above 750 °C, the films appears
`to be totally crystallized and exhibits a columnar-like
`structure along the whole film thickness as illustrated by
`X-TEM observations presented in ref. [11].
`The deposition durations were chosen according to
`needed poly-emitter thicknesses which must be within
`in order to
`improve the
`the 70-150 nm range,
`photocurrent by reducing the carrier recombination [2, 4].
`At 600 °C, e.g., a deposition time of at least 1 0 min is
`necessary to achieve the thickness bottom limit. As
`shown in figure 2, an incubation time of approximately 12-
`13 s is found by intersection of a least-squares-fitted line
`corresponding to the film thickness variation vs. the
`deposition duration at 750 °C on small-area control
`specimens (2 x 2 cm2) [11 ].
`This incubation time could be higher at lower
`
`1376
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: Sidley Austin LLP. Downloaded on June 22,2024 at 02:49:13 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`

`

`deposition temperatures [17]. In this case, one may
`expect that the effective deposition time might be smaller
`than the crystallization time, i.e., the needed time for the
`layer to be completely crystalline.
`
`Table 2: Effect of RTA treatment at fixed duration (20s)
`on the sheet resistance of LPCVD (450 nm) and RT(cid:173)
`LPCVD polysilicon 1ilms (80 nm, 120 nm).
`
`E
`~ 2
`
`(/)
`(/)
`<D
`
`0
`
`C _,,

`.§
`i.I
`
`.
`
`0
`
`0
`
`'t
`
`2
`1
`Deposition time (min)
`Figure 2: Polysi\icon films thickness vs. deposition time.
`750 ° C, 5 mbar, 1 o % SiH4 in Ar, 50 seem.
`
`3
`
`Sheet resistance
`
`On table 1 are listed the sheet resistance results
`corresponding to the POCl3-doped samples (series # 2)
`before (BA) and after (A) the RTA treatment. After the
`predeposition step, a typical phosphorus concentration
`of about 2x1020 cm-3 uniformly distributed along the film
`thickness has been measured (18]. It can be noted that
`the sheet resistance is significantly reduced (30-40 %)
`after annealing step (1050 °C/20 s), except for the
`specimen deposited at 750 °C.
`
`Table 1: Sheet resistance of RTCVD polysilicon films
`deposited at 5 mbar in the 650 °C-850 °C temperature
`range: (BA) before and (A) after RTA annealing
`(1050°C/20s). a: amorphous; c: crystalline .
`
`RTA
`('C)
`
`none
`950
`
`1000
`1050
`
`Sheet resistance (n/sq)
`a-Si
`RT-LPCVD
`(80nm)
`35
`21
`-
`6.7
`
`a-Si
`RT-LPCVD
`(120nm)
`13.4
`8.7
`-
`7
`
`poly-Si
`LPCVD
`(450 nm)
`200
`84
`73
`44
`
`Besides, we can see that the lowest sheet resistance
`is obtained for the crystallized amorphous material
`suggestive to a relatively more important grain growth
`under RTA treatment. But this grain growth is likely
`limited by the film thickness. Furthermore, it is worth
`noting that the sheet resistance is lowered when the RT(cid:173)
`LPCVD films are directly deposited on the virgin silicon
`substrate (see tables 1 and 2), and even more at higher
`RTA temperature . This indicates that further dopant loss
`by diffusion through interfacial oxide into the substrate
`has occured [19).
`
`Spectral response of solar cells
`
`Taking into account the sheet resistance results
`cited in the above section, we have selected thin silicon
`films deposited in the amorphous phase on non textured
`single crystal silicon .
`Spectral photo-response measurements of
`unannealed poly- emitter silicon solar cells with various
`thicknesses (80nm, 120 nm and 160 nm) are shown in
`Fig. 3. Front and back contacts were set up by screen
`printing either with the so-called N ink for the front
`contact, or with a P ink for the back contact.
`
`100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
`
`80
`
`-~
`
`60
`
`40
`
`~
`>,
`0
`C
`Q)
`:2
`ffi
`0
`:lll
`0
`(.)
`
`20
`
`0 160 nm S~poly
`CJ 120 nm Si-poly
`O so nm Si-poly
`
`350 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050
`wavelength (nanometers)
`Figure 3: spectral photoresponses of unannealed RT(cid:173)
`LPCVD poly-emitter silicon solar cells.
`
`1377
`
`Deposition Thicknes~ Sheet resistance (n/sq)
`(nm)
`temperature
`('C)
`650
`700
`750
`800
`B50
`
`(BA)
`139
`93
`353
`123
`74
`
`(A)
`85
`59.3
`305
`-
`55.5
`
`90
`160
`95
`135
`160
`
`initial
`structure
`
`a
`a+c
`
`C
`
`C
`
`C
`
`The influence of the RTA temperature on the sheet
`resistance of the emitter layer (series # 1) is summarized
`on table 2 both for in situ-doped LPCVD polysilicon films
`and POCl3-doped RT-LPCVD amorphous silicon films
`deposited at 600 °C. Nolin~ that a chemical phosphorus
`concentration of around 1 O 9 cm-3 have been determined
`by ion-probe analysis for the LPCVD layers. In both
`cases, the main feature is that the sheet resistance
`decreases by a factor 2-3 when the anneal temperature
`is varied between 950 °C to 1050 °C.
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: Sidley Austin LLP. Downloaded on June 22,2024 at 02:49:13 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`

`

`As expected, the ultraviolet and blue responses of
`the polysilicon emitter devices are improved when the
`emitter thickness is decreased. On the other hand, it can
`be noted that the infrared photoresponse loss is
`obviously due to the non optimized substrates used in
`this prospective study. In addition, some attempts on
`RTA annealed samples (1050 °C/20 s) have shown a
`device structure degradation revealed by a photo(cid:173)
`response lowering which might be also linked to the
`substrate quality (leakage current, minority carrier
`diffusion length reduction).
`Finally, we can conclude that optimization of the
`efficiency of a polysilicon emitter requires that a
`compromise be made between the loss of blue response
`encountered with series resistance associated with a
`thin layer [ 4].
`
`SUMMARY
`
`This work was devoted to the comparative study of
`the structural and electrical properties of thin silicon films
`deposited by RT-LPCVD with respect to conventional
`LPCVD films. We have introduced the new concept of
`Rapid Thermal Multiprocessing (RTMP) in the poly-emitter
`silicon solar cells technology. This particular technique
`offers a convenient means for all-low thermal budget
`integrated processing in order to achieve in-situ
`compatible sequences like as cleaning , deposition or
`growth of multiple layers and heat treatments . Electrical
`measurements showed that the lowest sheet resistance
`is achieved for the crystallized amorphous material owing
`to the grain growth enhancement under RTA treatment
`and even more when the films are directly formed on
`virgin silicon substrates.
`Furthermore, it appeared that the blue response is
`improved as the poly-emitter thickness decreases. Other
`photoresponse measurements are needed and
`preferably on adequate Float-Zone substrates.
`
`AKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`This work was supported by CNRS-ECOTECH and
`AFME, with the collaboration of Photowatt International
`S.A. 38300, Bourgoin-Jallieu, France.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`[1] P. Ashburn et al., IEEE. Trans. Electron Devices ,
`Vol. ED-31 (7), pp. 853-859, 1984.
`
`[2] N.G. Tarr, " A polysilicon Emitter Solar Cell" , IEEE
`Electron Device Letters, Vol. EDL-6 (12), pp. 655-658,
`1985.
`
`[3)J.Y. Gan et al., " Polysilicon emitters for silicon
`concentrator solar cell ", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices,
`Vol. ED-37, 1990, pp. 245-250.
`
`[4] G. Papadoulos et al. "Development of polysilicon
`emitter solar cell", 10th EPVSEC, Lisbon-Portugal, 1991 ,
`pp. 27-30.
`
`[5] D. Waechter et al., "Low-temperature crystallisation of
`in situ phosphorus-doped low pressure chemical vapour
`
`deposited amorphous silicon" , Can. J. Phys. , Vol. 65,
`1987, pp. 1030-1032.
`
`[6] A. Kermani et al., "Single- wafer rapid thermal CVD
`technology for fabrication of MOS and bipolaire devices",
`ULSI Science & technology, Proc. Vol. 11, 1991, pp.
`566-573.
`
`[7] J. Nulman et al., " Rapid thermal processing of thin
`Gate Dielectrics. Oxidation of Silicon", IEEE . EDL- 6 (5),
`1985, pp. 205-207.
`
`[8] H. Fukuda et al., "Highly reliable thin nitrided SiO2
`films formed by rapid thermal processing in an N2O
`ambient", Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol.29 (12) , 1990, pp.
`L2333-L2336.
`
`[9] J. F Gibbons et al., " Limited reaction processiong:
`Silicon Epitaxy ", Appl. Phys. Lett. , Vol. 47 (7), 1985, pp.
`721- 723.
`
`[1 OJ N. A. Masnari, " Single wafer process integration for
`subm icron structures ", J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Vol. B12
`(14), 1994, pp. 2749-2751.
`
`[11) B. Semmache et al., " Radial control of the physical
`properties of RT-LPCVD polysilicon films deposited in a
`cylindrical cold wall reactor", Eur. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp.
`Proc., Vol. 37, 1993, pp. 99-107.
`
`[12] J. Magarino, " Structural and electronic properties of
`CVD silicon ", Eur. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Ed. P.
`Pinard, 1984, pp. 651-660.
`
`[13) M. C. Ozturck et al.," Low-pressure chemical vapor
`deposition of polycrystalline silicon and silicon dioxide by
`rapid thermal processing ", Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.,
`Vol. 146, 1989, pp. 109-114.
`
`[14] N. Gonon et al., " Optical and electrical
`characterization of ultra-thin oxide grown by rapid thermal
`processing in 02 or N2O ", Microe/ectron. J., Vol. 24,
`1993, pp. 401-407.
`
`[15] Private communication .
`
`[16) B. Semmache et al., " Structural and electrical
`properties of polysilicon films deposited at 5 mbar in a
`RTP reactor", In Semicond. Silicon., 1994, pp. 311-321.
`
`[17] A. J. Toprac et al., "Characterization of the silane
`surface reaction in the chemical vapor deposition of
`polysilicon in a cold wall, rapid thermal system ", / n
`Proceeding of the 3rd Int. Symp. on process physics &
`modeling in semiconductor., The Electrochemical
`Society, Vol. 6, 1993, pp. 337-345.
`
`[18] B. Semmache et al., " Growth and physical
`properties of RT-LPCVD polysilicon", In Proceeding of the
`1st Int. ATP. Cont., Scottsdale-AZ, 1993, pp. 313-317.
`
`[19] N.G. Tarr et al., " Rapid thermal annealing of
`polysilicon emitter solar cell ", 11th E.C.P.S.E.C,
`Montreux-Switzerland, 1992, pp. 434-436.
`
`1378
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: Sidley Austin LLP. Downloaded on June 22,2024 at 02:49:13 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket